|
Title: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 24, 2019, 09:57:47 PM I’ve prepared my Merit source application for a while now, collected under-merited posts and would like to apply to get a Merit source. The biggest problem was that there were quite a few good posts and I had to decide which ones I’m going to list here, so no easy decision at all.
About me: I’m active on the German board, but also on different English boards. In the German community I’ve launched a few topics to help beginners or bring interesting content of other topics. I manage a topic against automated translations (the famous “Übersetzungs-Spam”) to prevent translation abuse and help to detect such cases. As a Merit source, I would try to encourage members to write interesting content and share their knowledge. Hoarding my sMerit isn’t something I’m known for and I’m always trying to spend them when I see valuable content. I feel sorry if I can’t give Merit to good posts because of my limited sMerit although I try to keep at least 1 sMerit if I come over an outstanding post. Recently, I’ve reached 1000 Merit in just a little bit more than a year. Thanks everyone for the support who detects his name in the graphic below, I appreciate it very much. https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/05/22/merit18e806f113eed428c.jpeg https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/05/22/merit2ba83dc0b0569a641.jpeg Source: https://fusiontables.google.com/DataSource?docid=1wM2Op6_ol8_0iP0sDEemIGr9weKvIeLPvKsKMpFy#chartnew:id=3 I hope I can be defined as a “somewhat established” member and fulfill the requirements as a Merit source. :) I’m applying because I think it’s important to encourage people posting good content here. If everyone puts some effort into their posts, ranking up isn’t a difficult thing. And besides from ranking up you’ll help some other people when they are asking a question or searching via Google. For search results of Bitcoin-related questions, Bitcointalk.org is ranked very high so your helpful guides and answers will also reach not registered users. You should always remember that you can be a helpful part of the community in the forum where Satoshi himself was active and discussed Bitcoin. In addition, you’ll help to speed up the adoption (at least a little bit) if you write helpful content and Newbies get answers for their questions. I would appreciate it to reward such high-quality posts with Merit. Some other reasons why I’m applying as a Merit source: In January, the allocation of our main local Merit source was halved from 600 to 300 because he was busy in December and couldn't distribute much Merit: Interessantes Detail: da ich wohl zu wenig meiner Source Merit im Dezember verbraucht habe, wurde mir das "Taschengeld" auch gleich zusammengestrichen. Translation: Bisher hatte ich 600 Source Merit im Monat, momentan sind es nur noch 300. (allerdings hatte ich vor der letzten Erhöhung auch nur 300) Interesting detail: because I haven’t used enough of my source sMerit in December my allocation of source Merit was reduced. I had 600 source sMerit per month before, right now it’s only 300 sMerit (like I had before the last increase from 300 to 600) In addition, the distribution of Merit is very centralized on the German board, here are the current stats from DdmrDdmr's Merit Dashboard: https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/05/22/merit36d5cbc5ad01f7bbb.jpeg Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4428616.0 And in May 2019 our Merit source tyz got a 2 month ban + 1 year signature ban: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147191.0 I hope he’ll get his status as a Merit source back but until then the distribution of sMerit has slowed down aside from the other points. I don't expect to get a high number of source sMerits but a little bit would be nice already to decentralize the Merit distribution in the German local board. I will select posts meeting the following requirements: - Contribution to the topic: is the post giving an answer to the question and offering new knowledge? Also, short replies can be worth a Merit if the content is interesting. - Time spent for creating the post: how much time was required to make the posts? That includes research, the technical background but also explaining and writing down the content and presenting it. Is it just a rehash or copy pasted from somewhere else or a genuine research? - I’ll try to prefer lower ranks to encourage them in discussions if the post offers at least a somewhat meaningful contribution. The higher the rank, the better your post has to be to get merited, especially for Legendary Members. I’ve always tried to send only 1 Merit per post to split my sMerit to as many posts as possible but there are still posts that I have to pass unmerited. I hope my application gets accepted and I receive a few sMerit every month to distribute them for quality posts. :) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 24, 2019, 09:58:41 PM Here are my 10 under-merited posts:
1. [Guide] Ethereum custom-adress ("Vanity Address") [CPU] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5135402.0) 2. Wie funktioniert ein "double spend , 51% Angriff" ? Erklärung und Beispiele. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035620.0) 3. How does a double spend 51% attack work ? Explanation and examples. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035336.0) 4. Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4657305.msg48426579#msg48426579) 5. Die Default Trust wurde geändert ! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095223.0) 6. Meine Erfahrung mit Faucet-Seiten und Empfehlungen für Anfänger (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098029.0) 7. [CHECKLISTE] zur Bewertung von ICOs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5132140.0) 8. (Comparison) What is the best Ethereum explorer? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153067.0) 9. [Guide] Newbies please read Services' / Bounties' topic tittle before applying (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126809.0) 10. Sidechains, Drivechains und Co: (Fast) vergessene Scalinglösung (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5154420.0) and quoted: In his guide "How to create your customized Bitcoin-Address (vanitygen) – step by step" (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096373.0) 1miau already explained how to create a "Custom" Bitcoin address using vanitygen. Examples (BTC): 1fudCz15sHGR8L2YQnaG4JVMjMQpaDo37 Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5096373.0 || https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125703.msg50359232#msg50359232 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125703.msg50359232#msg50359232)1BTCTUnYLskK7N9nXb17wf6oVYMYrX5WHG 1DogemNVw8AZnMf3cB4L1wijGnr9DVKzia 1Fomo7V86nWrjdv6JzU7yavtp5hfzZWsZr However generating such a custom address does not only work for Bitcoin, but also for Ethereum. Bitcoin addresses are Base58 encoded and can contain the following characters: Code: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f g h i j k m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R S T U V W X Y Z When creating our Ethereum address, we unfortunately have to limit ourselves to the hexadecimal system with the following characters: Code: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F A few examples of custom ETH-addresses: 0xcafebabeb69f2361cec1106cb26e3f422b65442f 0xdeadbeef36072d66d93b2c9fda370c06964262b2 0xbadc0dedf5b784a70bc9a8c8476b5c88e9f6f49e 0x11111111262b236c9ac9a9a8c8e4276b5cf6b2c9 Example of "Hexspeak": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexspeak For creating our desired address, we'll need some computing power and the time it takes to score a hit increases with the length of our prefix. Available Tools: VanityEth - only uses CPU (-> slow) - Open Source - trustworthy source https://github.com/MyEtherWallet/VanityEth profanity - uses GPU (-> much faster) - Windows/Linux - Open Source https://github.com/johguse/profanity vanity-eth.tk (online, therefore not recommended) [1] - only uses CPU (-> slow) - browser-based - Open Source https://github.com/bokub/vanity-eth In this guide I will focus on creating a custom ETH-address utilizing our CPU using "VanityEth" - if you've got a GPU you might also want to check out my [Guide] on how to create an Ethereum custom-adress utilizing your GPU (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126793.0) _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ Prerequisites: - Node.js https://nodejs.org/en/download/ Windows Installer (.msi) [32- or 64bit depending on your OS] _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ First we need the current source code of VanityEth, which can be found at the following link: https://github.com/MyEtherWallet/VanityEth Navigate to "Clone or download" and click "Download ZIP". https://myimghost.000webhostapp.com/rsz_src.png Extract the content of the "VanityEth-master.zip" to your C:\ partition.. Now we start a command prompt by entering "CMD" in the Windows search or open the run dialog box by pressing the [WINDOWS] + [R] key at the same time and start the command prompt by entering "CMD". https://myimghost.000webhostapp.com/cmd.jpg Run the following commands to switch to the folder containing the contents of our previously extracted .zip-file followed and installing the VanityEth-Package using npm. Code: cd C:\VanityEth-master Code: npm install We're ready to start generating our address (I'd recommend disconnecting your internet connection first). Assuming we'd like to have an address starting with the prefix "0xDEAD" (e.g. 0xDEADxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), we'll have to use the following command: Code: node index.js -i dead -l As soon as a matching address has been found, it will be saved to a text-file with the corresponding private-key. You can find the text-file in the VanityEth-master folder on your C:\-drive ( C:\VanityEth-master\"VanityEth-log-[...].txt) [2][3]. https://myimghost.000webhostapp.com/rsz_ergebnis.png Syntax: Code: Usage: node index.js <command> [options] If you have any questions please feel free to ask anytime. _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________ [1] I didn't go into vanity-eth.tk in detail, but according to its Github it can also be used offline: Quote Once the web page is loaded, you can turn off the internet and continue playing, it will work seamlessly Source: https://github.com/bokub/vanity-ethYou can also download the latest build of Vanity-ETH here and use it on a completely offline computer The code is 100% open source and available on Github. You can review it as much as you want before using it [2] [MyEtherWallet] Creating a (new) keystore-file using your private-key (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3014688.0) [3] [Guide] MyEtherWallet Offline Transactions [SECURITY] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4500372.0) © Nestade 22.04.2019 Wie funktioniert ein double spend , 51% Angriff ? BTCurious erklärte es super und in ein paar wenigen Sätzen: If I had 51%, I could mine a chain of blocks in which I transfer all my coins to my personal wallet. I'd mine this chain about 10 long, but not tell the rest of the network. At the same time, I convert all my coins to dollars on the exchange and withdraw them. This happens on the normal blockchain. BTCurious quote übersetzt :After my withdrawal has gone through. the normal blockchain is about 9 long, while my blockchain is 10 long. I announce all my blocks to the network, and lo and behold, the network confirms I am right. But dollars can't be reverted! So the exchange takes a loss. Quote Wenn ich 51% hätte,dann könnte ich eine Reihenfolge von Blöcken in der Blockchain minen in der ich alle meine Coins in meine persönliche Wallet überweise. Ich würde in dieser Blockchain etwa 10 Blocks minen aber dem Rest des Blockchain Netzwerkes nicht mitteilen das ich dies mache. Zur gleichen Zeit konvertiere ich alle meine Coins in Dollars an der Börse und überweise diese sofort. Dies geschieht nun auf der normalen Blockchain. Nachdem meine Überweisung durchgegangen und fertig ist ,ist die normale Blockchain ungefähr 9 Blöcke lang, während meine eigene Blockchain 10 Blöcke lang ist. Ich kündige nun alle meine Blöcke im normalen Netzwerk an, und siehe da, das Netzwerk bestätigt, das meine Blockchain recht hat und akzeptiert diese. Aber die Dollars können nicht zurückgeholt werden! Somit macht die Exchange (Börse) einen Verlust damit. Quote Monacoin, bitcoin gold, zencash, verge and now, litecoin cash. At least five cryptocurrencies have recently been hit with an attack that used to be more theoretical than actual, all in the last month. In each case, attackers have been able to amass enough computing power to compromise these smaller networks, rearrange their transactions and abscond with millions of dollars in an effort that's perhaps the crypto equivalent of a bank heist. More surprising, though, may be that so-called 51% attacks are a well-known and dangerous cryptocurrency attack vector. Quote Monacoin, Bitcoin Gold, Zencash, verge und jetzt, Litecoin Cash. Mindestens fünf Kryptowährungen wurden so vor kurzem mit einem solchen Angriff getroffen der im letzten Monat mehr theoretisch als tatsächlich war. In jedem Fall waren die Angreifer in der Lage genügend Rechenleistung zu sammeln um diese kleineren Netzwerke zu kompromittieren, die Transaktionen neu anzuordnen und Millionen von Dollar zu stehlen was vielleicht das Crypto Äquivalent eines Banküberfalls gleich kommt. Viel überraschender ist es jedoch das sogenannte 51% Angriffe ein bekannter und gefährlicher Kryptowährungs-Angriffsvektor sind. Hier ist eine umfassendere Erklärung: Wenn eine Person mehr als 51% der Mining power eines Coinnetzwerkes kontrolliert kann sie den Konsens kontrollieren. Der Angreifer mietet oder holt sich die benötigte Menge an Miningleistung bei (Mingrigrentals.com oder Hashnest.com) oder nutzt ein Botnet, um diese zu erhalten. Zum Beispiel, wenn das Hauptnetzwerk 25 Gh Hashpower hat kann ein 51% Angriff mit 25,5 Gh gemieteter Miningleistung gemacht werden. Das wäre sehr einfach und auch nicht so teuer. https://i.imgur.com/lJYlmsy.png Wie funktioniert der Angriff: Mit einem geheimen privatem Pool erstellen sie eine private chain die