[ANN] ECASH | Probably going to die really, really soon with no hosting nodes

[nikkers]

Shame this coin had so many weak retarded hands coin supply about 7 million and you sell for 200sat!! wtf are you people on your are selling at massive lost you silly %^&*(. Why do i have to buy into a coin with the most stupid people imaginable involved in ffs

I agree mate,i think it must be the bigger holders dumping as they stake

I started with about 22k which cost me around 0.2 btc to mine, now i have 35k which is worth half that  

LoL at traders that don't understand economics.

care to help me understand then dude, instead of lolling at us dumb asses

[jc12345]

Shame this coin had so many weak retarded hands coin supply about 7 million and you sell for 200sat!! wtf are you people on your are selling at massive lost you silly %^&*(. Why do i have to buy into a coin with the most stupid people imaginable involved in ffs

I agree mate,i think it must be the bigger holders dumping as they stake

I started with about 22k which cost me around 0.2 btc to mine, now i have 35k which is worth half that  

LoL at traders that don't understand economics.

care to help me understand then dude, instead of lolling at us dumb asses

Iv posted enough about it already. 

[rahmad2nd]

How POS interest for ecash now ?

[asuryan180]

Shame this coin had so many weak retarded hands coin supply about 7 million and you sell for 200sat!! wtf are you people on your are selling at massive lost you silly %^&*(. Why do i have to buy into a coin with the most stupid people imaginable involved in ffs

No need to get personal with the traders. If your view is positive for the future, then buy in at 200 sats. People are just factoring in the coin supply after 21 days growing at 10k% - 20k% per year.

Lets assume the 21 days was over today and supply was 7m today and interest was 20,000% for three days in a row, it would mean coin supply of 10.8m after day 1, 16.7m after day 2 and 25.9m after day 3. what is going to happen with all those new coins apart from the option to stake them for even more? In reality, all blocks being 20,000% for 3 days is unrealistic but if you take the average between 10-20k you might look at 30m supply after a week or so. People are therefore not selling a coin supply of 7m but a supply of 30m+, depending on your timeframe after the 21 days. Unfortunately with all traders having short term profit in mind, the pattern as previously explained will repeat itself. At least there is a dice game thanks to Spots that will help a bit with demand.

I will stop you there, they are not traders LOL. If i am positive for the future does it sound like i am? I hope you understand there is no profit to be made from selling for 200 only losses you only be selling stake but you are destroying the price of your coin what you hold. Please do not try and teach me basic percentages dear oh dear. I will leave you to your theory i will stick with the facts.. They are not traders and i will keep to myself what they are...

[jc12345]

Shame this coin had so many weak retarded hands coin supply about 7 million and you sell for 200sat!! wtf are you people on your are selling at massive lost you silly %^&*(. Why do i have to buy into a coin with the most stupid people imaginable involved in ffs

No need to get personal with the traders. If your view is positive for the future, then buy in at 200 sats. People are just factoring in the coin supply after 21 days growing at 10k% - 20k% per year.

Lets assume the 21 days was over today and supply was 7m today and interest was 20,000% for three days in a row, it would mean coin supply of 10.8m after day 1, 16.7m after day 2 and 25.9m after day 3. what is going to happen with all those new coins apart from the option to stake them for even more? In reality, all blocks being 20,000% for 3 days is unrealistic but if you take the average between 10-20k you might look at 30m supply after a week or so. People are therefore not selling a coin supply of 7m but a supply of 30m+, depending on your timeframe after the 21 days. Unfortunately with all traders having short term profit in mind, the pattern as previously explained will repeat itself. At least there is a dice game thanks to Spots that will help a bit with demand.

I will stop you there, they are not traders LOL. If i am positive for the future does it sound like i am? I hope you understand there is no profit to be made from selling for 200 only losses you only be selling stake but you are destroying the price of your coin what you hold. Please do not try and teach me basic percentages dear oh dear. I will leave you to your theory i will stick with the facts.. They are not traders and i will keep to myself what they are...

Of course they are traders. Your post just proved that you don't understand economics either. If you can tell me what they must do with their stake apart from selling or staking more for academic or entertainment purposes then I might revise my statement to say that you know at least a little bit of economics.

I have to put a caveat and that is there is always the possibility of a white knight to turn things around, just like what Spots did for the coin technically.

[Kaenguru]

Hey, Spots, can you explain that?
Everytime i send coins, there is automatically a second transaction, but not by me.
And only in my second wallet (Backup) is it possible to see that.
I wanna know where my coins gone.....
And yes, i only downloaded the wallet from here...

[iGotSpots]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

[Kaenguru]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

No, the wallet is a clone, 1:1

[iGotSpots]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

No, the wallet is a clone, 1:1

So the balance that you sent is all that's actually being deducted; the second one's amount doesn't actually leave your wallet, correct?

[Kaenguru]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

No, the wallet is a clone, 1:1

So the balance that you sent is all that's actually being deducted; the second one's amount doesn't actually leave your wallet, correct?

Both leave my wallet, one to Bittrex and the 2nd. somewhere else, dont know where... just gone....

[iGotSpots]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

No, the wallet is a clone, 1:1

So the balance that you sent is all that's actually being deducted; the second one's amount doesn't actually leave your wallet, correct?

