Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 06:49:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why is a PCIE latency rise required for many GPUs???  (Read 3302 times)
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2012, 04:03:45 AM
 #1

I've seen it reported on numerous occasions that on some motherboards when you get to about 5 GPUs, they won't work unless you increase the PCIE latency from 64 to 96 in the bios. As it turns out I recently added a 4th 7970 to my GD70 motherboard and ran into precisely that issue. Xorg would crash every time I tried to start it with all 4 GPUs. So I went into the bios and tried upping the PCIE latency to 96 and then it worked fine.  Anyone know why that is?

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
1715194183
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715194183

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715194183
Reply with quote  #2

1715194183
Report to moderator
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715194183
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715194183

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715194183
Reply with quote  #2

1715194183
Report to moderator
1715194183
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715194183

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715194183
Reply with quote  #2

1715194183
Report to moderator
1715194183
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715194183

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715194183
Reply with quote  #2

1715194183
Report to moderator
aqrulesms
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2012, 05:41:03 AM
 #2

Although I don't know the technicality in this area, it would appear that the amount of data the GPUs are requesting is too much for the motherboard to handle, so naturally the higher the latency, the less bandwidth is being taken up.

                   
      ██ ██    ██ ██    ▀ ██ ██ ██ ██  ██
      ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄      ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄
      ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀      ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀
      ██    ██ ██ ██      ██    ██ ██ ██
   ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄      ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄
   ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀      ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀
      ██ ██ ██ ██ ██      ██ ██ ██ ██ ██    ██  
▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄      ▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄
▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀      ▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀
     ▀ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██
    ██  ▄  ▄▄  ▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄  ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄
        ▄▄ ▀▀ ▄▄ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▄▄ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀
        ▀▀  ▀ ▀▀ ██ ██ ██ ▀▀  ▀  ██ ██
         ██ ██ ▄▄ ▄▄    ▄▄ ██ ██ ▄ ▄▄
           ▄▄  ▀▀ ▀▀    ▀▀      ▄▄ ▀▀
           ▀▀    ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ▀▀
UCHAIN  ▄█▄   
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄█▄   
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄█▄   
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
.████████████████████████.
██████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
███▄     ███████     ▄████
█████     █████     ██████
█████ ▌    ███▌     ██████
█████ █     █▌ ▐    ██████
█████ ██      ▐█    ██████
█████ ███    ▐██    ██████
████▀ ▀███   ███    ██████
██▀     ▀██ ██▀      ▀████
██████████████████████████
.████████████████████████.
.████████████████████████.
██████████████████████████
██████████████▀     ▀█████
███ ▀████████▌        ▄███
███    ▀████▀        ▄████
███                 ▐█████
████                ▐█████
██████              ██████
███████           ▄███████
██████▀         ▄█████████
████▄▄      ▄▄████████████
██████████████████████████
.████████████████████████.
.███████████████████████.
█████████████████████████
███████████████████▀▀▀███
█████████████▀▀▀ ▄    ███
████████▀▀     ▄█▀   ▐███
████▀▀       ▄█▀     ████
█▀         ▄██      ▐████
████▄▄▄  ▄██▀       █████
███████████        ▐█████
██████████         ██████
██████████ ▄██▄▄  ▐██████
█████████████████████████
.███████████████████████.
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2012, 05:45:34 AM
 #3

Perhaps in my case because they're all running on 16x slots and they're 7970s I hit the limit earlier.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
aqrulesms
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2012, 06:01:16 AM
 #4

Perhaps in my case because they're all running on 16x slots and they're 7970s I hit the limit earlier.

Yeah shouldn't be too big of an issue since it's working for you now. 

That's a pretty good thought.  Must be why some mobos reduce the speed as you add more cards.

