[ANN] Kryptohash | Brand new PoW algo | 320bit hash | ed25519 | PID algo for dif

[wr104]

I'm working on the sgminer fork   

[xinbinbin]

I'm working on the sgminer fork   

A new algorithm of time what to do?

[mrmanager]

I'm working on the sgminer fork   

A new algorithm of time what to do?

Lol, it's going to take some time.

[WORE]

all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash

This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin.  It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards.  It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.

This is why I decided to bring my GPUs out of retirement.

It looks like someone has bought up quite a few sells on lazycoins.

Yeah, it does look like we are not the only folks that see potential in this, as soon as I saw it is actually something new I was on it.  Bang up job wr104!  SYS is below 100 sats again after 500 sat IPO sale, not sure if those folks missed the boat, or just flat jumped off.  KHC trading at 900 sats and hasen't even been really introduced yet, wait until it hits the larger exchanges.

[WhyMe]

Anyone test the power consumption of the algo versus X11 and other algos? Just curious about the results...

Full config with one 6950@6970 :
x11 = 195w
khc = 240w

stop killing your gpus!!! running full voltage???


280x
x11             6.5mhs 144W
khc             151khs 137W
Neoscrypt    325khs 157W

Lol.
You have values with your hardware, i have values with mine.

On MY config with 1 6950 with shaders unlocked, I have :
x11 : @850/1300, ~1.9MHs, ~190w
khc : @825/1200, ~110kHs, ~240w
neoscrypt : @875/1300, ~6khs, ~165w

Compare what it can be !

EDIT : on idle, full config is at ~90w ...

[scamkiller]

all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash

This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin.  It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards.  It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.

This is why I decided to bring my GPUs out of retirement.

It looks like someone has bought up quite a few sells on lazycoins.

Yeah, it does look like we are not the only folks that see potential in this, as soon as I saw it is actually something new I was on it.  Bang up job wr104!  SYS is below 100 sats again after 500 sat IPO sale, not sure if those folks missed the boat, or just flat jumped off.  KHC trading at 900 sats and hasen't even been really introduced yet, wait until it hits the larger exchanges.

It's me,I've bought 23K KHC at the market price on lazycoins.

[scamkiller]

KHC reminds me of Spreadcoin,low price in the beginning but rising steady.

[WORE]

all the "cool" coins are now X something, xmr, xpy...
so should we start calling this one xhc and xryptohash

This is not a scrypt or standardized x[y] scrypt coin.  It is a new algo that can be modified to combat the idea of the asic, and with pid to control diff, it is in a class by itself, beyond that it complies with new standards.  It does not need an 'X' to be 'cool', it has that all on it's own.

This is why I decided to bring my GPUs out of retirement.

It looks like someone has bought up quite a few sells on lazycoins.

Yeah, it does look like we are not the only folks that see potential in this, as soon as I saw it is actually something new I was on it.  Bang up job wr104!  SYS is below 100 sats again after 500 sat IPO sale, not sure if those folks missed the boat, or just flat jumped off.  KHC trading at 900 sats and hasen't even been really introduced yet, wait until it hits the larger exchanges.

It's me,I've bought 23K KHC at the market price on lazycoins.

Get'm while the getting is hot, but is it my browser or is the trade history not updating over there?

[digital_money]

Dev,what's status of your developmnet of the sgminer that supports 6 cards??

[WORE]

Dev,what's status of your developmnet of the sgminer that supports 6 cards??

Pretty sure it is not done yet, but you can read through the pages in this thread to get an idea maybe when.

[wr104]

Actually, I'm testing a new version of cgminer-khc

Stay tuned 

[digital_money]

Dev,what's status of your developmnet of the sgminer that supports 6 cards??

Pretty sure it is not done yet, but you can read through the pages in this thread to get an idea maybe when.

maybe 2 weeks later,I'll wait.

[wr104]

Here is a new 3.7.6 BETA version of cgminer-khc

https://github.com/kryptohash/cgminer-khc/releases


Changes since version 3.7.5

- Fixes for the stratum pool submitted by nonce-pool (thanks for the patch).
- Fixed the functions that calculate Diff which caused wrong diff values to be displayed and bogus found block messages.
- Fixed one of the causes of HW errors on secondary GPUs (more fixes might be needed).

