nachoig
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 22, 2015, 09:10:21 PM Last edit: February 23, 2015, 04:39:58 AM by nachoig |
|
So, how and why? Just because you can generate in an offline computer it doesn't mean it's secure.
Then what is 'secure'? ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) AFIAK cold storage is the best option and is very secure. Cold storage is done in an offline computer, does that mean it isn't secure? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) You didn't understood correctly what secure is. If your peovate key is never exposed to internet, how can anyone steal the private key? Reused R values are a problem but it is different matter. Please understand what it is, what you are hoing to tell and then post the correct one. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) -MZ The issue is if the keys in question are generated without sufficient randomness a hacker can find a way to discover these keys, even if it was generated offline. The claim here is because these JavaScript generators don't have the sufficient randomness. If they really have sufficient randomness, please explain how this is achieved or post some material proving this. Edit: from the advertising space: Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on sites such as blockchain.info and brainwallet.org. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
|
Mewtwo
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
ROAD TO HEAVEN...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 22, 2015, 09:39:08 PM |
|
Im using Mycelium and it works perfect to me. It has many functions to be an android wallet.
But I also use paper wallet to hold btc, I think is more secure.
Are u agree with this?
|
|
|
|
PonZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 12:14:28 AM |
|
i want use offline wallet , so where i can download it ? and which wallet name i should use
If your wanting a "watch only" wallet, you can get the newest bitcoin core and enter the address you are wanting to watch by using importaddress, I believe.
|
|
|
|
el kaka22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3640
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 12:37:46 AM |
|
i want use offline wallet , so where i can download it ? and which wallet name i should use
If your wanting a "watch only" wallet, you can get the newest bitcoin core and enter the address you are wanting to watch by using importaddress, I believe. i got a problem with the internet, im waiting for sync i waited a long time for sync
|
|
|
|
btcminer021
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Mine hard!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 03:12:28 AM |
|
BlockChain is good for <1BTC or daily use and I feel secure with 2FA and long random passwords.
|
|
|
|
koshgel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 03:40:07 AM |
|
BlockChain is good for <1BTC or daily use and I feel secure with 2FA and long random passwords.
Agreed. I use it for day to day activities and never had any issues.
|
|
|
|
Gisado
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Yoohoo
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 04:01:19 AM |
|
BlockChain is good for <1BTC or daily use and I feel secure with 2FA and long random passwords.
Agreed. I use it for day to day activities and never had any issues. Problem is, when their servers have issues you won't be able to spend your coins, unless you have backup and you can import it.
|
|
|
|
|
deepestfear
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 04:18:57 AM |
|
I keep swapping around the wallets that I use Currently I use Electrum and Blockchain
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1217
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 05:43:15 AM |
|
I have used Blockchain.info for ages. But currently I don't keep many coins there (infact only a few mBTCs). Most of my stash is stored in USB sticks and paper wallets.
|
|
|
|
ColderThanIce
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 01:13:35 PM |
|
Don't forget Silver and Gold Wallets! They're pretty secure in their own right. And they're pretty!!! http://www.silverwallets.com/images removed Definitely good conversation pieces, and great for long term wallet storage. those silver wallets do look pretty cool! i was just reading on their site, and i think they would be pretty secure as long as you generate your wallets on a safe offline pc, and keep the coin in a safe place too.
|
ROLLIN.IO | BITCOIN DICE GAME ⚁ ⚂ ⚃ ⚄ ⚅ ⚁ ⚂
| ███████████████████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████████████████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████████ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████
| ███████████ S O C I A L C H A T T I N G | ██ ████ ██████ ████████ ██████████ ████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████ ██████████████████ ████████████████████ ████████ ████████
████████
████████
| ██████████████ LEVEL UP SYSTEM WITH REWADS | ██████ ████████ ██████████ ████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████████ ████████████████████ █ ████████████████ █ ████████████████ █ ████████████████ █ ████████████████ ██████████████████ ████████████████ █████████████ ██████████ █████ | ██████████████ FREE BITCOINS |
|
|
|
ChuckBuck
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 01:36:11 PM |
|
Don't forget Silver and Gold Wallets! They're pretty secure in their own right. And they're pretty!!! http://www.silverwallets.com/images removed Definitely good conversation pieces, and great for long term wallet storage. those silver wallets do look pretty cool! i was just reading on their site, and i think they would be pretty secure as long as you generate your wallets on a safe offline pc, and keep the coin in a safe place too. Yes, SilverWallets.com basically use https://www.bitaddress.org to generate the offline paper wallets. If you're interested in them, I'm sure you can PM nightowlace or Blazedout419 here in the forum, to get your hands on one.