                   
      ██ ██    ██ ██    ▀ ██ ██ ██ ██  ██
      ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄      ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄
      ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀      ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀
      ██    ██ ██ ██      ██    ██ ██ ██
   ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄      ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄
   ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀      ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀
      ██ ██ ██ ██ ██      ██ ██ ██ ██ ██    ██  
▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄      ▄▄    ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄
▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀      ▀▀    ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀
     ▀ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██
    ██  ▄  ▄▄  ▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄  ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄ ▄▄
        ▄▄ ▀▀ ▄▄ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▄▄ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀ ▀▀
        ▀▀  ▀ ▀▀ ██ ██ ██ ▀▀  ▀  ██ ██
         ██ ██ ▄▄ ▄▄    ▄▄ ██ ██ ▄ ▄▄
           ▄▄  ▀▀ ▀▀    ▀▀      ▄▄ ▀▀
           ▀▀    ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ▀▀
UCHAIN  ▄█▄   
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄█▄   
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄█▄   
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
▄ ▄
███
 ▀
█▄█
▀█▀
.████████████████████████.
██████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
███▄     ███████     ▄████
█████     █████     ██████
█████ ▌    ███▌     ██████
█████ █     █▌ ▐    ██████
█████ ██      ▐█    ██████
█████ ███    ▐██    ██████
████▀ ▀███   ███    ██████
██▀     ▀██ ██▀      ▀████
██████████████████████████
.████████████████████████.
.████████████████████████.
██████████████████████████
██████████████▀     ▀█████
███ ▀████████▌        ▄███
███    ▀████▀        ▄████
███                 ▐█████
████                ▐█████
██████              ██████
███████           ▄███████
██████▀         ▄█████████
████▄▄      ▄▄████████████
██████████████████████████
.████████████████████████.
.███████████████████████.
█████████████████████████
███████████████████▀▀▀███
█████████████▀▀▀ ▄    ███
████████▀▀     ▄█▀   ▐███
████▀▀       ▄█▀     ████
█▀         ▄██      ▐████
████▄▄▄  ▄██▀       █████
███████████        ▐█████
██████████         ██████
██████████ ▄██▄▄  ▐██████
█████████████████████████
.███████████████████████.
bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 14, 2012, 12:19:26 PM
 #5

Perhaps in my case because they're all running on 16x slots and they're 7970s I hit the limit earlier.

Yeah shouldn't be too big of an issue since it's working for you now. 

That's a pretty good thought.  Must be why some mobos reduce the speed as you add more cards.

So the solution is to use only x1 risers to force x1 speeds and avoid x16 negotiations ?
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2012, 12:32:30 PM
 #6

Perhaps in my case because they're all running on 16x slots and they're 7970s I hit the limit earlier.

Yeah shouldn't be too big of an issue since it's working for you now. 

That's a pretty good thought.  Must be why some mobos reduce the speed as you add more cards.

So the solution is to use only x1 risers to force x1 speeds and avoid x16 negotiations ?
I'm pretty sure I've seen people suffer this with x1 as well, but usually when in combination with some higher speed ones, so perhaps with all of them 1x this is true... OR it could be the reason no one has successfully used more than 8 devices?

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Cablez
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000


I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...


View Profile
June 14, 2012, 12:55:19 PM
 #7

I thought that was a driver limit and not a motherboard limit?

Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup???   Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right!  No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
malevolent
can into space
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3472
Merit: 1721



View Profile
June 14, 2012, 01:01:08 PM
 #8

I thought that was a driver limit and not a motherboard limit?

It can be a mobo limit, an OS limit or a driver limit.

Signature space available for rent.
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
June 14, 2012, 01:13:38 PM
 #9

The amd driver seems to have scope for 16 devices but no one has successfully booted more than 8.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
June 14, 2012, 03:32:11 PM
 #10

I ran 6x 5870s an one board (ASRock 970 Extreme4) for a while, never had to do any BIOS tweaks like that. Maybe it was automatic.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 14, 2012, 03:33:41 PM
 #11


I have a few rigs running 6 5870s.


still could not get the 7x series to do 6.  but I will try the 1x riser on all 6 and see if that works.

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!