länger ist als die öffentliche chain. Zum Beispiel: Sagen wir mal, angenommen sie beginnen bei Block 100 000 Nun würden sie eine längere private Blockchain aufbauen als die öffentliche Blockchain. Ihre private Blockchain hat nun mehr Hashpower als die normale und wird jetzt die Blöcke schneller finden. Die private Blockchain könnte nun 10 Blöcke gefunden haben während die öffentliche Blockchain während dieser Zeit nur 9 gefunden hat. Der Double-Spend (Ich lasse dies mal so da es sich nicht gut übersetzten läßt .) Sobald sie ihre private Blockchain starten gehen sie zu einer Exchange(Börse) oder einer Handelsplattform und machen eine große Einzahlung. Wir nehmen als Beispiel 10.000 GLD. Dies wird in Block 100, 001 an die öffentliche Blockchain gesendet. Aber sie senden diese Transaktion nicht an ihre private Blockchain sondern nur an die öffentliche Blockchain. Auf ihrer privaten Blockchain tätigen sie nun eine Transaktion die dieselben 10000 GLD an eine andere Walletadresse in Block 100,001 sendet. Das ist der “double spend” part - Sie geben diese Anzahl an GLD zweimal in die Netzwerke raus. Wie profitieren sie davon Die Börse sieht nun die 10.000 GLD Einzahlung in der öffentlichen Blockchain und nach 6 bestätigten Blöcken wird sie akzeptiert und der Saldo wird an die Exchange-Ledger übertragen und wird für den Handel nun verfügbar gemacht. Der Betrag ist jetzt sicher in der exchange wallet – richtig ? Weil das Coinnetzwerk bestätigt hat das sie da sind. Nun wird es auch im Block Explorer als korrekte Transaktion angezeigt. Der Angreifer tradet dann die 10.000 GLD zu Bitcoin zu den aktuellen Marktpreisen und überweist sofort die getradeten Bitcoins zurück. Die Börse genehmigt die Bitcoinüberweisung und der Angreifer hat nun den Betrag in BTC. Jetzt sind wir bei Block 100,008 oder 100,009. Sobald die BTC aus der Börse kommen wird der Angreifer seine lange private Blockchain von 10 Blöcken freigeben und an das öffentliche Netzwerk senden. Die private Blockchain ist jetzt öffentlich. Da das private Netzwerk eine höhere Miningleistung hat (über 51%) und länger als die vorherige öffentliche Blockchain ist wird sie nun von der öffentlichen Blockchain als der wahre Datensatz akzeptiert. Dies wird “Chain Reorganization” genannt. Die 9 Blöcke zuvor im Mainnet sind veraltet und die 10 neuen Blöcke werden als neues Mainnet installiert. So werden alle Blockchainaufteilungen im GLD Coinnetzwerkprotokoll aufgelöst. Die Coins die ursprünglich vom Netzwerk in der Exchange wallet akzeptiert wurden, werden nun vom Coinnetzwerk als ungültig zurückgewiesen. Aber die Börse hat bereits den Betrag aus dem Verkauf der Coins für BTC an den Angreifer in BTC freigegeben. Während ihre Wallet anfänglich die 10.000 GLD hatte, hat das Netzwerk diese Transaktion für ungültig erklärt und die private Blockchain als die "richtige Blockchain" anerkannt. Plötzlich enthält das Mainnet nicht die ursprüngliche Einzahlung von 10.000 GLD an die Exchange zurück in den ursprünglichen Block 100001, aber es beinhaltet eine Übertragung dieser 10.000 GLD an die eigene Wallet des Angreifers zurück aus dem privat abgebauten Block 100.001. Bei der neuen Version der Blockchain schickte der Angreifer sie nie zur Börse, sondern schickte sie stattdessen an sich selbst. Also nahm der Angreifer von der Börse die 10.000 GLD in Betrag von BTC ab , aber gab die 10.000 GLD nicht mehr an die Börse zurück. Sie haben sie vielleicht eine Menge Geld für all diese Miningleistung bezahlt, aber die GLD die sie gestohlen haben ist viel mehr wert. Also ist es ein Hack? Die Blockchain wurde nicht gehackt. Aber das dezentrale Coin node netzwerk, das die Blockchain betreibt, wurde ausgenutzt weil das Netzwerk eine unzureichende Hashrate hatte, um sie davor schützen zu können. Im Mai wurde Bittrex Opfer eines 51% Double-Spend-Angriffs auf das Bitcoin Gold Netzwerk. Die Bitcoin Gold Entwickler boten Bittrex nur einen Teil der Verluste an und Bittrex entschied sich dafür stattdessen Bitcoin Gold zu delisten. Andere Coins die durch 51% Angriffe ins Visier genommen wurden haben normalerweise die Börsen für ihre Verluste kompensiert. Wenn eine Coin genug Hashrate hat um ihr Netzwerk zu sichern wäre es fast unmöglich einen 51% Angriff durchzuführen. Einige Coinnetzwerke haben sich auf ein merged mining geeinigt oder eine Mischung aus POW und POS eingeführt. Sources: https://www.coindesk.com/blockchains-feared-51-attack-now-becoming-regular/ https://forum.bitcoingold.org/t/anatomy-of-a-double-spend-51-attack/1398 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52388.0 https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hacker-makes-over-18-million-in-double-spend-attack-on-bitcoin-gold-network/ https://cointelegraph.com/news/bittrex-to-delist-bitcoin-gold-by-mid-september-following-18-million-hack-of-btg-in-may Der Orginaltext und Thread ist von xtraelv und er hat mich gefragt ob ich es ins deutsche Übersetzen möchte , da das Thema mit GLD gerade aktuell ist ! Xtraelv's Thread : How does a double spend 51% attack work ? Explanation and examples. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035336.0) How does a double spend 51% attack work ? BTCurious explained it brilliantly in a couple of sentences: If I had 51%, I could mine a chain of blocks in which I transfer all my coins to my personal wallet. I'd mine this chain about 10 long, but not tell the rest of the network. At the same time, I convert all my coins to dollars on the exchange and withdraw them. This happens on the normal blockchain. After my withdrawal has gone through. the normal blockchain is about 9 long, while my blockchain is 10 long. I announce all my blocks to the network, and lo and behold, the network confirms I am right. But dollars can't be reverted! So the exchange takes a loss. Quote Monacoin, bitcoin gold, zencash, verge and now, litecoin cash. At least five cryptocurrencies have recently been hit with an attack that used to be more theoretical than actual, all in the last month. In each case, attackers have been able to amass enough computing power to compromise these smaller networks, rearrange their transactions and abscond with millions of dollars in an effort that's perhaps the crypto equivalent of a bank heist. More surprising, though, may be that so-called 51% attacks are a well-known and dangerous cryptocurrency attack vector. This is the more comprehensive explanation: When one person controls more than 51% of the mining power on a coin network they can control the concensus. The attacker will rent (Miningrigrentals.com or Hashnest.com) or use a botnet to obtain a lot of hashpower. For instance if the mainnet has 25 Gh of hashpower a 51% attack can be done with 25.5 Gh of rented mining power. Which would be easy and not very expensive. https://i.imgur.com/lJYlmsy.png How the attack works: Using a secret pool they make a private chain that is longer than the public chain. For example: Say they start at block 100 000 They will build a longer private chain than the public chain. The private chain has more hashpower so will find blocks faster. The private chain might have found 10 blocks while the public chain has only found 9 during that time. The Double-Spend As soon as they start their private chain they go to an Exchange or merchant and make a large deposit. Using 10,000 GLD as an example. This is broadcasts to the public blockchain in block 100,001. But they don’t broadcast that transaction on their private chain, only the public chain. On their private chain they make a transaction sending those same 10,000 GLD to another wallet address in block 100,001. This is the “double spend” part - they spend those same GLD twice. How they Profit The exchange sees the 10,000 GLD deposit on the public chain and after 6 blocks of confirmations it is accepted and the balance is transferred to the exchange ledger – making it available to be traded. The funds are now securely in the exchange wallet – right ? Because the coin network has confirmed that they are there. It appears on the block explorer as a correct transaction. The attacker then trades the 10,000 GLD for Bitcoin at market prices and immediately withdraws the Bitcoin. The exchange approves the Bitcoin withdrawal and the attacker now have the proceeds in BTC. By now, we’re at block 100,008 or 100,009. As soon as the BTC comes out of the exchange - the attacker will release their long private chain of 10 blocks, broadcasting it to the public network. Their longer private chain is now public. Because the private network has a higher hashing power (over 51%) and longer than the previous public chain it is now accepted by the public chain as the true record. This is called “Chain Reorganization.” The 9 blocks previously on mainnet are orphaned and the 10 new blocks are put in place as the new mainnet. This is how any chain splits are resolved in the GLD coin network protocol . The coins that were accepted origionally by the network in the exchange wallet are now rejected as invalid by the coin network. But the exchange has already released the proceeds of the sale of the coins for BTC to the attacker in BTC. While their wallet initially had 10,000 GLD the network has voided that transaction and approved the private chain as the “true chain”. Suddenly, the mainnet does not include the original deposit of 10,000 GLD to the Exchange back in the original block 100001 but it does include a transfer of those 10,000 GLD to the attacker’s own wallet back from privately-mined block 100,001. On the new version of the chain the attacker never sent them to the exchange but they sent them to themselves instead. So the attacker took out 10,000 GLD worth of BTC from the exchange, and they no longer gave the 10,000 GLD to the Exchange in the first place. They may have paid a lot of money for all that hashpower but the GLD they stole is worth a lot more than that. So is it a hack ? The blockchain didn't get hacked. But the decentralized coin node network that runs the blockchain got exploited because the network had inadequate hashrate to protect against that. In May Bittrex was the victim of a 51% double spend attack on the Bitcoin Gold network. The Bitcoin Gold developers only offered to partially compensate Bittrex for the losses and Bittrex chose to delist Bitcoin Gold instead. Other coins that have been targeted by 51% attacks have usually compensated exchanges for their losses. If a coin has enough hashrate to secure their network it would be almost impossible to carry out a 51% attack. Some coin networks have resorted to merged mining or introducing a hybrid of POW and POS. Sources: https://www.coindesk.com/blockchains-feared-51-attack-now-becoming-regular/ https://forum.bitcoingold.org/t/anatomy-of-a-double-spend-51-attack/1398 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=52388.0 https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/hacker-makes-over-18-million-in-double-spend-attack-on-bitcoin-gold-network/ https://cointelegraph.com/news/bittrex-to-delist-bitcoin-gold-by-mid-september-following-18-million-hack-of-btg-in-may Translations of this article: Thank you to Lafu for the awesome German translation he has made of this topic. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035620.0 Thank you to theyoungmillionaire for his fantastic Filipino translation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5038913.0 Thank you to taikuri13 for a great Russian translation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5039027.0 Grüß euch! Anbei die Verteilung für November. Den Anfang macht wie immer die Monatsübersicht: https://i.postimg.cc/4xqFN6tN/image.png Nochmal eine deutliche Steigerung zum Oktober! Die Top-Receiver https://i.postimg.cc/6qRtQWby/image.png Letztes Monat noch mit den Bayern gewitzelt und schon musste mole seinen Platz an der Sonne abtreten, wenn auch nur knapp ;-) Die Top-Spender https://i.postimg.cc/3JBkT1sm/image.png Der spendenfreudigste Wochentag Dieses Monat wurde der Donnerstag vom Thron der spendenfreudigsten Tage verdrängt, geht im November an einen Mittwoch: https://i.postimg.cc/K8BsjK5P/image.png Wir im Vergleich zu anderen Boards Auch dieses Mal habe ich mir wieder angesehen, wie wir uns im Vergleich zu anderen Boards so schlagen. Nachdem wir leider im letzten Monat keine automatisierte Lösung gefunden haben wie man die Postinganzahl pro Subboard ermitteln kann, habe ich mir heute die Werte der Top 5 Boards notiert, werd das in Zukunft einfach händisch vergleichen. Danke auch nochmal an @qwk für den Tipp! Spendenfreudigstes lokales Board Das spendenfreudigste Board ist ganz klar wieder das Russische: https://i.postimg.cc/q7YLG4QJ/image.png Hier werde ich wie gesagt ab dem nächsten Monat auch die Postinganzahl in Relation setzen, dann wird das Ganze aussagekräftiger. Spendenfreudigster User im Vergleich zum deutschen Board Hier noch ein Vergleich über die spendenfreudigsten User über die 3 Top Boards hinweg: https://i.postimg.cc/mDmTnpzg/image.png Auch diesmal sind wir mit qwk und mole wieder mit 2 Personen in den Top 5 vertreten ;-) Sollten euch noch neue Ideen für Auswertungen einfallen bitte einfach posten! Die Trust also die vertrauens Einstellungen wurden heute geändert von theymos ! Übersetzung vom orginal Beitrag von theymos : Ich bin seit Jahren unzufrieden damit wie DefaultTrust zu einer zentralisierten und weitgehend unberührbaren Instanz wurde. Aber ich zögerte lange dies zu ändern da die Alternativen zu chaotisch für mich wirkten. Ich habe mich jedoch entschlossen einige Änderungen auszuprobieren und wir werden sehen, wie es funktioniert. # 1 Wenn ihr euch auf der Standard Vertrauensliste ("DT1") befindet, aber euch mehr andere DT1 Mitglieder misstrauen als euch explizit vertrauen ist dies eine besondere Ausnahme für den normalen Algorithmus zur Bestimmung des Vertrauensnetzwerks eines Benutzers der Standard Vertrauensliste für alle Zwecke, außer für diese Bestimmung der DT1-Zusammensetzung. Wenn also jemand auf DT1 etwas Dummes tut können sie andere DT1 Mitglieder bitten diesen zu misstrauen. # 2 Ihr könnt jede Seite so anzeigen lassen als würdet ihr die Standardeinstellungen für das Vertrauen verwenden indem ihr am Ende der URL " ;dt " dazuschreibt . Z.B. