[ANN][FIRE] FireCoin BitBlockForging @ 1% APR | 98,750+ Supply | 150K limit

[mafort1469]

No FIRE is quite alive and doing very well. Can you help in any way to promote FIRE to anyone/everyone you know?

[1715000164]

1715000164

[FIRE-community]

The FIRE Community Account has received a PM about additional nodes, here's the PM if anyone would like to take a look at it.

Hello,

I think i may help you with your coin. Please see the announcement of my service https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1033101.0

Thanks for your time.

Forge on with FIREhttps://i.imgur.com/gDIGDiR.png

[mafort1469]

This is fantastic. I really can't believe someone hasn't done this sooner. I like it!!!

[Testing Crypto]

This is fantastic. I really can't believe someone hasn't done this sooner. I like it!!!

  That has been a thought for a long time, hence the reason many alts do ICO/IPO/ITO's & premines.

   Multifaucet   



   

_________________________________ Recent 6 donations Total amount: 300.02199 FIRE

_________________________________ Sent 56 payments Total amount: 0.58300000 FIRE

Forge on with FIRE in the meantime

[mafort1469]

This is fantastic. I really can't believe someone hasn't done this sooner. I like it!!!

  That has been a thought for a long time, hence the reason many alts do ICO/IPO/ITO's & premines.

   Multifaucet   



   

_________________________________ Recent 6 donations Total amount: 300.02199 FIRE

_________________________________ Sent 56 payments Total amount: 0.58300000 FIRE

Forge on with FIRE in the meantime

Yes, my wallet is always open and unlocked for staking.

[*Sakura*]

Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.


EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!

[Testing Crypto]

Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.


EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!

1) ~ http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info

2) ~ http://blockexperts.com/fire   (click the PEERS tab for nodes)

[SlamPower]

No FIRE is quite alive and doing very well. Can you help in any way to promote FIRE to anyone/everyone you know?

I'm already doing this, but my followers on twitter are skeptical about the coin... do you know how we can make it more trustworthy ??

[*Sakura*]

Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.


EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!

1) ~ http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info

2) ~ http://blockexperts.com/fire   (click the PEERS tab for nodes)

Thanks for the tip!

It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138.

Which one is correct?

[*Sakura*]

Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.


EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!

1) ~ http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info

2) ~ http://blockexperts.com/fire   (click the PEERS tab for nodes)

Thanks for the tip!

It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138.

Which one is correct?

I've done a full resync from scratch. And now I have the same block count with two BlockExplorers.

So, now I'm Ok and staking.

[Testing Crypto]

Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.


EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!

1) ~ http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info

2) ~ http://blockexperts.com/fire   (click the PEERS tab for nodes)

Thanks for the tip!

It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138.

Which one is correct?

I've done a full resync from scratch. And now I have the same block count with two BlockExplorers.

So, now I'm Ok and staking.

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS  
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves

[Coinmin]

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS  
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves

Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum.
Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.)

[Testing Crypto]

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS  
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves

Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum.
Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.)

It will never reach 1 mil, 150,000 FIRE is the max & that will take over a decade (Github Link to the Max supply). The specs on FIRE seem to be more for a certain rarity, adding more coins would not only hurt the people that bought in on the launch of FIRE (100k sats). It would would make it almost impossible to help anyone who bought in on the second launch of FIRE, but that's just what I see here & I could be wrong.

[Coinmin]

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <<Here's where the math comes in for PoS  
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves

Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum.
Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.)

It will never reach 1 mil, 150,000 FIRE is the max & that will take over a decade (Github Link to the Max supply). The specs on FIRE seem to be more for a certain rarity, adding more coins would not only hurt the people that bought in on the launch of FIRE (100k sats). It would would make it almost impossible to help anyone who bought in on the second launch of FIRE, but that's just what I see here & I could be wrong.

But the problem of attracting users is still open. Is not it? If no one buys the coin, so it is useless and old holders simply have nothing to lose. I think problem in its parameters. With the current parameters, it is not profitable to buy. Here in the forum is very large community of fans of high pos. They will just happy to buy this coin, if you make a few changes to the coin parameters to increase the total to ~5 million FIRE and increase the pos % to ~100% per annum.
Create a poll on this issue, I am sure that the holders will support it.

p.s. I had been receiving BTC dividends from this coin, so I want to see it successful again.

[weenfan]

https://yobit.net/en/trade/FIRE/BTC .. bids on fire .. lets make a market here.

[Coinmin]

So what future plans for this coin, dev?

[Testing Crypto]

So what future plans for this coin, dev?

The original developer abandon right after PoW (Original Post Info), a few community members (coders & non-coders, or dev's as most say) tried to build a good community around FIRE & also decided to leave it. If there's no community, there's no development & developers can't do anything about that. FIRE works great (having personally tested over 1000+ wallets, it's resources to run are far less than most), but there's 100's of coins that work & have very small community (or lack of communication). There's also 1000's of them that have been defunct (abandon or broken beyond repair). I know many have spent 100's of hours working on rebuilding FIRE (more than once to help from the abandonment after PoW), really don't get some of these coingen launches & it wouldn't take much to have something working for over a year (last week was 1 year, thought about having a give a way & have spent more time helping in crypto than most do in there full time jobs? I have made less than a penny or cent an hour if you calculate how many hours I've spent trying to help, aside from mining that is). As they say on many other coins, development without some kind of funding is almost a certain failure & the few that have tried to help FIRE didn't have anymore time or money to waste (I have all the time in the world, but having a bad back & no money to help isn't going to get FIRE anywhere). Wish it weren't true, but that's the facts & only a current or new person / group can get FIRE anywhere

// I could spend 100's of hours updating the ANN, website, github & maybe a few other things. It still wouldn't do any good without others helping out, someday maybe FIRE will get it's chance

[TomVelvetPaws]

I'm still with Fire.I have never had a problem with the wallet until recently.Good to hear some news it caught my attention. 

[Repunza]

Is firecoin still going? Let's get some ideals.

[*Sakura*]

Good to see FIRE network alive and healthy.