[BIT-X.com] [CoinsBank.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign

[Testing123]

Rule updates:
Minimum of 10+ posts in the bitcoin discussion board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)
Mimimum of 10+ posts in the beginners & help board. (this is a minimum NOT a max)

Must post minimum 10 post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help? or select between?

Looks like Macro has updated the numbers from 10+ to 5+.

I believe you need to fulfill both the two requirements.

Edit: Please read the latest update in the next post by Macro.

[marcotheminer]

UPDATE:

Posting in ['x'] board requirements have been removed.

Please do try to post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help anyway!

[hilariousandco]

Rule update:
Minimum of 5 new topics (that's only one or two a week) in the bitcoin discussion board (make them interesting and relevant to news and continually reply to the discussion in the thread!)

What is the point in this and how is it even enforceable? Are you going to go through everybody's posts (potentially hundreds) one by one to check if they've made the mandatory minimum five threads? You can't even tell if they created the thread just by looking at their post history anyway. Seems more hassle than it's worth and will only cause problems for everyone.

You can look at the title of the thread in a person's post history. If the title starts with a "Re:" then it is a reply, if he title of the post does not have this then it is a new thread (at least this is how it is by default, someone could manually change the post title).

I think he is trying to weed out spammers with this rule (and others). I personally think this will end up backfiring as people will get denied payment for breaking the rules and get upset. Anyone that is denied payment for breaking the rules has the potential to make a lot of noise about the company and will likely counter the positive effect of signature advertising. I think the way that EvilPanda handles the GAW campaign (and the way that Stunna handled the PD campaign) is much more effective and less reputation risky then the way that the luckyb.it campaign is run (on the other end of the spectrum).

The result of this rule will probably be a lot more threads like this.

It will backfire especially if people are denied payment over technicalities. It's also still not really feasible to go through potentially hundreds of posts per user to check. This rule just creates more hassle for everyone - users, campaign manager and staff. There's easier ways to weed out spammers: check their posts before they sign up, keep an eye on them whilst they're posting and check again at the end of the term before you send payment.

UPDATE:

Posting in ['x'] board requirements have been removed.

Please do try to post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help anyway!

Glad to see. I think this will benefit everyone.

[gkv9]

@marcotheminer,
Are all the Full Member slots filled? It's seriously my bad this time I didn't receive any code and just promises from their side that they are fixing it. I've checked the google docs spreadsheet and I think I'm out of the game. Please update me whether shall I still put the signature or remove it?

[irfan_pak10]

UPDATE:

Posting in ['x'] board requirements have been removed.

Please do try to post in bitcoin discussion and beginners & help anyway!

We all know that you are trying to get more exposure of your site and want your site to reach a maximum number of visitor and members every day. we really try to help you out and make posts in all the section but please don't make us bound that do this thing or this or avoid this  

thanks

[marcotheminer]

Some full members have been rejected. 9 have been accepted.

[Magic Of Nigeria]

Great to see many new campaigns pop up lately! It's great for the economy of the forum, as these campaigns are what keep the forum running!

What I am sad to see is that I am not able to join. I think once my activity updates I should be nearing the Full Member rank, but that will not be after more posts of mine.

Good luck with this great campaign! Seems very legitimate.

[conteaza]

Some full members have been rejected. 9 have been accepted.

and why did you do this?

[Gianluca95]

Some full members have been rejected. 9 have been accepted.

and why did you do this?

I think that this full members which has been rejected had many spam posts. Marcotheminer said in the first OP that he checked the history of the all user (one for one) to check that the best part of post are constructive or not.

[marcotheminer]

Some full members have been rejected. 9 have been accepted.

and why did you do this?

I think that this full members which has been rejected had many spam posts. Marcotheminer said in the first OP that he checked the history of the all user (one for one) to check that the best part of post are constructive or not.

Correct. Not all were spamming posts but some posted rarely and not well enough.

conteaza you've been re-accepted.

[commandrix]

Changed my signature to your Full Member sig. With this post, I have 777 posts. Preferred Bitcoin address: 1HqYxABtf7gSsvp4bLL4b6XnruY83uChva

[sifter]

Please could you update the OP with the new rules.
That would be helpful thanks.

[conteaza]

Some full members have been rejected. 9 have been accepted.

and why did you do this?

I think that this full members which has been rejected had many spam posts. Marcotheminer said in the first OP that he checked the history of the all user (one for one) to check that the best part of post are constructive or not.

I must to say that i'm not a spammer and I was accepted from the beginning .
I was first in the spreadsheet

Correct. Not all were spamming posts but some posted rarely and not well enough.

conteaza you've been re-accepted.

well thanks

[Gianluca95]

Some full members have been rejected. 9 have been accepted.

and why did you do this?

I think that this full members which has been rejected had many spam posts. Marcotheminer said in the first OP that he checked the history of the all user (one for one) to check that the best part of post are constructive or not.

I must to say that i'm not a spammer and I was accepted from the beginning .
I was first in the spreadsheet

Have you tried to heard marcotheminer to see what he say? If you aren't spammer, keep calm and don't worry, marcotheminer will accept you to this signature campaign.

[irfan_pak10]

Some full members have been rejected. 9 have been accepted.

and why did you do this?

I think that this full members which has been rejected had many spam posts. Marcotheminer said in the first OP that he checked the history of the all user (one for one) to check that the best part of post are constructive or not.

Correct. Not all were spamming posts but some posted rarely and not well enough.

conteaza you've been re-accepted.

@conteaza  be happy here you are coming 

[tencentcoin]

chinese phone could not receive the confirm code ,

[marcotheminer]

Please could you update the OP with the new rules.
That would be helpful thanks.

Everything is up to date!

Make sure to read them.

[WhatTheGox]

unless i clicked on the wrong image picture in google docs next to my name isnt my posting section history

[marcotheminer]

Changed my signature to your Full Member sig. With this post, I have 777 posts. Preferred Bitcoin address: 1HqYxABtf7gSsvp4bLL4b6XnruY83uChva

You must sign up on site and provide the address from there.

[marcotheminer]

unless i clicked on the wrong image picture in google docs next to my name isnt my posting section history

Corrected, good catch thanks!