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=35;dt # 3 Ich werde regelmäßig (möglicherweise jeden Monat) die Standard Vertrauensliste rekonstruieren um alle Personen aufzunehmen die die folgenden Kriterien erfüllen: - Wenn der Rang ausschließlich anhand des verdienten Merits ermittelt wurde müsst ihr mindestens im Member rang sein. - Ihr müsst innerhalb der letzten 3 Tage einmal online gewesen sein. - Ihre Vertrauensliste muss mindestens 10 Benutzer enthalten die nicht mit ~ Misstrauen gekennzeichnet sind. - Ihr dürft nicht gebannt sein oder manuell auf die Blacklist gesetzt worden sein. - Ihr müsst irgendwann in den letzten 30 Tagen einen Beitrag gepostet haben. - Ihr müsst mindestens 10 Personen haben die euch direkt vertrauen und die mindestens 10 Merits haben aber jedoch nicht Merits enthält die ihr gesendet habt. - Ihr müsst mindestens eine Person haben die euch direkt vertraut mit 100 Merits aber jedoch nicht Merits enthält die ihr gesendet habt. Im Gegensatz zu der vorherigen Politik werde ich generell nicht versuchen, eine gute Liste zu erstellen. Das wird den DT1 Mitgliedern selbst überlassen. Ich behalte mir jedoch das Recht vor euch von der zukünftigen Auswahl zu entfernen und euch auf eine Blacklist zu setzen wenn ihr ärger und offensichtlichen Missbrauch begeht oder wenn mehrere bekannte Alt Accounts zu eurem aktuellen Account nachgewiesen werden können. Derzeit sind nicht so viele Benutzer berechtigt. Wenn in Zukunft hunderte von Benutzern ausgewählt werden sollen möchte ich stattdessen jedes Mal eine zufällige Menge von etwa 100 berechtigten Benutzern auswählen. Diese DT1 Rekonstruktion kann in der Zukunft sogar automatisch nach Zeitplan erfolgen , derzeit wird das jedoch nicht gemacht. Ein Hauptziel dabei ist es Vergeltungsvertrauen und tatsächliche bewertungen eine gewisse Chance zu geben so das umstrittene Bewertungen keine tatsächlichen Kosten verursachen. Wenn jemand offensichtlich betrügt sollte eine Vergeltungswertung aufgrund des "Voting" des DT1 nicht lange dauern. Wenn ihr jedoch jemanden negativ bewertet weil ihr ihn generell nicht mögt kann die Vergeltungsmaßnahme gegen euch selbst bestehen bleiben. In Grenzfällen sollte dies zu einem politischen Kampf führen. Dies ist zum Teil von etwas inspiriert das " David Friedman " einmal gesagt hat (obwohl ich das Zitat nicht finden kann) das eine der Voraussetzungen für eine friedliche Gesellschaft die glaubwürdige Drohung von Vergeltungsmaßnahmen ist, falls ihr davon betroffen seit. Da DT zuvor organisiert wurde war es für eine oder beide Seiten eines Streits normalerweise nicht möglich sich zumindest über das Vertrauenssystem selbst effektiv auf ein Rating zu revanchieren. Jetzt wird euere Fähigkeit sich effektiv zu rächen tendenziell zunehmen, je mehr ihr euch in der Gemeinschaft etablieren, was Missbrauch generell abschrecken sollte. (Das ist zumindest die Idee.) Trotz alledem rate ich immer noch von Vergeltungsmaßnahmen ab und mit diesen Änderungen möchte ich die Leute ermutigen zu versuchen "das Kriegs Beil zu begraben" ohne das es eskaliert zu versuchen eine erhöhte Vergeltungskraft einzusetzen die ihr jetzt habt. Außerdem ist es am besten eine eigene benutzerdefinierte Liste zu erstellen und ihr müsst dies tun wenn ihr DT1 verwenden möchtet. Ich bin nie ganz an irgendetwas gebunden, aber lasst euch und uns dies einige Monate lang versuchen und sehen wie es funktioniert. Orginal Beitrag von theymos : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0) Da es sich bereits geändert hat habe ich DT1 gerade wieder aufgebaut, und vielleicht mache ich es in ein paar Tagen noch einmal. Viele Leute können nur durch das Einrichten einer Vertrauensliste eine Berechtigung erhalten sodass sich die Dinge zu Beginn schnell ändern können. Dann werde ich dies ungefähr monatlich versuchen. Statischer Teil: wird nur periodisch berechnet Jede Nummer enthält die vorherigen Kriterien. Quote - Wenn der Rang ausschließlich anhand des verdienten Merits ermittelt wurde müsst ihr mindestens im Member rang sein. 2431 members- Ihr müsst innerhalb der letzten 3 Tage einmal online gewesen sein. Quote - Ihre Vertrauensliste muss mindestens 10 Benutzer enthalten die nicht mit ~ Misstrauen gekennzeichnet sind. 100 membersQuote - Ihr müsst irgendwann in den letzten 30 Tagen einen Beitrag gepostet haben. 90 membersQuote - Ihr dürft nicht gebannt sein oder manuell auf die Blacklist gesetzt worden sein. 90 membersQuote - Ihr müsst mindestens 10 Personen haben die euch direkt vertrauen und die mindestens 10 Merits haben aber jedoch nicht Merits enthält die ihr gesendet habt. 23 membersQuote - Ihr müsst mindestens eine Person haben die euch direkt vertraut mit 100 Merits aber jedoch nicht Merits enthält die ihr gesendet habt. 23 members, die ein abschließendes DT1 ergeben:Code: theymos Dynamischer Teil: ständig neu berechnet (Verzeichnis von Listen für unbestrittene.) theymos: Total votes 9 = included HostFat: Trusted by theymos; distrusted by gmaxwell, TMAN, Lauda, achow101, owlcatz, The Pharmacist. Total votes -6 = excluded. dooglus: Total votes 8 = included gmaxwell: Trusted by theymos, OgNasty, Cyrus, TMAN, Lauda, achow101, The Pharmacist; distrusted by HostFat. Total votes 6 = included. OgNasty: Trusted by theymos, SebastianJu, greenplastic, achow101, krogothmanhattan; distrusted by TMAN, Lauda, suchmoon, owlcatz, BitcoinPenny, The Pharmacist. Total votes -1 = excluded SebastianJu: Total votes 4 = included. qwk: Total votes 5 = included Cyrus: Total votes 7 = included. monkeynuts: Total votes 6 = included. TMAN: Trusted by Lauda, greenplastic, owlcatz, BitcoinPenny, The Pharmacist, krogothmanhattan; distrusted by OgNasty. Total votes 5 = included. Lauda: Trusted by gmaxwell, qwk, TMAN, Blazed, suchmoon, owlcatz, JohnUser, BitcoinPenny, The Pharmacist; distrusted by HostFat, OgNasty. Total votes 7 = included. Mitchell: Total votes 9 = included. Blazed: Trusted by Cyrus, monkeynuts, TMAN, Lauda, Mitchell, suchmoon, BitcoinPenny, The Pharmacist, krogothmanhattan; distrusted by zazarb. Total votes 8 = included. greenplastic: Total votes 2 = included. suchmoon: Trusted by dooglus, Lauda, Blazed, owlcatz, The Pharmacist; distrusted by OgNasty. Total votes 5 = included. achow101: Total votes 2 = included. owlcatz: Trusted by TMAN, greenplastic, suchmoon, BitcoinPenny, krogothmanhattan. Total votes 5 = included. JohnUser: No trusts/distrusts on DT1. Total votes 0 = included. BitcoinPenny: Total votes 4 = included. zazarb: Total votes 2 = included. actmyname: Trusted by TMAN, Lauda, Blazed, suchmoon, The Pharmacist; distrusted by theymos. Total votes 5 = included. The Pharmacist: Trusted by qwk, TMAN, Lauda, Blazed, suchmoon, owlcatz; distrusted by OgNasty, zazarb. Total votes 6 = included. krogothmanhattan: Trusted by monkeynuts, TMAN, greenplastic, BitcoinPenny; distrusted by owlcatz. Total votes 4 = included. Das Ergebnis ist dies: theymos dooglus gmaxwell SebastianJu qwk Cyrus monkeynuts TMAN Lauda Mitchell Blazed greenplastic suchmoon achow101 owlcatz JohnUser BitcoinPenny zazarb actmyname The Pharmacist krogothmanhattan Update vom Beitrag von theymos : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49143128#msg49143128 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49143128#msg49143128) Neues Update vom January 10, 2019 von theymos: Die Anzahl der Benutzer, denen mehr als 100 Benutzer vertrauen liegt jetzt bei über 700. Ich denke das ich das ändern kann das 2 Vertrauenswürdige mit 250 verdientem Merits erfordert. Nummer der 10-merit trusters: Code: +------------------+----------+ Nummer der 250-merit trusters: Code: +-------------------+----------+ Wenn DT1 jetzt mit dieser Änderung rekonstruiert wird: Code: theymos Beitrag von theymos : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49163910#msg49163910 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49163910#msg49163910) Update vom 4.4.2019 von theymos : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg50447891#msg50447891 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg50447891#msg50447891) Alte Liste: Code: theymos Neue Liste: Code: theymos Default Trust Update der Liste von theymos für 3.5.2019 ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg50886739#msg50886739 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg50886739#msg50886739) Alte Liste : Code: theymos Neue Liste : Code: theymos Hi, Lightning dürften die meisten ja inzwischen als Scaling-Technologie kennen. Ich verfolge aber etwas die Entwicklung eines alternativen Mechanismus namens Sidechains. Der Ansatz wurde bisher nur in einer halbzentralen Variante realisiert und es ist recht schwer, Infos zu bekommen, da die Technik kaum hier im Forum und den Bitcoin-Medien angesprochen wird. Dennoch finde ich die Technologie sehr interessant, da sie meiner Meinung nach als "Zwischenlayer" zwischen der Main Chain und Lightning-ähnlichen Offchain-Lösungen dienen könnte. Deshalb dachte ich, mache ich mal einen Thread dazu auf - vielleicht kommen auch andere Beiträge. Für die, die Sidechains noch nicht kennen: Es handelt sich kurz gesagt um unabhängige Blockchains, auf denen eine Währung zirkuliert, die an Bitcoin (oder eine andere "Haupt-Kryptowährung") gebunden ("gepeggt") ist. Also quasi um einen Altcoin, der immer genauso viel wert ist wie Bitcoin. Damit das funktioniert, gibt es bei echten Sidechains einen Mechanismus, der es erlaubt, stets einen Coin der Sidechain-Währung 1:1 mit der Hauptchain-Währung auszutauschen. Das impliziert natürlich, dass die Geldmenge der Sidechain nicht einfach zur Bitcoin-Geldmenge hinzugefügt werden kann. Stattdessen gilt bei "echten Sidechains" die Regel, dass ein Sidechain-Coin nur existieren darf, solange er auf der Bitcoin-Hauptchain entweder per "Proof of Burn" zerstört ("One-Way-Peg") oder so lange eingefroren und nicht verwendet wird, bis er auf der Sidechain zerstört wird, damit er wieder in der Hauptchain verwendet werden darf ("Two-Way-Peg"). Die Geldmenge von 21 Mio. bleibt also gleich. Was sind die Vor- und Nachteile? Vorteile:
Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 24, 2019, 10:00:03 PM Second part:
Hallo, Ich habe vor ca. einem Monat angefangen mich für Kryptowährungen zu interessieren. Ich habe mir als Ziel gesetzt so viel Geld wie möglich, mit so wenig Geldeinsatz wie nötig zu machen. Also fing ich mit Faucet-Seiten an, um kostenlos an ein paar Coins zu kommen. Zu erst legte ich mir einen Account bei CoinPot und FaucetHub an. Dazu benötigte ich nur eine E-Mail Adresse und ein Passwort. Beides sind Online Micro-Wallets, auf denen die Faucet-Seiten ausgezahlt werden. Von den Micro-Wallets kann man die Coins dann auf eine eigene Wallet senden. - Bei CoinPot klickt man dazu auf einen Coin und wählt Withdrawal aus. Nach spätestens einem Tag sollte die Transaktion beendet sein. Man muss aber eine gewisse Menge an Coins gesammelt haben, damit man sie an ein anderes Wallet senden kann. Passt aber auf, denn ich habe gehört, CoinPot soll Scam sein. Ich kann nur sagen, dass bei mir die erste Auszahlung ohne Probleme angekommen ist. Falls mich die Seite mal scammt, werde ich es unter diesen Beitrag in die Kommentare schreiben. Auf CoinPot gibt es zudem noch einen eigenen Token, welchen man automatisch sammelt. Pro Claim auf einer der (nachfolgenden) Seiten erhält man 3 Token. Diese kann man sammeln, oder in eine andere Coin konvertieren. Man kann generell jede verfügbare Coin in jede Coin umwandeln. - Bei FaucetHub läuft das ein bisschen anders ab. Die gesammelten Coins bleiben auf den Faucet-Seiten gespeichert, bis man sie sich an FaucetHub auszahlen lässt. Damit man sich auszahlen lassen kann, muss man bei FaucetHub vorher aber seinen Public Key angeben. Von FaucetHub kann man sich in der Theorie immer auszahlen lassen, es gibt kein Auszahl-Minimum. Allerdings gibt es eine Gebühr, welche man zahlen muss. Je mehr Coins man sich auszahlen lässt, desto geringer ist diese Gebühr. Ich muss ehrlich zugeben, dass ich mich auf FaucetHub noch nicht auszahlen lassen habe, da ich da noch nicht so viel gesammelt habe. Ende Jänner werde ich dort die erste Auszahlung versuchen und das Ergebnis in Form eines Kommentares unter diesen Beitrag posten. Die Seite scheint aber legit zu sein, ich habe mir mehrere Rezenssionen angesehen. Die Seite hat einen einzigen Entwickler, ich glaube es ist sogar ein Deutscher, der anscheinend ganz nett sein soll und auch auf Fragen eingeht. Man kann ich laut den Rezenssionen ohne Probleme kontaktieren. Kommen wir nun zu den Faucet-Seiten: CoinPot hat 7 Seiten, bei denen man Claimen kann:1. Moon Bitcoin 2. Moon Bitcoin Cash 3. Moon Dash 4. Moon Doge 5. Moon Litecoin 6. Bit Fun 7. Bonus Bitcoin 1.-5. funktionieren gleich. Es gibt einen Timer und einen Counter. Je höher der Timer, desto höher der Counter, desto mehr Coins kann man in einmal Sammeln. Man muss mindestens 5 Minuten warten, bevor man sammeln kann. Der Timer geht bis zu einer Woche. Ich würde allerdings empfehlen, mindestens einmal am Tag die Coins zu sammeln, da man einen täglichen Bonus bis zu 100% bekommt. Zum täglichen Bonus kommt noch ein Random Bonus hinzu, der zwischen 1%-100% ist. Es gibt auch noch einen ref. Bonus bis zu 25%. Bei Moon Bitcoin hat man auch die möglichkeit die CPU Leistung zum Minen zu verwenden und bekommt dafür noch einen Bonus. Um sich auf den Seiten anzumelden, benötigt man lediglich eine E-Mail Adresse. Bit Fun ist für Bitcoins und funktioniert eigentlich gleich wie die Moon-Seiten. Der Timer wird zwar nicht angezeigt, aber man bekommt in der gleichen Zeit aber mehr Coins als bei Moon Bitcoin. Auf der Seite kann man zudem auch einige Spiele spielen, um sich die Zeit zu vertreiben, bis man wieder sammeln kann. Um sich anzumelden, benötigt man eine E-Mail Adresse und ein Passwort. Bonus Bitcoin funktioniert anders. Man kann alle 15 Minuten sammeln. Es gibt aber keinen Counter, der nach den 15 Minuten die Coins weiterzählt. Es gibt zwei Modi, wie man sammeln kann: 1. Einen fixen Betrag (zur Zeit zwischen 46-50 Satoshi) 2. Man kann sein Glück herausfordern und auch mehr erhalten, indem man eine Random Summe bekommt. Ich empfehle die erste Methode, denn bei der Random Summe, kommen immer weniger wie 46-50 Satoshi raus. Für diese Methode muss man unter dem Claim Button auf Change Claim Settings klicken und dann ein Häckchen bei Always receive the average claim amount setzen. Für diese Seite benötigt man ebenfalls eine E-Mail Adresse und ein Passwort. Die Coins werden nach dem Claim direkt an die CoinPot Wallet geschickt. FaucetHub unterstützt 14 verschiedene Coins und unzählig viele Faucet-Seiten. Viele davon sind anscheinend auch Scam, aber ich habe bis jetzt noch keine getroffen. Ich werde später erklären, wie ich die Seiten prüfe. Die Seiten, welche ich benutze werde ich in Gruppen unterteilen, für eine bessere Übersicht. 