•••• COINICHIWA • DICE • SINCE 2014 • INVEST • NEW DARK THEME ••••

[CrackedLogic]

please fix my withdrawal request

Username: yenzae0215

Love the name.

What Happened to his withdrawal?

[yenzae0215]

please fix my withdrawal request

Username: yenzae0215

Love the name.

What Happened to his withdrawal?

i dont know, i deposit some satoshis then withdraw it after several minutes, it says withdrawals will be processed after 4 confirmations on deposit by now its already 12 confirmations and still my withdrawal isnt processed

[omahapoker]

I was up 0.35 but with every up...there is a down




this site has the fastest autobot i've seen. its 3 times faster than anything ive seen. doesnt slow down site at all

[Shogen]

Why do you choose to use sha1 instead of sha256 or sha512 which are used by almost all other sites? Are there any special advantage of sha1?
Just curious about that.

[vit1988]

@yenzae0215 withdraw issue is fixed. there was a flaw in the script so that auto withdraws were blocked.

[vit1988]

Why do you choose to use sha1 instead of sha256 or sha512 which are used by almost all other sites? Are there any special advantage of sha1?
Just curious about that.

A verification hash must be:
- Impossible to generate different results with the same hash so it is a proof nothing was manipulated by the site owner afterwards.
- Hard to bruteforce so the secret seeds can not be determined by a user in a reasonable time

Sha1 has all sufficient attributes for this purpose as long as the secret seed is long enough and it is faster (not sure if that makes a significant difference overall but anyways). I was always wondering why others use sha256/512. Actually in my opinion even md5 would be fine for this use case but that is generally stigmatized as insecure.

[yenzae0215]

@yenzae0215 withdraw issue is fixed. there was a flaw in the script so that auto withdraws were blocked.

thank you.. the site's admin is very nice

[ComboChris]

The Site looks really nice, though i wonder why you would launch with such a low bankroll if you already own another bitcoin gambling site

[Holderbert]

The Site looks really nice, though i wonder why you would launch with such a low bankroll if you already own another bitcoin gambling site

You are right. I don't see what the advantage of operating with such a low bankroll would be.
I myself would have problems trusting a site like that  to be honest.
It really makes it look like you are not taking your project seriously enough.

[Bobblehead Pete]

How old is your site sir?

probably be playing here

[vit1988]

@ComboChris + @holderbert:
Golden gambling principle #1 is: don't play with more money than you are willing to lose and at this stage I'm not willing to risk more.

@Bobblehead Pete:
Site is ~1 day old... but I also operate another gambling site for over a year now.

[vit1988]

New feature (as requested): Define your personal hot keys in your settings.

And I've lowered the bet delay to 0.2 seconds for now.

[enryk]

New feature (as requested): Define your personal hot keys in your settings.

And I've lowered the bet delay to 0.2 seconds for now.

What are the hot keys used for? Also is the bet delay of 0.2 seconds for all wagered amounts or does it differ with different amounts? Just dice had a different delay for different amounts. It was faster for higher amounts wagered.

[FanEagle]

I loved to play here, owner is been very gentle, even if later on I changed game and loss everything

[nothingnew]

Is the payout instant?

[vit1988]

Sha1 has all sufficient attributes for this purpose as long as the secret seed is long enough and it is faster (not sure if that makes a significant difference overall but anyways). I was always wondering why others use sha256/512. Actually in my opinion even md5 would be fine for this use case but that is generally stigmatized as insecure.

Uggh no. MD5 collision finding techniques allow finding collisions with arbitrary prefixes and suffixes -- making it completely unsuitable. MD5 is no more stigmatized as being insecure as a sphere is stigmatized as being round.

Sha1 is a lot better, but it's been sufficiently weakened to the point you should consider migrating to sha2 now. Given the choice between secure and weak, I'm not sure why you'd choose a weak hash.

Ugh, yes. Crypto experts, please show me only one example collision following the common combined seed scheme in dice games. And even if you find one collision, the verification for all other bets in the same series (same client/server seed but incrementing nonce) will fail. I'd say it's absolutely impossible to find a collision for two bets in a series let alone the whole series.

Sha1 and even md5 are absolutely sufficient for this purpose.

[vit1988]

Is the payout instant?

No. Requires all your deposits to have 4 confirmations.

[nothingnew]

Ugh, yes. Crypto experts, please show me only one example collision following the common combined seed scheme in dice games. And even if you find one collision, the verification for all other bets in the same series (same client/server seed but incrementing nonce) will fail. I'd say it's absolutely impossible to find a collision for two bets in a series let alone the whole series.

Sha1 and even md5 are absolutely sufficient for this purpose.

You're the most sort of dangerous: arrogant and clueless. If you don't lose peoples money due to malice, I'm sure you'll manage to do so with incompetence. I was going to demonstrate a practical md5 hash collision for you on your site, but your misconceptions (regarding the series) are so entrenched that your site isn't even close to provably fair, as you don't even give a guarantee of you changing the server seed. You only need to make 10^4 sha1's per bet in the series to revert it. Which means practically you can pick the outcome for the first 10 or so bets after someone changes their client seed.

Anyway, you might want to gloss over the wikipedia article on md5. And if you're still not convinced, download hashclash or something. And when you're done, check out how every other dice site proves they don't change the server-seed, and follow suite -- you obviously don't have the skills or understanding to deviate from the norm.

Wow, surprised to read this...

[cryptasm]

@ComboChris + @holderbert:
Golden gambling principle #1 is: don't play with more money than you are willing to lose and at this stage I'm not willing to risk more.

@Bobblehead Pete:
Site is ~1 day old... but I also operate another gambling site for over a year now.

I dont know, the low bankroll looks verry unprofessional to me

[vit1988]

You're the most sort of dangerous: arrogant and clueless. If you don't lose peoples money due to malice, I'm sure you'll manage to do so with incompetence. I was going to demonstrate a practical md5 hash collision for you on your site, but your misconceptions (regarding the series) are so entrenched that your site isn't even close to provably fair, as you don't even give a guarantee of you changing the server seed. You only need to make 10^4 sha1's per bet in the series to revert it. Which means practically you can pick the outcome for the first 10 or so bets after someone changes their client seed.

Anyway, you might want to gloss over the wikipedia article on md5. And if you're still not convinced, download hashclash or something. And when you're done, check out how every other dice site proves they don't change the server-seed, and follow suite -- you obviously don't have the skills or understanding to deviate from the norm.

I have no idea what you are talking about. Server seed only changes if the user changes his client seed and it keeps the same until the user choses a new one.

Now come on give me only one concrete example for this instead of unjustifiable discrediting me:

md5([32characters]-[10characters]-1) == md5([other32characters]-[10characters]-1) &&
md5([32characters]-[10characters]-2) == md5([other32characters]-[10characters]-2)

OR

sha1([32characters]-[10characters]-1) == sha1([other32characters]-[10characters]-1) &&
sha1([32characters]-[10characters]-2) == sha1([other32characters]-[10characters]-2)