Starin
|
|
June 16, 2015, 06:14:28 PM Last edit: June 16, 2015, 06:30:45 PM by Starin |
|
https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me.
|
|
|
|
NEVER.SELL.CRAVE...EVER
|
|
June 16, 2015, 06:34:32 PM |
|
https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me. Very very nice. I'd like to see these things on the OP.
|
|
|
|
industrialcoinmagic (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2015, 07:34:25 PM |
|
I think the easiest solution would be a mandatory update and do blockchain pruning that would cut out those blocks that we can't sync past.
Maybe that's what ICM has in mind already, I don't know..
Uh, no. You are I think misunderstanding why syncing takes awhile. It is not some block that you can't sync past (if that were the case, the network will have stopped). The UI progress bar appears to stall, but it is still sync'ing a ton of data in the background. The overhead of having the address index on all the time is causing it to take a long time. We only need address indexing going if we are running darkpoold. So I put a flag in there to turn it off by default.
|
|
|
|
NEVER.SELL.CRAVE...EVER
|
|
June 16, 2015, 07:46:59 PM |
|
I think the easiest solution would be a mandatory update and do blockchain pruning that would cut out those blocks that we can't sync past.
Maybe that's what ICM has in mind already, I don't know..
Uh, no. You are I think misunderstanding why syncing takes awhile. It is not some block that you can't sync past (if that were the case, the network will have stopped). The UI progress bar appears to stall, but it is still sync'ing a ton of data in the background. The overhead of having the address index on all the time is causing it to take a long time. We only need address indexing going if we are running darkpoold. So I put a flag in there to turn it off by default. Hi ICM, no,it's not that. If you download a clean wallet now,open it,you'll wait 1,2,3 days to get past that point and it'll never get. I have tried that many times. The only solution is to download a full blockchain.
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
June 16, 2015, 07:47:36 PM |
|
https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me. Very very nice. I'd like to see these things on the OP. 236889bf915bd3157b17a36d852e68b97d6f6ed349d1344a343350889e6fbd95 txid sent the faucet 16.17999 Craves
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
industrialcoinmagic (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2015, 08:01:36 PM |
|
I think the easiest solution would be a mandatory update and do blockchain pruning that would cut out those blocks that we can't sync past.
Maybe that's what ICM has in mind already, I don't know..
Uh, no. You are I think misunderstanding why syncing takes awhile. It is not some block that you can't sync past (if that were the case, the network will have stopped). The UI progress bar appears to stall, but it is still sync'ing a ton of data in the background. The overhead of having the address index on all the time is causing it to take a long time. We only need address indexing going if we are running darkpoold. So I put a flag in there to turn it off by default. Hi ICM, no,it's not that. If you download a clean wallet now,open it,you'll wait 1,2,3 days to get past that point and it'll never get. I have tried that many times. The only solution is to download a full blockchain. Yes but the reason is this, which was also an issue in bitcoin: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4431This was fixed in Bitcoin Core when they rewrote the entire sync mechanism. Our codebase is not quite close enough to Core to be able to use the entirely new headers first download mechanism with multiple sync nodes. However we can do some things like mentioned in pull request 4431. But the address index is what is causing it to stretch out even longer. I tested it and tested a clean sync from scratch with it turned off. With it turned off by default I can sync the complete chain in something like 8 hours. Which is still long. With some other tweaks I am testing I think we can speed that up more. I haven't really been focused on optimizing the address indexing because darkpool/blur has seen little use so far, so I backburnered it while focusing on the new wallet tech and the markets. One day, we will probably have headers first support which will make sync'ing far less of a headache. There are some proof-of-stake specific challenges that have to get figured out first in order to do headers first though.
|
|
|
|
Ccexicocartel
|
|
June 16, 2015, 08:04:26 PM |
|
I think the easiest solution would be a mandatory update and do blockchain pruning that would cut out those blocks that we can't sync past.
Maybe that's what ICM has in mind already, I don't know..
