^^^ "PREDICTION OF SHEAR STRESSES AND CRITICAL SPEED OF COMPOSITE FLYWHEEL BY VARYING DIFFERENT HUB ANGLES USING FEM" -- https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8abd/d7699572ad442e89a2f684339c59afca9416.pdf**cough** An air pressure gradient in a vacuum without a container? You're fucking high bruh! Spinning up a ~1,000 MPH then winding down a ~1,000 MPH while travelling ~66,6000 MPH in an elliptical orbit that also speeds up and slows down is fucking insane. Travelling a 100 MPH in a straight line at a constant speed is NOT analogous to the mad spinning ride that is the globe, you're delusional! Yeah the debate is over, there is no geometric horizon because there is no globe. The horizon is apparent, it's based on the eye and aperture size. This is why we see so far and the globe theory fails.
|
|
|
20,000 dead last year from the flu and not a peep, a handful of folks in China catch a cold and everybody loses their minds!
|
|
|
@ odolvlobo, When the globe claims we're riding a 1,000 MPH (rim speed) flywheel that has a diameter of 8,000 miles, I call that weak because I know that the shear forces involved would cause an instant explosion to happen. When the globe claims a pressure gradient (air) exists next to a vacuum without a container, I call that weak because I know it's a violation of the second law of thermodynamics. When the globe claims we're travelling at 66,600 MPH while spinning 1,000 MPH, I call that weak because I've been on a mad carnival ride before. I know a precision gyroscope proven to react to a 15 deg/hr rotation does not react to the globe's claim that we're spinning. [...] ... the fact that the earth is observably and measurably flat for as far as a modern super-zoom camera can see.
That is open to debate because the same camera seems to show examples of flat earth (objects seen above the horizon) and spherical earth (objects obscured by the horizon). What's the debate? There's water in the air and it causes a refractive effect (there's a multitude of effects) called looming where objects in the far distance are magnified. The magnified objects are cropped at bottom by the horizon vanishing line. In fact I've discussed looming, other refractive effects & optical compression with you before so I'm really just left with the impression that you're intellectually dishonest. The fact you pressed me for censored/memory holed images & diagrams makes it seem like you glow in the dark.
|
|
|
@odolvlobo you can see the wrap-around lighting effect in the bottom of a coffee mug FFS. You want to speculate that the surface of the earth curves based on observations of lights in the sky, yet when I speculate on those same lights you start calling the kettle black.
I can see all the search engines had agents put time into manually removing search results to the images I want to post, this being the case the somewhat weak images I did find will have to suffice. I think they're rather informative IMO.
The light sources in the sky are speculative in nature and any conclusions derived thereof must also follow. You're distracting and diverting from the fact that the earth is observably and measurably flat for as far as a modern super-zoom camera can see.
me: "the earth is observably and measurably flat and motionless!" you: "hold my beer!"
|
|
|
^^^ You wanted an answer, you got one. The provided images while not exactly what I was looking for give some idea of what's going on.
I'm not wasting a massive amount of time producing or searching for illustrations and photos of an effect where agents have burnt a lot of time manually removing said images. I'll just take my chips to the cashier k thx.
The question at hand is whether the surface of earth curves or not, this is irregardless of what the lights in the sky are doing. Pointing at the lights in the sky is a distraction technique. The image you provided indicates that the earth is flat for as far as that camera can see.
|
|
|
There's an elephant of biblical proportions in this room, and it's twice as organized as we give it credit for.
|
|
|
"To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork." -- KJV, Psalm 19:1
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
^^^
|
|
|
What does forced vaccination have to do with corporations and foundations gathering together to simulate a pandemic he asks? "And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months." -- KJV, Revelation 9:10Some more reading on 5G: https://blog.ossia.com/what-does-wireless-power-have-to-do-with-5g
|
|
|
^^^ You sound like one of those "anti-vaxx" conspiracy theorists, I bet you believe the Earth is flat too! Just because a vaccine is a toxic soup of chemicals, complete with a human genome modified to give it over 400 different mutations leading to cancer, that doesn't contain a single listed ingredient or antigen and, is manufactured by a company convicted of multiple counts of fraud resulting in billions in fines and payouts, doesn't mean you shouldn't agree to be forcibly vaccinated with it by your state.
|
|
|
^^^ Nice, so the source I posted earlier claiming we're in the throes of a zombie apocalypse claims that (((leading scientists))) say 65 million (keyword is "could") could die. IMO this virus is a weaponized variation of the "common cold", meaning there's a synergistic trigger chemical. So unless you're "painted" as a target you're just a carrier, like a bat with rabies who has no ill effects from the pathogen. I don't take anything I see on the (((news))) at face value these days. Has winter come at last?
|
|
|
^^ We're going to ride the bomb are we?
|
|
|
Media hysteria with little to no facts.
|
|
|
According to wikipedia the Coronavirus is in fact the common cold. "...patients with the common cold that were subsequently named human coronavirus 229E and human coronavirus OC43..." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus
|
|
|
Heaven's gate had a better chance of on landing on Hale-Bopp than NASA had making it to the Moon back in '69.Marshall Herff Applewhite Jr. (May 17, 1931 – March 26, 1997), also known as Do."The members of the Heaven's Gate cult believed they were destined for another world — and in the end, there was only one way to get there." -- allthatsinteresting.com
|
|
|
Picture taken from the peak of Mounth Everest.
https://i.imgur.com/yFEg47n.png
Picture taken from the peak of Mount Everest (GoPro corrected). https://havecamerawilltravel.com/lightroom/correct-gopro-fisheye-distortion/
The problem with most FE videos is, they portray 3D rather than 2D. If the earth is flat, why don't essentially all FE videos portray 2D rather than 3D? After all, there is nothing that is flat... certainly not the earth. You didn't even bother to click on the link, it's a flat earth conference mockery video you absolute putz! This is the second time that video has been spammed, the fucking user even created an account just to spam it! Authentic flat earth video: Lack of Earth's Curvature - 37 Scientific Experiments (2018) -- https://youtu.be/qUfilDNrDyQ
|
|
|
|