◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈

[bitcreditscc]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again. Meanwhile , what do you think is a fair, sustainable  limit ? 1/20 blocks, 1/10 or 1/40?

To have +50% of network mining range:-

@ 1/10 - 6* 50000 BCR + mining power  (300K BCR)
@ 1/20 - 11* 50000 BCR + mining power (550K BCR)
@ 1/40 - 21* 50000 BCR + mining power (1.05M BCR)
@ 1/100 - 51* 50000 BCR + mining power (2.55M BCR)

The higher the limit, the higher the expense of trying to control the network, but also the higher level of cooperative mining required. The higher limits apart from making it difficult to control the network, also make it harder for miners to push the diff too high as you'd need a huge investment to be able to mine enough consecutive blocks to push the diff out of reach of other miners. And i doubt anyone is about to potentially spend on trying to tear us down @ this point, further along the way, i'd hope that market pressure caused by such buying would make these costs prohibitive.

[dragos_bdi]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again. Meanwhile , what do you think is a fair, sustainable  limit ? 1/20 blocks, 1/10 or 1/40?

To have +50% of network mining range:-

@ 1/10 - 6* 50000 BCR + mining power  (300K BCR)
@ 1/20 - 11* 50000 BCR + mining power (550K BCR)
@ 1/40 - 21* 50000 BCR + mining power (1.05M BCR)
@ 1/100 - 51* 50000 BCR + mining power (2.55M BCR)

The higher the limit, the higher the expense of trying to control the network, but also the higher level of cooperative mining required. The higher limits apart from making it difficult to control the network, also make it harder for miners to push the diff too high as you'd need a huge investment to be able to mine enough consecutive blocks to push the diff out of reach of other miners. And i doubt anyone is about to potentially spend on trying to tear us down @ this point, further along the way, i'd hope that market pressure caused by such buying would make these costs prohibitive.

@ 1/20 - 11* 50000 BCR + mining power (550K BCR) for me seems OK

[tombcoin]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again. Meanwhile , what do you think is a fair, sustainable  limit ? 1/20 blocks, 1/10 or 1/40?

To have +50% of network mining range:-

@ 1/10 - 6* 50000 BCR + mining power  (300K BCR)
@ 1/20 - 11* 50000 BCR + mining power (550K BCR)
@ 1/40 - 21* 50000 BCR + mining power (1.05M BCR)
@ 1/100 - 51* 50000 BCR + mining power (2.55M BCR)

The higher the limit, the higher the expense of trying to control the network, but also the higher level of cooperative mining required. The higher limits apart from making it difficult to control the network, also make it harder for miners to push the diff too high as you'd need a huge investment to be able to mine enough consecutive blocks to push the diff out of reach of other miners. And i doubt anyone is about to potentially spend on trying to tear us down @ this point, further along the way, i'd hope that market pressure caused by such buying would make these costs prohibitive.

@ 1/20 - 11* 50000 BCR + mining power (550K BCR) for me seems OK

Yes, for now it seems OK. Time will tell...

Syncing with the new bla-version is very slow.
Even at reindex, slooowww.

[dragos_bdi]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again.

First, I can't start banknode because say that he sync.
Seccond, "removing" this problem, the problem seems to go from the voting part, creating grantdb. This part must be active from 210000 ?

Code:

2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed

[dragos_bdi]

@bitcreditscc

https://github.com/bitcreditscc/bicreditsnew/blob/new-bla-bla-ver/src/main.cpp#L2172

Did you check if grantdb is constructed/updated ?
On a fresh wallet, now it does not create the grantdb.

[bitcreditscc]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again.

First, I can't start banknode because say that he sync.
Seccond, "removing" this problem, the problem seems to go from the voting part, creating grantdb. This part must be active from 210000 ?

Code:

2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner started
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27  === Grant Database Block Height 210000 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 Checking Grant Database is updated. ===
=== Required Height : 210000, requested from: 210005 ===
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed
2015-09-30 12:00:27 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed

Looks like it's refusing because there are no active bank nodes hence :-

Code:

2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed

As for grantDB , it's still very primitive and needs work but it should work on a system you either reindexed or synced from start.

[dragos_bdi]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again.

Code:

2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed

As for grantDB , it's still very primitive and needs work but it should work on a system you either reindexed or synced from start.

I can confirm that it does NOT create on reindex or synced from start.

[bitcreditscc]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again.

Code:

2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed

As for grantDB , it's still very primitive and needs work but it should work on a system you either reindexed or synced from start.