Uh, no. You are I think misunderstanding why syncing takes awhile. It is not some block that you can't sync past (if that were the case, the network will have stopped). The UI progress bar appears to stall, but it is still sync'ing a ton of data in the background. The overhead of having the address index on all the time is causing it to take a long time. We only need address indexing going if we are running darkpoold. So I put a flag in there to turn it off by default. Hi ICM, no,it's not that. If you download a clean wallet now,open it,you'll wait 1,2,3 days to get past that point and it'll never get. I have tried that many times. The only solution is to download a full blockchain. Yes but the reason is this, which was also an issue in bitcoin: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4431This was fixed in Bitcoin Core when they rewrote the entire sync mechanism. Our codebase is not quite close enough to Core to be able to use the entirely new headers first download mechanism with multiple sync nodes. However we can do some things like mentioned in pull request 4431. But the address index is what is causing it to stretch out even longer. I tested it and tested a clean sync from scratch with it turned off. With it turned off by default I can sync the complete chain in something like 8 hours. Which is still long. With some other tweaks I am testing I think we can speed that up more. I haven't really been focused on optimizing the address indexing because darkpool/blur has seen little use so far, so I backburnered it while focusing on the new wallet tech and the markets. One day, we will probably have headers first support which will make sync'ing far less of a headache. There are some proof-of-stake specific challenges that have to get figured out first in order to do headers first though. Hello Industrial Magic. Been working up some new magic these days???
|
|
|
|
NEVER.SELL.CRAVE...EVER
|
|
June 16, 2015, 08:04:43 PM |
|
I think the easiest solution would be a mandatory update and do blockchain pruning that would cut out those blocks that we can't sync past.
Maybe that's what ICM has in mind already, I don't know..
Uh, no. You are I think misunderstanding why syncing takes awhile. It is not some block that you can't sync past (if that were the case, the network will have stopped). The UI progress bar appears to stall, but it is still sync'ing a ton of data in the background. The overhead of having the address index on all the time is causing it to take a long time. We only need address indexing going if we are running darkpoold. So I put a flag in there to turn it off by default. Hi ICM, no,it's not that. If you download a clean wallet now,open it,you'll wait 1,2,3 days to get past that point and it'll never get. I have tried that many times. The only solution is to download a full blockchain. Yes but the reason is this, which was also an issue in bitcoin: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4431This was fixed in Bitcoin Core when they rewrote the entire sync mechanism. Our codebase is not quite close enough to Core to be able to use the entirely new headers first download mechanism with multiple sync nodes. However we can do some things like mentioned in pull request 4431. But the address index is what is causing it to stretch out even longer. I tested it and tested a clean sync from scratch with it turned off. With it turned off by default I can sync the complete chain in something like 8 hours. Which is still long. With some other tweaks I am testing I think we can speed that up more. I haven't really been focused on optimizing the address indexing because darkpool/blur has seen little use so far, so I backburnered it while focusing on the new wallet tech and the markets. One day, we will probably have headers first support which will make sync'ing far less of a headache. There are some proof-of-stake specific challenges that have to get figured out first in order to do headers first though. Ok,thank you. Just do your best
|
|
|
|
tema
|
|
June 16, 2015, 08:11:15 PM |
|
Hello friends! People have suggested in our news topic to add CRAVE to our exchange for trading. And so i'm here and asking you, is it really necessary for your community to expand the number of exchanges where your coin is trading? Would you come to us for trading? Thanks to all who answer! ICM, exchange wondered about adding
|
✔ Freedom ✔ Reliability ✔ Global accessibility ▮▮ BITCOIN ▮▮ ✔ Trust and Integrity ✔ Independence
|
|
|
Starin
|
|
June 16, 2015, 08:29:34 PM |
|
https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me. Sent out the first set of payments. Already getting some attention. I did not put any add so far but I might if we keep getting more attention to help the community funds. Thanks for your interest. Please don't try to exploit!
|
|
|
|
proletariat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 16, 2015, 08:37:35 PM |
|
https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me. Sent out the first set of payments. Already getting some attention. I did not put any add so far but I might if we keep getting more attention to help the community funds. Thanks for your interest. Please don't try to exploit! Looks like that faucet is dripping some very very fat crave drops. Already paid: 4.22981114 with 12 payouts = 0.3524833333333333 per payout it's a lot.
|
|
|
|
Ratnet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2015, 08:52:09 PM Last edit: June 16, 2015, 09:02:33 PM by Ratnet |
|
Looks like that faucet is dripping some very very fat crave drops. Already paid: 4.22981114 with 12 payouts = 0.3524833333333333 per payout it's a lot.
As far as I checked the faucet script is very strange, it sends some balance to some new addresses but they are in the same wallet so the coins are just changing from addresses, I don't know why the script do that. When a payout is executed It can be from the donation address or from the other addresses that script creates. But I will check further into that.
