Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 06:09:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 71 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BTER.com hacked| 7170 BTC stolen | DON'T KEEP YOUR MONEY ON AN EXCHANGE |  (Read 119637 times)
redsn0w (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 09:43:13 PM
 #101

Despite all the added security and what not this still happens, at exchanges that hold large amounts of money in both fiat and BTC. It's kind of disappointing. What's the point of having a cryptocurrency when this happens over and over again?

Also, it's a bad name in the press as the public will be even more scared of using/accepting bitcoins as payment.
You are right just because of these mistakes many exchanges lost big amounts and faith of many peoples now some are thinking to leave  this crypto world

This is a really bad situation, I've updated the OP with two reddit discussions :

- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vz1zq/its_now_officialbtercom_was_hackedlost_7170_btc/
- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2w00yo/three_exchanges_hacked_in_24_hours/
1715450959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715450959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715450959
Reply with quote  #2

1715450959
Report to moderator
1715450959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715450959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715450959
Reply with quote  #2

1715450959
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Borisz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:00:08 PM
 #102

Despite all the added security and what not this still happens, at exchanges that hold large amounts of money in both fiat and BTC. It's kind of disappointing. What's the point of having a cryptocurrency when this happens over and over again?

Also, it's a bad name in the press as the public will be even more scared of using/accepting bitcoins as payment.
You are right just because of these mistakes many exchanges lost big amounts and faith of many peoples now some are thinking to leave  this crypto world

This is a really bad situation, I've updated the OP with two reddit discussions :

- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vz1zq/its_now_officialbtercom_was_hackedlost_7170_btc/
- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2w00yo/three_exchanges_hacked_in_24_hours/


Exchanges are needed to retain value and so we can bind the worth of a Bitcoin to something we know. The thing is I am considering moving all my coins from exchanges to my wallet. Although, with respect to the recent events I'm not sure if that is any more safer. Maybe only due to the "decentralizedness" of keeping my coins with me and not thousands of coins in one place.

It's just sad to watch exchanges go down every now and then.

Seems to me it is easier to rob 1.6 million $ of BTC than 1.6 million $ of fiat. And get away with it.
Deadstock
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:02:51 PM
 #103

cshelswell
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 615
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 10:03:45 PM
 #104



It's just sad to watch exchanges go down every now and then.

Seems to me it is easier to rob 1.6 million $ of BTC than 1.6 million $ of fiat. And get away with it.

Every now and then? Seems to be a week occurrence

nachoig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:06:55 PM
 #105

Despite all the added security and what not this still happens, at exchanges that hold large amounts of money in both fiat and BTC. It's kind of disappointing. What's the point of having a cryptocurrency when this happens over and over again?

Also, it's a bad name in the press as the public will be even more scared of using/accepting bitcoins as payment.
You are right just because of these mistakes many exchanges lost big amounts and faith of many peoples now some are thinking to leave  this crypto world

This is a really bad situation, I've updated the OP with two reddit discussions :

- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vz1zq/its_now_officialbtercom_was_hackedlost_7170_btc/
- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2w00yo/three_exchanges_hacked_in_24_hours/


Exchanges are needed to retain value and so we can bind the worth of a Bitcoin to something we know. The thing is I am considering moving all my coins from exchanges to my wallet. Although, with respect to the recent events I'm not sure if that is any more safer. Maybe only due to the "decentralizedness" of keeping my coins with me and not thousands of coins in one place.

It's just sad to watch exchanges go down every now and then.

Seems to me it is easier to rob 1.6 million $ of BTC than 1.6 million $ of fiat. And get away with it.

Exchanges shouldn't be used as traditional banks.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=932052.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=945881.0
Borisz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:11:19 PM
 #106



It's just sad to watch exchanges go down every now and then.

Seems to me it is easier to rob 1.6 million $ of BTC than 1.6 million $ of fiat. And get away with it.

Every now and then? Seems to be a week occurrence

Well sometimes more sometimes less often.

TBH, I felt Bter was pretty safe to use. 2FA, separate withdrawal password and what not. Turns out, all this doesn't matter if the source is attacked.

Exchanges shouldn't be used as traditional banks.

They are similar in the aspect that they both hold large sums of money. And Bter was also giving interest on funds held by the users.
Nixian
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 10:13:48 PM
 #107

Is this the thief ?

http://tools.tracemyip.org/lookup/46.28.204.193

Reverse DNS in-addr.arpa:
193.204.28.46.in-addr.arp­a domain name pointer hosted-by.solarcom.ch.

http://en.utrace.de/ip-address/193.204.28.46


IP Address:       193.204.28.46
ISP:       GARR Italian Research and Academic Network
Organization:       Universita' degli Studi G. D'Annunzio

https://db-ip.com/193.204.28.46

cshelswell
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 615
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 10:16:30 PM
 #108


What if you simply have BTC / Alts in there to day trade with? You can't keep taking them out. I don't think you should store coins there but to trade it's necessary.