1. Faucets: - Dash (dash-faucet.com) - Doge (doge-faucet.com) - Ethereum (ethereum-faucet.org) - Monero (xmr-faucet.com) Bei diesen Seiten kann man alle 4 Stunden Coins sammeln, nachdem man ein Captcha gelöst hat. Es wird eine Zahl gewürfelt und je nachdem welche Zahl man hat, bekommt man auch eine Anzahl an Coins. Allerdings bekommt man für die Zahlen von 0-9999 immer die gleiche Summe und lediglich bei 10000 eine höhere Summe. Hierfür benötigt es eine E-Mail Adresse und ein Passwort. 2. Speedup Faucets: (speedup-faucet.com) - Speedup Bitcoin - Speedup Doge - Speedup Ethereum - Speedup Litecoin Bei diesen Seiten kann man alle 10 Minuten claimen. Man benötigt nur den Public Key zum Anmelden. Dann klickt man auf claim, löst ein Captcha und wird zu einer Seite weitergeleitet, auf der man ein weiteres Captcha lösen muss. Dann gehts zur nächsten Seite, bei der man warten muss und dann auf get link klicken, dann kommt man wieder zurück zu Speedup mit seinen Coins. Es ist ziemlich anstrengend, da viele Seiten oft nicht gehen, dann mus man wieder zurück, auf Speedup, wieder Captcha lösen, dann kommt vlt wieder eine Seite, wo es nicht geht, wieder zurück auf Speedup, usw. Aber man kann viele Coins daraus machen, da man alle 10 Minuten claimen kann. Zudem kann man nach 15 claims einen Bonus einsammeln. 3. Allcoins (allcoins.pw) Allcoins führe ich als letztes an, da man dort die Coins an FaucetHub auszahlen lassen kann, oder direkt auf sein Wallet (allerdings mit höherer Gebühr). Die Seite unterstützt 15 verschiedene Coins, nicht alle können auf FaucetHub ausgezahlt werden. Um die Coins zu bekommen, muss man nur auf claim klicken, das Captcha lösen und schon bekommt man sie. Man kann alle 5 Minuten EINEN Coin claimen. Claime ich jetzt z.B. Bitcoin, muss ich 5 Minuten warten, bis ich bspw. Dash sammeln kann. Für Allcoins benötigt man eine E-Mail Adresse und ein Passwort. Weitere Seiten, auf denen man was bekommt sind: - Doge-Faucet (dogefaucet.com) - Free Bitcoin (freebitco.in) - Free Doge (freedoge.co.in) - Free IOTA (freeiota.de) Doge-Faucet würde ich nicht empfehlen. Die Seite finanziert sich durch spenden, dementsprechend niedrig sind die Doge, welche man erhält. Man muss 3 Stunden bis zum nächsten Claim warten, bekommt nichtmal 1 Doge und muss 20 Doge sammeln, bevor man sich auszahlen lassen kann. Bei Free Bitcoin und Doge muss man nur ein Captcha lösen und schon erhält man die Coins. In einem Monat habe ich 50 Doge gesammelt (ab 50 Doge kann mansich auszahlen lassen). Bei Free Bitcoin habe ich ca. 1/3 der zum Auszahlen benötigten Coins gesammelt. Free Coins hat zudem eine Lotterie und ein HI-LO Game. Sie funktionieren wie die Seiten von Punkt Nr. 1 Faucets, aber mit mehr Gewinnmöglichkeiten. Free IOTA ist neu und wurde von einem Deutschen entwickelt. Sie funktioniert gleich wie Free Bitcoin/Doge und man hat ebenfalls mehrere Gewinnmöglichkeiten. Für eine Liste mit mehr Faucets könnt ihr hier mal einen Blick drauf werfen: bestfaucetsites.com Mit CoinPot habe ich im letzen Monat etwa 1,50€ verdient. Es ist nicht viel, aber ich habe viel gelernt, wie man mit den Keys umgeht, wie man ein Wallet benutzt, wie man Coins verschickt, usw. Wie kontrolliere ich nun, ob eine Seite Scam oder Legit ist? Nun, bei bestfaucetdites steht es daneben. Sonst gehe ich auf netbusinessrating.com und gib in der Suchleiste den Namen der Seite oder die Adresse ein. Wenn die Seite nicht in der Datenbank gespeichert ist, gebe ich den Namen der Seite zusammen mit dem Wort "Scam" in Google ein und schaue mir an, was Google dazu findet. SCAMWARNUNG! Da auf den oben angegebenen Seiten viel Werbung von Cryptime kommt, wollte ich es mal testen, habe aber herausgefunden, dass die Seite scam ist (www.newsonline.com/cryptime/). Investiert also lieber nicht in die Seite, auch wenn das Angebot gut klingt. Wenn ihr euch also nebenbei eine kleinigkeit verdienen möchtet, wisst ihr jetzt, auf welchen Seiten es geht. Auch wenn es nur wenig ist - in ein paar Jahren steigt der Wert vielleicht wieder enorm, dann sind die 1,50€ auch wieder mehr wert ;) Für mich für den Anfang sind diese Seiten eine tolle Sache. Die nachfolgende Übersicht soll Tips geben bzw. Möglichkeiten aufzeigen um ICOs zu bewerten! https://i.imgur.com/XtmjP6A.png ÜBERSICHT (klickbar)
Domain überprüfen: Wann wurde die Domain registriert? - Kurz vor dem ICO registriert? >> Red Flag << - https://web.archive.org/ Crawler für Webseiten, zeigt archivierte Versionen! Wer ist der Eigentümer dieser Domain? - Eine WHOIS https://www.whois.com/whois/ Abfage gibt Auskunft über sämtliche Details einer Domain. Whitepaper Schlüsseldaten Folgende Zahlen sollten in einem Whitepaper unbedingt enthalten sein: - Softcap und Hardcap Wie hoch wurde der Hardcap gesetzt? Wurde überhaupt ein Hardcap gesetzt? Nein? >> Red Flag << Wurde kein Hardcap gesetzt bzw. sammelt ein Projekt zuviel Geld, ist ein Projekt schnell überbewertet. => Die immensen gesammelten Mittel entsprechen nicht dem eigentlichen Wert des Unternehmens! (tatsächlicher Wert ≠ angenommener Wert) => Dadurch kann es schnell passieren, dass nach einem Listing das Interesse an dem Projekt nachlässt und sich der Wert des Tokens verringert. - Daten für den Token Sale - Token Preis - Total Supply - Vesting Perioden (kein Muss aber wünschenswert!), z.B.: 4 Jahre Vesting + 1 Jahr Cliff Bedeutung: Als Teammitglied muss man min. 1 Jahr dabei bleiben, sonst bekommt man (von dieser 'gesperrten' Menge) gar nichts. Ab dem ersten Jahr bekommt man einen bestimmten (vereinbarten) Prozentsatz. => Gibt es für private/frühzeitige Investoren Rabatte von >50% ist eine Sperrfrist umso wichtiger, da diese sonst bei der ersten Gelegenheit ihre Token veräußern! - Verteilung der Gelder Geht ein zu hoher Prozentsatz der eingenommenen Mittel an das Team selbst? >> Red Flag << Token für Team: eine gesunde Verteilung bewegt sich im Bereich von 10-25% für das Team Token zum Verkauf: Hier gilt: je höher der Prozentsatz, desto 'dezentraler'. => Bevorzugt werden hier natürlich viele Investoren mit mit weniger Token als umgekehrt ;) => Laut Token Metrics (https://medium.com/@tokenmetrics/token-metrics-ico-rating-methodology-v2-0-2f2cc20f5507) wurden bei den erfolgreichsten ICOs im Schnitt 63% der Token zum Verkauf angeboten. - Was geschieht mit Nicht- verkauften Token? => sollten verbrannt werden! Zusätzlich sollten noch die folgenden Informationen enthalten sein: - Problem Definition: Welches Problem wird das Projekt lösen? - Lösung: Wie wird das Problem mit Hilfe der Blockchain gelöst - Der Grund für die Verwendung einer Blockchain / eines Tokens - Roadmap - Teammitglieder >> Red Flag << sollten Punkt(e) fehlen! Whitepaper Plagiate: Wurden Stellen eines Whitepapers einfach aus einem anderen Projekt kopiert? >> Red Flag << Um auf Plagiate zu prüfen gibt es mehrere Möglichkeiten, wie z.B. https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/ Generelle Empfehlung: Vor einer Investition Whitepaper lesen! (Auch vor einem Beitritt zu einer Bounty- Kampagne lohnt es sich, das Whitepaper im Vorfeld zumindest zu überfliegen!) Team/Berater: Zusammenstellung des Teams: >> Sollte eine gesunde Mischung aus technischen und nicht-technischen Personen umfassen << Sind die Teammitglieder mit dem angestrebten Bereich vertraut? Hat das Team Blockchain Erfahrung? Wirbt irgendein Promi für das Projekt? **mcafee** >> Red Flag << (zumindest für mich ;D) Untersuche die Social Media Profile der Teammitglieder! Wie sehen die LinkedIn Profile aus? - Projekt auf LinkedIn Seite hinzugefügt? - Artikel oder Beitrag zum ICO auf der LinkedIn- Aktivitätsseite geliked? Wenn Nein >> Red Flag << Wurden Team- Bilder aus anderen Projekten verwendet? >> Red Flag << Die Verwendung falscher Team- Bilder (Google, Stock Photos) ist gerade recht modern. Nachfolgend einige hilfreiche Webseiten, um gefälschte Fotos zu finden: Für Reverse-Image-Search (Durchsuchen das Web nach ähnlichen Bildern): http://www.reverse-image-search.org https://www.duplichecker.com/reverse-image-search.php https://berify.com/ Um zu prüfen, ob ein Bild geändert/bearbeitet wurde: https://fotoforensics.com/ Durchsucht die 50 führenden Stock-Image-Agenturen: https://www.everypixel.com/ Findet ähnliche Fotos auf über 50 Millionen Webseiten: https://pimeyes.com/en/ Suche einer Person anhand einer Mail- Adresse, eines Usernamen, einer Telefonnummer: https://pipl.com/ Berater die in der Vergangenheit Erfahrungen mit größeren Projekten hatten? Berater für die Branche vorhanden, die das ICO zu lösen versucht? Berater aus dem Krypto- Bereich vorhanden, die verstehen wie Exchanges funktionieren und die Beziehungen zu ihnen haben? Community: Wie viele Follower hat das Projekt auf Telegram, Reddit, Medium etc.? Kamen die Follower auf 'natürliche Weise' zustande oder gab es einen Airdrop oder Telegram Bounties? => einfach kurz nach 'Airdrop' oder 'Bounty' in der Telegram- Gruppe suchen! Wie gestaltet sich die Kommunikation in der Gruppe? Beantworten die Admins alle Fragen? Gekaufte Shills und Bumping Service im Bitcointalk ANN? - Geben viele Newbie Accounts positive Kommentare im ANN ab, kann man davon ausgehen dass ein solches Angebot in Anspruch genommen wurde. siehe, unten: Design der Webseite: Kommt dir das Design der Webseite bekannt vor? Wurde mal wieder das gleiche Wordpress- Theme verwendet? >> Red Flag << Hier kann man es überprüfen: https://www.wpthemedetector.com/ Github- Repo: Wie aktiv ist das Github Repo? Folgende Seiten verfolgen die Aktivitäten und vergleichen Projekte (gilt weniger für ICOs, da diese vermutlich noch kaum Aktivität haben):[/b][/i] - Projekte nach Anzahl der Commits sortieren: https://www.cryptomiso.com/ - oder besser: nach Anzahl der Events sortieren: https://app.santiment.net/assets/all https://i.imgur.com/cazqFRy.jpg Wie aktiv sind die Github- Profile der Teammitglieder? Smart Contract Code vorhanden? - Ist bis kurz vor dem ICO immer noch kein Smart Contract Code verfügbar? >> Red Flag << Wie viele Sterne hat das Repo bereits erhalten? (Signalisiert die 'Beliebtheit' des Git- Repo) https://i.imgur.com/XZxXK2H.jpg Ist ein MVP vorhanden? - Zeigt, dass das Team auf dem richtigen Weg ist. Roadmap: Beginnt die Roadmap mit dem ICO oder gab es bereits in der Zeit davor zahlreiche Meilensteine? Erscheinen die enthaltenen Ziele realisierbar? Welche Ziele wurden in der Vergangenheit bereits erreicht? Gibt es bereits Strategien zur Nutzerakquise? Idee / Konkurrenz: Ist die Idee neu oder einfach ein Abklatsch bestehender Projekte? z.B. das Geschäftsfeld 'Exchange ICO', das bereits hoffnungslos überlaufen ist. Inwiefern unterscheidet sich der Problemlösungsansatz von den Mitbewerbern? Weshalb ist das angebotene Produkt besser als das, was bereits auf dem Markt verfügbar ist? Liste wird in Zukunft noch weiter bearbeitet! Sollten euch noch weitere relevante Punkte einfallen immer her damit! Ich werde diese dann einpflegen! ;D Folgende Quellen wurden als Hilfsmittel herangezogen: Topic 1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5004397.msg45150042#post_A) @Coolcryptovator Topic 2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4586576.0) @Coolcryptovator Medium- Artikel (https://medium.com/@krishnenduchatterjee/ico-evaluation-investing-a-vc-perspective-for-investment-over-greedy-short-term-returns-433f6f9e13d8) @Krishnendu Chatterjee bullrunfactory (https://www.bullrunfactory.com/blog/must-have-key-figures-for-ico-whitepapers-checklist) hackernoon (https://hackernoon.com/how-to-spot-good-ico-how-to-spot-scam-ico-f0f57c1a4c38) @Bogdan Fiedur If you want to know what’s going on within the Ethereum network, then you need to become familiar with block explorers. They are extremely useful tools for checking on the state of the network, individual transfers, contract calls and more. Many also provide details around tokens. But which one should you be using? Let’s explore the options. ETHERSCAN (https://etherscan.io/) Etherscan the original and overall best block explorer for Ethereum. You can check pretty much anything, diving deep into mined blocks, transactions, addresses. It’s got a load of other cool tools like checkers for gas, nodes, DEXs, along with some interesting charts & stats. It’s very easy to see what has been coming in and out an address, and for each transaction, you can check status (in real time), block height, gas stats, tx cost, etc. They also have a comprehensive token list (covering both ERC-20 & ERC-721), where you can see the various assets that have been launched on Ethereum and dig into details like: top holders, price history, volume, circulating supply, ICO info, exchanges, etc. https://i.imgur.com/J71zZlx.png ETHPLORER (https://ethplorer.io/) Ethplorer has a chart that tracks the $ price of your address balance, and also shows transfer volume. Also has a solid focus on tokens, and you can find most of the key information (although they lack descriptions and links). It’s easy to see at a glance the token balance in your address, as well as the price fluctuations. Every token has a profile, where you can check the ‘pulse’, which reveals the price as well as onchain ‘operations’ (transaction count). https://i.imgur.com/IZhwxdW.png ETHERCHAIN (https://www.etherchain.org/) Etherchain is very similar to Etherscan, with a slightly more appealing interface. It’s got a lot of similar charts and tools (one unique thing I noticed was the Unit Converter, useful if you’ve ever wondered about the difference between a WEI, Szabo or Finney). The address overview is compact and gives you all the required info, and it’s very easy to see what you have sent and received over time (displayed in chart form as well, by clicking on ‘History’ tab). A major feature that is lacking is the token explorer. Input a token address and you will not get anything useful. https://i.imgur.com/yka2Wr2.png BLOCKSCOUT (https://blockscout.com/eth/mainnet/) Blockscout covers everything on Ethereum, from transactions and block information, token values to sidechains and private chains. The address interface has everything you would expect to see and identifies clearly between transactions, token transfers, contract calls, and so on, which is very useful and lacking in most other explorers. The token explorer is however very limited and not pulling through recent