Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 09:48:52 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: DPR subpoena  (Read 11704 times)
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
January 20, 2015, 01:55:21 AM
 #81

This is not very surprising/interesting, but I thought I'd mention that I received a subpoena for information related to Ross Ulbricht's alleged forum account altoid. I mostly just compiled some publicly-available information. The only non-public data I had to include were some deleted posts in the heroin store topic that were not written by DPR and probably won't be useful in the case.

You might be surprised to learn that this is the first subpoena I've received for the forum.

Actually I was interested that the forum has only recieved one subpoena so far thanks for sharing Theymos
I was expecting at least three this one with Ross
One for Evorhees, and one from Pirateat40

I would mention MP as well but well still banned lol.

Homero Josh Garza is next.

http://qntra.net/2015/01/theymos-claims-josh-garza-is-sending-him-legal-threats-to-have-content-removed/

Forgive my petulance and oft-times, I fear, ill-founded criticisms, and forgive me that I have, by this time, made your eyes and head ache with my long letter. But I cannot forgo hastily the pleasure and pride of thus conversing with you.
1714859332
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859332

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859332
Reply with quote  #2

1714859332
Report to moderator
1714859332
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859332

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859332
Reply with quote  #2

1714859332
Report to moderator
1714859332
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859332

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859332
Reply with quote  #2

1714859332
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714859332
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859332

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859332
Reply with quote  #2

1714859332
Report to moderator
1714859332
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859332

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859332
Reply with quote  #2

1714859332
Report to moderator
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
January 20, 2015, 01:57:16 AM
 #82

This is not very surprising/interesting, but I thought I'd mention that I received a subpoena for information related to Ross Ulbricht's alleged forum account altoid. I mostly just compiled some publicly-available information. The only non-public data I had to include were some deleted posts in the heroin store topic that were not written by DPR and probably won't be useful in the case.

You might be surprised to learn that this is the first subpoena I've received for the forum.

Actually I was interested that the forum has only recieved one subpoena so far thanks for sharing Theymos
I was expecting at least three this one with Ross
One for Evorhees, and one from Pirateat40

I would mention MP as well but well still banned lol.

Homero Josh Garza is next.

http://qntra.net/2015/01/theymos-claims-josh-garza-is-sending-him-legal-threats-to-have-content-removed/

Payback https://coinfire.cf/2015/01/19/sec-investigation-of-gaw-miners-underway/

hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2616


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
January 20, 2015, 07:10:45 AM
 #83


Is that legit? I don't know why someone who was working on the case would leak such information to this coinfire site.

Quote
Coin Fire has obtained over 1,000 pages of an investigation file from a confirmed Commission employee that also has a bombshell draft of a potential enforcement litigation action against the company. The documents given to Coin Fire editors contain several hundred references to deleted forum posts on the company owned-and-operated Hashtalk forums, emails from potential victims of securities fraud, news stories from various websites, numerous social media postings, a sealed subpoena demanding the IPs associated with certain accounts on a well-known site where Garza and potential sock puppets have operated.

If true does that mean theymos will be recieving another subpoena?

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
GrandmaJean
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 20, 2015, 07:16:26 AM
 #84


Is that legit? I don't know why someone who was working on the case would leak such information to this coinfire site.

Quote
Coin Fire has obtained over 1,000 pages of an investigation file from a confirmed Commission employee that also has a bombshell draft of a potential enforcement litigation action against the company. The documents given to Coin Fire editors contain several hundred references to deleted forum posts on the company owned-and-operated Hashtalk forums, emails from potential victims of securities fraud, news stories from various websites, numerous social media postings, a sealed subpoena demanding the IPs associated with certain accounts on a well-known site where Garza and potential sock puppets have operated.

If true does that mean theymos will be recieving another subpoena?
Who knows if it is legit or not, however it would not be unheard of for someone in the media to receive this kind of leaked information.

It would probably not be theymos to receive such a subpoena, it would probably be the gaw forums (their hosts ect) to receive it as a lot more of the manipulation apparently took place there then on bitcoin talk (because of their lack of ability to censor information).
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2616


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
January 20, 2015, 07:21:38 AM
 #85

It would probably not be theymos to receive such a subpoena, it would probably be the gaw forums (their hosts ect) to receive it as a lot more of the manipulation apparently took place there then on bitcoin talk (because of their lack of ability to censor information).

It already mentioned their own forum earlier in the quote but this seems to br another additional one which I can only assume is here.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
GrandmaJean
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 20, 2015, 07:26:32 AM
 #86

It would probably not be theymos to receive such a subpoena, it would probably be the gaw forums (their hosts ect) to receive it as a lot more of the manipulation apparently took place there then on bitcoin talk (because of their lack of ability to censor information).

It already mentioned their own forum earlier in the quote but this seems to br another additional one which I can only assume is here.
It is possible that it is here. However there are a lot of other "forums" that could be much more easily manipulated then there (reddit). I would also doubt that receiving a subpoena is something that is unusual for theymos considering how much commerce takes place here and how many scams there are
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2616


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
January 20, 2015, 08:06:44 AM
 #87

would also doubt that receiving a subpoena is something that is unusual for theymos considering how much commerce takes place here and how many scams there are.

From the op of this very thread:

You might be surprised to learn that this is the first subpoena I've received for the forum.

Though I'm sure it'll be the first of many.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
Blazr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1005



View Profile
January 20, 2015, 12:47:05 PM
 #88


Is that legit? I don't know why someone who was working on the case would leak such information to this coinfire site.

Quote
Coin Fire has obtained over 1,000 pages of an investigation file from a confirmed Commission employee that also has a bombshell draft of a potential enforcement litigation action against the company. The documents given to Coin Fire editors contain several hundred references to deleted forum posts on the company owned-and-operated Hashtalk forums, emails from potential victims of securities fraud, news stories from various websites, numerous social media postings, a sealed subpoena demanding the IPs associated with certain accounts on a well-known site where Garza and potential sock puppets have operated.

If true does that mean theymos will be recieving another subpoena?

Pics of the 1000 page investigation file or it didn't happen.

.cf is a free domain, owned by the same guys as .tk: http://www.dot.cf/en/index.html?lang=en how are we supposed to take their word for it if they can't even afford a domain?

goozman96
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 23, 2015, 05:48:39 AM
 #89

You might be surprised to learn that this is the first subpoena I've received for the forum.
Does that include NSLs?
Or is that number confidential?

BTC: 19DKtsdGfQyFzNiEze9KuFQrWGiLDvg6F1 | LTC: LbV6UGyjYbVP49NvQFmuAnkADcaFYvNagK | NMC: NDCdMJmTmGH54Cezmo3CwSxAC7grAoZJbj
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!