[ANN] [REKT] Got rekt? Let's get REKT! [UPDATED WALLETS]

[logocreator]

So far, "jimmy_mne's" submission fits our image best. Simple but effective. "Logo creator" looks good but does not fit what we want and totally does not give a REKT feeling. Again, the first submission is absolutely awesome but does not scale well and is not suited for the serious image we still want to create for the coin! "Crypotradekid" is nice but looks too similar to the current logo!

Sorry i can not meet your requirements. i can't do logos like that. It hurts my image.

[DogeCoCanine]

I had to.

https://i.imgur.com/Z1KpwBX.png

[earlz]

rekt https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840489.0

Heritage: Axis-ish, communitycoin, ECC

Problems:

* MODERATE: genesis seed is not a news event
* MODERATE: Past time drift checking for block times is disabled. This can allow some timestamp and difficulty manipulation attacks
* MODERATE: Launch was somewhat unfair. Source was released later than binary wallets

Notes:

Good, has some checkpoints already

-        // ppcoin: enforce minimum output amount
+       /*
         if ((!txout.IsEmpty()) && txout.nValue < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
            return DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue below minimum"));
+         */
+
+        if (txout.nValue < 0)
+           return DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue negative"));

 
     // Check coinbase timestamp
-    if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + nMaxClockDrift)
-        return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));
+    // if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + nMaxClockDrift)
+    //    return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));

Odd. First miner appears to have been a private pool mining to address RArzZkA4G1u1cJpBkKLzU5sXwy2iCNvSMT.
This mining pool began mining about 1 minute after ANN. This private pool was extremely powerful, pushing difficulty to about 240 by itself.
However, the last found block for the pool was 214, indicating it stopped being used soon after launch.
The pool itself made payouts for the first time at block 52 primarily to RDUgnYPDUP4eLJMnmwLo5eimb8w7HQQhPR.
There is no proof for or against this being a founder-run pool. It could just as easily be an early miner with an exotic setup



Watermarks:  uint64, pos

[DarKSpectrE]

I had to.

ROFL! Nice design. You got my vote, congrats 

[doch]

I had to.

I'll never let go, Jack. I'll never let go. 

I vote 4 dis.

[KMN]

rekt https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840489.0

Heritage: Axis-ish, communitycoin, ECC

Problems:

* MODERATE: genesis seed is not a news event
* MODERATE: Past time drift checking for block times is disabled. This can allow some timestamp and difficulty manipulation attacks
* MODERATE: Launch was somewhat unfair. Source was released later than binary wallets

Notes:

Good, has some checkpoints already

-        // ppcoin: enforce minimum output amount
+       /*
         if ((!txout.IsEmpty()) && txout.nValue < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
            return DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue below minimum"));
+         */
+
+        if (txout.nValue < 0)
+           return DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue negative"));

 
     // Check coinbase timestamp
-    if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + nMaxClockDrift)
-        return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));
+    // if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + nMaxClockDrift)
+    //    return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));

Odd. First miner appears to have been a private pool mining to address RArzZkA4G1u1cJpBkKLzU5sXwy2iCNvSMT.
This mining pool began mining about 1 minute after ANN. This private pool was extremely powerful, pushing difficulty to about 240 by itself.
However, the last found block for the pool was 214, indicating it stopped being used soon after launch.
The pool itself made payouts for the first time at block 52 primarily to RDUgnYPDUP4eLJMnmwLo5eimb8w7HQQhPR.
There is no proof for or against this being a founder-run pool. It could just as easily be an early miner with an exotic setup



Watermarks:  uint64, pos

a solo mining  ?   

time is a best  truesure  for miner...

i don't think it's have any problem.

[Gunther]

Probably someone with huge rig solomining. But thanks for the info!

[sofu]

Miners get Rekt if bittrex is not adding this 

[KMN]

Miners get Rekt if bittrex is not adding this 

recently ,the most population coin is get rekt..

if bittrex haven't add rekt..  must be a big loss

[Weekend Warrior]

So far, "jimmy_mne's" submission fits our image best. Simple but effective. "Logo creator" looks good but does not fit what we want and totally does not give a REKT feeling. Again, the first submission is absolutely awesome but does not scale well and is not suited for the serious image we still want to create for the coin! "Crypotradekid" is nice but looks too similar to the current logo!

Sorry i can not meet your requirements. i can't do logos like that. It hurts my image.