transfers, but as a note informs, the chain is still being indexed, so I hope this aspect will be improved over time. https://i.imgur.com/ZPUuF6U.png ENJINX (https://enjinx.io/) EnjinX is a very fast and nice looking explorer that was only released in December 2018 by the EnjinCoin team. It not only supports Ethereum (along with ERC-20, 721 & 1155 tokens), but also Bitcoin and Litecoin. The address interface crams a lot into a tabular format, which might be a bit crowded for some. However, the key info is all clearly displayed, with token transfers separated into its own tab. The token explorer covers basic details, holders and transfers. https://i.imgur.com/yaUmHob.png BLOCKCHAIN.com (https://www.blockchain.com/explorer?currency=ETH) Blockchain.com is rather basic, shows what has been sent and received, so good for quick checks. https://i.imgur.com/X2g5C5W.png BTC.com (https://eth.btc.com/#/) Btc.com covers the basics of Ins and Outs, but nothing much to dig into. A nice colorful representation of token holdings, and has a functional token explorer. https://i.imgur.com/DfD9n1a.png BLOXY (https://bloxy.info/) Bloxy is one serious piece of kit. If it’s happening on Ethereum, Bloxy is intent on letting you know about it. For simply checking transactions, it’s a bit of overkill, and quite confusing when you first fire it up. However, if you want to see everything that is going on within your address, this is where you need to go. Some features: sent + received, activities by month graph, calls to smart contracts, relations with other addresses, portfolio analysis, notifications. Bloxy also has you covered for comprehensive analysis of tokens. Here some features: onchain activities (daily + monthly graphs), transfers, contract calls, holders (distributions, historical growth, owner intersection with other tokens), DEX trades. Bloxy covers ERC-20, 721, 223 + 827. While you can see the most transferred tokens at a glance. A couple more things: great API, and very cool Analytical Reports. https://i.imgur.com/H3Xoym6.png AMBER DATA (https://amberdata.io/home) Amber Data is similar to Bloxy, in that you can access some intriguing data around transactions and tokens. It also lists ERC-721 collectibles in an appealingly visual way. However, Amber Data feels a bit limited, and the interface is confusing. For example, while it’s easy to see what’s been sent and received, you can only view a graph of account history for 30 days, and ‘No Addresses were found’ for Incoming Volume by Address. The token view has some nice graphs (especially Incoming Volume by Address) but again limited to only 30 days. The Contract Activity and Adoption & Usage graphs I do not find especially useful, due to the confusing terms that are poorly defined (eg. EOA to Contract Transactions or Unique Address Interactions). https://i.imgur.com/nyYaUHX.png ETHECTIVE (https://ethtective.com/) Ethective could be a great help for our forum investigators because has a very interesting way to visualize Ethereum network, that makes exploring transfers much more interactive. It’s quite easy to get lost in the maze of transfers and connections, but nonetheless, a cool tool for seeing how active an address is, and where the larger transactions are heading to and from. A nice touch is the categorization of addresses, so you can easily identify whales, small fish, exchanges, scams, etc. https://i.imgur.com/lOxbdu0.png ETHSTATS (https://ethstats.io/) ETHStats this explorer takes some time to get familiar with it, but once you do it’s seriously cool and very beautiful to look at. The address interface shows you the value of your portfolio, with the distribution of ETH and tokens, charting the rise and fall over time. Of course, you can dive deeper into the transactions, and it even visualizes where in the block your transaction fell. https://i.imgur.com/TAQExKF.png BLOCKCHAIR (https://blockchair.com/ethereum) BLOCKCHAIR - block explorer and the most powerful API for BTC, ETH, BCH, LTC, DASH, BSV and DOGE (many more will be added) that allows you to find, sort and filter transactions and addresses. Very handy to check multiple currencies with great visualization. Look up Ethereum (ETH) blocks, transactions, addresses, smart contracts but there is no token information. I think another useful explorer on the list. https://i.imgur.com/ByuzlNN.png Translation: (Porównanie) Jaki jest najlepszy eksplorator Ethereum? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153432) Source: https://medium.com/coinmonks/whats-the-best-ethereum-block-explorer-10-alternatives-to-etherscan-8eb5f2be263d I admited that when I was noob, I often applied immediately when I saw bounties open up. Before reading next lines, you should honest with you and answer the question: "How much time do you often spend to read bounties' topic tittle?" Read first, before applying, but in fact bounty hunters tend to applying first, before they read. It's one of the worst thing you can do due to several reasons: - Bounties have been filled up totally, mean that there is not open slot for new comers. - Bounties have been paused by campaigns' owners. - And other reasons. In order to help noobs better understand the tittle of bounty topic, I quote the part below for you. Please read it carefully to make sure that you understand the meanings of those acronyms. Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns Sometimes, you can see something different, like:The following abbreviations will be used for campaigns (where applicable):
- Paused - On Hold - [FIN]: Finished Both of two means campaign has been on the situation and period in which campaign's owners need to reconsider about the results they got from campaigns, before making next decision to keep running it or totally stop. Using which acronym depends on each manager, but these ones are the most popular acronym to describe bounties situation. Please spend your little time to read those ones, steps by steps: 1> Topic tittle, that mostly disclose the current situation of bounties (mentioned above). 2> Read the information on which ranks are available. 3> Read the information on open slots. 4> Read information on earned merits required (most of BTC paid campaigns ask some earned merits or earned merits in last 120 days to meet first requirements to apply.) 5> Trust requirements (most of campaign don't accept applicants have negative trusts. If you find out there are chances for you from steps 1 to 3, let move to last 2 steps (4, and 5). If you don't find out chances in steps 1 to 3, let skip steps 4, and 5, and move on to other bounties. There is a topic, which give you active campaigns that paid in BTC, remember that the topic is only for BTC-paid campaigns. So, you should not post anything relates to altcoins-paid campaigns in the topic. Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 31-Mar-2019] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0) Enjoy! Hi, Lightning dürften die meisten ja inzwischen als Scaling-Technologie kennen. Ich verfolge aber etwas die Entwicklung eines alternativen Mechanismus namens Sidechains. Der Ansatz wurde bisher nur in einer halbzentralen Variante realisiert und es ist recht schwer, Infos zu bekommen, da die Technik kaum hier im Forum und den Bitcoin-Medien angesprochen wird. Dennoch finde ich die Technologie sehr interessant, da sie meiner Meinung nach als "Zwischenlayer" zwischen der Main Chain und Lightning-ähnlichen Offchain-Lösungen dienen könnte. Deshalb dachte ich, mache ich mal einen Thread dazu auf - vielleicht kommen auch andere Beiträge. Für die, die Sidechains noch nicht kennen: Es handelt sich kurz gesagt um unabhängige Blockchains, auf denen eine Währung zirkuliert, die an Bitcoin (oder eine andere "Haupt-Kryptowährung") gebunden ("gepeggt") ist. Also quasi um einen Altcoin, der immer genauso viel wert ist wie Bitcoin. Damit das funktioniert, gibt es bei echten Sidechains einen Mechanismus, der es erlaubt, stets einen Coin der Sidechain-Währung 1:1 mit der Hauptchain-Währung auszutauschen. Das impliziert natürlich, dass die Geldmenge der Sidechain nicht einfach zur Bitcoin-Geldmenge hinzugefügt werden kann. Stattdessen gilt bei "echten Sidechains" die Regel, dass ein Sidechain-Coin nur existieren darf, solange er auf der Bitcoin-Hauptchain entweder per "Proof of Burn" zerstört ("One-Way-Peg") oder so lange eingefroren und nicht verwendet wird, bis er auf der Sidechain zerstört wird, damit er wieder in der Hauptchain verwendet werden darf ("Two-Way-Peg"). Die Geldmenge von 21 Mio. bleibt also gleich. Was sind die Vor- und Nachteile? Vorteile:
Nachteile und mögliche Probleme:
Arten von Sidechains Es gibt drei grundsätzliche Arten von Sidechains: solche mit einem "zentralen" Peg, "föderierte" Sidechains und "dezentrale" Sidechains, von denen bisher nur das "Drivechain"-Modell zumindest in die Alpha-Phase gekommen ist. Kommerziell eingesetzt werden bisher nur zentrale und föderierte Chains. Zentralisierte Sidechains: Hier wird der "Peg" von einem einzigen Akteur verwaltet. Das heißt, dieser Akteur sorgt dafür, dass Bitcoins auf der Hauptchain eingefroren werden und in Sidechain-Coins umgewandelt werden. Dieses Modell ist natürlich nur begrenzt interessant zur Skalierung von Bitcoin, da man dem zentralen Akteur vertrauen muss. Föderierte Sidechains: Funktionieren im Prinzip wie zentrale Sidechains. Aber hier gibt es mehrere Akteure, die mit Hilfe von Multisig-Transaktionen gemeinsam über das "Einfrieren" und das Umwandeln in Sidechain-Token entscheiden. Wenn die "vertrauenswürdigen Entitäten" gut ausgewählt werden, kann damit die Abhängigkeit gegenüber einer zentralen Entität verringert werden. Dieses Modell wird bei den bisher wichtigsten Sidechain-Projekten Liquid (https://blockstream.com/liquid/) (Blockstream) und Rootstock/RSK (https://rsk.co) eingesetzt. Drivechains: Dieses Modell ist dezentral und damit das wohl interessanteste. Es sind hier die Bitcoin-Miner, die über das "Einfrieren" und "Auftauen" von Coins entscheiden, indem sie entsprechende Signale in die Blöcke einbauen. Grundsätzlich müssen die Miner zuerst das Einfrieren bestätigen, bevor auf der Sidechain der Coin kreiert wird. Wird auf einer Sidechain ein Coin zerstört, der auf die Hauptchain zurück soll, so müssen die Miner ebenfalls zustimmen, dass die eingefrorenen Coins wieder "aufgetaut" werden können. Damit die Angriffswahrscheinlichkeit minimiert wird, müssen die Miner das "Auftauen" einer Transaktion mehrmals - laut Vorschlag mehrere Wochen oder sogar Monate lang - kontinuierlich bestätigen. Erst dann kann der Coin auf der Hauptchain wieder genutzt werden. Drivechains befinden sich zur Zeit in der Entwicklung, ein Testnet gibt es seit September 2018, siehe drivechain.info (http://www.drivechain.info/). Zu News siehe den Twitter-Account von Paul Sztorc (https://twitter.com/truthcoin). Soviel erstmal, bei Interesse später mehr ;) Wer weitere Sidechain-Modelle und Aspekte kennt - nehme ich gerne auf. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lafu on June 24, 2019, 10:13:29 PM I definitely support this and its always nice to read your posts and you can see that there is always or the most times put in a lot of effort for the threads and post !
Also the information in the Topics and post is always nice too . And as you has written one more Merit Source would be great in the local Board ! I think that you will be a good source and i wish ya good luck to get one ! 8) :) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: qwk on June 24, 2019, 10:35:51 PM Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: CoinEraser on June 24, 2019, 11:05:04 PM Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: jademaxsuy on June 25, 2019, 09:24:56 AM Let me help you OP, of course the more merit source, the happier it will be. I am supporting every possible merit source here in the forum for it will be beneficial to all users in the forum to have a better merit distributions though theymos does have already its own ways on promoting and preserving the forum. So, all of this applications are subject for approval and it is the admins discretion on choosing one.
All I can do as a user seeing that this could be a beneficial to the users in the forum is just by bumping this thread. Hopefully you will get it OP. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: mole0815 on June 25, 2019, 09:58:12 AM you have my support in any case! incredible performance you deliver and a real enrichment for the forum :)
Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: yxt on June 25, 2019, 11:17:26 AM 1miau would be a good choice
Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Real-Duke on June 25, 2019, 11:22:17 AM 1miau has my full support. I hope his application as merit source is going to be accepted!
He is a good and well known member of the german community and a self-made legendary because of his good quality postings. Please give him a chance :) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: CryptopreneurBrainboss on June 25, 2019, 01:28:26 PM I didn't bother looking through your selected post as I do in others before I give my support. You have proven yourself to be a quality poster and it takes one to know one therefore meriting of quality post won't be a problem for you as you can easily identify them also having seen your contribution to your local board, there isn't a doubt you're a net positive, good for the fourm user and would do well as a merit source Irrespective of the boards you focus more on. Welcome to the club in advance.
Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: DdmrDdmr on June 25, 2019, 02:43:30 PM There are a couple of stats that help to understand your meriting habits, which after all, are potentially part of one’s credentials when postulating to become a Merit Source. Without flooding your thread with them, here are the most significant ones, that I find speak rather well as to your candidacy:
You’ve awarded sMerit to 155 different profiles, giving out 496 sMerits in total (as of last Friday), with a hammer time consistency average of 1,01 sMerits per TX. Specifically on your local board, you’ve sent sMerit to 68 different profiles, awarding 322 sMerits with an average of 1,02 sMerits per TX. The above is the distribution of your sMerits over the different boards. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 25, 2019, 06:38:15 PM Many thanks for the support @everyone!
