|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
 |
August 01, 2012, 03:53:07 PM |
|
Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front.  IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself. So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on? Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid. |
|
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
August 01, 2012, 04:01:30 PM |
|
Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front. IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself. So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on? Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid. In that case, I hereby suspect you of drug trafficking for a major cartel, and you can't defend yourself because you are the suspect. Deny it all you want, but it means nothing! Yeah right. |
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
August 01, 2012, 04:14:41 PM |
|
Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front. IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself. So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on? Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid. In that case, I hereby suspect you of drug trafficking for a major cartel, and you can't defend yourself because you are the suspect. Deny it all you want, but it means nothing! Yeah right. Well then what was the point of the thread where AurumExchange was presenting the evidence to us? Of course you can say that wasn't evidence just accusations. Are you doing that? |
|
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
August 01, 2012, 04:22:47 PM |
|
Funny how you Mods quickly show up for his defense, way to show an united front. IMO, if this were anybody else he'd have that label by now. The evidence seems pretty clear and from what I can tell anything to the contrary comes from ZT himself. So a lack of evidence is a defense? Funny how your vision gets clouded by a witch hunt. Where there is an opposing statement, there is ambiguity that needs to be resolved. What reason do you have to completely ignore his statements as if they were false, just because they oppose your opinion as to what may be going on? Statements made by a suspect shouldn't be counted as evidence. If there was somebody independent bringing that up it should be valid. In that case, I hereby suspect you of drug trafficking for a major cartel, and you can't defend yourself because you are the suspect. Deny it all you want, but it means nothing! Yeah right. Well then what was the point of the thread where AurumExchange was presenting the evidence to us? Of course you can say that wasn't evidence just accusations. Are you doing that? Sure, there was evidence, but the suspect provided counter-evidence that refuted some of the conclusions that the accuser jumped to. So yes, some of it was nothing more than accusations. |
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
August 01, 2012, 04:27:51 PM |
|
He denied an not refuted. At least I haven't found any evidence of the existence of his associate.
In case I have missed it, point me to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 01, 2012, 04:36:43 PM |
|
He denied an not refuted. At least I haven't found any evidence of the existence of his associate.
In case I have missed it, point me to it.
We'll know soon enough, assuming ZT ever wants that $40k back, thanks to an official AML investigation that requires ZT's, his friend's and Chen's identity. |
|
|
|
|
mem
|
|
August 02, 2012, 05:48:35 AM |
|
"there was evidence" ok.
"the suspect provided counter-evidence that refuted some" - You say it refuted this is not agreed. Dismissing "some" does not equal dismissing all.
"some of it was nothing more than accusations." dismiss them and focus on what is known
|
|
|
|
|
