۩۞۩ secondstrade.com ★signature campaign★upto0.00017/post

[kydranel]

Name:  kydranel
Post count:  91
Rank:  Jr. Member
Bitcoin address:  15Nrs1R6YG9nFJJXFrQmSNHgeY1oMfAZv5

Hlu sir can i enroll here?? i keep my posts constructive as possible..thanks a lot

[syndria]

Name:  kydranel
Post count:  91
Rank:  Jr. Member
Bitcoin address:  15Nrs1R6YG9nFJJXFrQmSNHgeY1oMfAZv5

Hlu sir can i enroll here?? i keep my posts constructive as possible..thanks a lot

You have to wear secondstarades signature.

[kostya.ash]

The max post count will be go down from 70 posts to 50 posts from next week payment.

thank you.

the right decision from secondtrade, hopefully this can reduce spammers from here,
i think you must edit in first page and title for max earn

[BAGOBO]

So if max post count has lowered , it means you need to change your title into "weekly 0.03 btc "
Surely this decision wise enough

[hasiramasenju]

The max post count will be go down from 70 posts to 50 posts from next week payment.

thank you.

good decision from you i believe it would reduce the spammers but if may i to know is there any chance to increase again the pay rates?

[Brob12321]

Name:  Brob12321
Post count:  142
Rank:  Jr. Member
Bitcoin address:  1Afiyan1PWr9txaJXU22rEv8krajN76vPf

[lemipawa]

Reducing the maximum post will not change the post quality of the participants of a signature campaign.
Stricter rules and campaign manager will make them change their way of posting.
100 maximum posts is OK as long as the post quality is good.

[cjmoles]

Reducing the maximum post will not change the post quality of the participants of a signature campaign.
Stricter rules and campaign manager will make them change their way of posting.
100 maximum posts is OK as long as the post quality is good.

The new rules punish quality posters so what's going to end up happening is that the quality posters will apply to more legitimate signature campaigns while the bad posters will get stuck here because they wont get accepted to another campaign.  The result being a signature campaign full of trolls....Quality posters should be rewarded and bad posters should be penalized to run a quality signature campaign.  One gets what they pay for though and their endorsement team is a reflection of their product.

[Kanapka]

Reduce the max posts will have no effect alone. People will just multi-account and post as much as before

[Ninjaskills]

Reducing the maximum post will not change the post quality of the participants of a signature campaign.
Stricter rules and campaign manager will make them change their way of posting.
100 maximum posts is OK as long as the post quality is good.

So what should be do, to reduce spammer, if not by reducing the max post, let alone?

[lemipawa]

Reducing the maximum post will not change the post quality of the participants of a signature campaign.
Stricter rules and campaign manager will make them change their way of posting.
100 maximum posts is OK as long as the post quality is good.

The new rules punish quality posters so what's going to end up happening is that the quality posters will apply to more legitimate signature campaigns while the bad posters will get stuck here because they wont get accepted to another campaign.  The result being a signature campaign full of trolls....Quality posters should be rewarded and bad posters should be penalized to run a quality signature campaign.  One gets what they pay for though and their supporters are a reflection of their product.

I agree with you on this and just like what I said 100 maximum posts is OK, OP can even increase it to Unlimited if he can pay as long as the post quality is good. Looking at the campaigns spreadsheet alone will tell you no one is doing their part to reduce the number of low quality posters. Last I've seen rejected posts or posts that we're not counted we're Sep 28 or the 39th period, after that, all posts we're accepted even if post is made up of only 7 words

[Battareus]

I decided to live the campaign now. Thanks for payment for previous week in advance.

[hilariousandco]

The max post count will be go down from 70 posts to 50 posts from next week payment.

thank you.

the right decision from secondtrade, hopefully this can reduce spammers from here,
i think you must edit in first page and title for max earn

It won't do anything but reduce the number of shitposts by 20. That's still 50 posts of drivel which is 50 too much. Secondstrade should be more concerned about stopping the spam all together but they're probably just more interested in cutting the money they're paying out.

[kostya.ash]

The max post count will be go down from 70 posts to 50 posts from next week payment.

thank you.

the right decision from secondtrade, hopefully this can reduce spammers from here,
i think you must edit in first page and title for max earn

It won't do anything but reduce their number of shitposts by 20. That's still 50 posts of drivel which is 50 too much. Secondstrade should be more concerned about stopping the spam all together but they're probably just more interested in cutting the money they're paying out.

I just saw, that the payment of this week reached BTC1,8
true, spending money in the signature is too much so he reduces max post,

my advice , don't count post in games and rounds and local board

[hilariousandco]

my advice , don't count post in games and rounds and local board

This would be a good start. This campaign consists mostly of spammy Indonesians posting shit in giveaway threads daily. No idea why you pay for those posts in the first place and I doubt they would even bother making them if they wern't getting paid for it.

[Battareus]

I think every binary options player is important and it does not matter how he got to the site, from local topics or games and rounds. But in every tematic section there topics, where spamers post only because of signature. Not count this topics. Thats all.

[cjmoles]

Wow...I just went through some of the names on the spread sheet at random and reviewed their posts for quality.  Unbelievable!  I didn't realize it was that bad....paying for those type of posts cannot be effective advertising.  Solution: Remove those type of members from the campaign and offer some sort of reward stipend for quality posts, or think about hiring a campaign manager that could utilize advertising funds more efficiently.

[mexxer-2]

Wow...I just went through some of the names on the spread sheet at random and reviewed their posts for quality.  Unbelievable!  I didn't realize it was that bad....paying for those type of posts cannot be effective advertising.  Solution: Remove those type of members from the campaign and offer some sort of reward stipend for quality posts, or think about hiring a campaign manager that could utilize advertising funds more efficiently.

I went through the sheet and published the obvious spammers here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1225853.msg12811898#msg12811898 But they don't seem to care.

[devil11]

Name : devil11
Post Count : 112
Rank : Member
Bitcoin Address : 1DYSZB4XjEED3oeCGtwM25BbF8hp9PZmh6

Want to join this campaign, Sir. Thanks

Sir please let me know whether i am selected or not ..

[mark coins]

Name : devil11
Post Count : 112
Rank : Member
Bitcoin Address : 1DYSZB4XjEED3oeCGtwM25BbF8hp9PZmh6

Want to join this campaign, Sir. Thanks

Sir please let me know whether i am selected or not ..

check the Spreadsheat so see if you are already enrolled. i see your name on the list (#188) so its means you are in