What did Martin Armstrong say about the pandemic when it started? He played it down as a flu: See Jan 27, 2020 Coronavirus still appears to be Normal Virusand Feb 5, 2020 Why Exaggerated Nonsense on Flu?Definitely on Feb 6 2020 ZeroHedge got it right this time with their high quality reporting. Compare that with Martin Armstrong's Gossip. Later ... Bill Gates on February 28, 2020: Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said the coronavirus is starting to behave like the once-in-a-century pathogen we've been worried about.
Gates also pointed out COVID-19's current predicted fatality rate is higher than that of the 1957 influenza pandemic, which killed an estimated 66,000 people in the U.S. on March 12, 2020 Coronavirus is France's 'greatest health crisis in a century', says Macron
Meanwhile, Martin Armstrong sees his chance to exploit the crisis and uses the The Fan Email Confidence Trick ... to start a petition to get his own name out. Not surprisingly, he has a new e-book for sale at $9.95 to turn the crisis into revenue: Coronavirus & Next Great Depression. That's just a teaser - the real payload is MAY 2020 Virtual Conrona Conference $300. However, the actual petition "Bring in the expert Martin Armstrong to stop the destruction of the world economy" turns out to be a flop because it reaches only 850 signatures, not even 1% of the required minimum of 100,000 to be even considered. In light of the fact that it was well-promoted (even this blog was not spared), and that it costs nothing to sign it we can conclude that the number of clients who approve his views cannot be much higher than in the order of magnitude of 1,000, unlike the tens of millions of Socrates users he is claiming to have in his "largest forecasting firm in the world". I am not here to provide advice about the pandemic, but I sit at home locked down hoping that health system can deal with the load which it could not if everybody was still running around. Just google "Epidemic Calculator" and "The hammer and the dance" and you will think twice about the conspiracy theories that he wants to sell us. Quick info from a real expert can be found here: Not just a flu? and not a bioweapon? expertAnd now we see that this pandemic is not even seasonal as every normal flu is, and somewhat later we discover that this deadly creature is man-made: COVID-19 Is A Man-Made Virus: HIV-Discoverer Says "Could Only Have Been Created In A Lab"Meanwhile we hear from our newborn health expert that the virus thing is a fraud: The COVID-19 Fraud - It's Massive June 22 202 update: Florida running out of hospital beds because of covid-19 cases. Worldwide, case numbers are increasing at an alarming rate. Reports emerge that 1/3 of all recovering patients will have scars for the rest of their lives. Lock up the covidiots in Jail, Martin Armstrong first! Enough of these idiotic conspiracy theories created by these crackpots. Worse than politicians.
ARMSTRONG FRAUD
ARMSTRONG SCAM
SOCRATES FRAUD
SOCRATES SCAM
Standard Martin Armstrong operating procedure. It is called " The pot calling the kettle black". I can bet that if on this site we are writing the word " Fraud" in conjunction with his name Martin Armstrong then he will feel compelled to write about internet fraud. Why? Try a google search "Martin Armstrong Fraud" The first hit was some time ago The Martin Armstrong Wikipedia Entry. He hates it! Who is to blame? Don't ask me. So he had to do something to direct internet searches away from Wikipedia and this site as well and towards his own site to get more clicks. And it worked! As usual we provide the proof with an example: Internet Frauds From Hacking Emails to Dating Site Frauds. Why on earth would he want to write about all sorts of frauds otherwise? The word "frauds" is contained in the title twice: Keyword stuffing. You see? This is called Search Engine Optimization (SEO)The same principle is applied to his climate change campaign. His climate change articles fill the remaining space of the google results page. It is the same reason why he had the forecaster movie made for him. And here is the rub: He cannot complain about any of us of using the word fraud when we talk about him. Because he uses it all the time. But we don't have to. We just quote Wikipedia. The pot calling the kettle black.   Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog |
|
|
|
Hello AC
Have a sincere question for you. You say that you have purchased all or many of the MA reports and I assume were/are subscribing to
the his private blog etc. I also assume you took the time to study and test out the validity of his trading advice, as any
intelligent investor would before risking their hard earned money.
My question to you is at what point and on what evidence did you gain enough confidence in MA's trading advice where you
decided to go ahead and risk and then lose enough money so that it has left you so pissed off?
