Biomech
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
|
 |
June 13, 2015, 09:04:05 PM |
|
I'm sure there are plenty of people that have been ripped off by them. SpondooliesTech does NOT honor their warranty and ships DOA SP20s.
I've not seen any rip-off claims against Spondoolies ... they proved themselves as one of the good guys ... coming from nowhere to a 'standard'. Sure gave me and many, many others a great and responsive service ... shame we probably won't see any more home miners produced by them. They delivered DOA SP20s and refuse to RMA them. They lied about having a warranty. SpondooliesTech is dishonest and completely untrustworthy. Aside from just plain liking SP-T, I have no dog in this fight. I do, however, have a fair number of friends who have purchased their equipment. Some of whom had problems. SP-T ALWAYS resolved it. I follow the main thread, and it appears that you have demanded RMA and refused ALL OTHER forms of assistance. Sorry, bub. this is the real world. It don't work like that. RMA is almost always the last step in a warranty claim, and if you refuse the first steps, as clearly documented by your own words, then good fucking luck in any court. Not even the American 9th district court would give you "satisfaction" in this one, and they love to hand down ridiculous verdicts. Hell, even edgar, who had massive issues, eventually (grudgingly) conceded that they helped him. Not really in the manner he wanted, but they did do it. Many others have had their problems resolved very quickly. To my eyes, SP-T remains one of the best companies in the mining hardware business. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7862
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
June 13, 2015, 09:08:26 PM |
|
I'm sure there are plenty of people that have been ripped off by them. SpondooliesTech does NOT honor their warranty and ships DOA SP20s.
I've not seen any rip-off claims against Spondoolies ... they proved themselves as one of the good guys ... coming from nowhere to a 'standard'. Sure gave me and many, many others a great and responsive service ... shame we probably won't see any more home miners produced by them. They delivered DOA SP20s and refuse to RMA them. They lied about having a warranty. SpondooliesTech is dishonest and completely untrustworthy. Aside from just plain liking SP-T, I have no dog in this fight. I do, however, have a fair number of friends who have purchased their equipment. Some of whom had problems. SP-T ALWAYS resolved it. I follow the main thread, and it appears that you have demanded RMA and refused ALL OTHER forms of assistance. Sorry, bub. this is the real world. It don't work like that. RMA is almost always the last step in a warranty claim, and if you refuse the first steps, as clearly documented by your own words, then good fucking luck in any court. Not even the American 9th district court would give you "satisfaction" in this one, and they love to hand down ridiculous verdicts. Hell, even edgar, who had massive issues, eventually (grudgingly) conceded that they helped him. Not really in the manner he wanted, but they did do it. Many others have had their problems resolved very quickly. To my eyes, SP-T remains one of the best companies in the mining hardware business. I am pretty much in the same ballpark opinion wise. If he had done remote view and skpe and the gear did not work I would say SP tech fucked him. But he refused to do that. To this day I don't understand why. |
|
|
|
Ski72
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Kinex - The New Frontier
|
|
June 16, 2015, 04:27:04 PM |
|
I apologize ahead of time for this not really being an issue with regard to SP Tech.
I don't post very much, but I read the forums almost daily. I am a small miner, as I believe most on this thread are as well. I also believe that the people here are some of the most knowledgeable and intelligent among small miners.
Over the past few months we've seen major changes. The pool hashrate distribution chart [urlhttps://blockchain.info/pools][/url] is starting to look pretty ominous. BTC Guild is closing down as of June 30th.
I am just curious as to people's thoughts and feelings regarding the changes, as well as the future - our future as small miners. I'm also curious as to everyone's feelings toward bitcoin itself.
I hope the best for everyone, but the horizon doesn't look very bright for us anymore.
Regards,
Ski
|
Please help support our disabled veterans - support the *DAV* 1P8CuGjdAbnxRQxyHqwxrEq8iTyD5UgAyi As a 100% service connected disabled Navy Veteran, every bit helps!  |
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7862
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
June 16, 2015, 04:34:38 PM |
|
I apologize ahead of time for this not really being an issue with regard to SP Tech.
