Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 03:34:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the auction?  (Read 1127 times)
Blinken (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 338
Merit: 253



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 03:34:31 AM
 #1

Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?

Bitcoin ♦♦♦ Trust in Mathematics, Not Bankers ♦♦♦
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2015, 05:14:34 AM
 #2

Wouldn't it be ironic if THE FEDERAL RESERVE was?

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
SLVR4ME
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 05:23:14 AM
 #3

Wouldn't it be ironic if THE FEDERAL RESERVE was?

I dont think this as very far fetched at all....
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2015, 05:25:27 AM
 #4

Indeed it would. I actually think that some governments have been actively pushing the price down with bad news, to slowly buy in.
Don't be surprised if you see such situations.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2015, 05:32:50 AM
 #5

https://instagram.com/p/0Avb9yrL6Y/

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
TrailingComet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 05:35:42 AM
 #6

Ironic would not be the word, machiavellian would be

pooya87
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3444
Merit: 10555



View Profile
March 11, 2015, 05:39:49 AM
 #7

whit these rises and falls in price, government wants in too. Cheesy

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 05:50:40 AM
 #8

Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?

Not sure if it would be Ironic or if it would be a question of how anyone did not see it coming
Anyways until they reveal themselves I guess it could be anyone's guess.
But I think the bidder is an established party until proven otherwise could even be the new venutre capital group were talking about right know that funded the 21.co organization if we were to be speculative about it.

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 06:58:16 AM
 #9

Nope, They already benefitted from the auction.... why double dip?

I think transparency will be a issue, and opposing parties will use that as ammunition, if they get caught out.  Wink

If they really wanted to spoil the party, they could have dumped all those coins in one go... The secret bidder will eventually be revealed and my bet is not on the government.  Grin

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
Possum577
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250

Loose lips sink sigs!


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2015, 07:15:09 AM
 #10

It wouldn't be ironic, by definition. But it would be very, very interesting...and perhaps typical (if you believe in some conspiracy theory stuff.)

QuestionAuthority
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393


You lead and I'll watch you walk away.


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 07:43:24 AM
 #11

They could buy all Bitcoins currently in existance with the congressional budget for champagne and condoms. I don't think there has ever been a purchase large enough to be a government.

NUFCrichard
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 07:50:29 AM
 #12

Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?

As they can print as much fiat "money" as the want, they could pretty much buy up Bitcoin if they so chose.  Any left over Bitcoin (in the US) could be seized.
They have plenty of ways to largely take over bitcoin, if they wanted to.  I don't really see why they would do it by buying small tranches in the Feds auctions.

It would be very interesting though. I would rather it be a big investor, like a Bill Gates or Warren Buffet though, but that also seems unlikely.
findftp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1006

Delusional crypto obsessionist


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 07:55:10 AM
 #13

Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?

They are already heavily invested.
All you see now is just for the show.
They don't need those few k bitcoins because they already have thousands.
They *will* let us know about it, but not yet.
Beliathon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2015, 11:29:33 PM
 #14

Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
No, because that's not what irony means.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Slaxt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250

Gone......


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:32:59 PM
 #15

Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?

Lol are you trolling are you trying to be serious because dude that is crap. I mean at least give us a reason to why you would think that would be a possibility?

If it was the case they would have been sold and know one would have been informed i say sold what i mean is given but firstly they have no use for them secondly zzzzZZZZ

TC is the worse thing to happen to default, needs to open his eyes and not jump to conclusions, not everyone lies!!! Anyway as promised I have left, pass word changed to long random which I will forget like that plonker who ruined a perfectly fine account.
lucasjkr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2015, 11:35:53 PM
 #16

No. No reason for the treasury to be interested. And if they were, they'ed let the DOJ knks that and the coins never would have come up for auction
BitcoinFr34k
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500




View Profile
March 13, 2015, 04:55:58 AM
 #17

They could buy all Bitcoins currently in existance with the congressional budget for champagne and condoms. I don't think there has ever been a purchase large enough to be a government.
This is (generally) true. The government tends to spend a lot of money and tends to spend much more money then they really should be spending.

The US government budget is hundreds of times larger then the market cap of bitcoin and it would really not make much sense for them to be in the business of buying/investing in bitcoin
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!