I didn't understand your comment at first read. You're telling that faucet pays a lot. Well, I'll wait for Stairn message if he decides to change payout rate. I'm just the hoster of the faucet script by Stairn request .
|
|
|
|
trader19
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 16, 2015, 09:11:52 PM |
|
https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me. Sent out the first set of payments. Already getting some attention. I did not put any add so far but I might if we keep getting more attention to help the community funds. Thanks for your interest. Please don't try to exploit! great job @Starin & @Ratnet //retweeted // where can i donate some crave for faucet?
|
|
|
|
Starin
|
|
June 16, 2015, 09:20:31 PM |
|
Looks like that faucet is dripping some very very fat crave drops. Already paid: 4.22981114 with 12 payouts = 0.3524833333333333 per payout it's a lot.
As far as I checked the faucet script is very strange, it sends some balance to some new addresses but they are in the same wallet so the coins are just changing from addresses, I don't know why the script do that. When a payout is executed It can be from the donation address or from the other addresses that script creates. But I will check further into that.
I didn't understand your comment at first read. You're telling that faucet pays a lot. Well, I'll wait for Stairn message if he decides to change payout rate. I'm just the hoster of the faucet script by Stairn request . Yeah, we can lower it as soon as the initial interest wear off. I'll pm you about that. https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me. Sent out the first set of payments. Already getting some attention. I did not put any add so far but I might if we keep getting more attention to help the community funds. Thanks for your interest. Please don't try to exploit! great job @Starin & @Ratnet //retweeted // where can i donate some crave for faucet? The faucet wallet's balance address is located at faucet. It is: Bu3uddZK8Fb1f7qSkP1ADVCbY5geWGQRdX I'll keep sending some too. Don't know the exact timeframe yet but I hope we can get multipool running by the end of the week. JJ's been working really hard on it.
|
|
|
|
pieterjanvh
|
|
June 16, 2015, 10:00:04 PM |
|
has ICM ever posted in which timeframe the update can be expected Yes, he mentioned before the end of this month
|
|
|
|
trader19
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 16, 2015, 10:03:07 PM |
|
Looks like that faucet is dripping some very very fat crave drops. Already paid: 4.22981114 with 12 payouts = 0.3524833333333333 per payout it's a lot.
As far as I checked the faucet script is very strange, it sends some balance to some new addresses but they are in the same wallet so the coins are just changing from addresses, I don't know why the script do that. When a payout is executed It can be from the donation address or from the other addresses that script creates. But I will check further into that.
I didn't understand your comment at first read. You're telling that faucet pays a lot. Well, I'll wait for Stairn message if he decides to change payout rate. I'm just the hoster of the faucet script by Stairn request . Yeah, we can lower it as soon as the initial interest wear off. I'll pm you about that. https://cravefaucet.cf/Thanks to Ratnet.Next stage: Multipool paying out in CRAVE! (jj's working hard on it) If you want to open your own CRAVE faucet please contact with me. Sent out the first set of payments. Already getting some attention. I did not put any add so far but I might if we keep getting more attention to help the community funds. Thanks for your interest. Please don't try to exploit! great job @Starin & @Ratnet //retweeted // where can i donate some crave for faucet? The faucet wallet's balance address is located at faucet. It is: Bu3uddZK8Fb1f7qSkP1ADVCbY5geWGQRdX I'll keep sending some too. Don't know the exact timeframe yet but I hope we can get multipool running by the end of the week. JJ's been working really hard on it. donated for faucet now guys retweet please https://twitter.com/dandidanillo/status/610915470678437889@litlebirde told me livecoin next?
|
|
|
|
industrialcoinmagic (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2015, 12:35:16 AM |
|
has ICM ever posted in which timeframe the update can be expected Yes, he mentioned before the end of this month Yep, I'm getting close. Probably put out a screenie soon so you can see.
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
June 17, 2015, 02:11:51 AM |
|
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
rocoro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 17, 2015, 03:49:21 AM |
|
Thanks for the info and explaining the syncing the issue!
Makes it clearer with what it is going on, thank you
|
|
|
|
industrialcoinmagic (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2015, 04:23:28 AM |
|
Thanks for the info and explaining the syncing the issue!
Makes it clearer with what it is going on, thank you
I pushed some updates to github that fix the sync'ing issue. I can sync the entire chain from scratch in a little less than an hour now. I'll rebuild the Win wallet in a bit.
|
|
|
|
|