Note: This version comes with an updated version of the OpenCL Kernel called kshake320-546.cl file. To avoid conflict with the old Kernel, place these new files in a brand new directory

[Youghoor]

Here is a new 3.7.6 BETA version of cgminer-khc

https://github.com/kryptohash/cgminer-khc/releases


Changes since version 3.7.5

- Fixes for the stratum pool submitted by nonce-pool (thanks for the patch).
- Fixed the functions that calculate Diff which caused wrong diff values to be displayed and bogus found block messages.
- Fixed one of the causes of HW errors on secondary GPUs (more fixes might be needed).

Note: This version comes with an updated version of the OpenCL Kernel called kshake320-546.cl file. To avoid conflict with the old Kernel, place these new files in a brand new directory

So what are the difference in speeds in this Kernel.

[wr104]

No change in speed. I made a small fix in there that could have been the cause of HW errors. It shouldn't impact performance.

[WORE]

No change in speed. I made a small fix in there that could have been the cause of HW errors. It shouldn't impact performance.

Device0 running about 10 degrees hotter with Intensity dynamic.  Should we be using the load-balance with this kernel?

Temp cutoff at 90 not working but is not going over 95 so either it knows the card is a Tahiti and has it's own temp safe zones coded or there could be trouble with that part.

Size of share found only reports 0/1 but the block diff up on top is reported correctly now.  Haven't seen Block! yet but I'd bet that is why block diff got your attention.

So far so good.

[antonio8]

I take it the new miner will not work for Nvidia cards?

Also I am not the brightest. Is putting the file in a new directory as simple as just putting the miner in a separate folder?

[wr104]

No change in speed. I made a small fix in there that could have been the cause of HW errors. It shouldn't impact performance.

Device0 running about 10 degrees hotter with Intensity dynamic.  Should we be using the load-balance with this kernel?

Temp cutoff at 90 not working but is not going over 95 so either it knows the card is a Tahiti and has it's own temp safe zones coded or there could be trouble with that part.

Size of share found only reports 0/1 but the block diff up on top is reported correctly now.  Haven't seen Block! yet but I'd bet that is why block diff got your attention.

So far so good.

Intensity Dynamic setting doesn't have an effect in this version.  I can try adding something similar to Dynamic in the next build.  For the mean time, I would suggest you to lower the 'shaders-mul' parameter in order to allow your GPU0 some room to breathe.  It seems setting 'shaders-mul' to 8 would be equivalent to the Max Intensity value in Scrypt.


 

I take it the new miner will not work for Nvidia cards?

Also I am not the brightest. Is putting the file in a new directory as simple as just putting the miner in a separate folder?

Nvidia cards should work but, you're only going to get a fraction of the Kh/s you'd get with any AMD card.  This is because KSHAKE320 and other PoW algos that calculate hashes, take advantage of the high number of very simple Arithmetic/Logic Units (or ALUs) found in AMD GPUs.  nVidia on the other hand, have fewer but more complex ALUs in their GPUs.

Copy all the files into a new folder and you'll be ready to go.
 

[WORE]

No change in speed. I made a small fix in there that could have been the cause of HW errors. It shouldn't impact performance.

Device0 running about 10 degrees hotter with Intensity dynamic.  Should we be using the load-balance with this kernel?

Temp cutoff at 90 not working but is not going over 95 so either it knows the card is a Tahiti and has it's own temp safe zones coded or there could be trouble with that part.

Size of share found only reports 0/1 but the block diff up on top is reported correctly now.  Haven't seen Block! yet but I'd bet that is why block diff got your attention.

So far so good.

Intensity Dynamic setting doesn't have an effect in this version.  I can try adding something similar to Dynamic in the next build.  For the mean time, I would suggest you to lower the 'shaders-mul' parameter in order to allow your GPU0 some room to breathe.  It seems setting 'shaders-mul' to 8 would be equivalent to the Max Intensity value in Scrypt.

cgminer uses dynamic if it is not specified in conf or bat file but doesn't appear to be changing the clock as designed.  Just strange that it is running hotter on this kernel than the last one but it is not going over around 92 degress.  If it becomes problematic I'll just lower gpu-engine as it is running around 1080 and powertune is already -20 and I could undervolt it but I don't want to starve the hardware beyond what is allowed in CCC overdrive. Gpu-engine 1050 seems to be a sweet spot, not going over 90 but still delivers +140k, shaders-mul is already at 8.

-Correction - It is kicking the clock down, dropped to 1000mhz in range from 850-1050, it is just taking it's time about doing it.

What driver version did you drop in?  Is this the newest omega driver?

[MemoryShock]

The continuing dev involvement with this thread is pretty cool...I wish I had the tools to mine...