Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
I would like to remote access my 2x Apollo’s. What ports do I need to forward?
Thanks
Can anyone help with this. I have forwarded port 80 but get stuck on the setup page, even though the Apollo is working (for months) Have updated to the latest image and fowarded Ports 80 and 5000 to the Apollo but still no joy logging in remotely (iPhone). It asks for Password but then never loads. Can anyone help? I am still not able to login remotely - any advice? Has anyone else had trouble with remote access to their Apollos?
|
|
|
Dogecoin thru the roof, will we see a jump in PPS?
Of course. We're at 185% PPS now. Is this a record for the pool? 305% must be a record
|
|
|
I would like to remote access my 2x Apollo’s. What ports do I need to forward?
Thanks
Can anyone help with this. I have forwarded port 80 but get stuck on the setup page, even though the Apollo is working (for months) Have updated to the latest image and fowarded Ports 80 and 5000 to the Apollo but still no joy logging in remotely (iPhone). It asks for Password but then never loads. Can anyone help? I am still not able to login remotely - any advice?
|
|
|
I would like to remote access my 2x Apollo’s. What ports do I need to forward?
Thanks
Can anyone help with this. I have forwarded port 80 but get stuck on the setup page, even though the Apollo is working (for months) Have updated to the latest image and fowarded Ports 80 and 5000 to the Apollo but still no joy logging in remotely (iPhone). It asks for Password but then never loads. Can anyone help?
|
|
|
I would like to remote access my 2x Apollo’s. What ports do I need to forward?
Thanks
Can anyone help with this. I have forwarded port 80 but get stuck on the setup page, even though the Apollo is working (for months)
|
|
|
I would like to remote access my 2x Apollo’s. What ports do I need to forward?
Thanks
|
|
|
I use VNC viewer to control my pi/Moonlanders remotely
|
|
|
For Batch 1 units, can the MCU be sourced locally (UK) or is it specific to the Apollo?
|
|
|
Would you ever consider adding a 'solo' pool to litecoinpool.org? Nothing fancy, just a simple pool where people could solo mine and basically play a lottery. ckpool.org has one for Bitcoin at solo.ckpool.org and I thought you could do similar.
Thanks for your input. I'm personally open to the idea, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of demand (only a couple of people have asked for it over the past few years), and I'm not sure it would be high enough to justify the effort. I'll think about it. If anybody else would like such a service, please let me know (either on here or via email) so that I can gauge interest. Any more consideration on this? We haven't received feedback from many interested miners since your post. We might still go ahead with this, but it's certainly not taking priority at the moment. So far I have spent some time thinking about how to best implement this, but I haven't written any actual code yet. I think people might try solo mining if it was available - I would have a go at the “lottery” if available As other people have said, it’s about trust.
|
|
|
Hi, had my 2x Apollo’s running fine since having them. Might be changing location of the miners and have tried to remote access them/dashboard but can’t get passed the ‘Inital setup’ page. Tried iOS and Windows.
Can access them fine when on same network, but not remotely. Any clues?
Thanks
|
|
|
I think I've solved the reason why the fan rpm doesn't sound stable even when the fan is manually set to some specific speed and have a solution to fix it. The fan is being controlled with software generated pwm as there doesn't appear to be any hw pwm capable pins unused on the board. The software solution needs to keep a stable timing with the pwm in order for the fan to keep the same rpm. At the same time, the MCU can have a frequency of several values between 240 MHz and 1.20 GHz. By default, this works so that if there's zero load then the frequency will eventually drop to 240 MHz and when there's any load spike then the frequency jumps directly to 1.20 GHz no matter how small the actual cpu demand was. I used the following command to monitor the frequency and it's clear that it's constantly jumping between minimum and maximum even when nobody is using the dashboard: while true ; do echo "$(date) - $(sudo cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0/cpuinfo_cur_freq)" ; sleep 1 ; done
The constant cpu frequency variation makes it difficult for the software pwm to maintain exact rpm. It's close but still the variation is audible. Looking at the frequency usage stats with the "cpufreq-info" command, we can also see that the cpu is spending much time at maximum frequency: 240 MHz:42.72%, 480 MHz:24.41%, 648 MHz:0.00%, 816 MHz:0.00%, 912 MHz:0.00%, 960 MHz:0.00%, 1.01 GHz:0.01%, 1.10 GHz:0.01%, 1.20 GHz:32.85% (2229569)
The solution itself is rather simple. The default behaviour is to react instantly to any processing power demand and bump the frequency to maximum. However, other behaviours are also available and switching to the one called "conservative" results in slower changes in the frequency is processing power is needed. It turns out that the demand with the current software content is so low in reality that with the "conservative" setting the frequency rarely increases resulting in the software pwm staying stable and the audible changes in the manually set fan rpm going away. First, without saving the change, the behaviour (frequency governor) can by changed with: sudo cpufreq-set -g conservative If that doesn't help then the change can be reverted back with: sudo cpufreq-set -g ondemand Making the change permanent requires modifying /etc/default/cpufrequtils and replacing "GOVERNOR=ondemand" with "GOVERNOR=conservative". The other positive side effect is that since the higher frequencies are no longer used that often, the MCU temperature also stays a little bit lower. With the changed governor, "cpufreq-info" now shows (after a stats reset): cpufreq stats: 240 MHz:99.21%, 480 MHz:0.30%, 648 MHz:0.07%, 816 MHz:0.08%, 912 MHz:0.05%, 960 MHz:0.05%, 1.01 GHz:0.03%, 1.10 GHz:0.03%, 1.20 GHz:0.17% (18182)
Hi, how do I make this change? Absolute beginners guide please 😀
|
|
|
try to run only MMR, no failover
Spot on, mate. It worked https://imgur.com/a/W2MKbxCAt least for now. Dashboard show status as "unknown", but Apollo continues to mine there. Thanks! Yea the issue is how bfgminer handles failovers. Currently it assumes that everything its mining is the same coin (this is based from bfgminers original bitcoin origins, it was never designed to handle multiple coins of the same algorithm). This gets pronounced when your on a multipoool, then have failover/donation configured to Litecoin. This ASIC is different from the Moonlanders and uses a midstate, so the midstate of one coin is injected into another and stuff gets confused. Sadly bfgminer is starting to show its age, ill see if there is a short term fix, but for now if your on mutipool/rental pool make sure thats the only pool configured. I had the exact same issue, MRR as first pool, Litecoinpool as 2nd. Rig was rented, problems with renters pool, Apollo swapped over to 2nd pool, but never swapped back. Ended up removing 2nd pool, and just having MRR (now need to keep eye on email notifications)
|
|
|
261w at the wall running 2
same for me with a Corsair cx600 Sounds about right for that PSU...its not that efficient (I believe its under 80% at low loads). My Corsair AX860i (Platinum rated) is using 250w running 2x Apollo’s So are we better off using a 300w PSU at near capacity? EDIT: they are actually giving off a nice bit of heat at this time of year!
|
|
|
I originally saw this at 519 GBP
|
|
|
I have emailed my tel no. to futurebit.io
Order #1210
|
|
|
Obviously a lot of miners have switched off
|
|
|
It looks like the discount is just 1x 25$ off, not per unit. I brought 6x Moonlander 2, does the discount not apply PER unit?
Edit: I want to buy 2x Apollo units
|
|
|
It’s NOT sold out - the page has been set up ready. It will change to available/in stock at 6pm EST.
|
|
|
Hi, which coupon should I use - from FutureBit.io or bitshopper.de?
|
|
|
I have been getting notifications about this thread but you need to update first post for new readers 👍
|
|
|
|