Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 10:58:51 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Admins can close FPGA subforum  (Read 2384 times)
BCMan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527



View Profile
June 16, 2012, 07:48:56 AM
 #1

 Well, because FPGAs are simply destroyed.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481108331
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481108331

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481108331
Reply with quote  #2

1481108331
Report to moderator
1481108331
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481108331

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481108331
Reply with quote  #2

1481108331
Report to moderator
friedcat
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 848



View Profile
June 16, 2012, 07:54:39 AM
 #2

Well, because FPGAs are simply destroyed.

Could you show me the picture of a working ASIC mining chip please?

Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442



View Profile
June 16, 2012, 07:57:28 AM
 #3

Well, because FPGAs are simply destroyed.

Could you show me the picture of a working ASIC mining chip please?



And that other thing bellow the ASIC is an Ellet lol

BCMan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527



View Profile
June 16, 2012, 08:21:04 AM
 #4

 Actually forget about this thread. Asics will fail hard.

bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


I heart thebaron


View Profile
June 16, 2012, 08:25:03 AM
 #5

Actually forget about this thread. Asics will fail hard.

FPGAs destroyed, ASICs will fail hard, GPUs too inefficient....so what's left ? CPU Mining FTW !

BCMan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527



View Profile
June 16, 2012, 08:32:22 AM
 #6

Actually forget about this thread. Asics will fail hard.

FPGAs destroyed, ASICs will fail hard, GPUs too inefficient....so what's left ? CPU Mining FTW !
Where I did said that GPUs are too inefficient? They will be main hashing speed for years, ands rest will be fpgas and asics(?).

Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952


What's a GPU?


View Profile
June 16, 2012, 08:38:51 AM
 #7

I think we should just do all transactions by hand, and train pigeons to broadcast them. It might not be the most efficient way in terms of mh/j, but hey, better than no Bitcoin, eh?

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
BCMan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 527



View Profile
June 16, 2012, 08:52:38 AM
 #8

I think we should just do all transactions by hand, and train pigeons to broadcast them. It might not be the most efficient way in terms of mh/j, but hey, better than no Bitcoin, eh?
Read my previous reply plz.

Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952


What's a GPU?


View Profile
June 16, 2012, 09:12:19 AM
 #9

I think we should just do all transactions by hand, and train pigeons to broadcast them. It might not be the most efficient way in terms of mh/j, but hey, better than no Bitcoin, eh?
Read my previous reply plz.

'twas a joke.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


I heart thebaron


View Profile
June 16, 2012, 10:03:10 AM
 #10

I read somewhere that THIS ASIC gets 10 TH/s....unfortunately it doesn't warm your Coffey, but rather it warms 'the kitty'...


bulanula
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile
June 16, 2012, 10:19:40 AM
 #11

I read somewhere that THIS ASIC gets 10 TH/s....unfortunately it doesn't warm your Coffey, but rather it warms 'the kitty'...



LOL.

BEST POST EVER !

Thanks for the laughs man. You are EPIC !
norulezapply
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475


View Profile
June 17, 2012, 01:42:23 PM
 #12

Well, because FPGAs are simply destroyed.

FUD - Boring...

If my post helped, I'll happily accept a few bitmills!   15rGg6A1JFZV3b7TTbtpAaiYGdUD1e1oAm
DiabloD3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


DiabloMiner author


View Profile WWW
June 18, 2012, 05:29:02 PM
 #13

Well, because FPGAs are simply destroyed.

ASIC goes in here too.

Unacceptable
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946



View Profile
June 18, 2012, 07:35:53 PM
 #14

I think we should just do all transactions by hand, and train pigeons to broadcast them. It might not be the most efficient way in terms of mh/j, but hey, better than no Bitcoin, eh?

Hey,we can get Mike Tyson to be our spokesperson then  Grin

"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole."  -Raylan Givens
Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be
"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan Smiley
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


1ngldh


View Profile
June 18, 2012, 07:37:10 PM
 #15

Well, because FPGAs are simply destroyed.

ASIC goes in here too.
Should rename to FPGA/ASIC

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
ice_chill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
June 18, 2012, 07:59:49 PM
 #16

What if the Code changes, then the ASIC will be destroyed Smiley FPGA is more universal thus the higher price. ASIC = very high risk.
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile
June 18, 2012, 08:02:31 PM
 #17

What if the Code changes, then the ASIC will be destroyed Smiley FPGA is more universal thus the higher price. ASIC = very high risk.

People keep talking about this. The code hasn't changed so far, so why do people keep thinking it will? Protocol changes can be made without affecting the ASIC, but as long as it's based on SHA256, nothing is going to come along and "destroy" and ASIC's viability for mining.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
DiabloD3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


DiabloMiner author


View Profile WWW
June 18, 2012, 08:02:47 PM
 #18

Well, because FPGAs are simply destroyed.

ASIC goes in here too.
Should rename to FPGA/ASIC

Take it up with Theymos.

Garr255
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952


What's a GPU?


View Profile
June 19, 2012, 05:01:08 AM
 #19

We shouldn't have a dedicated ASIC subforum yet, because it would be almost entirely FUD Roll Eyes

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!