mafort1469
|
|
April 23, 2015, 02:02:43 AM |
|
No FIRE is quite alive and doing very well. Can you help in any way to promote FIRE to anyone/everyone you know?
|
|
|
|
FIRE-community (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
April 23, 2015, 07:55:17 PM |
|
The FIRE Community Account has received a PM about additional nodes, here's the PM if anyone would like to take a look at it. Forge on with FIRE https://i.imgur.com/gDIGDiR.png
|
|
|
|
mafort1469
|
|
April 24, 2015, 01:58:49 AM |
|
This is fantastic. I really can't believe someone hasn't done this sooner. I like it!!!
|
|
|
|
Testing Crypto
|
|
April 29, 2015, 01:37:23 AM |
|
This is fantastic. I really can't believe someone hasn't done this sooner. I like it!!!
That has been a thought for a long time, hence the reason many alts do ICO/IPO/ITO's & premines. Multifaucet | _________________________________
Recent 6 donations Total amount: 300.02199 FIRE | _________________________________
Sent 56 payments Total amount: 0.58300000 FIRE |
Forge on with FIRE in the meantime
|
ZwNpPhVYrSrPMS71GLc7TEnbqA9VSZopGn // Gift5YapqsZqSTW8T4S3sCU4sngCkvh4ba // 3Gwc4KzVtuJ9ADnuqzF7XRhSaaE7HkBWpr // 1PAGEHrN62tgUHncGWbbhKe9jhZGXsxFC4 "In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi {SAT OS hi}
|
|
|
mafort1469
|
|
April 29, 2015, 02:38:44 AM |
|
This is fantastic. I really can't believe someone hasn't done this sooner. I like it!!!
That has been a thought for a long time, hence the reason many alts do ICO/IPO/ITO's & premines. Multifaucet | _________________________________
Recent 6 donations Total amount: 300.02199 FIRE | _________________________________
Sent 56 payments Total amount: 0.58300000 FIRE |
Forge on with FIRE in the meantime Yes, my wallet is always open and unlocked for staking.
|
|
|
|
*Sakura*
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
|
|
May 13, 2015, 04:41:07 AM Last edit: May 14, 2015, 04:28:46 AM by *Sakura* |
|
Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.
EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Testing Crypto
|
|
May 15, 2015, 04:36:32 PM |
|
Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.
EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!
1) ~ http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info2) ~ http://blockexperts.com/fire (click the PEERS tab for nodes)
|
ZwNpPhVYrSrPMS71GLc7TEnbqA9VSZopGn // Gift5YapqsZqSTW8T4S3sCU4sngCkvh4ba // 3Gwc4KzVtuJ9ADnuqzF7XRhSaaE7HkBWpr // 1PAGEHrN62tgUHncGWbbhKe9jhZGXsxFC4 "In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi {SAT OS hi}
|
|
|
SlamPower
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
June 01, 2015, 02:57:28 PM |
|
No FIRE is quite alive and doing very well. Can you help in any way to promote FIRE to anyone/everyone you know?
I'm already doing this, but my followers on twitter are skeptical about the coin... do you know how we can make it more trustworthy ??
|
|
|
|
*Sakura*
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
|
|
June 09, 2015, 02:11:44 PM Last edit: June 09, 2015, 02:29:19 PM by *Sakura* |
|
Thanks for the tip! It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138. Which one is correct?
|
|
|
|
*Sakura*
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
|
|
June 10, 2015, 07:44:01 AM |
|
Thanks for the tip! It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138. Which one is correct? I've done a full resync from scratch. And now I have the same block count with two BlockExplorers. So, now I'm Ok and staking.
|
|
|
|
Testing Crypto
|
|
June 10, 2015, 08:14:51 AM |
|
Thanks for the tip! It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138. Which one is correct? I've done a full resync from scratch. And now I have the same block count with two BlockExplorers. So, now I'm Ok and staking. For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date: Total blocks: 60048 Synchronized blocks: 60048 (100.00000000 %) Total transactions: 120671 Total coins: 97856.62985808 FIRE POW coins: 97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall rightPOS coins: 364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS Total send amount: 1459278.17679470 FIRE Total receive amount: 1459273.84894470 FIRE Total fee amount: 4.32785000 FIRE Total used addresses: 4942 Total funded addresses: 428 Total empty addresses: 4514 // 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves
|
ZwNpPhVYrSrPMS71GLc7TEnbqA9VSZopGn // Gift5YapqsZqSTW8T4S3sCU4sngCkvh4ba // 3Gwc4KzVtuJ9ADnuqzF7XRhSaaE7HkBWpr // 1PAGEHrN62tgUHncGWbbhKe9jhZGXsxFC4 "In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi {SAT OS hi}
|
|
|
Coinmin
|
|
June 13, 2015, 11:36:54 PM |
|
For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date: Total blocks: 60048 Synchronized blocks: 60048 (100.00000000 %) Total transactions: 120671 Total coins: 97856.62985808 FIRE POW coins: 97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall rightPOS coins: 364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS Total send amount: 1459278.17679470 FIRE Total receive amount: 1459273.84894470 FIRE Total fee amount: 4.32785000 FIRE Total used addresses: 4942 Total funded addresses: 428 Total empty addresses: 4514 // 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum. Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.)
