[BIT-X] Signature Campaign - Discussion

[--Encrypted--]

@marcotheminer,

If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit  of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think?

Second thing:
Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website?


Thanks again for the attention.

50 would be okay if it was for a month. People would abuse this too much I'm afraid. Even though there are some nice discussions there, the moderation is lower than in some other sections.
When are these changes going to be implemented?

I will make changes in a week or so.

I'm curious, will you exclude the Indonesian board like you said before?
I wouldn't prefer that to happen, but decision is decision.

[1715459189]

1715459189

[1715459189]

1715459189

[1715459189]

1715459189

[1715459189]

1715459189

[1715459189]

1715459189

[1715459189]

1715459189

[funtotry]

I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected.

[waterpile]

I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected.

Most chose the btc, not in terms of USD.

[erikalui]

@marcotheminer,

If I can ask you another thing, can you allow (count) again the post made in the local boards ? Maybe you can put a limit  of 25-50 posts in those local boards. What do you think?

Second thing:
Can you add a chat-box on the site www.bitsig.website?


Thanks again for the attention.

50 would be okay if it was for a month. People would abuse this too much I'm afraid. Even though there are some nice discussions there, the moderation is lower than in some other sections.
When are these changes going to be implemented?

I will make changes in a week or so.

Especially the Market Place as it deals with bitcoin trades. Indian Marketplace section for eg.

[marcotheminer]

I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected.

BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign.

[Bit_Happy]

How does a transition work:
Will we still get out current weekly payment right before a monthly change starts?
Also, have you thought about every two weeks, instead of a whole month?

[NUFCrichard]

I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected.

BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign.

I think that is a good thing, but I hope they stick to it if the price goes up..
Is everything ok regarding the campaign and your trust Marco?  I have had no problems and everything seems to be running well, but having a big negative trust doesn't look good for BitX or the campaign, will it make a difference?

[redsn0w]

I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected.

BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign.

I think that is a good thing, but I hope they stick to it if the price goes up..
Is everything ok regarding the campaign and your trust Marco?  I have had no problems and everything seems to be running well, but having a big negative trust doesn't look good for BitX or the campaign, will it make a difference?

Maybe he can choose a new "manager" and ask the bit-x team if they agree or not, but also for me it is not a real problem (at the end he can talk with who left him a negative trusts and maybe they can change it to a neutral one, but it is their choice).

[pawel7777]

Maybe he can choose a new "manager" and ask the bit-x team if they agree or not, but also for me it is not a real problem (at the end he can talk with who left him a negative trusts and maybe they can change it to a neutral one, but it is their choice).

His trust is not the problem in running sig campaign, he's been managing it for a while now and he earned participants' trust, don't think anyone really bothers whether he's green or red.

The problem is Marco is very active in the official Bit-x thread and pretty much acts as customer support there. It will be much harder to attract new customers with negative trust score. So yes, he should probably talk to Mitchełł and try to sort it out.

[funtotry]

I think that rates should be increased for next week unless we see a major price improvement in btc. Btc fell over 10% this week and payouts have stayed the same. unless bit-x has actually chosen to not care about the fiat price as would be respected.

BIT-X deals in terms of BTC for the signature campaign.

I think that is a good thing, but I hope they stick to it if the price goes up..
Is everything ok regarding the campaign and your trust Marco?  I have had no problems and everything seems to be running well, but having a big negative trust doesn't look good for BitX or the campaign, will it make a difference?

Maybe he can choose a new "manager" and ask the bit-x team if they agree or not, but also for me it is not a real problem (at the end he can talk with who left him a negative trusts and maybe they can change it to a neutral one, but it is their choice).

I think that marco is perfectly fnie, I don't care about the red trust, he is trusted by bit-x and therefore I trust him as well. Marco has done many good things with the community and other than trafficking in stolen accounts (which I don't care about) he is trusted by many others.

[marcotheminer]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

[alani123]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

I wouldn't really like this to be a thing again. 

[redsn0w]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

If I can vote, I want to say : yes , why not.

[unamis76]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

Sure I'd be up to that

[abyrnes81]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

Yes,  I think I will put the bit-x avatar if you will pay a bonus weekly.

[Lauda]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

Well this could be useful. Avatars unlike signatures can't be disabled.
You could add a bonus to people who use both, and add a special per post for people who only use avatars.

[redsn0w]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

Well this could be useful. Avatars unlike signatures can't be disabled.
You could add a bonus to people who use both, and add a special per post for people who only use avatars.

I think you are wrong, if you will go here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=Your_forum_ID;sa=theme  you will find Don't show users' avatars.

So also the avatars "can be" disabled.

[pawel7777]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

No.

Unless you get to choose whether you want to participate in signature or avatar campaign. One member with both will just look ridiculous. That's simply too much.

Some threads are already overwhelmed with paid ads, let's keep healthy ads/content proportions.

Edit:

So also the avatars "can be" disabled.

Yup, both can be disabled. And more people will be using those option if we overdose with ads.

[freedomno1]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

Optional but leaning towards No
Don't want the precedent around if it can be avoided. 

[gentlemand]

Avatar advertising.

Yes or no?

It's a no for me. That would be too much noise.