LOL......hurts your image?
Dude, posting some logos almost unreadable that it is rekt and nothing to do with the feeling "get rekt" is hurting your image more than your arrogance

[get rekt]

rekt https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840489.0

Heritage: Axis-ish, communitycoin, ECC

Problems:

* MODERATE: genesis seed is not a news event
* MODERATE: Past time drift checking for block times is disabled. This can allow some timestamp and difficulty manipulation attacks
* MODERATE: Launch was somewhat unfair. Source was released later than binary wallets

Notes:

Good, has some checkpoints already

-        // ppcoin: enforce minimum output amount
+       /*
         if ((!txout.IsEmpty()) && txout.nValue < MIN_TXOUT_AMOUNT)
            return DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue below minimum"));
+         */
+
+        if (txout.nValue < 0)
+           return DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : txout.nValue negative"));

 
     // Check coinbase timestamp
-    if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + nMaxClockDrift)
-        return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));
+    // if (GetBlockTime() > (int64)vtx[0].nTime + nMaxClockDrift)
+    //    return DoS(50, error("CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early"));

Odd. First miner appears to have been a private pool mining to address RArzZkA4G1u1cJpBkKLzU5sXwy2iCNvSMT.
This mining pool began mining about 1 minute after ANN. This private pool was extremely powerful, pushing difficulty to about 240 by itself.
However, the last found block for the pool was 214, indicating it stopped being used soon after launch.
The pool itself made payouts for the first time at block 52 primarily to RDUgnYPDUP4eLJMnmwLo5eimb8w7HQQhPR.
There is no proof for or against this being a founder-run pool. It could just as easily be an early miner with an exotic setup



Watermarks:  uint64, pos

thanks for your review earlz! Yes we kind of got rekt ourselves at lauch. Plan was to obviously mine from launch, but as soon as the wallets were up someone immediately started to mine with HUGE hashpower! As quoted from the second page of this topic:

No instamine, somebody else mined with huge hashrate at the beginning.

Instamine got REKT'ed  

so yes, we got REKT. Anyway, that's what the coin is for.  But it didn't really matter because the diff was low over the last days anyway. Thanks again for your comment! We are halving soon so everyone remember:

got rekt? get rekt!

[Gunther]

Since there's no exchange yet, i'm willing to sell my 3000 mined REKT for a price of 23500k sats each. (0,7 BTC), which is still pretty cheap for a coin with 600k coins. (See Fibre)

Send PM if interested.

[klopper]

Since there's no exchange yet, i'm willing to sell my 3000 mined REKT for a price of 23500k sats each. (0,7 BTC), which is still pretty cheap for a coin with 600k coins. (See Fibre)

Send PM if interested.

It is traded on two exchanges (low volume ones) but still..
Current price: 5000 - 10 000 sat.

https://betasharex.com/trade/REKT/BTC

[CryptoTradeKid]

So far, "jimmy_mne's" submission fits our image best. Simple but effective. "Logo creator" looks good but does not fit what we want and totally does not give a REKT feeling. Again, the first submission is absolutely awesome but does not scale well and is not suited for the serious image we still want to create for the coin! "Crypotradekid" is nice but looks too similar to the current logo!

Guys, let me know what you don't like/want me to change in my logo submission, the color, shape, anything... Worked really hard on it so don't want to blow everything.

[klopper]

[Gunther]

So far, "jimmy_mne's" submission fits our image best. Simple but effective. "Logo creator" looks good but does not fit what we want and totally does not give a REKT feeling. Again, the first submission is absolutely awesome but does not scale well and is not suited for the serious image we still want to create for the coin! "Crypotradekid" is nice but looks too similar to the current logo!

Guys, let me know what you don't like/want me to change in my logo submission, the color, shape, anything... Worked really hard on it so don't want to blow everything.

Where is your logo?

[Weekend Warrior]

I am curious to see where this is going.....
Shitty ANN at start, cutting POW
Have seen the same at Fibre (same amount of coins), I made +1670% in the first days....

Fibre turned  out to be a serious coin with good stuff, dev talked about a REKT platform.....hmmmmm

[DogeCoCanine]

So far, "jimmy_mne's" submission fits our image best. Simple but effective. "Logo creator" looks good but does not fit what we want and totally does not give a REKT feeling. Again, the first submission is absolutely awesome but does not scale well and is not suited for the serious image we still want to create for the coin! "Crypotradekid" is nice but looks too similar to the current logo!

Any comments on my design? It's pretty much as rekt as you can get.

[get rekt]

I am curious to see where this is going.....
Shitty ANN at start, cutting POW
Have seen the same at Fibre (same amount of coins), I made +1670% in the first days....

Fibre turned  out to be a serious coin with good stuff, dev talked about a REKT platform.....hmmmmm

Yes like i said this project is serious with fun aspects. There is a market and need for this coin since people are getting rekt daily in crypto. In the upcoming week we will start announcing the new features along with our REKTmap!

dogecocaine. We think your design gives a great rekt feeling! But the usage is a bit harder. I's also not really scalable. On small size it will just look like a black dot. REKT

And before i forget: got rekt, get rekt!

[CryptoTradeKid]

So far, "jimmy_mne's" submission fits our image best. Simple but effective. "Logo creator" looks good but does not fit what we want and totally does not give a REKT feeling. Again, the first submission is absolutely awesome but does not scale well and is not suited for the serious image we still want to create for the coin! "Crypotradekid" is nice but looks too similar to the current logo!

Guys, let me know what you don't like/want me to change in my logo submission, the color, shape, anything... Worked really hard on it so don't want to blow everything.

Where is your logo?

A few pages back, red one with a skull.