|
|
|
|
Testing Crypto
|
|
June 14, 2015, 12:06:42 AM |
|
For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date: Total blocks: 60048 Synchronized blocks: 60048 (100.00000000 %) Total transactions: 120671 Total coins: 97856.62985808 FIRE POW coins: 97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall rightPOS coins: 364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS Total send amount: 1459278.17679470 FIRE Total receive amount: 1459273.84894470 FIRE Total fee amount: 4.32785000 FIRE Total used addresses: 4942 Total funded addresses: 428 Total empty addresses: 4514 // 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum. Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.) It will never reach 1 mil, 150,000 FIRE is the max & that will take over a decade ( Github Link to the Max supply). The specs on FIRE seem to be more for a certain rarity, adding more coins would not only hurt the people that bought in on the launch of FIRE (100k sats). It would would make it almost impossible to help anyone who bought in on the second launch of FIRE, but that's just what I see here & I could be wrong.
|
ZwNpPhVYrSrPMS71GLc7TEnbqA9VSZopGn // Gift5YapqsZqSTW8T4S3sCU4sngCkvh4ba // 3Gwc4KzVtuJ9ADnuqzF7XRhSaaE7HkBWpr // 1PAGEHrN62tgUHncGWbbhKe9jhZGXsxFC4 "In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi {SAT OS hi}
|
|
|
Coinmin
|
|
June 18, 2015, 02:46:32 AM Last edit: June 18, 2015, 03:18:36 AM by Coinmin |
|
For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date: Total blocks: 60048 Synchronized blocks: 60048 (100.00000000 %) Total transactions: 120671 Total coins: 97856.62985808 FIRE POW coins: 97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall rightPOS coins: 364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS Total send amount: 1459278.17679470 FIRE Total receive amount: 1459273.84894470 FIRE Total fee amount: 4.32785000 FIRE Total used addresses: 4942 Total funded addresses: 428 Total empty addresses: 4514 // 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum. Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.) It will never reach 1 mil, 150,000 FIRE is the max & that will take over a decade ( Github Link to the Max supply). The specs on FIRE seem to be more for a certain rarity, adding more coins would not only hurt the people that bought in on the launch of FIRE (100k sats). It would would make it almost impossible to help anyone who bought in on the second launch of FIRE, but that's just what I see here & I could be wrong. But the problem of attracting users is still open. Is not it? If no one buys the coin, so it is useless and old holders simply have nothing to lose. I think problem in its parameters. With the current parameters, it is not profitable to buy. Here in the forum is very large community of fans of high pos. They will just happy to buy this coin, if you make a few changes to the coin parameters to increase the total to ~5 million FIRE and increase the pos % to ~100% per annum. Create a poll on this issue, I am sure that the holders will support it. p.s. I had been receiving BTC dividends from this coin, so I want to see it successful again.
|
|
|
|
|
Coinmin
|
|
July 04, 2015, 01:58:00 AM |
|
So what future plans for this coin, dev?
|
|
|
|
Testing Crypto
|
|
July 04, 2015, 05:47:10 AM Last edit: July 08, 2015, 10:17:11 PM by Testing Crypto |
|
So what future plans for this coin, dev?
The original developer abandon right after PoW ( Original Post Info), a few community members (coders & non-coders, or dev's as most say) tried to build a good community around FIRE & also decided to leave it. If there's no community, there's no development & developers can't do anything about that. FIRE works great (having personally tested over 1000+ wallets, it's resources to run are far less than most), but there's 100's of coins that work & have very small community (or lack of communication). There's also 1000's of them that have been defunct (abandon or broken beyond repair). I know many have spent 100's of hours working on rebuilding FIRE (more than once to help from the abandonment after PoW), really don't get some of these coingen launches & it wouldn't take much to have something working for over a year (last week was 1 year, thought about having a give a way & have spent more time helping in crypto than most do in there full time jobs? I have made less than a penny or cent an hour if you calculate how many hours I've spent trying to help, aside from mining that is). As they say on many other coins, development without some kind of funding is almost a certain failure & the few that have tried to help FIRE didn't have anymore time or money to waste (I have all the time in the world, but having a bad back & no money to help isn't going to get FIRE anywhere). Wish it weren't true, but that's the facts & only a current or new person / group can get FIRE anywhere // I could spend 100's of hours updating the ANN, website, github & maybe a few other things. It still wouldn't do any good without others helping out, someday maybe FIRE will get it's chance
|
ZwNpPhVYrSrPMS71GLc7TEnbqA9VSZopGn // Gift5YapqsZqSTW8T4S3sCU4sngCkvh4ba // 3Gwc4KzVtuJ9ADnuqzF7XRhSaaE7HkBWpr // 1PAGEHrN62tgUHncGWbbhKe9jhZGXsxFC4 "In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi {SAT OS hi}
|
|
|
TomVelvetPaws
|
|
July 04, 2015, 06:25:15 AM |
|
I'm still with Fire.I have never had a problem with the wallet until recently.Good to hear some news it caught my attention.
|
◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ ☠ CRAVE ☠ Embrace the privacy movement ☠ ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣ Your Market. Your Blockchain Business. Your Profit. ◥ ◣◥ ◣◥ ◣
|
|
|
Repunza
|
|
July 23, 2015, 01:51:49 AM |
|
Is firecoin still going? Let's get some ideals.
|
|
|
|
*Sakura*
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
|
|
November 27, 2015, 02:40:40 PM |
|
Good to see FIRE network alive and healthy.
|
|
|
|
|