BetKing.io - 20% Rakeback Christmas Bonus - Most trusted Bitcoin Dice site

[game-protect]

THIS WAS ONE OF THE GREATEST SCAM EVER.

I WAS SKEPTIC OF HIM GIVING 20BTC COS I KNOW DEAN IS NOT THAT GENEROUS. I NEVER KNEW HE HAD A SELFISH PLAN TO LURE INOOCENT PLAYERS AS USUAL. WHEN THE CONTEST STARTED, MANY BIG PLAYERS WHERE NOT THERE. BUT 4 HOURS TO THE END OF THE CONTEST, VERY BIG BETS STARTED POPPING UP. QUESTION NOW IS. WHERE WHERE ALL THESE PLAYERS DAYS BEFORE THE CONTEST.

CONCLUSION: DEAN LURED GUYS TO PLAY, RIGGED THEM OF THEIR CASH, THEN USED HIS BANROLL  TO PLAY AD KICK OFF ALL WINNERS.
BE SMRTER NEXT TIME SCAMMER

I could not have put it better myself.

You are absolutely right, scammer Dean Nolan had a plan to lure innocent newbies or gullible players on to his scam betking website.
The reason he cancelled the Christmas wager and refused to pay over 20 BTC to the legitimate winners was because he was not happy so many people won so many BTC and he did not want to pay them.

The theory is half-contrived. There is the possibility of fraudulent play but in consideration with most wagering contests that are +ev, few would start betting large amounts prior to the final day, since it does not guarantee their position.

Much of the time, you will see players enter high volumes within the final hour (or even final minutes). This is parallel to when there were weekly wagering competitions: if you inspected the betting amounts on the final day as opposed to the others, it would be a huge dichotomy.

Are you able to explain how exactly players possibly (Edited 7/01/2019) played fraudulent as you claim?

Did they manipulate the betting software?

Did they make too high bets?

[actmyname]

Are you able to explain how exactly players played fraudulent as you claim?

I did not.

[JollyGood]

The theory is half-contrived. There is the possibility of fraudulent play but in consideration with most wagering contests that are +ev, few would start betting large amounts prior to the final day, since it does not guarantee their position.

Much of the time, you will see players enter high volumes within the final hour (or even final minutes). This is parallel to when there were weekly wagering competitions: if you inspected the betting amounts on the final day as opposed to the others, it would be a huge dichotomy.

Are you able to explain how exactly players played fraudulent as you claim?

Did they manipulate the betting software?

Did they make too high bets?

I think there is a misunderstanding because actmyname never said that players did anything fraudulent.

[game-protect]

Are you able to explain how exactly players played fraudulent as you claim?

I did not.

You meant the theory is half-contrived, because there is the possibility of fraudulent play?

The theory is half-contrived. There is the possibility of fraudulent play but in consideration with most wagering contests that are +ev, few would start betting large amounts prior to the final day, since it does not guarantee their position.

I misunderstood your theory, because theories based on possibilities do not make much sense in this case!

However, are you able to explain how players possibly could have played fraudulent?

Why would scam artist Dean Nolan allow players to play fraudulent?

I mean it was his scam contest, why would he allow other scammers to participate in his scam?

[actmyname]

The theory is half-contrived. There is the possibility of fraudulent play but in consideration with most wagering contests that are +ev, few would start betting large amounts prior to the final day, since it does not guarantee their position.

I misunderstood your theory, because theories based on possibilities do not make much sense in this case!

However, are you able to explain how players possibly could have played fraudulent?

Why would scam artist Dean Nolan allow players to play fraudulent?

I mean it was his scam contest, why would he allow other scammers to participate in his scam?

You don't understand what I'm saying.

Proposition by RichGang, supported by JollyGood: "Big bets showed up in the final four hours because this was Dean playing, to kick off winners from the leaderboard."

My reply indicated that the theory is partially flawed, due to the fact that players will often wait until the last moments to bet in a +ev wagering contest. I had indicated "there is the possibility of fraudulent play" not that players are fraudulently playing.

The reasoning that I had provided for the suspicious-looking betting is not based on superficial probabilities. It is what happens.

[BillyBurns]

<---- Investor of ICO who lost every single penny on a casino, who loses 100% as a casino, quite a accomplishment. Never even did a buy back because I assume easy  money maker but Dean seemed to be sabotaging it the whole way. The Poker addition was LOL I did warn him that nobody would use it, and then he decided that he needed to offer better prices  than other sports books to get more volume ( LOL LOL LOL)  guy is not a high level thinker.

edit since relaunch, site looks good volume is up chat is back looks like Dean has been working hard, maybe not all is lost. Hopefully this forward momentum can continue.

[dis93]

Ahhh, dice betking now almost dead. Few people last week  played dice.
I think there is no need bump it without remembering past scam

[game-protect]

The theory is half-contrived. There is the possibility of fraudulent play but in consideration with most wagering contests that are +ev, few would start betting large amounts prior to the final day, since it does not guarantee their position.

