Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 08:19:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: It's funny to see these thugs in Ferguson bitching about how they have nothing  (Read 9869 times)
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2015, 07:57:15 PM
 #81

I guess the fact that this answers your bogus criticisms so perfectly is evidence of you taking your talking points directly from the bible thumpers who are trying so hard to distort history. You haven't said anything novel, just repeated the same trash that's been discredited so frequently, it has an entry on Wikipedia about it.

You are so wrapped up in your anti-religion stance that you fail to see that the people bringing this issue up are opposed to eugenics, not necessarily anti-abortion.
1714767598
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714767598

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714767598
Reply with quote  #2

1714767598
Report to moderator
1714767598
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714767598

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714767598
Reply with quote  #2

1714767598
Report to moderator
1714767598
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714767598

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714767598
Reply with quote  #2

1714767598
Report to moderator
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714767598
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714767598

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714767598
Reply with quote  #2

1714767598
Report to moderator
Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 08:20:40 PM
 #82

You've still yet to provide any credible evidence that Sanger intended to start abortion houses to target blacks, as per your original statements. If this were true, I suspect PP's focus would have been on abortions first under Sanger's direction, and not contraception, as was actually the case.

Btw:

In the 1920s various theories of eugenics were popular among intellectuals in the United States. For example, 75% of colleges offered courses on eugenics. Sanger, in her campaign to promote birth control, teamed with eugenics organizations such as the American Eugenics Society, although she argued against many of their positions. Scholars describe Sanger as believing that birth control, sterilization and abortion should be voluntary and not based on race. She advocated for "voluntary motherhood"—the right to choose when to be pregnant—for all women, as an important element of women's rights. Opponents of Planned Parenthood often refer to Sanger's connection with supporters of eugenics to discredit the organization by associating it, and birth control, with the more negative modern view of eugenics. Planned Parenthood has responded to this effort directly in a leaflet acknowledging that Sanger agreed with some of her contemporaries who advocated the voluntary hospitalization or sterilization of people with untreatable, disabling, hereditary conditions, and limits on the immigration of the diseased. The leaflet also states that Planned Parenthood "finds these views objectionable and outmoded" but says that it was compelled to discuss the topic because "anti-family planning activists continue to attack Sanger . . . because she is an easier target" than Planned Parenthood.

I guess the fact that this answers your bogus criticisms so perfectly is evidence of you taking your talking points directly from the bible thumpers who are trying so hard to distort history. You haven't said anything novel, just repeated the same trash that's been discredited so frequently, it has an entry on Wikipedia about it.







picolo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 31, 2015, 09:25:25 AM
 #83

I guess the fact that this answers your bogus criticisms so perfectly is evidence of you taking your talking points directly from the bible thumpers who are trying so hard to distort history. You haven't said anything novel, just repeated the same trash that's been discredited so frequently, it has an entry on Wikipedia about it.

You are so wrapped up in your anti-religion stance that you fail to see that the people bringing this issue up are opposed to eugenics, not necessarily anti-abortion.

Atheist want to impose their view on everyone while using the argument that religions are bad because they impose their view on people, come on!
Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
January 31, 2015, 04:31:19 PM
 #84

I guess the fact that this answers your bogus criticisms so perfectly is evidence of you taking your talking points directly from the bible thumpers who are trying so hard to distort history. You haven't said anything novel, just repeated the same trash that's been discredited so frequently, it has an entry on Wikipedia about it.

You are so wrapped up in your anti-religion stance that you fail to see that the people bringing this issue up are opposed to eugenics, not necessarily anti-abortion.

Atheist want to impose their view on everyone while using the argument that religions are bad because they impose their view on people, come on!



In the case of this character here, he/she/it/they do(es) not define what atheism should be. For example he/she/it/they is(are) definitely not a skeptic.

When you believe so strongly in the idolatry of the sanctity of sanger's thoughts and memoirs using wikipedia's lonely link, making your faith in her image denying what you see and hear yourself from multiple sources and years of evidence, then you became what you hate most: a religious zealot...

 Grin


Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
February 03, 2015, 06:14:21 AM
 #85




Infighting Alert! Al Sharpton Asks If Young Black Protesters Are Stupid, Compares Them To Whores Being ‘Pimped’ By Others





[...]
Today, the 60-year-old reverend responded to the growing challenge by lashing out at younger activists, addressing them in a speech to his congregants.

