SistaFista
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 251
Hexhash.xyz
|
|
March 08, 2015, 08:13:57 PM |
|
Good stuff I don't mind waiting. What to mine till then..... EmoneyCoin, i guess
|
|
|
|
SistaFista
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 251
Hexhash.xyz
|
|
March 08, 2015, 08:15:31 PM |
|
You're right, looks good now:
./fonziecoind getwork
"target" : "00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000958d0100000000"
Should I fire up the stratums ? :-)
I'm kind of busy today with family stuff. Also this is supposed to be fair. I don't want screaming from the gallows. How about in a few hours. I'll post a time. I'd really rather not blow the whole fairness thing just trying to get it launched. Sure no prob, just let me/us know when you want to launch, I'm around While your here 10k.suprnova.cc is down btw
|
|
|
|
scorpio18
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Admin of CoinMiners Pools
|
|
March 08, 2015, 08:28:44 PM |
|
Ill give it a try in about an hour
Even with the new genesis it is still stuck on block 1. Could this be a problem with stratum? This was cloned from an X-something (11, 13?) and converted to SHA-256d. Might stratum itself be rejecting the blocks? No it is a diff /Target issue. Just do a 'getwork' and you will see Target is 0000000000000.. A matching block can never be found (has to be smaller than Target) I will have a close Look a little later Yeah, it's a retarget issue. I got it. This is real embarrassing. CBigNum bnTargetLimit; if (fTestNet) { CBigNum bnTargetLimit = bnTestTarget; // PoS & PoW limits are same on testnet } else { CBigNum bnTargetLimit = fProofOfStake ? bnProofOfStakeLimit : bnProofOfWorkLimit; }
Notice how I re-initialize CBugNum in the conditional, that makes the outer CBigNum 0 always. I'm not sure why I did that. I probably copied the original line and forgot to remove the initializers. It should be CBigNum bnTargetLimit; if (fTestNet) { bnTargetLimit = bnTestTarget; // PoS & PoW limits are same on testnet } else { bnTargetLimit = fProofOfStake ? bnProofOfStakeLimit : bnProofOfWorkLimit; }
Do we want to try again at Mar. 9 UTC 7:30 AM, or stick with Mar. 10? I'd like to launch earlier. I have a functional test net so I'll mine on the testnet before launch to make sure it's working. We'll do it if we get 6 votes yes. I hope you will update the github to
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
March 08, 2015, 08:30:51 PM |
|
You're right, looks good now:
./fonziecoind getwork
"target" : "00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000958d0100000000"
Should I fire up the stratums ? :-)
I'm kind of busy today with family stuff. Also this is supposed to be fair. I don't want screaming from the gallows. How about in a few hours. I'll post a time. I'd really rather not blow the whole fairness thing just trying to get it launched. Sure no prob, just let me/us know when you want to launch, I'm around While your here 10k.suprnova.cc is down btw Hmm, was it closed longer than 14 days ago ? Then it has been auto-cleaned. EDIT: Yep, its wiped
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
Fonziecoin (OP)
|
|
March 08, 2015, 09:33:06 PM Last edit: March 08, 2015, 11:27:20 PM by Fonziecoin |
|
Ill give it a try in about an hour
Even with the new genesis it is still stuck on block 1. Could this be a problem with stratum? This was cloned from an X-something (11, 13?) and converted to SHA-256d. Might stratum itself be rejecting the blocks? No it is a diff /Target issue. Just do a 'getwork' and you will see Target is 0000000000000.. A matching block can never be found (has to be smaller than Target) I will have a close Look a little later Yeah, it's a retarget issue. I got it. This is real embarrassing. CBigNum bnTargetLimit; if (fTestNet) { CBigNum bnTargetLimit = bnTestTarget; // PoS & PoW limits are same on testnet } else { CBigNum bnTargetLimit = fProofOfStake ? bnProofOfStakeLimit : bnProofOfWorkLimit; }
Notice how I re-initialize CBugNum in the conditional, that makes the outer CBigNum 0 always. I'm not sure why I did that. I probably copied the original line and forgot to remove the initializers. It should be CBigNum bnTargetLimit; if (fTestNet) { bnTargetLimit = bnTestTarget; // PoS & PoW limits are same on testnet } else { bnTargetLimit = fProofOfStake ? bnProofOfStakeLimit : bnProofOfWorkLimit; }
Do we want to try again at Mar. 9 UTC 7:30 AM, or stick with Mar. 10? I'd like to launch earlier. I have a functional test net so I'll mine on the testnet before launch to make sure it's working. We'll do it if we get 6 votes yes. I hope you will update the github to I'm going to make a commit with a few changes. I'm going to move that ill-advised testnet junk out of GetNextTargetRequired_. I have a some mac-specific changes that need to go in. I'll update git in a couple of hours and then do my tests today. I think it's looking like we'll go with a launch for Mar. 9 UTC 7:30 AM (Mar. 9 PDT 12:30 AM). I'll change I've changed the OP.