Fred
First of all, your question cannot be answered because you are mixing four assumptions up. 1) That I was pissed off when I lost money 2) That I am posting here because I lost money 3) That I am posting so much because I lost so much money 4) That I am acting alone Every speculator loses money at some point. As to why I was getting pissed of, this is well documented here (click) and it has nothing to do with losses. As far as my losses are concerned, I did not even blame Armstrong for them. I thought it was my mistake because I thought did not know how to interpret his model. I am not joking. That is because Martin Armstrong makes claims that his models never fail. At the time, it looked ok because the market basically moved in a straight line. I made a spreadsheet with all reversals and election details that I could get hold of, in old reports, from his web sites and so on. This seemed to confirm his assertions. So I did what one should do to build some confidence. The thing is one does not need a model for a market that moves in a straight line. The model failed to predict the turn and Martin Armstrong lied about it. That lie initially delayed my discovery of the scam, so that episode resulting in a loss wasn't even my staring point. Today we know that he manipulates historical records and cherry-picks results. I should have considered that from the start. My due diligence was flawed. The big mistake a few people are making in my case is that they think everybody must act in their own interest, and therefore, their activity would need to be funded in some way to be sustainable. That is the flaw / feature in human nature that Martin Armstrong exploits. It does not apply to me. And it probably does not apply to many people, either. I don't have this flaw / feature. He says (literally): "There is no such thing as bad publicity" and he calculates quite correctly, that the majority, the silent losers will keep quiet because they are afraid to be seen as losers, and they do not see any gain in what I am doing so they move on. So all he has to do is to replenish the pool of clients at least as fast or faster than the attrition rate (of the losers). I am here to break that cycle. That is why I am posting here. The fact is that WE are winning and HE is losing. Again, in good tradition, I provide proof as usual: To stay within the scope of the current events, we stick with the coronavirus petition Bring in the expert Martin Armstrong to stop the destruction of the world economy (target 100,000 signatures). Signing this does not cost a thing, so everybody with only half a brain who knows how to fill a form can do it. I can afford to even advertise it here which is the ultimate irony  Apart from the self-documenting incompetence and recklessness of our Charlatan-in-chief as he becomes a Coronavirus Expert overnight. At this time, the signature count is topping out below the 1% mark somewhere at 850. That is all the support Martin Armstrong has. This bitcoin Armstrong forum gets more viewers in four days. He basically shot himself in the foot by showing everyone that nobody believes him. The other example is his book he sells at amazon in 200 lots and then claims it is sold out the fastest ever. He limits it to get the effect. He simply does not have more supporters than that roughly. Not the millions of Socrates users he is claiming to have.You see, why should I stop NOW? Martin Armstrong needs more idiots to exploit. We can call them idiots now, because now the evidence is here for everyone to see, and even an idiot - all he needs to do is to click around here and he can see what he can expect from him. So I am cutting off the stream of idiots - the last resource that was available to him. What a difference a few well-researched, well-hyperlinked blog articles make, eh? As to who the others are who support my activity, just go through the 300+ pages of this blog  Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedian is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
"The Government wants the Computer Code for Forecasting" Conspiracy Theory Martin Armstrong repeatedly mentioned that the US Government was interested in his computer model and therefore requested from him the source code of it. He also mentioned that the CIA requested from him he build a forecasting model for them. He claims that he declined in both cases. Instead he claims that his computer model has self-awareness which allowed it to self-destruct when the hardware was physically moved by court order. See: Sorting the Nonsense & Prejudices from the Truth of RealityPosted Mar 27, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
Money cannot buy everything in life. I turned down $500 million for Socrates where it would have just provided analysis for a single user. I rejected the request of the CIA to build a version for the US government. I offered to run any study they asked and was told they had to own it.