I can confirm that it does NOT create on reindex or synced from start.

Fresh sync @ height 210004 should have a folder named "ratings" ...it's not there?

[bitcreditscc]

resyncing from start again, taking a bit of time, looks like the building of addrDB is slowing things down. Fresh sync may take up to 3 times more time.

After what i have learnt in trying to figure out the addrDB, I feel as though I should push back voting again. the way the DB is built is seperate from normal processes which is resulting in it not being built right from the start. I want to move this  repititive DB creation into one single function.

SecureMsg maintains a DB
Block Index DB
Voting DB
Addr DB

Since I was thinking of moving the DB code out of them all, merge into one hefty block. While connect block would take longer, it would do all the work in one place since all DBs are mandatory. Anyway this is mostly technical so i'll just post changes on a seperate branch for consideration, after the chain is already moving.

[dragos_bdi]

to me, is correct

Edit: on "setgenerate true" his closing the wallet

Ok good start, can you try debugging(at least find the offending line? ) I'm mobile, will take an hour before i'm sitting at a pc again.

Code:

2015-09-30 12:00:27 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : no banknode payment ( required=600000000)
2015-09-30 12:00:27 BitcreditMiner runtime error: CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed

As for grantDB , it's still very primitive and needs work but it should work on a system you either reindexed or synced from start.

I can confirm that it does NOT create on reindex or synced from start.

Fresh sync @ height 210004 should have a folder named "ratings" ...it's not there?

Nope

[tombcoin]

On reindex folder ratings is well created, also a grantdb with entries.
But still waiting for sync to finish.

Content of grantdb at height ~93500

210000
5
5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7
37800000000000
5rNk8orWGkJbhmA7Vgb9312FSYtiNffUmS
176400000000000
5z5ECKDqbZqAUuhFeRTVGqLstq1RgxoWv8
20000000000
6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL
37800000000000
6E9FhwnJ5QjYgqCrok6hxizFpamnEZxQi2
126000000000000
0
0
0
0
0

This is an node with an empty wallet.

[thelonecrouton]

Fresh sync @ height 210004 should have a folder named "ratings" ...it's not there?

Nope

Same here on linux - fresh sync to 200004.

[bitcreditscc]

Fresh sync @ height 210004 should have a folder named "ratings" ...it's not there?

Nope

Same here on linux - fresh sync to 200004.

do setgenerate true and it will build the db. As it stands once we can connect enough nodes the network is ready to go Meanwhile, i'm already busy working on updating some of the primitive methods and code used here.

[thelonecrouton]

Fresh sync @ height 210004 should have a folder named "ratings" ...it's not there?

Nope

Same here on linux - fresh sync to 200004.

do setgenerate true and it will build the db. As it stands once we can connect enough nodes the network is ready to go Meanwhile, i'm already busy working on updating some of the primitive methods and code used here.

Yep, rating directory appeared straight away, grantsdb.dat inside it shows

Code:

210000
5
5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7
37800000000000
5rNk8orWGkJbhmA7Vgb9312FSYtiNffUmS
176400000000000
5z5ECKDqbZqAUuhFeRTVGqLstq1RgxoWv8
20000000000
6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL
37800000000000
6E9FhwnJ5QjYgqCrok6hxizFpamnEZxQi2
126000000000000
0
0
0
0
0

(identical to what tombcoin posted on last page)

Also balances.dat appeared, lists 7672 addresses/balances, mine seem about right. First line is a bit odd though, truncated address?

Code:

3QJmnh,78264498802

edit: not actually mining though as can't start BN, "waiting for sync"

[jasemoney]

I thought you can just setgenerate true you dont have to be active banknode you just need to have 50k in one input (thats how we get the chain rolling again)

looking forward to a public win wallet.

[thelonecrouton]

I thought you can just setgenerate true you dont have to be active banknode you just need to have 50k in one input (thats how we get the chain rolling again)

looking forward to a public win wallet.

Just reporting, bitcredit-qt idling at about 1-2% CPU... not sure you can mine at all regardless of BN stuff if it thinks it's not yet synced?

