WORE
|
|
December 12, 2014, 06:07:16 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to get any Nvidia cards working with the miner?
I have been trying to run one by itself with no luck at all.
No, only AMD so far.
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2014, 06:21:36 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to get any Nvidia cards working with the miner?
I have been trying to run one by itself with no luck at all.
No, only AMD so far. Darn. I like this coin. I just E-bayed 5 of 6 of my AMD cards.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
WORE
|
|
December 12, 2014, 06:31:46 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to get any Nvidia cards working with the miner?
I have been trying to run one by itself with no luck at all.
No, only AMD so far. Darn. I like this coin. I just E-bayed 5 of 6 of my AMD cards. No worries, currently released miner only does one card.
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2014, 06:48:59 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to get any Nvidia cards working with the miner?
I have been trying to run one by itself with no luck at all.
No, only AMD so far. Darn. I like this coin. I just E-bayed 5 of 6 of my AMD cards. No worries, currently released miner only does one card. I think someone has found a way around it or using a private miner. I have been on Nonce-Pool all day and the top 2 hashers has not been below 400 kh/s. They are constantly in the 550-650 kh/s. I know the stats fluctuate. I am constant 140ish kh/s but nonce-pool some times show me at 325 kh/s, but the top 2 has never been below the 400 kh/s that I have seen.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
jox
|
|
December 12, 2014, 07:02:38 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to get any Nvidia cards working with the miner?
I have been trying to run one by itself with no luck at all.
No, only AMD so far. Darn. I like this coin. I just E-bayed 5 of 6 of my AMD cards. No worries, currently released miner only does one card. I think someone has found a way around it or using a private miner. I have been on Nonce-Pool all day and the top 2 hashers has not been below 400 kh/s. They are constantly in the 550-650 kh/s. I know the stats fluctuate. I am constant 140ish kh/s but nonce-pool some times show me at 325 kh/s, but the top 2 has never been below the 400 kh/s that I have seen. There are still people which have multiple rigs, so there is not problem to reach this hashrate from multiple GPU0 cards.
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2014, 07:04:28 AM |
|
Has anyone been able to get any Nvidia cards working with the miner?
I have been trying to run one by itself with no luck at all.
No, only AMD so far. Darn. I like this coin. I just E-bayed 5 of 6 of my AMD cards. No worries, currently released miner only does one card. I think someone has found a way around it or using a private miner. I have been on Nonce-Pool all day and the top 2 hashers has not been below 400 kh/s. They are constantly in the 550-650 kh/s. I know the stats fluctuate. I am constant 140ish kh/s but nonce-pool some times show me at 325 kh/s, but the top 2 has never been below the 400 kh/s that I have seen. There are still people which have multiple rigs, so there is not problem to reach this hashrate from multiple GPU0 cards. I guess I forgot about that since I only have 1 AMD rig now.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
December 12, 2014, 07:04:34 AM Last edit: December 12, 2014, 07:15:02 AM by Riseman |
|
I have been on Nonce-Pool all day and the top 2 hashers has not been below 400 kh/s. They are constantly in the 550-650 kh/s.
They might be using more than one PC to mine to the same pool account as well.
|
|
|
|
Arux
|
|
December 12, 2014, 11:25:13 AM |
|
550-650 kh/s can be made with 5 or 6 motherboard (and 5 or 6 gpu of course), that's not extraordinary.
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
December 12, 2014, 02:31:34 PM |
|
Quix update on the miner. I received my brand new 290x (so shinny, my precious !!!! ) but, cgminer now crashes when there is more than 1 card present on my mining rig. If I cannot get it working end of today, I'm going to give up entirely on cgminer and spend all my time getting a working version using sgminer 5.01 instead. I like what the sgminer developers did on their versions and how they support multiple coins without the horrible hacks cgminer had in place. Moving forward, I think it would be better for the community if we get sgminer to support the KSHAKE320 algorithm.
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 12, 2014, 02:57:13 PM |
|
Quix update on the miner. I received my brand new 290x (so shinny, my precious !!!! ) but, cgminer now crashes when there is more than 1 card present on my mining rig. If I cannot get it working end of today, I'm going to give up entirely on cgminer and spend all my time getting a working version using sgminer 5.01 instead. I like what the sgminer developers did on their versions and how they support multiple coins without the horrible hacks cgminer had in place. Moving forward, I think it would be better for the community if we get sgminer to support the KSHAKE320 algorithm. I think you might be better off with sgminer asit seems that cgminer has been abandoned by majority of the devs.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
cyptohunter
|
|
December 12, 2014, 04:19:51 PM |
|
Quix update on the miner. I received my brand new 290x (so shinny, my precious !!!! ) but, cgminer now crashes when there is more than 1 card present on my mining rig. If I cannot get it working end of today, I'm going to give up entirely on cgminer and spend all my time getting a working version using sgminer 5.01 instead. I like what the sgminer developers did on their versions and how they support multiple coins without the horrible hacks cgminer had in place. Moving forward, I think it would be better for the community if we get sgminer to support the KSHAKE320 algorithm. Great,sgminer 5.0 is better and lighter than cgminer.
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13
|
|
December 12, 2014, 11:43:50 PM |
|
What is the average hashrate for an AMD 280X on this algo? Does the newer Sgminer work with this?
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
|
|
|
WORE
|
|
December 13, 2014, 12:15:59 AM |
|
What is the average hashrate for an AMD 280X on this algo? Does the newer Sgminer work with this?
R9 280X (XFX) peaks breaking 148K.
|
|
|
|
cyptohunter
|
|
December 13, 2014, 12:42:07 AM |
|
What is the average hashrate for an AMD 280X on this algo? Does the newer Sgminer work with this?
stable at the speed of 144kh/s
|
|
|
|
bt_spectro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2014, 01:07:48 AM |
|
So if the PID diff algo is working correctly, next diff should go down since we're 2 hr's past the 100 blocks every 5 hrs mark
|
|
|
|
|
bt_spectro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2014, 03:06:40 AM |
|
I don't think we can control hashrate but the dev selected a PID algorithm ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller) to control the difficulty and it seems to be working as designed. I studied control systems theory in college and i'm intrigued by how this could be applied to control difficulty on a cryptocoin. Remember from the OP, setpoint is a block every 180 seconds (or 100 blocks every 5 hrs). As far as I can tell the PID is right on getting there.
|
|
|
|
WORE
|
|
December 13, 2014, 03:17:43 AM |
|
I don't think we can control hashrate but the dev selected a PID algorithm ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller) to control the difficulty and it seems to be working as designed. I studied control systems theory in college and i'm intrigued by how this could be applied to control difficulty on a cryptocoin. Remember from the OP, setpoint is a block every 180 seconds (or 100 blocks every 5 hrs). As far as I can tell the PID is right on getting there. Yes, but network conditions can change quite rapidly, and only within a few blocks, 100 blocks will be a long trip if say you have a pool go down that was a contributor of %30+ to over all network hash rate. Might have been better to do 100 block sensor survey but block diff to change every 50 blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 13, 2014, 03:08:03 PM |
|
Hi. I´m solo mining and my minner says "Found block" but Accepted an Rejected is zero. And there is no income in my wallet. Is this correct?
That is a known issue with the miner. If you look at your best share (which might be incorrect also) it show 40. The current difficulty is over 100 (or at least the last time I checked). It might take you a while to find a block solo mining now.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
|