I don't post very much, but I read the forums almost daily. I am a small miner, as I believe most on this thread are as well. I also believe that the people here are some of the most knowledgeable and intelligent among small miners.
Over the past few months we've seen major changes. The pool hashrate distribution chart [urlhttps://blockchain.info/pools][/url] is starting to look pretty ominous. BTC Guild is closing down as of June 30th.
I am just curious as to people's thoughts and feelings regarding the changes, as well as the future - our future as small miners. I'm also curious as to everyone's feelings toward bitcoin itself.
I hope the best for everyone, but the horizon doesn't look very bright for us anymore.
Regards,
Ski
I do not think I will ever do winter mining like I used to do 6watts from oct 1 to march 1. Last season I ran 12-13th in house. Not going to happen this time. I will go back to 1 or 2 th mostly with it all at my friends low power cost office. |
|
|
|
Dr Charles
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1080
|
|
June 16, 2015, 06:03:04 PM |
|
So I have one of my SP20E's with 2 chips acting up. At stock settings or underclocked, one states it has an overcurrent and the other states it has a serial problem. Ill upload some pictures of the dashboard this afternoon.
Right now I just have them both disabled and the unit is running about 1100 Gh/s. Any ideas on how/why this problem would occur out of nowhere?
Unit is on a single 1300w EVGA 80+ Gold PSU by itself.
|
|
|
|
cyc1990
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2015, 07:27:13 PM |
|
my 2 x sp 20 Mng board / controller board have problem both LED is no light only the lan port light on Then spondoolies charge 150 Usd without shipping each controller board...The price is expensive Have any way to fix this ?use other controller board? or wat else ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
tarzan2
|
|
July 02, 2015, 02:26:22 AM |
|
help someone please .. my sp20 is a brickhead and i cant get it to stop.. i tried recovery SD and boot img.. nothing works! lights in ethernet port light up when its plugged, and big orange light for a few sec on startup.. but not much more than that  i used 32gb sd card formatted fat32.. is that not the road to recovery? i leave sd card in while i perform manual reboot with power cord ... then i let it reboot and sit for ~15 minutes with power, its quite uneventful- nothing happens.. especially no christmas lights |
free bitcoin storage service! please send to: 1TArzAn26Wvw872Yw36JiBe21SEaypJTP
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7862
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
July 02, 2015, 01:00:14 PM |
|
help someone please .. my sp20 is a brickhead and i cant get it to stop.. i tried recovery SD and boot img.. nothing works! lights in ethernet port light up when its plugged, and big orange light for a few sec on startup.. but not much more than that i used 32gb sd card formatted fat32.. is that not the road to recovery? i leave sd card in while i perform manual reboot with power cord ... then i let it reboot and sit for ~15 minutes with power, its quite uneventful- nothing happens.. especially no christmas lights so the sd card is blank? I know you did a format. but I believe you need a formatted card with an image set with mining info. go to this link read it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1106042.msg11769785#msg11769785since Pt0x has done 5 sd cards and knows how to do them ask him how. maybe he would mail a good one to you if you ask him. |
|
|
|
GenTarkin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 03, 2015, 12:49:41 AM |
|
Anyone notice or test the new 2.6.4 or 2.7.1 firmware available via Manual Update selection in webgui?
Any known changes or documentation to these?
