Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 07:38:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Flurry of blocks from 24.211.152.165  (Read 6058 times)
pirateat40
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."


View Profile WWW
June 21, 2012, 06:10:12 PM
 #41

Coins are always moving in and out of various wallets within my projects.  We don't monitor for "tainted" coins nor do I care about them moving around my wallets.  Coins are coins and I treat them all the same.

The private pool is not owned or operated by GPUMAX.

1715153915
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715153915

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715153915
Reply with quote  #2

1715153915
Report to moderator
1715153915
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715153915

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715153915
Reply with quote  #2

1715153915
Report to moderator
1715153915
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715153915

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715153915
Reply with quote  #2

1715153915
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715153915
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715153915

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715153915
Reply with quote  #2

1715153915
Report to moderator
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
June 21, 2012, 06:56:26 PM
 #42

So why isn't this magical private pool not listed in the allow list in the GPUMAX thread?
Users can't add their own private pools for load testing, and yet here is one that isn't public that people are mining to.

This is starting to stink. Perfect avenue for on-demand Finney attacks just like gmaxwell was worried about.
I mined here on the understanding that only the pools listed were allowed.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
pirateat40
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."


View Profile WWW
June 21, 2012, 07:07:59 PM
 #43

So why isn't this magical private pool not listed in the allow list in the GPUMAX thread?
Users can't add their own private pools for load testing, and yet here is one that isn't public that people are mining to.

This is starting to stink. Perfect avenue for on-demand Finney attacks just like gmaxwell was worried about.
I mined here on the understanding that only the pools listed were allowed.

The pool isn't used by our users, it's only used by us at this point.  Early on it was used for testing and streamlining getwork and long poll connections from our servers.  Testing things with our system on public pools it's not something pool ops enjoy.

In the coming weeks we'll be releasing a new phase of GPUMAX that the private pool plays a role in.

Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 21, 2012, 07:19:43 PM
 #44

Does this stand for Pirate Savings Funds ? 1(psf)86     Cheesy

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
pirateat40
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."


View Profile WWW
June 21, 2012, 07:27:03 PM
 #45

Does this stand for Pirate Savings Funds ? 1(psf)86     Cheesy

 Cheesy lol

Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 22, 2012, 10:51:26 AM
 #46

That IP got boring now, seems the new interesting kid on the block is : 178.33.83.15

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
June 22, 2012, 10:52:14 AM
 #47

That IP got boring now, seems the new interesting kid on the block is : 178.33.83.15
Nah, that's just deepbit.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502


View Profile
June 22, 2012, 11:02:30 AM
 #48

That IP got boring now, seems the new interesting kid on the block is : 178.33.83.15
Nah, that's just deepbit.

Ah, seems to be one of those confused relays, quite a few belong to deepbit while a bunch of them are unknown.

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
June 22, 2012, 11:04:28 AM
 #49

That IP got boring now, seems the new interesting kid on the block is : 178.33.83.15
Nah, that's just deepbit.

Ah, seems to be one of those confused relays, quite a few belong to deepbit while a bunch of them are unknown.
DB's recruiting new IPs regularly to try and put off hoppers.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Gladamas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


Bitcoin today is what the internet was in 1998.


View Profile
June 22, 2012, 06:01:01 PM
 #50

That IP got boring now, seems the new interesting kid on the block is : 178.33.83.15
Nah, that's just deepbit.

Ah, seems to be one of those confused relays, quite a few belong to deepbit while a bunch of them are unknown.
DB's recruiting new IPs regularly to try and put off hoppers.

That's a fail on their part... they should just not do the proportional reward system anymore!

1GLADMZ5tL4HkS6BAWPfJLeZJCDHAd9Fr3 - LQ6Zx8v7fHVBiDX5Lmhbp6oEDB7dUFjANu
GPG 0xF219D5BB3C467E12 - Litecoin Forum
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
June 22, 2012, 10:54:08 PM
 #51

That's a fail on their part... they should just not do the proportional reward system any more!
We're all doing our part to rectify that situation  Wink

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Maged
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015


View Profile
July 03, 2012, 11:47:29 PM
 #52

The private pool is not owned or operated by GPUMAX.
It appears to be owned by a BS&T investor, though.

hashman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1264
Merit: 1008


View Profile
July 04, 2012, 10:38:00 PM
 #53




Don't hate me, but this is really the time for ASIC (a reasonably priced one) to make these god damn botnets worthless for btc mining.

If I could get my hands on one of these operators I'd tie them quartering style to a couple of trees ten feet up and give the wild things a challenge.
Nothing better for these guys, but a suspenseful, agonizing torture.

Why?  PTSD?   
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!