|
|
|
|
ColderThanIce
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 01:39:04 PM |
|
Don't forget Silver and Gold Wallets! They're pretty secure in their own right. And they're pretty!!! http://www.silverwallets.com/images removed Definitely good conversation pieces, and great for long term wallet storage. those silver wallets do look pretty cool! i was just reading on their site, and i think they would be pretty secure as long as you generate your wallets on a safe offline pc, and keep the coin in a safe place too. Yes, SilverWallets.com basically use https://www.bitaddress.org to generate the offline paper wallets. If you're interested in them, I'm sure you can PM nightowlace or Blazedout419 here in the forum, to get your hands on one. thanks for the info, i think i'll probably pass on it for now. looks like it would cost around 0.34 btc to buy a normal silver wallet, which would be a big chunk of my current btc balance. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
ROLLIN.IO | BITCOIN DICE GAME ⚁ ⚂ ⚃ ⚄ ⚅ ⚁ ⚂
| ███████████████████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████████████████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████████ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ████
| ███████████ S O C I A L C H A T T I N G | ██ ████ ██████ ████████ ██████████ ████████████ ██████████████ ████████████████ ██████████████████ ████████████████████ ████████ ████████
████████
████████
| ██████████████ LEVEL UP SYSTEM WITH REWADS | ██████ ████████ ██████████ ████████████ ██████████████ ██████████████████ ████████████████████ █ ████████████████ █ ████████████████ █ ████████████████ █ ████████████████ ██████████████████ ████████████████ █████████████ ██████████ █████ | ██████████████ FREE BITCOINS |
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 01:53:52 PM |
|
The issue is if the keys in question are generated without sufficient randomness a hacker can find a way to discover these keys, even if it was generated offline.
It is very rare and it happens mostly if you reuse address AFAIK. Bitaddress offers sufficient randomness, you can use alpha-numeric characters, special characters, mouse etc.. The claim here is because these JavaScript generators don't have the sufficient randomness. If they really have sufficient randomness, please explain how this is achieved or post some material proving this.
Not all JS scripts. For randomness, use mouse, keyboard and use special characters. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43496.msg10322571#msg10322571Edit: from the advertising space: Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on sites such as blockchain.info and brainwallet.org. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
You are misunderstanding it. It is says you should be careful when using JS scripts online and it gave Blockchain.info and Brainwallet.org as examples because it is widely used. Brainwallet.org is mainly used for signing transaction. And it says that the JS script can be changed anytime(mostly by owners/co-owners/contributors) and browsers don't have airtight security as the most of them doesn't wipe caches, app-datas and sometimes it will be there forver and when you connect to interent, it may have a loop hole and you will be in danger. None of them matters when using Bitaddress.org in an offline computer and you can make a full wipe of browser-related files and if are paranoid, you can delete everything related to browser and uninstall it and then install it again(if you want). -MZ.
|
|
|
|
ChuckBuck
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 01:55:54 PM |
|
Don't forget Silver and Gold Wallets! They're pretty secure in their own right. And they're pretty!!! http://www.silverwallets.com/images removed Definitely good conversation pieces, and great for long term wallet storage. those silver wallets do look pretty cool! i was just reading on their site, and i think they would be pretty secure as long as you generate your wallets on a safe offline pc, and keep the coin in a safe place too. Yes, SilverWallets.com basically use https://www.bitaddress.org to generate the offline paper wallets. If you're interested in them, I'm sure you can PM nightowlace or Blazedout419 here in the forum, to get your hands on one. thanks for the info, i think i'll probably pass on it for now. looks like it would cost around 0.34 btc to buy a normal silver wallet, which would be a big chunk of my current btc balance. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Lower priced coins, but still pretty are the Cryptolator series coins. If search hard enough, I'm sure you could get these for 0.1 BTC or lower. Here's a recent auction on them: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=955690.0
|
|
|
|
onlyyou
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 06:23:59 PM |
|
i only use a blockchain wallet and never use another because i like it...
|
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2015, 06:27:41 PM |
|
i am using coinbase as online wallet, their 2FA is really good, i have never an issue with their service, that is more secure online wallet.
|
|
|
|
nachoig
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2015, 12:54:16 AM |
|
The issue is if the keys in question are generated without sufficient randomness a hacker can find a way to discover these keys, even if it was generated offline.
It is very rare and it happens mostly if you reuse address AFAIK. Bitaddress offers sufficient randomness, you can use alpha-numeric characters, special characters, mouse etc.. The claim here is because these JavaScript generators don't have the sufficient randomness. If they really have sufficient randomness, please explain how this is achieved or post some material proving this.
Not all JS scripts. For randomness, use mouse, keyboard and use special characters. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=43496.msg10322571#msg10322571OK, this part is clarified. Edit: from the advertising space: Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on sites such as blockchain.info and brainwallet.org. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
You are misunderstanding it. It is says you should be careful when using JS scripts online and it gave Blockchain.info and Brainwallet.org as examples because it is widely used. Brainwallet.org is mainly used for signing transaction. And it says that the JS script can be changed anytime(mostly by owners/co-owners/contributors) and browsers don't have airtight security as the most of them doesn't wipe caches, app-datas and sometimes it will be there forver and when you connect to interent, it may have a loop hole and you will be in danger. None of them matters when using Bitaddress.org in an offline computer and you can make a full wipe of browser-related files and if are paranoid, you can delete everything related to browser and uninstall it and then install it again(if you want). -MZ. BitAddress.org is an online JS script too. It can be changed in the same way as of Blockchain.info or Brainwallet.org. So, even if you want to use offline, you should download it and verify the checksums and signature (it's obvious for a more experiencied user like you, but as we are in the newbie section, I think it's important to remember this).
|
|
|
|
NoahWL1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2015, 02:52:24 AM |
|
I use Coinbase since it's really easy to buy/sell there, but I also have the Bitcoin-qt client. I like running a full node to help out the network ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
grendel25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 24, 2015, 02:57:27 AM |
|
I use Coinbase since it's really easy to buy/sell there, but I also have the Bitcoin-qt client. I like running a full node to help out the network ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Coinbase is really good and more online businesses need to follow Coinbase's lead for security. However.. just also wanted to point out that Coinbase isn't really a wallet. Bitcoin-qt is a wallet.
|
|
|
|
|