|
|
|
|
mullick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 03, 2015, 12:51:28 AM |
|
Anyone have a good grasp on the amount of amps these would pull from the wall on 220v?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tarzan2
|
|
July 03, 2015, 12:51:49 AM |
|
help someone please .. my sp20 is a brickhead and i cant get it to stop.. i tried recovery SD and boot img.. nothing works! lights in ethernet port light up when its plugged, and big orange light for a few sec on startup.. but not much more than that i used 32gb sd card formatted fat32.. is that not the road to recovery? i leave sd card in while i perform manual reboot with power cord ... then i let it reboot and sit for ~15 minutes with power, its quite uneventful- nothing happens.. especially no christmas lights so the sd card is blank? I know you did a format. but I believe you need a formatted card with an image set with mining info. go to this link read it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1106042.msg11769785#msg11769785since Pt0x has done 5 sd cards and knows how to do them ask him how. maybe he would mail a good one to you if you ask him. Thanks philipma ur a helpful dude.. I already solved this issue.. It wasn't formatted but it worked when I set the image from linux kernel instead of windows software.. Only in boot disk mode which is fine I suppose. Recovery doesn't want to be reasonable |
free bitcoin storage service! please send to: 1TArzAn26Wvw872Yw36JiBe21SEaypJTP
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7862
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
July 03, 2015, 01:07:31 AM |
|
Anyone have a good grasp on the amount of amps these would pull from the wall on 220v?
sure if you run at sane speeds 1200gh to 1400gh you do 650 watts to 850 watts so 650/220 = about 2.95 amps and 850/220 = about 3.86 amps They can be pushed over 1400 but think of it as higher risk of killing the miner. they also pull far more power as you get past 1400 |
|
|
|
mullick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 03, 2015, 01:52:13 AM |
|
Anyone have a good grasp on the amount of amps these would pull from the wall on 220v?
sure if you run at sane speeds 1200gh to 1400gh you do 650 watts to 850 watts so 650/220 = about 2.95 amps and 850/220 = about 3.86 amps They can be pushed over 1400 but think of it as higher risk of killing the miner. they also pull far more power as you get past 1400 Awesome. Thank you sir |
|
|
|
|
otzi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
July 03, 2015, 12:55:14 PM |
|
Hi, I need help understanding the new page ASICS STATS the SP20. I have 3 SP20 and for a while I noticed that two of them undermined around 60 mhs unless the 3rd. With the new version of fw on page asics stats I see that (ffffffff) at the end of each record but the SP20 that undermined unless there is a record with a different letter, for example (fffffdff). 2.7.1
Uptime:4741 | FPGA ver:100 | BIST in 147
-----BOARD-0-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(268w/268w)[268 268 268] (->268w[268 268 268]) (lim=288) 0c 405GH cooling:0/0xdc
-----BOARD-1-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(192w/192w)[192 192 192] (->192w[192 192 192]) (lim=255) 0c 343GH cooling:0/0xdc
-----BOARD-2-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(270w/270w)[270 270 270] (->270w[270 270 270]) (lim=288) 0c 405GH cooling:0/0xdc
-----BOARD-3-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(211w/211w)[211 211 211] (->211w[211 211 211]) (lim=255) 0c 355GH cooling:0/0xdc
LOOP[0] ON TO:0 (w:424)
0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 109W 151A 80c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 1040hz(BL:1040) WN:224/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 107W 148A 93c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 1060hz(BL:1060) WN:200/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:347)
2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:660 vlt2:664(DCl:794 Tl:664 Ul:727) 74W 111A 84c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) WN:170/3 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:654 vlt2:658(DCl:794 Tl:658 Ul:727) 80W 122A 95c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 910hz(BL: 910) WN:177/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:426)
4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:707 vlt2:709(DCl:719 Tl:709 Ul:727) 106W 150A 73c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 1040hz(BL:1040) WN:232/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 112W 155A 92c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 1060hz(BL:1060) WN:194/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:406)
6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:695 Ul:727) 96W 139A 87c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 970hz(BL: 970) WN:223/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:636 vlt2:642(DCl:794 Tl:642 Ul:727) 73W 114A 88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) WN:183/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:1 L:0]
[H:HW:1509Gh (500),DC-W:761,L:0,A:8,MMtmp:0 TMP:(31/31)=>=>=>(72/72 , 71/71)]
Pushed 10 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:0, hw:0)!
