WORE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 22, 2014, 01:49:54 AM Last edit: December 22, 2014, 02:20:58 AM by WORE |
|
A bigger exchange and more pools are quite needed at present. lazycoins are not a reliable exchange and nonce-pool seems not stable.
In what way is lazycoins unreliable? If you've had an unresolved issue with our site I can try to help you. I think he might be talking about wallet updates, and now that things have calmed down that shouldn't be an issue. There are a couple bugs that I have noted though; 1 The trade history of KHC is not showing present data. 2. IE 11 does not show the order books. When it comes down to it, an exchange that is frequented by more users would stand to help some but there is a mutual benefactor of being just on Lazycoins for the moment, there is a need for more exposure for the coin if it is going to survive the dumpers. Not sure what dev has planned for that, but at any rate if it is designed as well as the coin itself using PID for diff and compliant 320bit hash, then this could be a BTC v2.0. The one thing that could put it over the top is code present in the wallet that will detect/avert collision.
|
|
|
|
WORE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 22, 2014, 03:28:27 AM Last edit: December 22, 2014, 03:46:10 AM by WORE |
|
A bigger exchange and more pools are quite needed at present. lazycoins are not a reliable exchange and nonce-pool seems not stable.
In what way is lazycoins unreliable? If you've had an unresolved issue with our site I can try to help you. I think he might be talking about wallet updates, and now that things have calmed down that shouldn't be an issue. There are a couple bugs that I have noted though; 1 The trade history of KHC is not showing present data. 2. IE 11 does not show the order books. When it comes down to it, an exchange that is frequented by more users would stand to help some but there is a mutual benefactor of being just on Lazycoins for the moment, there is a need for more exposure for the coin if it is going to survive the dumpers. Not sure what dev has planned for that, but at any rate if it is designed as well as the coin itself using PID for diff and compliant 320bit hash, then this could be a BTC v2.0. The one thing that could put it over the top is code present in the wallet that will detect/avert collision. mintpal was the big cool shit look what they have done.. so?? They are fighting moolah. As is everyone else, some are not counting the cost in that. Bad situation. Another thing I forgot to mention in the previous posts is regions, the dev has planned for exponential growth but wanted the value to remain the same across regions. With consideration to sociology and everyone, a single monetary system cannot do this, nor can a one and/or first world government like religion, or even third world law while still holding respect for nations, culture, and their traditions. An exchange rate and exchanges will always be needed, however that can easily be done in the wallet but it will still depend on physical paper and coin.
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 22, 2014, 04:41:42 AM |
|
Sorry, I can't find the total number of coins to be mined.
Anyone can help me?
If we average the random block subsidies (which may or may not be accurate) then at block 125000 there will be approximately 12,455,000 coins. If it isn't so random and on the worse case scenario then there would be approximately double that. Max coin supply, if I didn't misread, doesn't exist since from block 125000 on there will be an additional 50 coins per block. That's what I came up with...
|
|
|
|
WORE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 22, 2014, 06:06:41 AM |
|
Stratum port is officially open on 3390.
Proxy is leaking, and not in a good way. Not sure from what side but I keep finding my miner submitting blocks but web UI is tossing them for a 100% loss, back to long-pool for me...
|
|
|
|
Chris-LC
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 22, 2014, 11:40:20 AM |
|
A bigger exchange and more pools are quite needed at present. lazycoins are not a reliable exchange and nonce-pool seems not stable.
In what way is lazycoins unreliable? If you've had an unresolved issue with our site I can try to help you. I think he might be talking about wallet updates, and now that things have calmed down that shouldn't be an issue. There are a couple bugs that I have noted though; 1 The trade history of KHC is not showing present data. 2. IE 11 does not show the order books. When it comes down to it, an exchange that is frequented by more users would stand to help some but there is a mutual benefactor of being just on Lazycoins for the moment, there is a need for more exposure for the coin if it is going to survive the dumpers. Not sure what dev has planned for that, but at any rate if it is designed as well as the coin itself using PID for diff and compliant 320bit hash, then this could be a BTC v2.0. The one thing that could put it over the top is code present in the wallet that will detect/avert collision. Thanks for the reply, perhaps your presumption of his intent is correct. I'd just want to remind everyone that we are still in beta, we do not intent to remain a low volume exchange (or only crypto to crypto.) As for the two bugs you've mentioned. The KHC trade history we are aware of and it's being fixed however I didn't know about the IE11 issue. O.O People still use IE? Or is it a computer at your work that forcing this? Either way I'll look into it
|
|
|
|
WORE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 22, 2014, 03:15:44 PM |
|
A bigger exchange and more pools are quite needed at present. lazycoins are not a reliable exchange and nonce-pool seems not stable.
