Zhou Tong advertising on BitcoinTalk.

[Shadow383]

Would you be so kind as to help me find 1297 Ercole Street Stonington, ME 04134 on a map? Any map? Even a relic one.

http://whois.domaintools.com/dailycheckout.com

http://www.dailycheckout.com/faq.asp?#100003
^you were looking for Roy Ditmas, you could do worse than call this number 

[ElectricMucus]

Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front. 

IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself.

So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on?

Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid.

[rjk]

Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front. 

IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself.

So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on?

Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid.

In that case, I hereby suspect you of drug trafficking for a major cartel, and you can't defend yourself because you are the suspect. Deny it all you want, but it means nothing! Yeah right.

[ElectricMucus]

Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front. 

IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself.

So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on?

Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid.

In that case, I hereby suspect you of drug trafficking for a major cartel, and you can't defend yourself because you are the suspect. Deny it all you want, but it means nothing! Yeah right.

Well then what was the point of the thread where AurumExchange was presenting the evidence to us? Of course you can say that wasn't evidence just accusations. Are you doing that?

[rjk]

Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front. 

IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself.

So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on?

Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid.

In that case, I hereby suspect you of drug trafficking for a major cartel, and you can't defend yourself because you are the suspect. Deny it all you want, but it means nothing! Yeah right.

Well then what was the point of the thread where AurumExchange was presenting the evidence to us? Of course you can say that wasn't evidence just accusations. Are you doing that?

Sure, there was evidence, but the suspect provided counter-evidence that refuted some of the conclusions that the accuser jumped to. So yes, some of it was nothing more than accusations.

[ElectricMucus]

He denied an not refuted. At least I haven't found any evidence of the existence of his associate.

In case I have missed it, point me to it.

[Maged]

He denied an not refuted. At least I haven't found any evidence of the existence of his associate.

In case I have missed it, point me to it.

We'll know soon enough, assuming ZT ever wants that $40k back, thanks to an official AML investigation that requires ZT's, his friend's and Chen's identity.

[mem]

"there was evidence" ok.

"the suspect provided counter-evidence that refuted some" - You say it refuted this is not agreed. Dismissing "some" does not equal dismissing all.

"some of it was nothing more than accusations." dismiss them and focus on what is known