spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029
|
|
December 29, 2014, 08:49:28 PM |
|
Can someone tell me how the version numbering works?
I was sure after all the 0.9.x versions the next was logically.....1.xxxx
0.1 + 0.9 = 0.10
Really guys??
There is a reason it has 0.10 .0. After 9 comes 10, or did you not go to primary school? Thanks for the condescending response. I'm sure women find this attractive.
|
Society doesn't scale.
|
|
|
Parazyd (OP)
|
|
December 29, 2014, 08:53:44 PM |
|
Can someone tell me how the version numbering works?
I was sure after all the 0.9.x versions the next was logically.....1.xxxx
0.1 + 0.9 = 0.10
Really guys??
There is a reason it has 0.10 .0. After 9 comes 10, or did you not go to primary school? Thanks for the condescending response. I'm sure women find this attractive. Women on the Internet. LOL!
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029
|
|
December 29, 2014, 08:58:32 PM |
|
Ok then, the men pretending to be women
|
Society doesn't scale.
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4798
|
|
December 29, 2014, 08:59:12 PM |
|
Can someone tell me how the version numbering works?
I was sure after all the 0.9.x versions the next was logically.....1.xxxx
0.1 + 0.9 = 0.10
Really guys??
There is a reason it has 0.10 .0. After 9 comes 10, or did you not go to primary school? Thanks for the condescending response. I'm sure women find this attractive. With most of the software version numbering systems I've been involved in: - Incrementing the first number represents a major change in the architecture and underlying design of the software.
- Incremening the second number represents new enhancements, and significant bug fixes
- Incrementing the third number represents minor bug fixes and very small changes to features (often considered a "maintenance release")
So, we could easily end up on version 0.957.3 (3rd maintenance release of the 957th enhancement release of the original code base) some day if there is no compelling reason to change the first digit of the version number. Interestingly, we often see altcoins trying to represent themselves as "Bitcoin 2.0" which is rather entertaining since there hasn't even been a "Bitcoin 1.0" yet.
|
|
|
|
coa032
|
|
December 29, 2014, 09:12:39 PM |
|
Good work guys. keep it up. This is great improvement. But still I am waiting for final version.
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
December 29, 2014, 09:29:55 PM |
|
Good work guys. keep it up. This is great improvement. But still I am waiting for final version. you can wait a long time, my friend ... all P2P freeware are in a "done" version (like 0.50a ... 1.16.23 or 0.89g). v1.0 is marketing.
|
|
|
|
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
|
|
December 29, 2014, 10:00:57 PM |
|
But still I am waiting for final version. You mean the stable version of 0.10.0 I'm assuming?
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
December 29, 2014, 10:04:09 PM |
|
But still I am waiting for final version. You mean the stable version of 0.10.0 I'm assuming? Could also mean that he is waiting for 1.0.0, which we might not see for many years.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
coa032
|
|
December 29, 2014, 10:06:06 PM |
|
But still I am waiting for final version. You mean the stable version of 0.10.0 I'm assuming? Exactly, I was not clearly enough.
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1029
|
|
December 29, 2014, 11:17:03 PM |
|
With most of the software version numbering systems I've been involved in: - Incrementing the first number represents a major change in the architecture and underlying design of the software.
- Incremening the second number represents new enhancements, and significant bug fixes
- Incrementing the third number represents minor bug fixes and very small changes to features (often considered a "maintenance release")
So, we could easily end up on version 0.957.3 (3rd maintenance release of the 957th enhancement release of the original code base) some day if there is no compelling reason to change the first digit of the version number. Interestingly, we often see altcoins trying to represent themselves as "Bitcoin 2.0" which is rather entertaining since there hasn't even been a "Bitcoin 1.0" yet. Thanks Danny. It is unjust that you are not labelled as a "Legend" on here.
|
Society doesn't scale.
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
|
|
December 29, 2014, 11:35:24 PM |
|
good work and the increased syncing is great!
|
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4798
|
|
December 30, 2014, 12:06:22 AM |
|
Thanks Danny. It is unjust that you are not labelled as a "Legend" on here.
Titles never really impress me much. Legendary comes at a random interval between 775 and 1030 activity. At the moment, I've got 924 activity, so I'm in the proper range, but just haven't yet reached my personal random value. Since activity increases by 14 every 2 weeks, I should reach "Legendary" sometime in the next 15 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Parazyd (OP)
|
|
December 30, 2014, 12:08:04 AM |
|
good work and the increased syncing is great!
I've yet to test this with TOR.
|
|
|
|
Flashman
|
|
December 30, 2014, 12:54:09 AM |
|
So, we could easily end up on version 0.957.3 (3rd maintenance release of the 957th enhancement release of the original code base) some day if there is no compelling reason to change the first digit of the version number.
Use the Mozilla system, then it will be at 40.0.0 by Valentines day.
|
TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6
Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
|
|
|
bitllionaire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 30, 2014, 02:15:54 AM |
|
cool changes
I hope we can have an stable version soon
|
|
|
|
HCLivess
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1090
=== NODE IS OK! ==
|
|
December 30, 2014, 09:01:09 AM |
|
Pretty nice, thanks.
|
|
|
|
Madness
|
|
December 30, 2014, 01:57:16 PM |
|
It had 13 week left for sync with the network . I closed it (yes I waited as it says) then when I opened it again , It says that the database or something got corrupted and ask me if I restore or "Abort" when I click "ok" to restore ... well It just go back to 5 years left for sync ... anyway I can make it back to 13 week ? it takes time ehre
|
|
|
|
BadAss.Sx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx
|
|
December 30, 2014, 08:40:12 PM |
|
If it needs to reindex you'll have to wait for it. But it should go faster with the RC build...
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
December 30, 2014, 10:06:47 PM |
|
I sure miss my SSD. Bitcoin client started up instatnely on my SSD. With my regular HHD it takes sometimes 15 minutes to load.
Its because the blockchain is too big for the SSD>
|
|
|
|
tl121
|
|
December 31, 2014, 05:29:59 AM |
|
Much faster download than 0.9.3. Complete blockchain sync from scratch in 8.5 hours. Speed was limited by CPU (core i5 650) rather than the network thanks to simultaneous downloads from multiple peers.
|
|
|
|
|