[CLOSED] Cryptomine.io - Jan Campaign

[BAGOBO]

I told to carra23 and also to the owner of the site  : I can make as escrow for free.


At the end carra23 replied me " this is not necessary an escrow I will make it"  and he added "if it is necessary I will search another trusted escrow and not you ".


However I think I'm trusted check my thread  and all my feedbacks.

You have a green trust and I can look that

Maybe Carra23 prefer someone green from default trust
Who knows  

[1714999826]

1714999826

[1714999826]

1714999826

[1714999826]

1714999826

[1714999826]

1714999826

[redsn0w]

I told to carra23 and also to the owner of the site  : I can make as escrow for free.


At the end carra23 replied me " this is not necessary an escrow I will make it"  and he added "if it is necessary I will search another trusted escrow and not you ".


However I think I'm trusted check my thread  and all my feedbacks.

You have a green trust and I can look that

Maybe Carra23 prefer someone green from default trust
Who knows  

It is not question of the greenTrust , he is not an escrow .

[allcoinminer]

I told to carra23 and also to the owner of the site  : I can make as escrow for free.


At the end carra23 replied me " this is not necessary an escrow I will make it"  and he added "if it is necessary I will search another trusted escrow and not you ".


However I think I'm trusted check my thread  and all my feedbacks.

You have a green trust and I can look that

Maybe Carra23 prefer someone green from default trust
Who knows 

It is not question of the greenTrust , he is not an escrow .

redsn0w is better than Carra23 but not the best. But for this amount,
If op is looking for the escrow then should opt for a highly experienced and trustworthy escrow providers like, John (John K., escrow.ms, etc.

[Zich]

redsn0w is better than Carra23 but not the best. But for this amount,
If op is looking for the escrow then should opt for a highly experienced and trustworthy escrow providers like, John (John K., escrow.ms, etc.

John K is busy man. I am prefer  monbux

[alani123]

I was just reading through the OP. Seems like we can also receive the payment in mining power. Can we have more details on that?

[lolled]

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

[Zich]

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

[lolled]

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

You just did above. Do you want to risk getting not paid? Or a better escrow for this campaign?

[redsn0w]

I told to carra23 and also to the owner of the site  : I can make as escrow for free.


At the end carra23 replied me " this is not necessary an escrow I will make it"  and he added "if it is necessary I will search another trusted escrow and not you ".


However I think I'm trusted check my thread  and all my feedbacks.

You have a green trust and I can look that

Maybe Carra23 prefer someone green from default trust
Who knows 

It is not question of the greenTrust , he is not an escrow .

redsn0w is better than Carra23 but not the best. But for this amount,
If op is looking for the escrow then should opt for a highly experienced and trustworthy escrow providers like, John (John K., escrow.ms, etc.

Thanks for the opinion , in the past I've   made as escrow for a signature campaign (barwick cloud mining)  so for me it is not a problem do it this time.

[Zich]

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

You just did above. Do you want to risk getting not paid? Or a better escrow for this campaign?

I just answer allcoinminer, that not count 
Half of me want escrow, but the other half had faith on carra23. So it's still undecided.

[btcmaze]

What is going on? Escrow War?

I suppose no spots are open for me.

I told to carra23 and also to the owner of the site  : I can make as escrow for free.


At the end carra23 replied me " this is not necessary an escrow I will make it"  and he added "if it is necessary I will search another trusted escrow and not you ".


However I think I'm trusted check my thread  and all my feedbacks.

You have a green trust and I can look that

Maybe Carra23 prefer someone green from default trust
Who knows  

It is not question of the greenTrust , he is not an escrow .

Yep. Green trust does not matter.

[arieq]

Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ

[redsn0w]

Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ

Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

[allcoinminer]

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

You just did above. Do you want to risk getting not paid? Or a better escrow for this campaign?

I just answer allcoinminer, that not count 
Half of me want escrow, but the other half had faith on carra23. So it's still undecided.

That's an invalid faith. There is no material reason for that trust.

[arieq]

Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ

Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

[redsn0w]

Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ

Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking .

[Zich]

Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ

Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking .

The count start when we put  the signature 

[enryk]

Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ

Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking .

I think users are allowed to update their signatures, but are free to change it by December 1st as well. If they change it now, they can be evaluated before the end of December. I think Op should confirm this as well, and make a record of the starting posts for differrent users.

[redsn0w]

Username : arieq
Activity : 210
current number of posts : 552
Position : Full member
BTC address : 1ArieqQVJJMBPS7V3ZKtvfpoAyjU2cmfVZ

Are you kidding us ? Have you read at least the title ?

Have you read at least post #2 ?

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking .

The count start when we put  the signature 

Yes , I understand but the sig. campaign will start officially the 1st December so I think now the post that you make  will not be counted.

[yenzae0215]

what if Carra23 and Cryptomine.Gabriel (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=832448.msg9300969#msg9300969) is only one person?

i mean, is Carra23 really an escrow or thats is the main BCT forum account of the Crytomine owner?

what do you think guys?