Both leave my wallet, one to Bittrex and the 2nd. somewhere else, dont know where... just gone....

I would copy your wallet and redownload the client. It sounds like one of the setting might have been accidentally edited. Please try that, send somewhere, and let me know if it's still happening. Make sure you remove the old client completely

Has anyone else seen this issue? I haven't experienced this in any of the 4 coins that use the same codebase

[Kaenguru]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

No, the wallet is a clone, 1:1

So the balance that you sent is all that's actually being deducted; the second one's amount doesn't actually leave your wallet, correct?

Both leave my wallet, one to Bittrex and the 2nd. somewhere else, dont know where... just gone....

I would copy your wallet and redownload the client. It sounds like one of the setting might have been accidentally edited. Please try that, send somewhere, and let me know if it's still happening. Make sure you remove the old client completely

Has anyone else seen this issue? I haven't experienced this in any of the 4 coins that use the same codebase

You can try this by yourself, install the wallet on a second computer and copy/paste the wallet.dat from the first one.

Send coins from wallet on PC1 to Bittrex and then sync wallet on PC2, see what happen

[iGotSpots]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

No, the wallet is a clone, 1:1

So the balance that you sent is all that's actually being deducted; the second one's amount doesn't actually leave your wallet, correct?

Both leave my wallet, one to Bittrex and the 2nd. somewhere else, dont know where... just gone....

I would copy your wallet and redownload the client. It sounds like one of the setting might have been accidentally edited. Please try that, send somewhere, and let me know if it's still happening. Make sure you remove the old client completely

Has anyone else seen this issue? I haven't experienced this in any of the 4 coins that use the same codebase

You can try this by yourself, install the wallet on a second computer and copy/paste the wallet.dat from the first one.

Send coins from wallet on PC1 to Bittrex and then sync wallet on PC2, see what happen

We do this often for all 4 coins via GorillaStake

[jeffery_dahmer]

My guess is change address which would mean the second values aren't actually being deducted from balance, but just displaying in transactions

Correct me if my assumption is wrong, please

No, the wallet is a clone, 1:1

So the balance that you sent is all that's actually being deducted; the second one's amount doesn't actually leave your wallet, correct?

Both leave my wallet, one to Bittrex and the 2nd. somewhere else, dont know where... just gone....

I would copy your wallet and redownload the client. It sounds like one of the setting might have been accidentally edited. Please try that, send somewhere, and let me know if it's still happening. Make sure you remove the old client completely

Has anyone else seen this issue? I haven't experienced this in any of the 4 coins that use the same codebase

You can try this by yourself, install the wallet on a second computer and copy/paste the wallet.dat from the first one.

Send coins from wallet on PC1 to Bittrex and then sync wallet on PC2, see what happen

i just opened my wallet on my laptop, sent an ECASH tx from my desktop to trex, and saw no extra tx's in either wallet. I am curious about your setup. i dont see any orphans in your pics.. you must have one hell of a connection to the nodes

[iGotSpots]

i just opened my wallet on my laptop, sent an ECASH tx from my desktop to trex, and saw no extra tx's in either wallet. I am curious about your setup. i dont see any orphans in your pics.. you must have one hell of a connection to the nodes

Wow, I didn't even notice that

[jeffery_dahmer]

i just opened my wallet on my laptop, sent an ECASH tx from my desktop to trex, and saw no extra tx's in either wallet. I am curious about your setup. i dont see any orphans in your pics.. you must have one hell of a connection to the nodes

Wow, I didn't even notice that

EDIT Yeah i have 3 orphans to every 1 accepted on my wallet... not 5 like i said before 

Code:

Confirmed	Date	Type	Label
FALSE	2015-03-15T22:01:29	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T22:00:16	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:58:28	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:57:25	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:56:52	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:54:13	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:52:51	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:51:38	Received with	Stake01
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:48:49	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:47:00	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:45:06	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:44:04	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:41:42	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:39:45	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:37:17	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:35:31	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:33:51	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:32:21	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:15:33	Sent to	Bittrex
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:14:48	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:13:57	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:13:06	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:11:55	Mint by stake	
TRUE	2015-03-15T21:11:10	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:07:48	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:02:29	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T21:00:06	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T20:58:43	Mint by stake	
FALSE	2015-03-15T20:55:06	Mint by stake	

[iGotSpots]

Just want to say thanks to ocminer for the three lines of code he contributed and for the negative trust. Much appreciated to get a red negative for fixing this piece of shit coin

[jeffery_dahmer]

Just want to say thanks to ocminer for the three lines of code he contributed and for the negative trust. Much appreciated to get a red negative for fixing this piece of shit coin

Nice. I know where my hash wont be.

[iGotSpots]

Apparently sending him three personal messages that his pool was on its own fork for three days was not enough, which, by the way, is three more messages than I sent everyone else combined, so..

[jeffery_dahmer]

Apparently sending him three personal messages that his pool was on its own fork for three days was not enough, which, by the way, is three more messages than I sent everyone else combined, so..

Yes. My opinion is, follow the latest news of the coin (i.e. btctalk thread, website, etc) or prepare to loose everything. 3 days is a long time in crypto. coins have gone from launch to hottest coin on the planet to failure in less time.