[cisahasa]

banknode(active(i call it by different name)) rules have a bug. i told that earlier.. == vs > or < compared to..
just a minor thing to fix

[dragos_bdi]

with the last version the daemon closes with:

Code:

2015-10-01 07:31:08 UpdateTip: new best=00552c9afa65b3df39dba972a76f1f1cadb53997f3f5c3a309184309977cbad6  height=210003  log2_work=35.939775  tx=218032  date=2015-09-26 13:45:55 progress=0.967562  cache=80992
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Connect postprocess: 0.00ms [91.65s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 - Connect block: 31.25ms [4894.59s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   nActualTimespan = 5834  before bounds
2015-10-01 07:31:08 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Before: 2000a313  00a3130000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 After:  2000d453  00d453bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Load block from disk: 0.00ms [0.19s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.00ms (0.000ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [7.44s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   Is (210004) a grant block? : No 
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 5rNk8orWGkJbhmA7Vgb9312FSYtiNffUmS , amount :-840000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 6E9FhwnJ5QjYgqCrok6hxizFpamnEZxQi2 , amount :-600000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08     - Verify 0 txins: 15.63ms (0.000ms/txin) [4464.79s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08     - Index writing: 0.00ms [127.21s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08     - Callbacks: 0.00ms [33.90s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Connect total: 15.63ms [4742.35s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Flush: 0.00ms [31.40s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Writing chainstate: 0.00ms [29.02s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 UpdateTip: new best=005286b1c29917aa464967ee2294957b5869761679c939fcdd6bf8df4fb4e802  height=210004  log2_work=35.939775  tx=218033  date=2015-09-26 14:17:17 progress=0.967707  cache=80993
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Connect postprocess: 0.00ms [91.65s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 - Connect block: 15.63ms [4894.61s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   nActualTimespan = 1882  before bounds
2015-10-01 07:31:08 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Before: 2000d453  00d4530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 After:  20025e53  025e53bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Load block from disk: 0.00ms [0.19s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.00ms (0.000ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [7.44s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08  === Grant Database Block Height -1 === 
2015-10-01 07:48:42 CDarksendPool::CheckTimeout() -- Session timed out (30s) -- resetting

[bitcreditscc]

with the last version the daemon closes with:

Code:

2015-10-01 07:31:08 UpdateTip: new best=00552c9afa65b3df39dba972a76f1f1cadb53997f3f5c3a309184309977cbad6  height=210003  log2_work=35.939775  tx=218032  date=2015-09-26 13:45:55 progress=0.967562  cache=80992
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Connect postprocess: 0.00ms [91.65s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 - Connect block: 31.25ms [4894.59s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   nActualTimespan = 5834  before bounds
2015-10-01 07:31:08 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Before: 2000a313  00a3130000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 After:  2000d453  00d453bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Load block from disk: 0.00ms [0.19s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.00ms (0.000ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [7.44s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   Is (210004) a grant block? : No 
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 5rNk8orWGkJbhmA7Vgb9312FSYtiNffUmS , amount :-840000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 New vout  address:- 6E9FhwnJ5QjYgqCrok6hxizFpamnEZxQi2 , amount :-600000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08     - Verify 0 txins: 15.63ms (0.000ms/txin) [4464.79s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08     - Index writing: 0.00ms [127.21s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08     - Callbacks: 0.00ms [33.90s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Connect total: 15.63ms [4742.35s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Flush: 0.00ms [31.40s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Writing chainstate: 0.00ms [29.02s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 UpdateTip: new best=005286b1c29917aa464967ee2294957b5869761679c939fcdd6bf8df4fb4e802  height=210004  log2_work=35.939775  tx=218033  date=2015-09-26 14:17:17 progress=0.967707  cache=80993
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Connect postprocess: 0.00ms [91.65s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 - Connect block: 15.63ms [4894.61s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   nActualTimespan = 1882  before bounds
2015-10-01 07:31:08 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60    nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-01 07:31:08 Before: 2000d453  00d4530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-01 07:31:08 After:  20025e53  025e53bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08   - Load block from disk: 0.00ms [0.19s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08 CheckBlock() : skipping banknode payment checks
2015-10-01 07:31:08       - Connect 1 transactions: 0.00ms (0.000ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [7.44s]
2015-10-01 07:31:08  === Grant Database Block Height -1 === 
2015-10-01 07:48:42 CDarksendPool::CheckTimeout() -- Session timed out (30s) -- resetting

Ah, i think i figured out some of the kinks with the re-implemention, the balance map was not persistent, a partial-reindex, reindex etc was overwritting the file causing incorrect balances. I have a new build compiling now. One i get it to compile, i'll push to git then we can both see if it works. Also it builds a map of all mined blocks now. If you can, let's both run two daemons, one re-indexing and one syncing from start.

[tombcoin]

I´ll participate...
waiting for the branch name to build.

One clean and another reindexing.
Both Linux headless