I can feel your sentiment mate because i have been spinning for long time and even won thousands of lottery tickets but never even win top 10 draws 

This makes me think a lot towards freebitco.in though they have been here for long years now.

Big matches like these get quite cagey at times as both teams don't want to lose at any cost. Given both teams lost their champions league matches to big opposition makes them more cautious in their approach. Real madrid are not performing even with additions like Hazard. So i understand why they dont go all out to win a big match.

You still need to verify if the source is reliable and besides not all bettors can bet on underdogs, only brave bettors go and gamble for underdogs only veteran gamblers with an appetite for high-risk betting, if he happens to have this trait he'll go bet for the underdog whether the news is reliable or not. of course we all love to win big amount on betting in an underdog if he can verify the news and it turn out to be true then you're one lucky guy

I haven't use that exchange yet (Tokpie), I only read that feature on their site. As you noted, hunters will still have an issue if there are no buyers or if buy orders are very low. Has any of the participants created a flag yet?

Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. This is by far not a "one man crusade", I just happen to be one of the most vocal. You are wrong, it hasn't been months, it has been YEARS. So many years in fact it began long before you even arrived during the "free lunch" Dogecoin wave of 2014. I have been around long enough to remember what this community USED TO be like, and how it focused around minding your own fucking business unless you have solid evidence of something as opposed to the current state of 1000 little wanna be Stasi officers running around filing reports to the Politburo every time some one jaywalks or says a bad word about dear leader. This kind of behavior is antithetical to the very reason why Bitcoin was created, to allow people to conduct trade without third parties trying to sneak their thumb up your butt ever time you bend over to pick up a quarter. Hope that explains things for you, and remember, if you see something say something comrade!

In case anyone is still wondering why LFC_Bitcoin has turned out to be quite accurate with the red tag rather than a neutral one (as I suggested in the thread itself), take a look at the thread he mentioned, more precisely to this quote


And as I also said in the first thread, Quickseller/LFC please, don't derail this into a personal thread

@susila_bai Dear, I would suggest you plz talk with LFC_Bitcoin before sending retaliate feedback to others, because I noticed that you already sent 3 negative feedback today. This move will start another pissing contest IMHO.

Hhampuz has long trade history. He has proven his worth in many circumstances. Anyone will trust him with only 0.5BTC or even more. So the case of the OP and Hhampuz is not the same to me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155671.msg51510995#msg51510995

Accept it or not, 0.05BTC in current market value is $570.70 is a very high amount. And without collateral it's very risky for the lender.

Suspicious users who are likely to default on their loan are often smacked down with a negative tag.

While it is true that the majority of these are given to newbies and Jr. members, I think higher rank users who should know better should be equally liable to receive the same.

If there was a rule, you could be reported to a moderator and your post deleted/your account banned.

Since there is not a rule, we use the trust system to tag some behaviours (like begging). You, as a Hero Member should know how the trust system works