I appreciate it very much ;) https://media.giphy.com/media/10dU7AN7xsi1I4/giphy.gif ... Great stats as usual, thanks for posting it. I've also requested some detailed informations from LoyceV about my Merit distribution on the German local board a few days ago, I'll just quote it here: 1miau (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143453) 1. 164 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Deutsch (German) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=16.0) > Altcoins (Deutsch) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=152.0) 2. 103 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Deutsch (German) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=16.0) 3. 67 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Other (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4) > Meta (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0) 4. 37 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Other (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4) > Beginners & Help (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=39.0) 5. 25 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Deutsch (German) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=16.0) > Anfänger und Hilfe (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=62.0) 6. 23 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Economy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#3) > Trading Discussion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=8.0) > Reputation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0) 7. 16 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Deutsch (German) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=16.0) > Trading und Spekulation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=61.0) 8. 9 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Economy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#3) > Trading Discussion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=8.0) > Scam Accusations (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0) 9. 8 sMerit spent in 10. 6 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Deutsch (German) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=16.0) > Off-Topic (Deutsch) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=64.0) 11. 4 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Alternate cryptocurrencies (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6) > Altcoin Discussion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=67.0) 12. 4 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Pilipinas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=219.0) 13. 4 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=191.0) 14. 4 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#1) > Project Development (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=12.0) 15. 3 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#1) > Development & Technical Discussion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=6.0) 16. 3 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Bitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#1) > Bitcoin Discussion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=1.0) 17. 2 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Other (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4) > Serious discussion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=250.0) 18. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Alternate cryptocurrencies (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6) > Marketplace (Altcoins) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=161.0) > Service Discussion (Altcoins) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=198.0) 19. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Alternate cryptocurrencies (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6) > Announcements (Altcoins) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0) 20. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > 中文 (Chinese) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=30.0) 21. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > العربية (Arabic) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=241.0) > إستفسارات و أسئلة المبتدئين (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=253.0) 22. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > العربية (Arabic) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=241.0) 23. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Deutsch (German) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=16.0) > Auktionen (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=141.0) 24. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Polski (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=142.0) 25. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Français (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=13.0) > Wiki, documentation et traduction (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=54.0) 26. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Local (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#5) > Français (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=13.0) > Altcoins (Français) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=149.0) > Annonces (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=258.0) 27. 1 sMerit spent in Bitcoin Forum (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php) > Economy (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#3) > Economics (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=7.0) > Speculation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=57.0) Total: 492 sMerit spent Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: MinoRaiola on June 26, 2019, 06:14:06 AM 1miau would be a good choice I can also confirm that. Very active and smart. If there is a merit source that is worthy of it, then m1au is the perfect choice.Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Scheede on June 27, 2019, 05:25:36 PM 1miau would be a good choice I can also confirm that. Very active and smart. If there is a merit source that is worthy of it, then m1au is the perfect choice.I fully back that application. https://media2.giphy.com/media/l2YWGoblzeLpfNQFW/giphy.gif Source: https://media2.giphy.com/media/l2YWGoblzeLpfNQFW/giphy.gif Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 27, 2019, 05:39:44 PM 1miau is observably either:
1. stupid or 2. dishonest. or 3. Unable to comprehend English to a standard where he could apply merit to the correct posts. We notice he left FAKE negative feedback on our account. The feedback is OBSERVABLY INCORRECT. We asked Hhampuz to answer some valid and important questions. We provided the observable instances which provided a STRONG case as a basis for each of the VALID QUESTIONS, those instances were not disputed or refuted by either HHampuz or any other person on that thread. If this fool 1miau believes presenting observable instances and asking questions about them (when they are dealing with the finances of project and members) makes you a scammer, then he is either a moron or dishonest or as we say incapable of comprehending English to a standard required of a merit source. Those observable instances still stand and NONE of them have been debunked and some are undeniable evidence of wrong doing. Hhampuz answered that - he did not knowingly hire some of those members as they were hired directly by the project. However he did REFUSE to be transparent regarding the standards and thresholds for his hiring and firing members on his sig campaigns. We believe this is not how campaign managers should behave. All members should be in a transparent and equal manner. We strongly oppose his merit source application. The noob seems to have appeared from nowhere and has suddenly arrived on DT and now asking for merit source too? No thanks. I mean if idiots like 1miau say " we will not believe a word you say" when you have only presented observable instances and asked questions relating to them?? then what sort of miscreant are we dealing with. How can it be trusted to allocate merit?? that's his basis for this comment? LOL Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lafu on June 27, 2019, 06:17:40 PM I mean if idiots like 1miau say " we will not believe a word you say" when you have only presented observable instances and asked questions relating to them?? then what sort of miscreant are we dealing with. How can it be trusted to allocate merit?? that's his basis for this comment? LOL OK cryptocunthunter lets get into this thread an spray some random shit posts as always you are doing ! The Problem is that everybody " will not believe a word you say " Your swap between Trust and Merit complains shows us that you dont know what you realy want from us all in the End . Maybe show us your real Skillz ( and i dont mean write a 2 pages post ) Apply for a Merit Source yourself with a Thread and show others what you are doing for the Forum and how great you are ! Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Sharon121212 on June 27, 2019, 06:41:02 PM It about time. Was wondering what was keeping you too long to apply. You are up there in the ranks of active users of the forum and you smerit distribution ratio are of impressive standard except the merit source positions are completely occupied I don't see any reason you not being selected. Best of luck mate
Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: fronti on June 27, 2019, 08:21:08 PM the only thing which makes it complicated for me to support 1miau as merit source will be the amount of cat related images in this thread.
but as this is the internet and the internet is for cats .. full support! https://blog.cellenza.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/cat-meme-219306_w650.jpg Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 27, 2019, 10:14:04 PM I mean if idiots like 1miau say " we will not believe a word you say" when you have only presented observable instances and asked questions relating to them?? then what sort of miscreant are we dealing with. How can it be trusted to allocate merit?? that's his basis for this comment? LOL OK cryptocunthunter lets get into this thread an spray some random shit posts as always you are doing ! The Problem is that everybody " will not believe a word you say " Your swap between Trust and Merit complains shows us that you dont know what you realy want from us all in the End . Maybe show us your real Skillz ( and i dont mean write a 2 pages post ) Apply for a Merit Source yourself with a Thread and show others what you are doing for the Forum and how great you are ! LOL who is this idiot lafu? oh yes, the person that expects us to believe he wasn't an insider on the cryptopia exit scam? You were pushing that exchange hard and yes your judgement and indeed word looks dubious far more than our own. Lafu we are laffing at u. This confused off topic garbage you are spewing is only confusing for you. The NEW trust flag system is fine although the lemons flag seems to range what "some people" want to believe you "may " do in the "future" right up to "proven scamming" . The merit system is meaningless garbage. Now to go back on topic. 1miau needs to explain his trust abuse comments because they are observably INCORRECT. They are as we just presented them above. Since right now he looks dishonest or stupid, actually both. These are not the qualities to look for with new merit sources. Now shhhh and get back to pushing exchanges that exit scam, dirt bag. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: pugman on June 27, 2019, 10:31:03 PM Dude, your application is amaazzziiingg!! All the best, hope you become a good merit source dude, I mean clout farmer/underground DT cultist/ secret member of the GANG, I mean WHAAAAT? :o
Hold up, are you contesting against Lauda who is also a cat? This should be interesting. ::) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: mikeywith on June 27, 2019, 10:57:28 PM Despite the fact that he likes to compete with me ;D I support his application, I had many interactions with 1miau , he is an excellent forum member , he takes the forum very seriously and the majority of his sent merit are a spot on, also the fact that he is an active member on a local board should help strengthening his application.
Good luck. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 28, 2019, 01:07:33 AM The feedback is OBSERVABLY INCORRECT. Wrong. I just don't trust liars. Easy Isn't it? I would give that feeback always again and thanks for proving me right one more time a few weeks later, liar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.msg50881357#msg50881357)! We strongly oppose his merit source application. Who is "we"? You and your other sockpuppet accounts? ::)It about time. Was wondering what was keeping you too long to apply. You are up there in the ranks of active users of the forum and you smerit distribution ratio are of impressive standard except the merit source positions are completely occupied I don't see any reason you not being selected. Best of luck mate I hope theymos sees it the same way. Thanks for the support! the only thing which makes it complicated for me to support 1miau as merit source will be the amount of cat related images in this thread. but as this is the internet and the internet is for cats .. Cats will be the new hats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117225.0). 8) :D :D https://i.imgur.com/wRENIzg.jpg But kiwis and lemons are also nice. For everyone's amusement (but especially for fronti): https://i.imgur.com/r0sqKv3.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/H8KPrhb.jpg LOL who is this idiot lafu? oh yes, the person that expects us to believe he wasn't an insider on the cryptopia exit scam? You were pushing that exchange hard and yes your judgement and indeed word looks dubious far more than our own. Lafu we are laffing at u. Here we go, you are spreading misinformation and lies again. ::)Dude, your application is amaazzziiingg!! All the best, hope you become a good merit source dude, I mean clout farmer/underground DT cultist/ secret member of the GANG, I mean WHAAAAT? :o Thx for the kind words :)Or member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) 8) And hey, now I've the first cryptocunt accusation here, that might bring me some street credibility. :D Hold up, are you contesting against Lauda who is also a cat? This should be interesting. ::) My main goal is to increase qwk's fear of the qwk / 1miau Flippening (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5099167.msg50851462#msg50851462). :DFor now. :P Despite the fact that he likes to compete with me ;D I support his application, I had many interactions with 1miau , he is an excellent forum member , he takes the forum very seriously and the majority of his sent merit are a spot on, also the fact that he is an active member on a local board should help strengthening his application. Competition is always useful. In Germany we say "Wettbewerb belebt das Geschäft" (competition improves the business) ;)Good luck. Many thanks for your support. How about you as a Merit source? I'm sure you would do a pretty good job and I would like to support your application. :) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Foxpup on June 28, 2019, 05:04:25 AM Or member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) 8) Indeed it does. And just when I was beginning to think he'd lost interest.And hey, now I've the first cryptocunt accusation here, that might bring me some street credibility. :D Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Scheede on June 28, 2019, 08:12:36 AM Or member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) 8) Indeed it does. And just when I was beginning to think he'd lost interest.And hey, now I've the first cryptocunt accusation here, that might bring me some street credibility. :D Meaning I´m too late for the party? Just while sleeping? That´s not satisfying. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: asu on June 28, 2019, 08:47:47 AM I support 1miau merit source application!
I trust 1miau will all my beliefs and my instincts! Don’t have any interaction to you, but I know with myself based from what I see to all your post and proved for being a good established member. I fully trust this person also. https://i.postimg.cc/Vk826KN2/FA4-B5-C0-A-8387-42-BA-9558-627869-EE20-AD.jpg (https://postimages.org/) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 28, 2019, 10:01:51 AM The feedback is OBSERVABLY INCORRECT. Wrong. I just don't trust liars. Easy Isn't it? I would give that feeback always again and thanks for proving me right one more time a few weeks later, liar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.msg50881357#msg50881357)! We strongly oppose his merit source application. Who is "we"? You and your other sockpuppet accounts? ::)It about time. Was wondering what was keeping you too long to apply. You are up there in the ranks of active users of the forum and you smerit distribution ratio are of impressive standard except the merit source positions are completely occupied I don't see any reason you not being selected. Best of luck mate I hope theymos sees it the same way. Thanks for the support! the only thing which makes it complicated for me to support 1miau as merit source will be the amount of cat related images in this thread. but as this is the internet and the internet is for cats .. Cats will be the new hats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117225.0). 8) :D :D https://i.imgur.com/wRENIzg.jpg But kiwis and lemons are also nice. For everyone's amusement (but especially for fronti): https://i.imgur.com/r0sqKv3.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/H8KPrhb.jpg LOL who is this idiot lafu? oh yes, the person that expects us to believe he wasn't an insider on the cryptopia exit scam? You were pushing that exchange hard and yes your judgement and indeed word looks dubious far more than our own. Lafu we are laffing at u. Here we go, you are spreading misinformation and lies again. ::)Dude, your application is amaazzziiingg!! All the best, hope you become a good merit source dude, I mean clout farmer/underground DT cultist/ secret member of the GANG, I mean WHAAAAT? :o Thx for the kind words :)Or member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) 8) And hey, now I've the first cryptocunt accusation here, that might bring me some street credibility. :D Hold up, are you contesting against Lauda who is also a cat? This should be interesting. ::) My main goal is to increase qwk's fear of the qwk / 1miau Flippening (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5099167.msg50851462#msg50851462). :DFor now. :P Despite the fact that he likes to compete with me ;D I support his application, I had many interactions with 1miau , he is an excellent forum member , he takes the forum very seriously and the majority of his sent merit are a spot on, also the fact that he is an active member on a local board should help strengthening his application. Competition is always useful. In Germany we say "Wettbewerb belebt das Geschäft" (competition improves the business) ;)Good luck. Many thanks for your support. How about you as a Merit source? I'm sure you would do a pretty good job and I would like to support your application. :) What a fucking moron you OBSERVABLY are, feltching slobbering piece of euro trash. Present the LIE that was contained within the reference in YOUR feedback that demonstrated we were lying This type of bullshit claim of yours demonstrates CLEARY you are not fit for merit source. You are simply part of the trust abusing shit stain team on this board. Now present the PROOF you have that we were lying in the REFERENCE you gave for your feedback or admit you're a dumb fuck spouting LIES of your own.# Got it fool? This Lafu issue just adds weight to our claims you are too stupid to be a merit source. How is asking him if he thinks we should believe that he did not have knowledge cryptopia were about to vanish with everyones money a LIE, 1, how can it be a lie if it is a question ? and 2, how can YOU PROVE if it were a statement that it was not true? This is why idiots and ass feltching noob euro trash like 1maui should not be merit sources. They simply do not have the capacity to even comprehend the true meaning of a post? How will they apply merit with any accuracy? How does noob garbage like this get on DT and start applying for merit source a year after it found out about btc? lol where were you before that under some rock ? bit slow off the (deutch) mark pal? Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: yogg on June 28, 2019, 10:09:49 AM I fully support 1miau's application as a merit source. :)