I just withdrew a large chunk of an alt as it looked like it was going to be down for a bit but if it had still been active I would have left it there to trade with.

Borisz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:17:29 PM
 #109

Is this the thief ?

http://tools.tracemyip.org/lookup/46.28.204.193

Reverse DNS in-addr.arpa:
193.204.28.46.in-addr.arp­a domain name pointer hosted-by.solarcom.ch.

http://en.utrace.de/ip-address/193.204.28.46


IP Address:       193.204.28.46
ISP:       GARR Italian Research and Academic Network
Organization:       Universita' degli Studi G. D'Annunzio

https://db-ip.com/193.204.28.46

It is most likely a proxy/VPN that leads to another one and so on.
If someone wants to steal so much money, I guess they make sure to stay safe as much as possible.
nachoig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:19:34 PM
 #110


Exchanges shouldn't be used as traditional banks.

They are similar in the aspect that they both hold large sums of money. And Bter was also giving interest on funds held by the users.

Like a savings account? If they are doing this, unless that interest are being paid from the exchange fees, they don't have 100% reserves.

BTW, I'm just aksing myself how they do to recover the stolen BTC. If they don't get it back, they should go to the market and re-buy those BTC. But a good question here is if they'll do this.
Nixian
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 10:24:46 PM
 #111

Is this the thief ?

http://tools.tracemyip.org/lookup/46.28.204.193

Reverse DNS in-addr.arpa:
193.204.28.46.in-addr.arp­a domain name pointer hosted-by.solarcom.ch.

http://en.utrace.de/ip-address/193.204.28.46


IP Address:       193.204.28.46
ISP:       GARR Italian Research and Academic Network
Organization:       Universita' degli Studi G. D'Annunzio

https://db-ip.com/193.204.28.46

It is most likely a proxy/VPN that leads to another one and so on.
If someone wants to steal so much money, I guess they make sure to stay safe as much as possible.

Students having the know how , intrest, time and equipment , and watch the ISP Research and academic network

Borisz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:35:18 PM
 #112


Exchanges shouldn't be used as traditional banks.

They are similar in the aspect that they both hold large sums of money. And Bter was also giving interest on funds held by the users.

Like a savings account? If they are doing this, unless that interest are being paid from the exchange fees, they don't have 100% reserves.

BTW, I'm just aksing myself how they do to recover the stolen BTC. If they don't get it back, they should go to the market and re-buy those BTC. But a good question here is if they'll do this.

Maybe that is the actual 7000 missing that added up over time  Cheesy

Seriously. The yearly interest was varying daily, sometimes 0.9%/year, other days or weeks went up to 5%/year. According to Bter, this interest was coming from and based on their trading fees and volume.
redsn0w (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:41:02 PM
 #113

Is this the thief ?

http://tools.tracemyip.org/lookup/46.28.204.193

Reverse DNS in-addr.arpa:
193.204.28.46.in-addr.arp­a domain name pointer hosted-by.solarcom.ch.

http://en.utrace.de/ip-address/193.204.28.46


IP Address:       193.204.28.46
ISP:       GARR Italian Research and Academic Network
Organization:       Universita' degli Studi G. D'Annunzio

https://db-ip.com/193.204.28.46

It is most likely a proxy/VPN that leads to another one and so on.
If someone wants to steal so much money, I guess they make sure to stay safe as much as possible.

Students having the know how , intrest, time and equipment , and watch the ISP Research and academic network

It is not the ip of the hacker but only the ip of the bitcoin node that saw/forwarded the tx for "first" :

https://blockchain.info/it/ip-address/46.28.204.193
Nixian
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 10:49:07 PM
 #114

Is this the thief ?

http://tools.tracemyip.org/lookup/46.28.204.193

Reverse DNS in-addr.arpa:
193.204.28.46.in-addr.arp­a domain name pointer hosted-by.solarcom.ch.

http://en.utrace.de/ip-address/193.204.28.46


IP Address:       193.204.28.46
ISP:       GARR Italian Research and Academic Network
Organization:       Universita' degli Studi G. D'Annunzio

https://db-ip.com/193.204.28.46

It is most likely a proxy/VPN that leads to another one and so on.
If someone wants to steal so much money, I guess they make sure to stay safe as much as possible.