min:56 wins:1603[this/last min:11/14] bist-fail:155, hw-err:3
leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:978gh/s asic-count:640 (wins:8+3)
wall watts:1034
Fan:90, conseq:200
AC2DC BAD: 0 0
R/NR: 4720/0
RTF asics: 0
FET: 0:9 1:5
0 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins
0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble
0 purge_queue 0 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_i2c 0 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn
0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle
0 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=24
0 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=240 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=24 2.7.1
Uptime:59458 | FPGA ver:100 | BIST in 163
-----BOARD-0-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(266w/266w)[266 266 266] (->266w[266 266 266]) (lim=288) 0c 395GH cooling:0/0xfd
-----BOARD-1-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(190w/190w)[190 190 190] (->190w[190 190 190]) (lim=250) 0c 341GH cooling:0/0xfd
-----BOARD-2-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(263w/263w)[263 263 263] (->263w[263 263 263]) (lim=288) 0c 393GH cooling:0/0xfd
-----BOARD-3-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(182w/182w)[182 182 182] (->182w[182 182 182]) (lim=250) 0c 328GH cooling:0/0xfd
LOOP[0] ON TO:0 (w:5343)
0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:720 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 107W 147A 74c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 1030hz(BL:1030) WN:2664/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 108W 149A 90c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 1020hz(BL:1020) WN:2679/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:4435)
2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:666 vlt2:672(DCl:794 Tl:672 Ul:727) 80W 120A 88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 900hz(BL: 900) WN:2260/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:634 vlt2:640(DCl:794 Tl:640 Ul:727) 72W 112A 90c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) WN:2175/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:5379)
4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:720 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 101W 139A 71c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 1000hz(BL:1000) WN:2715/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:724 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 112W 154A 87c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 1040hz(BL:1040) WN:2664/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:4276)
6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:650 vlt2:653(DCl:794 Tl:653 Ul:727) 73W 111A 79c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 860hz(BL: 860) WN:2232/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:656 vlt2:661(DCl:794 Tl:661 Ul:727) 73W 111A 82c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 840hz(BL: 840) WN:2044/3 (fffffdff) (E:187) F:0 L:0]
[H:HW:1459Gh (500),DC-W:728,L:0,A:8,MMtmp:0 TMP:(32/32)=>=>=>(72/72 , 66/66)]
Pushed 10 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:3, hw:3)!
min:52 wins:19089[this/last min:25/21] bist-fail:357, hw-err:3
leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:1468gh/s asic-count:7936 (wins:11+14)
wall watts:990
Fan:90, conseq:200
AC2DC BAD: 0 0
R/NR: 35747/0
RTF asics: 0
FET: 0:5 1:5
0 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins
0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble
0 purge_queue 0 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_i2c 0 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn
0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle
0 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=24
I wonder whether this indicates that there is some ASIC chip damaged or not recognized because it is the only thing different that I visualize in asic stats page. thx |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7862
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
July 03, 2015, 02:03:53 PM |
|
You are not reading the threads very well. you are running your gear far too fast. while sp-tech claimed 1700gh + /- 10 % it was not that true. this is clearly stated just about everywhere on this thread. also once you go over 1400gh the gear pulls far more power per gh. running your gear at 1590gh is reckless. If you got it for free and your power is free it is still reckless. your temps are just about maxxed. at 120 and 125 c lower your gh until it gets to 1400gh. Think of it this way. I own a KIA Forte. I live 60 miles from Atlantic City. You want a ride from me. My Kia can go 100 MPH if I am on a flat road. So I can drive you to AC at 100mph. Or we can drive at 70mph. Please slow down your gear will last longer and use less power. Hi, I need help understanding the new page ASICS STATS the SP20. I have 3 SP20 and for a while I noticed that two of them undermined around 60 mhs unless the 3rd. With the new version of fw on page asics stats I see that (ffffffff) at the end of each record but the SP20 that undermined unless there is a record with a different letter, for example (fffffdff). 2.7.1
Uptime:4741 | FPGA ver:100 | BIST in 147
-----BOARD-0-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(268w/268w)[268 268 268] (->268w[268 268 268]) (lim=288) 0c 405GH cooling:0/0xdc