I misunderstood your theory, because theories based on possibilities do not make much sense in this case!

However, are you able to explain how players possibly could have played fraudulent?

Why would scam artist Dean Nolan allow players to play fraudulent?

I mean it was his scam contest, why would he allow other scammers to participate in his scam?

You don't understand what I'm saying.

Proposition by RichGang, supported by JollyGood: "Big bets showed up in the final four hours because this was Dean playing, to kick off winners from the leaderboard."

My reply indicated that the theory is partially flawed, due to the fact that players will often wait until the last moments to bet in a +ev wagering contest. I had indicated "there is the possibility of fraudulent play" not that players are fraudulently playing.

The reasoning that I had provided for the suspicious-looking betting is not based on superficial probabilities. It is what happens.

Fraudulent play was indicating that players play fraudulent! If scam artist Dean Nolan manipulates the leaderboard it is simply cheating and not "fraudulent play". Scam artist Dean Nolan does not need to register several accounts and play, he can simply adjust the rankings in the server backend.

Anyway, what could have happened is irrelevant. Everyone too stupid or lazy to put "betking scam" into google deserves to get scammed!  

[LoyceV]

<---- Investor of ICO who lost every single penny on a casino, who loses 100% as a casino, quite a accomplishment.

There's an update: BetKing EOS Airdrop Whitepaper:

10,000,000,000 BKT will be created as an EOS.IO token.

Distribution

30% Airdrop

30% Bet Mining Prize Pool

20% Promos and bounties

10% Team

10% BKB holders

Soon you can exchange your BKB tokens for BKT tokens. 100% of the BKB tokens, 70% of which was valued around $6.5 million after the ICO, will now be worth 10% of the total BKT value.
The airdrop to EOS holders alone will be "worth" 3 times more than the entire BKB supply! The math on the BKB ICO didn't check out already, but this new plan is ten times crazier.

Did I understand this correctly Dean? Please correct me if I made any mistakes.

I still have over 7k BKB tokens which I'd love to sell them back at the "value" you claim they have:$720. 64.
Let's round it down to 0.2 BTC and we're good. Deal?
I've just sent a PM asking if I can sell them back.

[JollyGood]

<---- Investor of ICO who lost every single penny on a casino, who loses 100% as a casino, quite a accomplishment.

There's an update: BetKing EOS Airdrop Whitepaper:

10,000,000,000 BKT will be created as an EOS.IO token.

Distribution

30% Airdrop

30% Bet Mining Prize Pool

20% Promos and bounties

10% Team

10% BKB holders

Soon you can exchange your BKB tokens for BKT tokens. 100% of the BKB tokens, 70% of which was valued around $6.5 million after the ICO, will now be worth 10% of the total BKT value.
The airdrop to EOS holders alone will be "worth" 3 times more than the entire BKB supply! The math on the BKB ICO didn't check out already, but this new plan is ten times crazier.

Did I understand this correctly Dean? Please correct me if I made any mistakes.

I still have over 7k BKB tokens which I'd love to sell them back at the "value" you claim they have:$720. 64.
Let's round it down to 0.2 BTC and we're good. Deal?
I've just sent a PM asking if I can sell them back.

What is wrong with this fool Dean Nolan?

The new crowdfunding attempt by creating EOS tokens is just another way for him to pocket the cash and make "easy cash" without doing any work.

It seems $6.5 million from the betking ICO was not enough for this fool scammer Dean Nolan and now he wants to scam more. Pathetic.

[theskillzdatklls]

I wonder where things went wrong. He had such a good website back in the day and I'm really grateful for that. He always was a little miscalibrated but intentions were good. Then something just plummeted off of the deep end during the bear market I guess. GG

[JollyGood]

<---- Investor of ICO who lost every single penny on a casino, who loses 100% as a casino, quite a accomplishment. Never even did a buy back because I assume easy  money maker but Dean seemed to be sabotaging it the whole way. The Poker addition was LOL I did warn him that nobody would use it, and then he decided that he needed to offer better prices  than other sports books to get more volume ( LOL LOL LOL)  guy is not a high level thinker.

The whole thing regarding the way he tried to money grab by using ICOs as a way to line his own pockets was a total disgrace.

Before he started this new BKT token scam he tried to fool RHavar in to investing in betking and his recent venture trying to pass off a cheap template of a mobile phone app exchange as a reason to raise $10 million in an ICO for his "bitsafe" project which he has temporarily pulled the plug on as nobody wanted to invest.

Sometimes he says he wants to convert betking tokens to bitsafe tokens and close betking down, then sometimes he says something else.

What a pathetic little scammer Dean Nolan is.

