Blinken (OP)
|
|
March 11, 2015, 03:34:31 AM |
|
Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
|
Bitcoin ♦♦♦ Trust in Mathematics, Not Bankers ♦♦♦
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
March 11, 2015, 05:14:34 AM |
|
Wouldn't it be ironic if THE FEDERAL RESERVE was?
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
SLVR4ME
|
|
March 11, 2015, 05:23:14 AM |
|
Wouldn't it be ironic if THE FEDERAL RESERVE was?
I dont think this as very far fetched at all....
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
March 11, 2015, 05:25:27 AM |
|
Indeed it would. I actually think that some governments have been actively pushing the price down with bad news, to slowly buy in. Don't be surprised if you see such situations.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
TheButterZone
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
|
|
March 11, 2015, 05:32:50 AM |
|
|
Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
|
|
|
TrailingComet
|
|
March 11, 2015, 05:35:42 AM |
|
Ironic would not be the word, machiavellian would be
|
|
|
|
pooya87
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 10930
|
|
March 11, 2015, 05:39:49 AM |
|
whit these rises and falls in price, government wants in too.
|
Bitcoin is the only decentralized money in existence.
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
March 11, 2015, 05:50:40 AM |
|
Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
Not sure if it would be Ironic or if it would be a question of how anyone did not see it coming Anyways until they reveal themselves I guess it could be anyone's guess. But I think the bidder is an established party until proven otherwise could even be the new venutre capital group were talking about right know that funded the 21.co organization if we were to be speculative about it.
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
Kprawn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
|
|
March 11, 2015, 06:58:16 AM |
|
Nope, They already benefitted from the auction.... why double dip? I think transparency will be a issue, and opposing parties will use that as ammunition, if they get caught out. If they really wanted to spoil the party, they could have dumped all those coins in one go... The secret bidder will eventually be revealed and my bet is not on the government.
|
|
|
|
Possum577
|
|
March 11, 2015, 07:15:09 AM |
|
It wouldn't be ironic, by definition. But it would be very, very interesting...and perhaps typical (if you believe in some conspiracy theory stuff.)
|
|
|
|
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
|
|
March 11, 2015, 07:43:24 AM |
|
They could buy all Bitcoins currently in existance with the congressional budget for champagne and condoms. I don't think there has ever been a purchase large enough to be a government.
|
|
|
|
NUFCrichard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 11, 2015, 07:50:29 AM |
|
Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
As they can print as much fiat "money" as the want, they could pretty much buy up Bitcoin if they so chose. Any left over Bitcoin (in the US) could be seized. They have plenty of ways to largely take over bitcoin, if they wanted to. I don't really see why they would do it by buying small tranches in the Feds auctions. It would be very interesting though. I would rather it be a big investor, like a Bill Gates or Warren Buffet though, but that also seems unlikely.
|
|
|
|
findftp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1008
Delusional crypto obsessionist
|
|
March 11, 2015, 07:55:10 AM |
|
Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
They are already heavily invested. All you see now is just for the show. They don't need those few k bitcoins because they already have thousands. They *will* let us know about it, but not yet.
|
|
|
|
Beliathon
|
|
March 11, 2015, 11:29:33 PM |
|
Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
No, because that's not what irony means.
|
|
|
|
Slaxt
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Gone......
|
|
March 11, 2015, 11:32:59 PM |
|
Would it be ironic if the US Treasury was the secret bidder on the FBI auction of the seized Silk Road coins?
Lol are you trolling are you trying to be serious because dude that is crap. I mean at least give us a reason to why you would think that would be a possibility? If it was the case they would have been sold and know one would have been informed i say sold what i mean is given but firstly they have no use for them secondly zzzzZZZZ
|
TC is the worse thing to happen to default, needs to open his eyes and not jump to conclusions, not everyone lies!!! Anyway as promised I have left, pass word changed to long random which I will forget like that plonker who ruined a perfectly fine account.
|
|
|
lucasjkr
|
|
March 11, 2015, 11:35:53 PM |
|
No. No reason for the treasury to be interested. And if they were, they'ed let the DOJ knks that and the coins never would have come up for auction
|
|
|
|
BitcoinFr34k
|
|
March 13, 2015, 04:55:58 AM |
|
They could buy all Bitcoins currently in existance with the congressional budget for champagne and condoms. I don't think there has ever been a purchase large enough to be a government.
This is (generally) true. The government tends to spend a lot of money and tends to spend much more money then they really should be spending. The US government budget is hundreds of times larger then the market cap of bitcoin and it would really not make much sense for them to be in the business of buying/investing in bitcoin
|
|
|
|
|