-----BOARD-1-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(192w/192w)[192 192 192] (->192w[192 192 192]) (lim=255) 0c 343GH cooling:0/0xdc
-----BOARD-2-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(270w/270w)[270 270 270] (->270w[270 270 270]) (lim=288) 0c 405GH cooling:0/0xdc
-----BOARD-3-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(211w/211w)[211 211 211] (->211w[211 211 211]) (lim=255) 0c 355GH cooling:0/0xdc
LOOP[0] ON TO:0 (w:424)
0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 109W 151A 80c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 1040hz(BL:1040) WN:224/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 107W 148A 93c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 1060hz(BL:1060) WN:200/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:347)
2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:660 vlt2:664(DCl:794 Tl:664 Ul:727) 74W 111A 84c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) WN:170/3 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:654 vlt2:658(DCl:794 Tl:658 Ul:727) 80W 122A 95c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 910hz(BL: 910) WN:177/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:426)
4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:707 vlt2:709(DCl:719 Tl:709 Ul:727) 106W 150A 73c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 1040hz(BL:1040) WN:232/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 112W 155A 92c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 1060hz(BL:1060) WN:194/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:406)
6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:691 vlt2:695(DCl:794 Tl:695 Ul:727) 96W 139A 87c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 970hz(BL: 970) WN:223/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:636 vlt2:642(DCl:794 Tl:642 Ul:727) 73W 114A 88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) WN:183/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:1 L:0]
[H:HW:1509Gh (500),DC-W:761,L:0,A:8,MMtmp:0 TMP:(31/31)=>=>=>(72/72 , 71/71)]
Pushed 10 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:0, hw:0)!
min:56 wins:1603[this/last min:11/14] bist-fail:155, hw-err:3
leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:978gh/s asic-count:640 (wins:8+3)
wall watts:1034
Fan:90, conseq:200
AC2DC BAD: 0 0
R/NR: 4720/0
RTF asics: 0
FET: 0:9 1:5
0 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins
0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble
0 purge_queue 0 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_i2c 0 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn
0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle
0 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=24
0 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=240 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=24 2.7.1
Uptime:59458 | FPGA ver:100 | BIST in 163
-----BOARD-0-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(266w/266w)[266 266 266] (->266w[266 266 266]) (lim=288) 0c 395GH cooling:0/0xfd
-----BOARD-1-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(190w/190w)[190 190 190] (->190w[190 190 190]) (lim=250) 0c 341GH cooling:0/0xfd
-----BOARD-2-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(263w/263w)[263 263 263] (->263w[263 263 263]) (lim=288) 0c 393GH cooling:0/0xfd
-----BOARD-3-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(182w/182w)[182 182 182] (->182w[182 182 182]) (lim=250) 0c 328GH cooling:0/0xfd
LOOP[0] ON TO:0 (w:5343)
0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:720 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 107W 147A 74c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 1030hz(BL:1030) WN:2664/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:722 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 108W 149A 90c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 1020hz(BL:1020) WN:2679/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:4435)
2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:666 vlt2:672(DCl:794 Tl:672 Ul:727) 80W 120A 88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 900hz(BL: 900) WN:2260/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:634 vlt2:640(DCl:794 Tl:640 Ul:727) 72W 112A 90c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 870hz(BL: 870) WN:2175/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:5379)
4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:720 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 101W 139A 71c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 1000hz(BL:1000) WN:2715/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:724 vlt2:727(DCl:794 Tl:794 Ul:727) 112W 154A 87c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 1040hz(BL:1040) WN:2664/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:4276)
6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:650 vlt2:653(DCl:794 Tl:653 Ul:727) 73W 111A 79c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 860hz(BL: 860) WN:2232/0 (ffffffff) (E:193) F:0 L:0]
7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:656 vlt2:661(DCl:794 Tl:661 Ul:727) 73W 111A 82c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 840hz(BL: 840) WN:2044/3 (fffffdff) (E:187) F:0 L:0]
[H:HW:1459Gh (500),DC-W:728,L:0,A:8,MMtmp:0 TMP:(32/32)=>=>=>(72/72 , 66/66)]
Pushed 10 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:3, hw:3)!