In what way is lazycoins unreliable? If you've had an unresolved issue with our site I can try to help you. I think he might be talking about wallet updates, and now that things have calmed down that shouldn't be an issue. There are a couple bugs that I have noted though; 1 The trade history of KHC is not showing present data. 2. IE 11 does not show the order books. When it comes down to it, an exchange that is frequented by more users would stand to help some but there is a mutual benefactor of being just on Lazycoins for the moment, there is a need for more exposure for the coin if it is going to survive the dumpers. Not sure what dev has planned for that, but at any rate if it is designed as well as the coin itself using PID for diff and compliant 320bit hash, then this could be a BTC v2.0. The one thing that could put it over the top is code present in the wallet that will detect/avert collision. Thanks for the reply, perhaps your presumption of his intent is correct. I'd just want to remind everyone that we are still in beta, we do not intent to remain a low volume exchange (or only crypto to crypto.) As for the two bugs you've mentioned. The KHC trade history we are aware of and it's being fixed however I didn't know about the IE11 issue. O.O People still use IE? Or is it a computer at your work that forcing this? Either way I'll look into it Google chrome is the most used browser, but this makes it a high profile target on privacy/malware. Good to support all browsers because you just never know which way usage will run.
|
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 22, 2014, 08:32:20 PM |
|
Thanks, will have a Look for Sure
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Chris-LC
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 01:06:14 AM |
|
Google chrome is the most used browser, but this makes it a high profile target on privacy/malware. Good to support all browsers because you just never know which way usage will run.
You're saying chrome has a larger attack surface which is true but I doubt it has more exploits(per arbitrary unit of time such as month) than IE, if I'm wrong then I don't mind being corrected.
|
|
|
|
nikos64
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 07:04:04 AM |
|
Google chrome is the most used browser, but this makes it a high profile target on privacy/malware. Good to support all browsers because you just never know which way usage will run.
You're saying chrome has a larger attack surface which is true but I doubt it has more exploits(per arbitrary unit of time such as month) than IE, if I'm wrong then I don't mind being corrected. Anyway, the same thing happens with Opera 12.17. How many browsers it takes to understand that you are doing something wrong, not the others. Aha! I hear you say that this is the old Opera not the new shiny Opera 26 ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
WORE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 07:17:15 AM |
|
Google chrome is the most used browser, but this makes it a high profile target on privacy/malware. Good to support all browsers because you just never know which way usage will run.
You're saying chrome has a larger attack surface which is true but I doubt it has more exploits(per arbitrary unit of time such as month) than IE, if I'm wrong then I don't mind being corrected. I'd think you would want to support as many browsers as you can hosting an exchange. I'm not so much sold on Google products these days, they retain a lot of data. Not that I have something to hide, but I do value my privacy and take offense to having it violated. But I know they have to play ball or the NSA will dig out their magic wellness stick.
|
|
|
|
berbip
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 11:35:49 AM |
|
Great, thank you for your effort. This will make p2pool development easier.
|
|
|
|
Mikolo
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 12:50:42 PM |
|
Is there any mining hardware comparison? How much kh/s I can get on 7850?
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 01:35:40 PM |
|
Is there any mining hardware comparison? How much kh/s I can get on 7850?
im getting 36 k/hash on 7790/260x and looks like 280x gets around 125/135 k/hash it takes big time to get accepted share can't i change pool diff to get faster shares
|
|
|
|
linearzone
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 02:50:18 PM |
|
Is there any mining hardware comparison? How much kh/s I can get on 7850?
49kh/s
|
|
|
|
linearzone
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 02:56:18 PM |
|
Is there any mining hardware comparison? How much kh/s I can get on 7850?
im getting 36 k/hash on 7790/260x and looks like 280x gets around 125/135 k/hash it takes big time to get accepted share can't i change pool diff to get faster shares 280x gets around 149kh/s on my rigs.
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 04:23:52 PM |
|
Based on my tests on Windows
R9 290x ~192Kh/s HD7970 ~140Kh/s 6950 ~112Kh/s (this is a 6950 with shaders unlocked, stock GPU/Mem clock)
nVidia Tesla K20x ~75 Kh/s nVidia Quadro 4000 ~35 Kh/s
I've been also told that in Linux, the R9 series GPUs perform slower than in Windows. This could be Linux Drivers related.
|
|
|
|
berbip
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 04:50:12 PM |
|
145 kh/s with 280x set correct shaders lower your memory as much as you can and lower your voltage, lowers power and heat, no impact on performance currently running 1020/720mem 1100 vddc
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 23, 2014, 06:10:35 PM |
|
What about another exchange ?
|
|
|
|
happyaltminer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 24, 2014, 02:34:02 AM |
|
What about another exchange ?
keep mining under the radar before KHC listed on exchange ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
|