Students having the know how , intrest, time and equipment , and watch the ISP Research and academic network

It is not the ip of the hacker but only the ip of the bitcoin node that saw/forwarded the tx for "first" :

https://blockchain.info/it/ip-address/46.28.204.193

The 7120 Bitcoins are distributed equally to 7 accounts, all of them were operated from a Swiss Based IP  “46.28.204.193”

source : http://247cryptonews.com/bter-got-hacked-7000-bitcoins-stolen-7-different-accounts/

Was just opinion ,i'm still new at this bitcoin stuff, keep my bet open tho Wink

redsn0w (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:51:52 PM
 #115

Is this the thief ?

http://tools.tracemyip.org/lookup/46.28.204.193

Reverse DNS in-addr.arpa:
193.204.28.46.in-addr.arp­a domain name pointer hosted-by.solarcom.ch.

http://en.utrace.de/ip-address/193.204.28.46


IP Address:       193.204.28.46
ISP:       GARR Italian Research and Academic Network
Organization:       Universita' degli Studi G. D'Annunzio

https://db-ip.com/193.204.28.46

It is most likely a proxy/VPN that leads to another one and so on.
If someone wants to steal so much money, I guess they make sure to stay safe as much as possible.

Students having the know how , intrest, time and equipment , and watch the ISP Research and academic network

It is not the ip of the hacker but only the ip of the bitcoin node that saw/forwarded the tx for "first" :

https://blockchain.info/it/ip-address/46.28.204.193

The 7120 Bitcoins are distributed equally to 7 accounts, all of them were operated from a Swiss Based IP  “46.28.204.193”

source : http://247cryptonews.com/bter-got-hacked-7000-bitcoins-stolen-7-different-accounts/

Was just opinion ,i'm still new at this bitcoin stuff, keep my bet open tho Wink

That ip (46.28.204.193) is of the bitcoin node It is not the ip of the "hacker".
Borisz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 10:58:55 PM
 #116

That ip (46.28.204.193) is of the bitcoin node It is not the ip of the "hacker".

Yes I just read that too https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=957094.0
smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473


LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 11:18:33 PM
 #117



7170 btc stolen - https://bter.com/



This problem can be avoided with the simple use of multiSig address for their cold wallet, an example of an exchange that is using multiSignature addresses is:  BIT-X.com


Here some interesting articles about this bad situation :

- http://www.coindesk.com/bter-bitcoin-stolen-cold-wallet-hack
- http://247cryptonews.com/bter-got-hacked-7000-bitcoins-stolen-7-different-accounts/

Here the discussions on reddit :

- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vz1zq/its_now_officialbtercom_was_hackedlost_7170_btc/
- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2w00yo/three_exchanges_hacked_in_24_hours/

The only way bitcoins get stolen from a "cold" wallet is that the wallet wasn't really cold.

someone had access to it.

How the heck do you think there would be a transaction if the wallet was never touched?

Unless it was an inside job.

███████████████████████████████████████

            ,╓p@@███████@╗╖,           
        ,p████████████████████N,       
      d█████████████████████████b     
    d██████████████████████████████æ   
  ,████²█████████████████████████████, 
 ,█████  ╙████████████████████╨  █████y
 ██████    `████████████████`    ██████
║██████       Ñ███████████`      ███████
███████         ╩██████Ñ         ███████
███████    ▐▄     ²██╩     a▌    ███████
╢██████    ▐▓█▄          ▄█▓▌    ███████
 ██████    ▐▓▓▓▓▌,     ▄█▓▓▓▌    ██████─
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─  
     ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩    
        ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀       
           ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`          
                   ²²²                 
███████████████████████████████████████

. ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM        My PGP fingerprint is A764D833.                  History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ .
LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS.
 
redsn0w (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1042


#Free market


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 11:30:42 PM
 #118



7170 btc stolen - https://bter.com/



This problem can be avoided with the simple use of multiSig address for their cold wallet, an example of an exchange that is using multiSignature addresses is:  BIT-X.com


Here some interesting articles about this bad situation :

- http://www.coindesk.com/bter-bitcoin-stolen-cold-wallet-hack
- http://247cryptonews.com/bter-got-hacked-7000-bitcoins-stolen-7-different-accounts/

Here the discussions on reddit :

- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vz1zq/its_now_officialbtercom_was_hackedlost_7170_btc/
- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2w00yo/three_exchanges_hacked_in_24_hours/

The only way bitcoins get stolen from a "cold" wallet is that the wallet wasn't really cold.

someone had access to it.

How the heck do you think there would be a transaction if the wallet was never touched?

Unless it was an inside job.

It could be possible, we should wait more info from them. Maybe their definition of cold wallet is different from our, it should never be connected on internet.
Cluster2k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1692
Merit: 1018



View Profile
February 16, 2015, 04:01:10 AM
 #119

People keep repeating the mantra "don't keep your bitcoins anywhere but in your own wallet".  It's almost blaming the victim for being so careless about who they trust.  How do these people expect bitcoin commerce to work if businesses are always meant to be fearful of someone taking down an exchange?  How many businesses function in a world where Mastercard, Visa, PayPal, etc could at any moment lose all customer funds?

How is an exchange like bitfinex meant to be funded if no one is ever to keep bitcoins on there to fund leveraged positions and earn interest? 
flame1012
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 16, 2015, 05:17:25 AM
 #120


We should discuss if decentralized exchanges are going to be a good alternative and solution against these hacks.

> ALL cloudmining companies are SCAM <
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 71 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!