|
FonzieCoin: As Fair as it is Cool
|
|
|
Fonziecoin (OP)
|
|
March 08, 2015, 11:26:20 PM |
|
LAUNCH TIME CONVERSIONSBecause of daylight savings, there might be some confusion about launch. First, the time has moved to 7:30 AM UTC March 9Make sure you convert that. To my best ability to convert it, here it is in the US Time zones (except for AZ, I think who don't engage in this nonsense): https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.htmlUTC (Time Zone) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 7:30:00 AM UTC New York (U.S.A. - New York) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 3:30:00 AM EDT UTC-4 hours Austin (U.S.A. - Texas) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:30:00 AM CDT UTC-5 hours Denver (U.S.A. - Colorado) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 1:30:00 AM MDT UTC-6 hours Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 12:30:00 AM MST UTC-7 hours Los Angeles (U.S.A. - California) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 12:30:00 AM PDT UTC-7 hours Tokyo (Japan) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 4:30:00 PM JST UTC+9 hours Kathmandu (Nepal) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 1:15:00 PM NPT UTC+5:45 hours Istanbul (Turkey) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:30:00 AM EET UTC+2 hours Lisbon (Portugal) Monday, March 9, 2015 at 7:30:00 AM WET UTC
|
FonzieCoin: As Fair as it is Cool
|
|
|
cintrondigital
|
|
March 09, 2015, 12:27:12 AM |
|
See you at Launch time. ManhattanMine will be alert! Good Luck!
|
▞▬▬▬▞▬▬▬▞▬▬▬▞▬▬▬▞▬▬▬▞▬▬▬▚▬▬▬▚
|
|
|
|
minerpools
|
|
March 09, 2015, 02:05:56 AM |
|
Alright dev, good luck, I'll be ready for relaunch Cheers!
|
|
|
|
sly5am
|
|
March 09, 2015, 04:21:55 AM Last edit: March 09, 2015, 04:37:32 AM by sly5am |
|
Suprnova.cc getting ddos'd??? xfz.suprnova.cc back up
|
|
|
|
|
Fonziecoin (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2015, 06:59:51 AM |
|
DELAY: 1 hour
It's looking like we are going to have to delay one hour to test. New launch time is 8:30 AM UTC.
|
FonzieCoin: As Fair as it is Cool
|
|
|
|
Fonziecoin (OP)
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:12:45 AM |
|
LOL. Again?
Wow, that was quick. Sitting on the edge of your seat?
|
FonzieCoin: As Fair as it is Cool
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:19:42 AM |
|
Wow, that was quick. Sitting on the edge of your seat?
I'm lying on sofa actually Are you testing before launch?
|
|
|
|
Paycoinzzz
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:20:12 AM |
|
So what's the delay for this time?
|
|
|
|
scorpio18
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Admin of CoinMiners Pools
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:20:43 AM |
|
DELAY: 1 hour
It's looking like we are going to have to delay one hour to test. New launch time is 8:30 AM UTC.
I hope this time will be a good launch
|
|
|
|
Paycoinzzz
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:21:06 AM |
|
Wow, that was quick. Sitting on the edge of your seat?
I'm lying on sofa actually Are you testing before launch? And did you return the diff to standard for all sha256 diff levels?
|
|
|
|
Shadow_Runner
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:21:24 AM |
|
WTF with suprnova, no one pool is not working
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:23:08 AM |
|
WTF with suprnova, no one pool is not working DNS Problems currently, perfect timing for the launch Try http://xfz.rnova.cc - the "normal" domain should be back up within 30 mins as the support says
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
|