[CLOSED] Cryptomine.io - Jan Campaign

[wealthy$]

  CAN  SOMEBODY  EXPLAIN  TO  ME  HOW  I  MISSED  THIS 
Pm me a slot or someone should give me his or her own. LOL

[1715020627]

1715020627

[Zich]

..........

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking .

The count start when we put  the signature 

Yes , I understand but the sig. campaign will start officially the 1st December so I think now the post that you make  will not be counted.

Hi Carra23, post count will start from Monday, 1st of December right?

It will start as soon as somebody puts a signature in. So somebody can start ahead of Dec 1st and their counter will start.

[redsn0w]

..........

No I don't but I be seem it is not required to put the signature now ( or am I wrong?). However I didn't want to be arrogant I'm only joking .

The count start when we put  the signature 

Yes , I understand but the sig. campaign will start officially the 1st December so I think now the post that you make  will not be counted.

Hi Carra23, post count will start from Monday, 1st of December right?

It will start as soon as somebody puts a signature in. So somebody can start ahead of Dec 1st and their counter will start.

Then good luck with the signature campaign I hope he will not miss any your post.

[Zich]

..........

Then good luck with the signature campaign I hope he will not miss any your post.

I will pray 

[Carra23]

I was just reading through the OP. Seems like we can also receive the payment in mining power. Can we have more details on that?

I am not sure about that. I will find out. The amount I have is enough to cover the total pay in BTC only if all the Full Members and higher makes 100+ constructive posts. So in case the company runs into trouble and/or they do not provide the mining power for some reason, you will get the BTC amount only (not the 20% higher mining power).

..........

Then good luck with the signature campaign I hope he will not miss any your post.

I will pray  

This one does not count

I will check through later today and quote all those who have already added the signature.

[redsn0w]

This one does not count

I will check through later today and quote all those who have already added the signature.

I think all the posts here should not be count. .

[monetizator4]

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

Ok, I´m participant and I request escrow. Who else?
I will be more sure in payment if at least 50% of money will be hold not in just created wallet with 1 transaction but by well known escrow.

[Zich]

This one does not count

I will check through later today and quote all those who have already added the signature.

I think all the posts here should not be count. .

Indeed 

[dsly]

If I get enough participants doubting the funds, I will get some other escrow. To me it looks redundant as if I can be trusted to hand back the amount, I can be trusted to pay out; but nevertheless I would not want this to cause participants worry.

I see lot of participants requesting it now. Common Cara, get another escrow. You can manage the campaign. I see no reason now, why you won't .

Actually none of the participant request escrow yet.

Ok, I´m participant and I request escrow. Who else?
I will be more sure in payment if at least 50% of money will be hold not in just created wallet with 1 transaction but by well known escrow.

Me too,. Would love to have an escrow. I would be more than happy to have Carra as a campaign manager, but, an escrow is essential to ensure funds are delivered.
Thanks!

[pawel7777]

I don't think there is a high risk of scam (not paying for campaign). The whole 'value' of 1 month campaign is probably not high enough to sacrifice a hero account and risk the business' reputation.

And if they didn't intend to pay, they'd probably accept many more participants.

That being said, I don't see any reason not to escrow with trusted member, or at least pay once a week (and pay the '+50 posts bonus' on 31st).

[lolled]

I don't think there is a high risk of scam (not paying for campaign). The whole 'value' of 1 month campaign is probably not high enough to sacrifice a hero account and risk the business' reputation.

And if they didn't intend to pay, they'd probably accept many more participants.

That being said, I don't see any reason not to escrow with trusted member, or at least pay once a week (and pay the '+50 posts bonus' on 31st).

When you launch a business and it doesn't go well, then you always wish, you hadn't spent all those resources on it as it came down to nothing. In this case, say for example they don't get any interest in cloudmining, then they will have nothing to lose except for their work on the website. If Cara is part of their team, then the funds are like an exit escrow for them. They will have nothing to lose.

[pawel7777]

When you launch a business and it doesn't go well, then you always wish, you hadn't spent all those resources on it as it came down to nothing. In this case, say for example they don't get any interest in cloudmining, then they will have nothing to lose except for their work on the website. If Cara is part of their team, then the funds are like an exit escrow for them. They will have nothing to lose.

Good point. That's a plausible scenario. If the campaign is a success - they'll pay. If it's a fiasco - they won't.

But if that's the plan, they'd likely do it on a larger scale, with more participants (since they don't risk anything). Also they're not newly formed business and they seemed to invest way too much to wager everything on success/failure of a single sig campaign.

[bitkilo]

I like the idea of paying weekly then extra post bonus at the end of campaign.
Lots of people are getting into cloud mining now and its still growing. As long as they manage it well things will go smooth.

They do have a lot to loose. The websit looks good and very profesional so that would be money down the drain.
Then they would also have a hard time getting back into future cloudmining busineses.
Im in so i really hope it all hoes well.

[Quickseller]

I don't think there is a high risk of scam (not paying for campaign). The whole 'value' of 1 month campaign is probably not high enough to sacrifice a hero account and risk the business' reputation.

And if they didn't intend to pay, they'd probably accept many more participants.

That being said, I don't see any reason not to escrow with trusted member, or at least pay once a week (and pay the '+50 posts bonus' on 31st).

Hero accounts are generally worth between 1 and 3 btc, the op us offering 7 btc in payments in exchange for advertising. It would make sense to sacrifice a hero for 7 btc plus since he has zero trade history the op may have not even personally signed the message confirming the funds but was rather only given the message to display.

[pawel7777]

Hero accounts are generally worth between 1 and 3 btc, the op us offering 7 btc in payments in exchange for advertising. It would make sense to sacrifice a hero for 7 btc plus since he has zero trade history the op may have not even personally signed the message confirming the funds but was rather only given the message to display.

Probably they'll spend something around 5.5 BTC as not everyone will hit the max post + bonus. So say 5.5 BTC less say 2.5 BTC (hero acc worth) = 3 BTC.

So 3 BTC worth of advertising for the business with the ruined reputation (that will happen if they don't pay). Not really a 'high profile' scam, isn't it?

[Zich]

Take it easy guys, just ask for escrow.


Hi carra23, i am also vote for escrow service by reputable green member that experience with escrow service  

[Carra23]

Since even zich now is wavering, I am considering options.

I am thinking of offering 10 day payouts for those who want, but at a reduced rate (typically 10-20% depending on a nice divisible by 3 number). If a lot of the participants sign up for that I might even open up 1 or 2 slots (my max is limited to 7.03 BTC).

EDIT:

Something like this for 17/34 posts in 10 days. You get a third of the below mentioned amounts.

Member:        0.06
Full Member:  0.105/0.09
Sr. member:   0.12/0.105
Hero Member: 0.18/0.12

Let me know if anyone is interested. I will finalise the rules later for this if there are any takers.

[Zich]

Ok participant, carra23 already show good faith by giving options.
Now is time to speak your mind, i already open the way  

I guess i will stick with 0.2 BTC + 0.15 BTC 

[hobala]

that's great for open 1 or 2 slot, im still want to join this sig campaign.thanks

[Carra23]

Ok participant, carra23 already show good faith by giving options.
Now is time to speak your mind, i already open the way  

I guess i will stick with 0.2 BTC + 0.15 BTC  

I will assume all those who does not reply that they want the monthly arrangement. No need for anyone to mention that.

I am hoping we get enough takers for this. I think the rates are too high, and I would have preferred to get more posters in the same budget. I have left out some very good applicants so they will get priority, no need for anyone else to apply. The campaign is still closed for anybody else.