min:52 wins:19089[this/last min:25/21] bist-fail:357, hw-err:3
leading-zeroes:42 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:1468gh/s asic-count:7936 (wins:11+14)
wall watts:990
Fan:90, conseq:200
AC2DC BAD: 0 0
R/NR: 35747/0
RTF asics: 0
FET: 0:5 1:5
0 restarted 0 reset 0 reset2 0 fake_wins
0 stuck_bist 0 low_power 0 stuck_pll 0 runtime_dsble
0 purge_queue 0 read_timeouts 0 dc2dc_i2c 0 read_tmout2 0 read_crptn
0 purge_queue3 0 bad_idle
0 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=24
I wonder whether this indicates that there is some ASIC chip damaged or not recognized because it is the only thing different that I visualize in asic stats page. thx |
|
|
|
Xian01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1067
Christian Antkow
|
|
July 03, 2015, 03:39:05 PM |
|
Could not find notes on the 2.7.1 firmware. Any idea what's new ? Running 2.6.14 on all my SP20's.
|
|
|
|
|
alh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 04, 2015, 05:00:07 AM |
|
A new firmware release for the SP20 is a surprise to me as well. I figured that they were done working on the SP20 for bigger and better things. I too would like to know what is changed in 2.7.1 compared to 2.6.14.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bigblind
|
|
July 07, 2015, 11:04:18 AM |
|
Has anyone had this issue:
I changed voltages like always (running my miners from 1000-1300Ghs). The miner hung up. When I tried to reboot, it didnt start anymore. One of the 4 PCIe sockets seems damages. As soon as I pull out the cable of this one, the miner will boot and mine with 3 of 4 asics, 75% power. As soon as I provide the 4th socket with a cable again, the miner wont boot.
I cant figure out, where the problem is and what I can do.. It cant be that a part of the miner "burns" when switching voltages lower?? As stated, I never pushed them higher than 1300 or lower than 1000.
|
|
|
|
|
HerbPean
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 07, 2015, 01:43:11 PM |
|
Has anyone had this issue:
I changed voltages like always (running my miners from 1000-1300Ghs). The miner hung up. When I tried to reboot, it didnt start anymore. One of the 4 PCIe sockets seems damages. As soon as I pull out the cable of this one, the miner will boot and mine with 3 of 4 asics, 75% power. As soon as I provide the 4th socket with a cable again, the miner wont boot.
I cant figure out, where the problem is and what I can do.. It cant be that a part of the miner "burns" when switching voltages lower?? As stated, I never pushed them higher than 1300 or lower than 1000.
Had the same issue but no dmg on the connector. Dmg was on the board. Looks like you have a faulty half board (2 ASIC). Check the number of the connector, Like 4 would the last two ASIC in the UI (0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7) so that would be ASIC 6 and 7. Start your machine with only the 3 PCI-E conencted... try to manual turn off ASIC 7 and retry with 4 connectors, if it's not working try with only 6. Otherwise, your only chance to fix would be an RMA ... You can also play with the Voltage (lowering it) to see if they will revive. I had a faulty ASIC (i think it's 3) and 4 died not long after. |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7862
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
July 07, 2015, 01:56:10 PM |
|
Has anyone had this issue:
I changed voltages like always (running my miners from 1000-1300Ghs). The miner hung up. When I tried to reboot, it didnt start anymore. One of the 4 PCIe sockets seems damages. As soon as I pull out the cable of this one, the miner will boot and mine with 3 of 4 asics, 75% power. As soon as I provide the 4th socket with a cable again, the miner wont boot.
I cant figure out, where the problem is and what I can do.. It cant be that a part of the miner "burns" when switching voltages lower?? As stated, I never pushed them higher than 1300 or lower than 1000.
quakefiend420 has some spare boards his profile is below https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=226553send him a pm he is USA based |
|
|
|
|