Always enjoyed reading his posts, they are really great quality indeed. Some of their posts are really helpful and by seeing the content in OP, it makes no doubt that 1miau has been very involved with the community. I trust 1miau's judgement when it comes to give merits and I think the job will be nicely done. 8) It is important to have responsible people as merit sources. The fact that 1miau is active on some local boards is great too, because he will help to spread those merits to people that aren't particularly familiar with english. Keep up the great work 1miau. :) https://i.imgur.com/uZt7Z4r.png?1 Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lafu on June 28, 2019, 10:13:08 AM ~~~~~~~ All i Read everytime from you is " Blah Blah Blah .............. Blah Blah Blah ........... Blub " As i have written in my earlyer Post , come up with something Constructive for the Forum , apply for an Merit Source yourself , and dont Cry everytime like a Baby ! You write everytime lies about others because you dont get something working for yourself and all others are the Reason for it . Again , Show us your awesome SKILLZ , oh wait thats the problem , there are nothing . In contrast to you, 1miau has done more for the forum and for many members in a year than you have in the whole past since you came here! Cheers Cryptohunter you made it again on my Ignore. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 28, 2019, 10:17:55 AM ~~~~~~~ All i Read everytime from you is " Blah Blah Blah .............. Blah Blah Blah ........... Blub " As i have written in my earlyer Post , come up with something Constructive for the Forum , apply for an Merit Source yourself , and dont Cry everytime like a Baby ! You write everytime lies about others because you dont get something working for yourself and all others are the Reason for it . Again , Show us your awesome SKILLZ , oh wait thats the problem , there are nothing . In contrast to you, 1miau has done more for the forum and for many members in a year than you have in the whole past since you came here! Cheers Cryptohunter you made it again on my Ignore. Present the LIES you slobbering imbecile. You need PROOF not just you "claim" I am lying. 1miau is a "NOTHING BURGER" he is a non achieving piece of dirt like you. BRING your own largest achievement here or 1miau so we can compare it to something a TRUE legend has done here and laugh at you both. 1maui or whatever his shit stain trust abusing name is.. is NOT FIT TO BE A MERIT SOURCE. Like yourself he has observable issues differentiating between Observable instances and lies. How can such a fool be ready to be a merit source. Likely because you are both retarded euro trash feltching dregs. What you likely mean in 1miau has licked more ass and feltched more dirt than most people do in several life times if they are unlucky. The idiot is pure brown nosing dirt. ANOTHER --CHIPMIXER SIG SPAMMER - WHAT A SHOCK. Simply here to spam for his btc dust - that is all. Take it's sig away and see how it vanishes. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lafu on June 28, 2019, 10:24:41 AM Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 28, 2019, 10:34:04 AM Notice how they run when you ask for proof? LOL Same for 1miau who is not fit to be a merit source nor fit to lick our boots. Both vanish when you ask from some PROOF of their false claims. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 28, 2019, 01:31:02 PM Or member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) 8) Indeed it does. And just when I was beginning to think he'd lost interest.And hey, now I've the first cryptocunt accusation here, that might bring me some street credibility. :D snip What's so hard to understand? Please read my feedback again: Quote Tried to ruin the reputation of forum members - failed badly. However, I would not trust a single word of this user. It's clear to me that the only intention of that post was to ruin the reputation of Hhampuz, nothing else. That's a pattern of your posts everywhere, you are always trying to make up accusations and throw some mud where people have not your opinion. You have made many more posts where you show that you are not interested in a healthy discussion and your only goal is defamation of trusted users with unproven allegations. People should know this when they deal with you that you are dishonest and obviously retarded. :P You have proven to be dishonest multiple times and I would not trust you with any amount of money because you are either a malicious troll or completely braindead. And it's extremely sad to have the warning "Trade with extreme caution!" removed because it would fit very well to your account. You are 100% net negative and always derailing discussions with your utter nonsense. Please think about it if Newbies read you comments and they will turn off the forum because they don't want to fight here, they want information about Bitcoin. I would appreciate it if you change your mind and start to be useful for the community. This Lafu issue just adds weight to our claims you are too stupid to be a merit source. How is asking him if he thinks we should believe that he did not have knowledge cryptopia were about to vanish with everyones money a LIE, 1, how can it be a lie if it is a question ? and 2, how can YOU PROVE if it were a statement that it was not true? Because your question implies he would be involved. You know how to phrase things that people get a wrong impression of the situation although you didn't make a statement. And please, lern how to quote. While reading your post I feel like I'm in shitposting wonderland. Maybe that would be better. Let's see if you are right and I should just ignore him or if he's interested to stop his net negative posts. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 28, 2019, 04:30:50 PM Or member of Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5121375.msg50340632#msg50340632) 8) Indeed it does. And just when I was beginning to think he'd lost interest.And hey, now I've the first cryptocunt accusation here, that might bring me some street credibility. :D snip What's so hard to understand? Please read my feedback again: Quote Tried to ruin the reputation of forum members - failed badly. However, I would not trust a single word of this user. It's clear to me that the only intention of that post was to ruin the reputation of Hhampuz, nothing else. That's a pattern of your posts everywhere, you are always trying to make up accusations and throw some mud where people have not your opinion. You have made many more posts where you show that you are not interested in a healthy discussion and your only goal is defamation of trusted users with unproven allegations. People should know this when they deal with you that you are dishonest and obviously retarded. :P You have proven to be dishonest multiple times and I would not trust you with any amount of money because you are either a malicious troll or completely braindead. And it's extremely sad to have the warning "Trade with extreme caution!" removed because it would fit very well to your account. You are 100% net negative and always derailing discussions with your utter nonsense. Please think about it if Newbies read you comments and they will turn off the forum because they don't want to fight here, they want information about Bitcoin. I would appreciate it if you change your mind and start to be useful for the community. This Lafu issue just adds weight to our claims you are too stupid to be a merit source. How is asking him if he thinks we should believe that he did not have knowledge cryptopia were about to vanish with everyones money a LIE, 1, how can it be a lie if it is a question ? and 2, how can YOU PROVE if it were a statement that it was not true? Because your question implies he would be involved. You know how to phrase things that people get a wrong impression of the situation although you didn't make a statement. And please, lern how to quote. While reading your post I feel like I'm in shitposting wonderland. Maybe that would be better. Let's see if you are right and I should just ignore him or if he's interested to stop his net negative posts. Well then you have demonstrated EXACTLY WHY you can NOT be a merit source. Your post clearly demonstrates you are low functioning. Watch how I will pull you apart in public here as a lesson to other low functioning dregs of your type. You simply do not have the capacity to allocate merit to posts of value. 1. Present the observable instances that are FALSE and tell me how YOU can prove they ARE FALSE. These instances are not opinions these are events that took place. We have presented clearly an observable instance that demonstrates lying and scamming and several other instances that provide a strong case with regard clear financially motivated wrong doing. That is not slinging mud and opinions they are clear instances that are independently verifiable. Prove them ALL to be FALSE. If you can not then you are WRONG. 2. We are ASKING.. HHampuz if HE KNOWINGLY is employing these types of people in his campaigns. (subsequent to this HHampuz ADMITTED that he would NOT be transparent about this rules for employing or refusing to employ people for sig campaigns that he controls on behalf of projects - which as we explained leaves him wide open and his projects wide open to a lot of valid criticism and questions). That is a question we wanted answered. Your opinion of the intention means nothing noob trash. If he was knowingly employing these types of people then he WAS if he was NOT then he could answer on thread. If he could refute the observable instances then he was free to do that too. 3. Any other "OPINIONS" you have reached are your own problem. Screaming "defamation and lies" is actually simply FALSE ACCUSATIONS on your part. Only someone as dumb as yourself can not see that. Well done moron. 4. Now you further dig yourself further in to a corner by claiming. WE HAVE BEEN PROVEN dishonest MULTIPLE times. PRESENT 1 instance of being PROVEN dishonest. PROOF is what we want to see. Not your opinion of others speculations. You see what is "clear to you" means NOTHING. Failure to see that is exactly why you are not fit to be a merit source. What is the point of having low functioning ass kissing fools like 1miua giving out merit? you simply do NOT have the capacity to recognize a post of value. What you are suggesting is this. That a person like hhmapuz who's actions are lately 1. refusing to be transparent in his campaign selection process (seems very shady) 2. supporting the dox and placing at risk the forum treasurer and the boards funds. 3. it appears that he may be stealing btc from his campaign projects should not be asked QUESTIONS based on observable instances? Observable instances you are saying are clearly incorrect but NOBODY tried to refute or deny took place? Instances that several senior members believe are dishonest and shady and some that are undeniable evidence of lying and scamming? The person asking the questions is "dishonest" LOL How can this poor confused dumb piece of ass feltching dirt be a merit source? Boot this fool off DT also. Noob trash who didn't find out about btc until last year have no place as merit sources/dt. Who knows what you may find out about next... "The wheel" LOL . The board is surely not this hard up that we need noob trash that are also heavily retarded in positions of trust handing out merit. I wonder where your "merit " all came from CHIPMIXER SIG SPAMMER? Remove your sig and then we may believe you are here as a real enthusiast not just some euro skank begging for btc crumbs because you were too dumb to notice btc 9 yrs earlier LOL Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: asche on June 28, 2019, 09:12:50 PM @TOAA just crawl back into your darkhole, nobody wants to read you ranting everywhere.
Plus this is perfect non sense. Back to 1miau's application: 1miau is the perfect man for the job! He spends his merits wisely and without counting. He is also a nice person in general and easy to talk to. I also trust him (see feedback). The only negative point in my mind is, there isn't really any merit missing in the german section. The local source qwk is already doing a phantastisch job (pun intended). If there is a limited count of merit sources, maybe some other local boards need it more. If this is not the case, let it rain! Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 29, 2019, 12:18:05 AM snip Lol, again a huge wall of nonsense. I'm always surprised why you can write so much but provide nothing new. Shitposters would be proud of that skill. Everyone can read your bullshit in public and no one cares what you are saying because you have proven that you and your alts are toxic members and your only intention is to damage users you don't like. ::) Do you think all of your negative ratings are false or maybe you are the moron here? Actually, I should give you one more tag because of your lie (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.msg50881357#msg50881357) about TMAN's PMs. ::) Or can you prove it? ::) Please present OBSERVABLE PROOF. :P Otherwise you are indeed a LIAR and PROVEN dishonest. WE HAVE BEEN PROVEN dishonest MULTIPLE times. PRESENT 1 instance of being PROVEN dishonest. PROOF is what we want to see. Not your opinion of others speculations. I think everyone can read the trust pages of you and your sockpuppet alts. So yes, you and your sockpuppets ("we") are dishonest. Or who is "we"? If it's not your sockpuppets, "we" means that you are sharing your account with different people? I can't imagine that sharing your account is trustworthy. If you don't like my sent feedback add ~1miau to your trust list. If you don't like Hhampuz' way of managing campaigns don't join them and if you think you could do it better, become campaign manager yourself and we will see if the members of this forum will prefer your campaigns or the campaigns of Hhampuz. Maybe that would be better. Let's see if you are right and I should just ignore him or if he's interested to stop his net negative posts. Looks like I'm indeed proven wrong that The-Bullshit-Above-All is a pitiful idiot and there's no hope that he will change his attitude. My bad. @TOAA just crawl back into your darkhole, nobody wants to read you ranting everywhere. 100% agreed. Plus this is perfect non sense. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: asche on June 29, 2019, 10:43:51 AM You seem to be pretty good at taking things out of context. You should stop.
Several valued members have been selling/buying accounts in the old days. Nutildah tried to sell an account with exactly 0 trading history or positive feedback afaik. Your point is totally invalid. Back to 1miau, I think you have no clue what a merit source should be, because not a single message of yours in this thread shows that he is unfit for that duty. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Scheede on June 29, 2019, 10:51:55 AM <snip> The only negative point in my mind is, there isn't really any merit missing in the german section. The local source qwk is already doing a phantastisch job (pun intended). <snip> can´t agree more with the snipped parts and love your pun. Anyway have to disagree with the statement quoted, since there are many valuable posts in the German Sub, which QWK can not merit as much as he could (compared to merits received for less or similar quality/content in our language-Sub´s). @moderators and staff: This is clearly trolling. This user has done nothing but blast abusiveness at other members since the inception of their account. Across 441 hate-filled posts, they have failed to contribute anything positive in terms of discussion or otherwise to the forum. As demonstrated by their posts in this thread, they are intent on derailing discussion about the subject matter at hand for seemingly no other purpose than getting a rise out of those they are attacking. Just use the "report" button and ignore "him/her/them". Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 29, 2019, 01:39:54 PM snip Obviously you are too dumb to read my trust feedback. You have gotten that feedback because your only intention was to damage the reputation of Hhampuz with unproven nonsense (you call it "questions"). ::)He's an excellent signature campaing manager and his achievements for the forum are outstanding. If some other services are also interested to hire Hhampuz, they might read your bullshit that Hhampuz would reject good posters knowingly with malicious intent and that's just an outright lie. Everyone can check that Hhampuz is well-known for choosing the best users for campaigns managed by him. You are damaging his business with malicious intent. Your accusation out of nowhere shows how dangerous you are. Obviously, I wouldn't trust such kind of users and avoid to send them money - not a single satoshi. Maybe you are so pissed because he rejects shitposters effectively. ::) Aside from that your accusations against me are totally off-topic and not related to my Merit source application. If you want to discuss it further (although everything is said) create a new not selfmoderated thread in Reputation. If you can't do that you'll just show what your real intention is: damaging the reputation of other users at any cost. It's tiresome... https://media.giphy.com/media/89U4ODjFSNdV6/giphy.gif Enuff off-topic in my Merit source application... Anyway have to disagree with the statement quoted, since there are many valuable posts in the German Sub, which QWK can not merit as much as he could (compared to merits received for less or similar quality/content in our language-Sub´s). I can agree here, there are times when qwk is very busy distributing Merit because he's distrubuting nearly 50% of all Merit on our local board and if he hasn't much time, some posts made during that time receive less Merit or threads where he isn't active, too. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lafu on June 29, 2019, 01:46:47 PM ~~~~~ Just hit the Ignore button . As i has written only " Hieroglyphen and nonsense coming from CH " and its a waste of time to write to him ! Keep your way going and for sure you are worth to be a Merit Source and i trust you that you will be doing that job very good! Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 29, 2019, 02:13:46 PM snip Obviously you are too dumb to read my trust feedback. You have gotten that feedback because your only intention was to damage the reputation of Hhampuz with unproven nonsense (you call it "questions"). ::)He's an excellent signature campaing manager and his achievements for the forum are outstanding. If some other services are also interested to hire Hhampuz, they might read your bullshit that Hhampuz would reject good posters knowingly with malicious intent and that's just an outright lie. Everyone can check that Hhampuz is well-known for choosing the best users for campaigns managed by him. You are damaging his business with malicious intent. Your accusation out of nowhere shows how dangerous you are. Obviously, I wouldn't trust such kind of users and avoid to send them money - not a single satoshi. Maybe you are so pissed because he rejects shitposters effectively. ::) Aside from that your accusations against me are totally off-topic and not related to my Merit source application. If you want to discuss it further (although everything is said) create a new not selfmoderated thread in Reputation. If you can't do that you'll just show what's your real intention is: damaging the reputation of other users at any cost. It's tiresome... https://media.giphy.com/media/89U4ODjFSNdV6/giphy.gif Enuff off-topic in my Merit source application... Anyway have to disagree with the statement quoted, since there are many valuable posts in the German Sub, which QWK can not merit as much as he could (compared to merits received for less or similar quality/content in our language-Sub´s). I can agree here, there are times when qwk is very busy distributing Merit because he's distrubuting nearly 50% of all Merit on our local board and if he hasn't much time, some posts made during that time receive less Merit or threads where he isn't active, too. LOL at this low functioning idiot. This is not off topic. If you are unable to grasp even simple concepts like this how can you be trusted to apply merit to posts of value??? You can't just say that is your opinion and that makes it correct. You are speculating on our intentions. You have clearly demonstrated you are too stupid to form reliable opinions. We are asking you to now demonstrate you are capable of forming a reliable opinion that does not fall apart under even mild scrutiny. This is vital for merit to one day have any meaning here. NOW RE READ AND ANSWER SPECIFICALLY. You are repeating FALSE ACCUSATIONS that you made earlier. We are challenging them directly. Your LACK of ability to recognize these direct challenges is evidence that you are too stupid to be a merit source. 1. Bring the specific " unproven nonsense" that we were asking Hhampuz if he had direct knowledge of - that clearly demonstrates our intention was to damage hhampuz reputation. You need to understand that you are dealing with observable instance, events that undeniably took place. You do understand you can not cast those aside as simply "bullshit" , "nonsense" "our opinions" and then those observable instances vanish just like that. A low functioning dreg such as yourself ( I say that based on the clear evidence in this thread) can not speculate on the intentions of those far smarter. You are UNABLE to provide any refutation to those observable instances we were asking hhampuz if he had knowledge of ??? but now you claim those instances are bullshit nonsense?? Do you not see how stupid you appear? You don't just get to say it's my opinion that these observable instances are bullshit nonsense LOL and now I will say you are untrustworthy for asking if someone that may be directly employing these people are aware of these observable instances?? haha How does that sully hhampuz reputation?? all he has to say is I WAS NOT AWARE or NOW THAT I AM AWARE I WILL NO LONGER EMPLOY THEM or I WILL GIVE A TRANSPARENT ANSWER AS TO MY ACTIONS REGARDING THEM. Your entire argument that hinges on YOUR OPINION falls to pieces in our hands, with just a gentle probing. Bit like your mommy would. NOW TRY AGAIN. Demonstrate you are capable of understanding even very simple concepts. You want to CLAIM something is bullshit, or nonsense then you must be able to demonstrate that. You have zero hope of doing that when someone is only presenting observable instances. Now delete your merit source application until you can grasp simple concepts like this. You have no business trying to fathom where values lays in any specific thread. Back to school silly bitch. Can you not see how we are crushing your feeble mind in public to any reader with even an average level of intelligence? we almost feel sorry for you. Please stop forcing us to do it to you 1moron. HHampuz subsequent to that thread has sullied his own reputation. 1. He refuses to be transparent about his selection process (seems shady, why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide)? There should be transparent and fair rules for sig campaigns that ensure ALL members are treated equally. 2. He supported doxing of the forum treasurer placing him and the boards funds at risk 3. He is now implicated in a possible 0.5btc theft a projects funds - there has been NO CLEAR explanation as far as we can see. Your "opinions" are laughable. Since his selection process he REFUSES to make transparent, then again is simply your opinion and that is obviously just a joke. 1miau to stupid to be a merit source. Also looks to be deliberately attempting to silence whistle blowing or the presentation of observable instances that demonstrate "some members" are involved with financially dangerous behaviors. Can you publish your top 20 merit fans and recipients? also those that include your on DT? thanks. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on June 29, 2019, 05:20:47 PM Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: fillippone on June 30, 2019, 07:43:00 AM I don’t know anything about German board or 1miau.