“They are pimping you,” he said, referring to activists who he said were trying to divide young protesters from the older generation of activists.

“I’ve been meeting with them and talking with them since. And they were told, ‘Your problem is Al Sharpton and the other guys.’ Anytime you have movements, whether it’s in Ferguson, whether it’s in New York, whether it’s in Denver, wherever it is, when they got you more angry at your parents then they got you at the vote you’re supposed to be out there for, you’re being tricked and you’re trying to turn the community into tricks. And they are pimping you, to do the Willie Lynch in our community.”

“And why they got y’all arguing about old or young in Ferguson, they running an election and y’all ain’t got a candidate in the race. Cause you’re busy arguing with your mommy and daddy when they re-electing a mayor, and re-electing a prosecutor. They got you arguing about who going to lead a march—the old or the young—when they cutting up the city budget. You can’t be that stupid! You more worried about who going to lead [National Action Network] than who going to be the governor with a multi-billion dollar budget that you got to pay state tax in. You can’t be that stupid.

Sharpton added, “It’s the disconnect that is the strategy to break the movement. And they play on your ego. ‘Oh, you young and hip, you’re full of fire. You’re the new face.’ All the stuff that they know will titillate your ears. That’s what a pimp says to a ho.”

“They tell them what they want to hear,” he said. “They don’t tell you ‘I’m going to turn you out.’ They tell you ‘You’re beautiful. Nobody appreciates you like I do. Look at you. You deserve all these material things. You’re not being in that London Fog coat. You should be in minks. You should have diamonds. You should have earnings [and] all you’ve got to do is come with me. We can have a brand new car together. We can buy a house in the suburbs together.’ And after they seduce you, they reduce you. And I’m not going to sit here and let them reduce our children.”

[...]
In a statement to Capital following Sharpton’s speech,[young protester Josmar] Trujillo wrote, “In New York, specifically in the majority of the work happening in the last year, Sharpton’s brand is largely seen as destructive at worst– irrelevant at best.”

Trujillo also said, “As we move ahead here in New York, inspired by Ferguson youth, we’re speaking truth to power. Sharpton, and others like him, are in fact much too cozy with power to fill that role. For the former informant to paternalistically admonish younger, more dynamic leaders by comparing them to ‘hoes’ is just another self-serving attempt to squash dissent as he wrestles for control of a movement that’s leaving him behind.”



http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/city-hall/2015/01/8561365/amid-tensions-sharpton-lashes-out-younger-activists



Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
February 03, 2015, 06:29:49 AM
 #86




Hilarious! #BlackLivesMatter Protests Al Sharpton At His National Action Network Office In NYC











In other related news:

Records Show Every Business Started By Al Sharpton Has Been Closed For Failing To Pay Taxes…





Records show that Sharpton’s beleaguered for-profit entities often overlap and intertwine, some sharing ties with the reverend’s nonprofit organization, National Action Network. Their financial records are copious, confusing, and sometimes outright bizarre, and together, they depict persistent financial woes for Sharpton, who also personally owes New York State nearly $596,000, according to active tax warrants.

n that’s available to us — to have a history of noncompliance with tax obligations,” says Bernadette Schopfer, the director of taxation at New York’s Maier Markey & Justic, a certified public-accounting firm that has had no dealings with Sharpton or National Action Network. “It appears that [Sharpton] does not file [taxes for his businesses], and then opens up something else. At all the entities we see he has opened up, he has not been compliant with the obligations of the owner of a business. . . . He’s either willful in his behavior, or he’s just sloppy.”

Sharpton, who was traveling internationally, was unavailable for an interview, despite NRO’s numerous queries over several days.



http://www.nationalreview.com/article/397681/busted-jillian-kay-melchior



picolo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 03, 2015, 02:27:52 PM
 #87

Let's start to stop saying African American for every black in America when they are not even from Africa sometimes or they have been in the States for centuries. It's racist!
Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
February 03, 2015, 04:21:45 PM
 #88

Let's start to stop saying African American for every black in America when they are not even from Africa sometimes or they have been in the States for centuries. It's racist!


... Or call our president "african american" when his mom was white and his father had no slaves born in america, or brazil, in his long ancestry...

Can anyone prove me wrong and find that elusive 0bama slave from the american cotton fields, or the brazilian sugar cane fields?


funtotry
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info


View Profile
February 03, 2015, 04:35:01 PM
 #89

Interesting thread, good to see the views from both sides of the conversation.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!