[Lassie]

I wonder where things went wrong. He had such a good website back in the day and I'm really grateful for that. He always was a little miscalibrated but intentions were good. Then something just plummeted off of the deep end during the bear market I guess. GG

In my honest opinion, nothing has changed that much, its just too many people trust Dean and they dont see the negatives in the past and now that lsrger amount or amount is involve they are looking on more aspects

[JollyGood]

Ahhh, dice betking now almost dead. Few people last week  played dice.
I think there is no need bump it without remembering past scam

Scammer Dean Nolan realises that the website is virtually dead so he is trying to maximise any way he can which would allow him to put the money directly in to his own pocket. ICOs and tokens are the easiest way.

This scammer wrote in his bitsafe ICO whitepaper that he was going to transition all betking BKB tokens to bitsafe tokens and would phase out betking and concentrate solely on "bitsafe" yet here he is now trying to salvage the situation at betking by finding ways that are designed to line his own pockets by fooling investors.

[BillyBurns]

I wonder where things went wrong. He had such a good website back in the day and I'm really grateful for that. He always was a little miscalibrated but intentions were good. Then something just plummeted off of the deep end during the bear market I guess. GG

He went broke trading alt coins, according to him he was tired of alt coiners making more gains than him so he started trading and he got liquidated for everything, this is not a lie I was told to keep hush but I ain't letting this dude get away with another scam, my 30k is long gone. Now the interesting thing  is to speculate is if he used ico funds to gamble on is bitmmex acc or otc trades. Fromm y point of view since the inception of Ico it seems he is doing everything in his power for it to fail.

[game-protect]

I wonder where things went wrong. He had such a good website back in the day and I'm really grateful for that. He always was a little miscalibrated but intentions were good. Then something just plummeted off of the deep end during the bear market I guess. GG

He went broke trading alt coins, according to him he was tired of alt coiners making more gains than him so he started trading and he got liquidated for everything, this is not a lie I was told to keep hush but I ain't letting this dude get away with another scam, my 30k is long gone.

This would explain his curious behavior! Some years prison time awaiting investment scammer Dean Nolan!

Can you please forward proof of your 30k lost to JollyGood, because we will hold this pig liable?

[JollyGood]

In my honest opinion, nothing has changed that much, its just too many people trust Dean and they dont see the negatives in the past and now that lsrger amount or amount is involve they are looking on more aspects

I have to agree with your views. Now that the blinds have been lifted people are seeing scammer Dean Nolan for what he really is.

He made no announcement on his official betking thread about the EOS token scam he is conducting, instead he went to Medium to release that information.

[LoyceV]

There's another update: How BKB holders benefit from the new EOS airdrop.
It reminds me of the BKB ICO: just throw around some numbers, most people won't verify it anyway.

Example:

Meaning BKB holders will receive 6 times the BKT tokens as EOS holders even though EOS trades at 25x the price of BKB.

This is comparing apples and oranges: the EOS airdrop is free for EOS holders, while the BKB holders have to hand in $0.099 with each BKB.

BKB currently has a buy back price of $0.099.

Conveniently ignoring the fact that there are no buy backs anymore.

I still have over 7k BKB tokens which I'd love to sell them back at the "value" you claim they have:$720. 64.
Let's round it down to 0.2 BTC and we're good. Deal?
I've just sent a PM asking if I can sell them back.

I didn't get a reply to my PM (which I sent to 2 known accounts).

[JollyGood]

There's another update: How BKB holders benefit from the new EOS airdrop.
It reminds me of the BKB ICO: just throw around some numbers, most people won't verify it anyway.

Example:

Meaning BKB holders will receive 6 times the BKT tokens as EOS holders even though EOS trades at 25x the price of BKB.

This is comparing apples and oranges: the EOS airdrop is free for EOS holders, while the BKB holders have to hand in $0.099 with each BKB.

BKB currently has a buy back price of $0.099.

Conveniently ignoring the fact that there are no buy backs anymore.

I still have over 7k BKB tokens which I'd love to sell them back at the "value" you claim they have:$720. 64.
Let's round it down to 0.2 BTC and we're good. Deal?
I've just sent a PM asking if I can sell them back.

I didn't get a reply to my PM (which I sent to 2 known accounts).

You seem a very intelligent person so why hold out for any reply addressing your concerns and questions, or any reply at all when you know what scammer Dean Nolan is like?

Your question about 0.2 BTC for your betking tokens is a fair one but this pathetic scammer has no intention of buying your betking tokens back at the favorable rates you quoted.

His reputation is in tatters. He raised $6.5 million from the betking ICO and makde promises of where the funds would be spent (50% to go to bankroll and various going to developing new games etc) yet he did nothing apart from siphon off the funds and line his own pocket. He is now playing a new game "re-launching" betking again with a re-designed site and these new EOS tokens.

This scammer Dean Nolan is one of the lowest of the low.

[LoyceV]

You seem a very intelligent person so why hold out for any reply addressing your concerns and questions

The reason I haven't created a scam accusation thread yet, is that it'll take a lot of time to find all details. The ICO-information was spread out over a few threads, that's a lot of posts to read again.
If/when I do it, I want it to be a complete accusation, and after that I expect red tags to accumulate (like here).