I never met him or had any exchange, post or merit, with him. I just opened his application as a merit source by accident. Well, I must say that is the most accurately crafted merit application I have ever seen. Quality of informations provided, reasons because of he wants to be made source and reported posts are well written, sensible and right on spot. Meriting this post just because I feel it is the right to do, and also to mark it, if in a distant future, there will be a chance to compile an application by myself. Keep up with the good work and good luck with your application 1miau! Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: asche on June 30, 2019, 09:20:13 AM snip You might add that getting spammed by CH/TOAA is actually a pretty good sign that he is a good fit :D Both of them are pretty vocal only when good people are involved. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: o_solo_miner on June 30, 2019, 12:00:38 PM I support 1Miau, thats all I can say.
He is not a "greedy" cat ;D https://media.giphy.com/media/WrZy0ErftyGSGlp0Ej/giphy.gif Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 30, 2019, 03:49:27 PM You mean that you read it but too scared to continue the argument since we just crushed your pathetic excuses for the trust abuse. Just from this brief probing of your mind it is clear you are not worthy of being a merit source. The only people supporting you are either likely to be your merit cycling fellow DT chums or those with an even more fragile mind than your own. You failed all of the challenges. Your "opinions" are demonstrated to bogus. You called bullshit and nonsense on observable instances you now REALIZE you can not refute or debunk. So you looks stupid there. You claim it is to sully hhmapuz's reputation (which he has already destroyed himself) and all he needed to say was that he was not aware or be transparent about his actions towards those people involved. He flat out says he REFUSES to be transparent regarding his selection process. The entire purpose of that thread is to PUSH for TRANSPARENT FAIR RULES THAT ARE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL MEMBERS. Which hhampuz says he will not be willing to do. Now that you can also be observed in other threads calling DIFFERENT observable instances of financially motivated wrongdoing again nonsense and such terms trying to cast doubt upon them. It is quite clear that you are deliberately trying to prevent whistle blowing. Therefore not only should you not be a merit source you should not be on DT either. These are undeniable behaviors on your part. The reader may notice we just ignore the member asche - that is because it is such a low functioning sig spammer from the same chipmixer group we just feel ZERO satisfaction from crushing it's feeble mind in public. It is a pitiful moron, never achieved anything of note and seems to have ass kissed its way on to DT. It would be worrying if this idiot was a merit source but since tman is a merit source there are no lower thresholds here it would seem. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: phantastisch on June 30, 2019, 04:59:54 PM You mean that you read it but too scared to continue the argument since we just crushed your pathetic excuses for the trust abuse. Just from this brief probing of your mind it is clear you are not worthy of being a merit source. The only people supporting you are either likely to be your merit cycling fellow DT chums or those with an even more fragile mind than your own. You failed all of the challenges. Your "opinions" are demonstrated to bogus. You called bullshit and nonsense on observable instances you now REALIZE you can not refute or debunk. So you looks stupid there. You claim it is to sully hhmapuz's reputation (which he has already destroyed himself) and all he needed to say was that he was not aware or be transparent about his actions towards those people involved. He flat out says he REFUSES to be transparent regarding his selection process. The entire purpose of that thread is to PUSH for TRANSPARENT FAIR RULES THAT ARE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL MEMBERS. Which hhampuz says he will not be willing to do. Now that you can also be observed in other threads calling DIFFERENT observable instances of financially motivated wrongdoing again nonsense and such terms trying to cast doubt upon them. It is quite clear that you are deliberately trying to prevent whistle blowing. Therefore not only should you not be a merit source you should not be on DT either. These are undeniable behaviors on your part. The reader may notice we just ignore the member asche - that is because it is such a low functioning sig spammer from the same chipmixer group we just feel ZERO satisfaction from crushing it's feeble mind in public. It is a pitiful moron, never achieved anything of note and seems to have ass kissed its way on to DT. It would be worrying if this idiot was a merit source but since tman is a merit source there are no lower thresholds here it would seem. I think we can safely ignore your feedback since its based on some nonsense. Please proceed wasting your time. Bye. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: El duderino_ on June 30, 2019, 05:14:21 PM When a respected, well known, BTC-minded member ask for being able to help out more as he already does, that needs to be supported ...
Cheers hope you get there !!! 👊🏻👊🏻👊🏻 Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on June 30, 2019, 05:21:45 PM full support! He's got my full support, too. I'm not sure how well the German board is fixed for merit sources, but I'm all for adding them to pretty much any local board. Plus OP posts in English as well, and that's a plus. Anyone have any idea what Theymos's plans are for adding more sources? I haven't really been paying attention to that recently, nor have I stumbled across any information about it. It'd be nice if he'd add someone like OP even if his plans weren't to create any more merit sources. I think OP would do a great job. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: The-One-Above-All on June 30, 2019, 06:33:07 PM You mean that you read it but too scared to continue the argument since we just crushed your pathetic excuses for the trust abuse. Just from this brief probing of your mind it is clear you are not worthy of being a merit source. The only people supporting you are either likely to be your merit cycling fellow DT chums or those with an even more fragile mind than your own. You failed all of the challenges. Your "opinions" are demonstrated to bogus. You called bullshit and nonsense on observable instances you now REALIZE you can not refute or debunk. So you looks stupid there. You claim it is to sully hhmapuz's reputation (which he has already destroyed himself) and all he needed to say was that he was not aware or be transparent about his actions towards those people involved. He flat out says he REFUSES to be transparent regarding his selection process. The entire purpose of that thread is to PUSH for TRANSPARENT FAIR RULES THAT ARE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL MEMBERS. Which hhampuz says he will not be willing to do. Now that you can also be observed in other threads calling DIFFERENT observable instances of financially motivated wrongdoing again nonsense and such terms trying to cast doubt upon them. It is quite clear that you are deliberately trying to prevent whistle blowing. Therefore not only should you not be a merit source you should not be on DT either. These are undeniable behaviors on your part. The reader may notice we just ignore the member asche - that is because it is such a low functioning sig spammer from the same chipmixer group we just feel ZERO satisfaction from crushing it's feeble mind in public. It is a pitiful moron, never achieved anything of note and seems to have ass kissed its way on to DT. It would be worrying if this idiot was a merit source but since tman is a merit source there are no lower thresholds here it would seem. I think we can safely ignore your feedback since its based on some nonsense. Please proceed wasting your time. Bye. The never ending stream of low functioning dregs.... AGAIN Present the parts which you "claim" are nonsense and present your argument as to WHY they are nonsense? FAILURE to do so should inform the reader that your claims are not credible and should be struck from this thread. 1miua is not suitable for merits source or DT. We have clearly demonstrated this in this thread. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lafu on June 30, 2019, 06:54:02 PM We have clearly demonstrated this in this thread. Just unignored for looking what crap you write again ! So who is " We " ? What alt accounts from you are has written in here ? Dont saw one them posted here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4564216.msg51658493#msg51658493 in here ! The only one who complaining are you as always ! And by the way where are your Merit fans ? Oh right you have no fans ! Write your Bullshit somewhere else in the Reputaion board and let this thread clean with your nonsense posts. And back on ignore ! Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Souri on July 11, 2019, 10:01:36 AM Am I allowed to support the application of 1miau without adding cute cat content? If so I fully support his application as he is not only one of the most valuable members of the German subboard, but also one of the users with the most consistent high quality of posts.
Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Scheede on July 11, 2019, 10:14:12 AM Am I allowed to support the application of 1miau without adding cute cat content? If so I fully support his application as he is not only one of the most valuable members of the German subboard, but also one of the users with the most consistent high quality of posts. Sorry, but cat-content is mandatory. https://media.giphy.com/media/12olBDpsJhoASI/giphy.gif (source: https://media.giphy.com/media/12olBDpsJhoASI/giphy.gif) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: aundroid on July 29, 2019, 12:50:28 PM I can only agree with the others here - I fully support his application!
1miau is a nice and helpful user, who always has some high quality contributions ready. The following overview shows the number of sMerit he has distributed over the last few months. https://i.imgur.com/aNtbTpj.jpg [source: https://public.tableau.com/profile/ddmrddmr#!/vizhome/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/GlobalSummary - thanks @ddmrddmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324)] Considering that he is not a Merit Source and has to earn the Merit first, this is a remarkable performance. This and the fact that he regularly runs out of sMerits make him the perfect candidate. Added, nice stats. Unfortunately I'm out of sMerit, but it's noted. :) Looks like he once again ran out of sMerits ;) Just give this cat the job. https://media.giphy.com/media/13HBDT4QSTpveU/giphy.gif [source: https://giphy.com/gifs/ign-describe-plans-13HBDT4QSTpveU] Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on July 29, 2019, 11:36:30 PM ... Many thanks for the bump. Still waiting for a (positive) reply from our "CEO". ;)Added, nice stats. Unfortunately I'm out of sMerit, but it's noted. :) Looks like he once again ran out of sMerits ;) If someone is interested about more Merit stats from our local board, feel free to have a look here: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4657305.0) Latest stats from June 2019: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4657305.msg51717636#msg51717636 Especially the number of sent Merit: Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: fillippone on October 28, 2019, 10:56:56 PM Bumping up this thread.
I do support this Merit Source Application because, as I stated a few posts above, also inspired mine. This is my Merit Source application thread: fillippone Merit Source Application (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195299) I do hope the upper floor will summon both us soon, 1miau. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on October 28, 2019, 11:13:46 PM Bumping up this thread. Much appreciated! :)I do support this Merit Source Application because, as I stated a few posts above, also inspired mine. This is my Merit Source application thread: fillippone Merit Source Application (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195299) I do hope the upper floor will summon both us soon, 1miau. I'm still motivated to get a Merit source. There's not much Merit around in the German section right now : The translation of LoyceV's guide made by Lafu is a perfect example to get an impression that more sMerit is desirable: https://i.imgur.com/plurrYa.jpg https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5192157.0 And in gereral, we aren't doing well (October is almost over): https://i.imgur.com/sszTSxp.jpg Source: Merit Dashboard (https://public.tableau.com/profile/ddmrddmr#!/vizhome/BitcointalkMeritDashboard/GlobalSummary) While I'm out of sMerit again I can't spend Merit actively and have to wait and / or report unmerited posts to Merit Source (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093271.0): https://i.imgur.com/NwzHInb.jpg While I'm trying to focus on giving Merit to the German section while I'm low on sMerit, I would also like to distribute Merit in the English sections as a Merit source as well. :) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on November 15, 2019, 01:03:34 AM Today (yesterday) I received a PM. :)
I'm very grateful to be appointed and will do my best to spend my source sMerit for contributing posts when I notice them. Over the last few weeks I've collected quite a few good posts when I was out of sMerit so I'll be very busy the weekend using it. :) Many thanks to - theymos, - everyone who supported my application - everyone who's writing good posts and - our great Bitcoin commmunity https://media.giphy.com/media/10dU7AN7xsi1I4/giphy.gif So @everyone, make good posts! :) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: El duderino_ on November 15, 2019, 06:03:58 AM Congrats and good to have you among us
Cheers Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: qwk on November 15, 2019, 08:05:02 AM I'm very grateful to be appointed and will do my best to spend my source sMerit for contributing posts when I notice them. Code: \ / Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lafu on November 15, 2019, 09:36:39 AM Today (yesterday) I received a PM. :) Congrats and realy happy to see that you an Merit Source now too . You deserve it as well as other Users have done and its good to see that our Local board got an new Merit source. I have no thoughts about that you will getting busy this weekend. Cheers for that. 8) https://media1.tenor.com/images/e4df36f810684862994d5b47621bbc34/tenor.gif?itemid=8694321 Source : https://media1.tenor.com/images/e4df36f810684862994d5b47621bbc34/tenor.gif?itemid=8694321 (https://media1.tenor.com/images/e4df36f810684862994d5b47621bbc34/tenor.gif?itemid=8694321) Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: bct_ail on November 15, 2019, 09:45:31 AM Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: micaxel on November 15, 2019, 10:10:35 AM Congratz.
Now we have two meritcatz in germany ;D ;D Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Lakai01 on November 15, 2019, 01:12:30 PM Splendid, congratulations 1miau! You definitly deserve it because of your very constructive and informative posting behaviour. Very looking forward to better merit statistics for the current month in our local board ;)
Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: fillippone on November 15, 2019, 03:47:34 PM I love the idea of introducing more sources and merit to the forum, this will to increase the chances of lower users and everyone to get merited congrats 1miau. I tought I was special. You spammed my MS thread, congratulating with me for my MS status. You never posted in one of my threads, you never spent a merit for me nor did I ever merited you. Probably this is the same for 1 miau. It doesn't work like that, I am afraid. Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: Scheede on November 16, 2019, 10:33:27 AM Title: Re: 1miau Merit source application Post by: 1miau on November 16, 2019, 06:44:27 PM I tought I was special. At least most users are special here - excluding the Anti-DT sockpuppets. ;)Thanks to everyone for your support, keep posting good content that I have a reason to spend my Source sMerit. ;) Locking this topic now. |
