[ANN] [Vocal] ★ [Public POD]~ Empowering Artists ~ 1 vocal = 1 song ★1.8 M coin

[Crestington]

I don't know why kids on c-cex are fudding about this coin. The rich list that is referring to 84 mil is volume, not holdings and if you scroll down to balances you can see the burned address and the 1.8 mil remaining. The entire market cap is worth 9 btc at the ipo price! That's about the cost the developers put into it in terms of work.

First thing you should look at is building a multipool that pays out in vocal, would have a big impact on such a low valued float.

[qiwoman2]

I don't know why kids on c-cex are fudding about this coin. The rich list that is referring to 84 mil is volume, not holdings and if you scroll down to balances you can see the burned address and the 1.8 mil remaining. The entire market cap is worth 9 btc at the ipo price! That's about the cost the developers put into it in terms of work.

First thing you should look at is building a multipool that pays out in vocal, would have a big impact on such a low valued float.

They may want to buy more cheap coins, can't see why any other reason to fud.. This is a great coin with a lot of potential.

[Coin-Moron]

I don't know why kids on c-cex are fudding about this coin. The rich list that is referring to 84 mil is volume, not holdings and if you scroll down to balances you can see the burned address and the 1.8 mil remaining. The entire market cap is worth 9 btc at the ipo price! That's about the cost the developers put into it in terms of work.

First thing you should look at is building a multipool that pays out in vocal, would have a big impact on such a low valued float.

It would be wise, if the dev contacts COINKING for adding vocal in their multiports.

[Fire Rabbit]

I don't know why kids on c-cex are fudding about this coin. The rich list that is referring to 84 mil is volume, not holdings and if you scroll down to balances you can see the burned address and the 1.8 mil remaining. The entire market cap is worth 9 btc at the ipo price! That's about the cost the developers put into it in terms of work.

First thing you should look at is building a multipool that pays out in vocal, would have a big impact on such a low valued float.

I agree kind sir, lets see what happens today. 

[wtman]

Hello, our Artist Rumich is making the official videoclip of Bitcoin fiesta, as he signed with us, most part of future Youtube profits will go to vocal fund .
If you have talent you can apply too at contact@vocalplatform.com.

Good. This will be further proof of legitimacy

[Klaasje]

Still old coin supply on the website.

[wtman]

Lots of dumping. price down to 550 from all time high of 1300

[erwin45]

Lots of dumping. price down to 550 from all time high of 1300

welcome to crypto, its usual to see such roller coaster price its all about taking profit

[wtman]

Try to get on bittrex

[kcanup]

Fix supply data, wallet and explorer first according to latest available supply, i dont think this is too hard to do? 

[wtman]

Dev is there any news on bittrex? Where are you?

Since you do not have the platform yet and all we have is a few ids, can you prove in any way that the ids are not fake? How about your real facebook account or something else?

[biggernugs]

Fixing the supply data is a must to get added to Bittrex.  They rarely add a coin with incorrect numbers by any count. Mary Jane was added under similar circumstances, meaning just having burnt their unsold ICO coins also, and when it was added the was a big disclaimer on the top of the page regarding the coin count. The numbers were proven correct and it was finally removed but that pretty much tells you how Trex feels about coins with incorrect supply info.

Even if a hard fork is required to ignore the burn address permanently and correct the supply info I would take a serious look at it. Although low/high coin supply doesn't always equate to low/high value the reality is total coins is one of the first things people look at when researching a new coin. The lower, correct number would definitely pique more interest and we all know how important first impressions are.

[kcanup]

Fixing the supply data is a must to get added to Bittrex.  They rarely add a coin with incorrect numbers by any count. Mary Jane was added under similar circumstances, meaning just having burnt their unsold ICO coins also, and when it was added the was a big disclaimer on the top of the page regarding the coin count. The numbers were proven correct and it was finally removed but that pretty much tells you how Trex feels about coins with incorrect supply info.

Even if a hard fork is required to ignore the burn address permanently and correct the supply info I would take a serious look at it. Although low/high coin supply doesn't always equate to low/high value the reality is total coins is one of the first things people look at when researching a new coin. The lower, correct number would definitely pique more interest and we all know how important first impressions are.

+1
I keep saying this here but dev hasnt responded yet.. I am waiting for few hours before i sell my coins and move on if nothing changes

[wtman]

It is a scam unless the dev can prove that the ids are real, or theres any real evidence of the platform coming up.

Dev. can you show video evidence of ids? Physical ids are probably harder and more expensive to fake

[Fire Rabbit]

Needless to say, but we need all kinds of updates right now. 

[wtman]

Any word on the ids? How do we know they are not photoshopped ones?

[Skele]

Any word on the ids? How do we know they are not photoshopped ones?

We dint get too much attention on the ICO, we barely got less than 9 btc, so we are triying to do much with less, i am receiving pms that some bought at high price or idk.. ico was 500 sat, i am not responsible for people buying after ico, we are trying to get it into bittrex but as you know, it can take some days.

vocal team.

[Skele]

Fixing the supply data is a must to get added to Bittrex.  They rarely add a coin with incorrect numbers by any count. Mary Jane was added under similar circumstances, meaning just having burnt their unsold ICO coins also, and when it was added the was a big disclaimer on the top of the page regarding the coin count. The numbers were proven correct and it was finally removed but that pretty much tells you how Trex feels about coins with incorrect supply info.

Even if a hard fork is required to ignore the burn address permanently and correct the supply info I would take a serious look at it. Although low/high coin supply doesn't always equate to low/high value the reality is total coins is one of the first things people look at when researching a new coin. The lower, correct number would definitely pique more interest and we all know how important first impressions are.

+1
I keep saying this here but dev hasnt responded yet.. I am waiting for few hours before i sell my coins and move on if nothing changes

Sent email to block expertz to correct the supply amount asap.

[Coin-Moron]

Fixing the supply data is a must to get added to Bittrex.  They rarely add a coin with incorrect numbers by any count. Mary Jane was added under similar circumstances, meaning just having burnt their unsold ICO coins also, and when it was added the was a big disclaimer on the top of the page regarding the coin count. The numbers were proven correct and it was finally removed but that pretty much tells you how Trex feels about coins with incorrect supply info.

Even if a hard fork is required to ignore the burn address permanently and correct the supply info I would take a serious look at it. Although low/high coin supply doesn't always equate to low/high value the reality is total coins is one of the first things people look at when researching a new coin. The lower, correct number would definitely pique more interest and we all know how important first impressions are.

+1
I keep saying this here but dev hasnt responded yet.. I am waiting for few hours before i sell my coins and move on if nothing changes

Sent email to block expertz to correct the supply amount asap.

I guess only a hardfork can correct the supply amount.

[wtman]

Any word on the ids? How do we know they are not photoshopped ones?

We dint get too much attention on the ICO, we barely got less than 9 btc, so we are triying to do much with less, i am receiving pms that some bought at high price or idk.. ico was 500 sat, i am not responsible for people buying after ico, we are trying to get it into bittrex but as you know, it can take some days.

vocal team.

You didnt answer the question. How do we know you didnt buy photoshopped ids? Show video evidence of physical ids