He uses these fabricated stories for multiple purposes: - to distract from the real reason why the Government requested turnover of computer assets
- to distract from the fact that he most likely deleted the files manually
- to enhance his clients' perception of the capabilities of his computer (artificial intelligence, self-awareness)
- to enhance his own status with heroism based on the lie that he remained in prison for the sole reason that he refused to turn over his model's computer code to the US Government
Following are some links to documents with discussion of the topics above. Deletion of FilesIn ARMSTRONG v GUCCIONE we read: A forensic computer expert testified that (1) one of the four returned computers had its hard drive removed, (2) on the morning before another computer was turned over to the receiver, more than 500 files had been erased from its hard drive, and (3) on the same day that a third computer was turned over, software was installed enabling the deletion of computer files and the computer's internal clock was reset in an effort to mask the destruction of files. In It's just Time he writes: I can confirm, that the system was laced with a virus. If it was ever removed from the office, it would know and self-destruct. That I believe took place for it appears the Government seized the computer, took if to a lab at the World Trade Center, ironically where it was destroyed in the attack. The Government seized the computer, but it self-destructed when moved. This is consistent with a user installing a bulk erase software on a computer (as observed by the forensic expert) and executing it. There is nothing that indicates that a system was in place that could execute such a task when required, such as one that would detect a change of location. A forensic computer expert would have certainly detected such a system, including a virus (as Martin Armstrong claims) that could have executed it. Even more so, if such delete action had been planned and built into the system, the discovery of 500 deleted files would have been prevented by removing / replacing the file 500 file entries entirely. Claims of superior Performance based on Computer-based Self-AwarenessMartin Armstrong likes to claim that his computer model has abilities exceeding contemporary AI (Artificial Intelligence), based on self-awareness, backed up by his claims that it erased the files under threat as described above. In Self-Aware Artificial Intelligence he writes: It achieved self-awareness. It immediately knew the government was trying to take it to its secret computer lab in WTC building 7 that mysterious collapsed even though nothing struck the building. They were angry when they realized it had self-destructed. It was aware of its surroundings and it took all but 7 seconds to self-destruct overwriting all code 7 times and shifting around so they could never un-erase and put him back together again. The Global Market Watch is running. It is being tested live and seems to have handled these turning points rather well. Reassembling something of this magnitude is truly an awesome project. It is time consuming to say the least. What is at stake is the creation of an artificial being that monitors the world around it. This is beyond creating a mere drone that people control from a distance. This is something that thinks on its own and tells you what it has explored.
Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedian Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Emphasis added. Learn to read.
Learn to understand. Keep posting. Keep exhausting yourself! |
|
|
|
Only now I'm paying more attention to this guy. Can someone tell me if his forecasts are trustworthy? What method he uses for TA?
I also want to know more about STOs. Do Armstrong supports them, and for what reason?
RTFM armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
Just the Facts
As Usual
Number? another Number? Yeah. Number. Blah Blah Blah. Facts: End 2015 close 1060.20 Quarterly Bearish Reversal 1111 elected. Quarterly Bearish Reversal 1112 elected. Year End Report 2015, publish date: December 1 2015: When we look at gold going into year-2015, we see absolute critical support at
1044. A year-end closing g beneath this level will signal new lows and they can
be quite dramatic. From a technical perspective, the two key targets will be
1026 and 601. Important resistance during 2016 will begin at 1179 with key
resistance forming at 1310. Therefore, even a year-end closing for 2015 below
1179 will keep gold in a bearish position.
Additionally, we have a Quarterly Bearish Reversal at 1112. Therefore, a yearend
closing below this level should also warn of a drop becomes possible at
least to test the 875 to 904 former high of 1980. A monthly closing beneath 904
would also point to a drop way down to the 680 area.
I found out about M.A. around half a year ago. Myself being an engineer, I don't want to learn, I want to understand.
And for me that was possible only following M.A.
An engineer needs Martin Armstrong to understand? Perhaps time to go back to school to catch up? Gestern wusste ich nicht wie man das Wort "Ingenieur" schreibt, heute bin ich einen. But remember the joke about tigers. Why do you blow the horn? To keep the tigers away. But there are no tigers here. There you see! |
|
|
|
Fraud Warning Martin Armstrong is publishing misleading content here under his handle over45. What is he saying this time? Bankrupt contradictions and personal attacks, mud slinging This is spam. He spammed this thread with over 80 posts without providing a single coherent response. Game over. He is being ridiculed and he does not deserve any respect because he is just wasting other people's time.He has being exposed again for being a fraud for saying Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.
That is obviously just mud slinging without facts to evade the truth that predictions need a target date of some kind for qualifying as such and be verifiable. He pays the price of being ridiculed for his refusal to accept that his USD5,000 Gold prediction years ago went wrong, now saying that this "prediction" did not have a target date. Bankrupt. He also recently posted here as m96 and under Gumbi. Gumbi needs a break because he has fallen flat on his face here once again. His scheme has been exposed many times. The damage is done. Irreversible damage. It's a scam. Game over. There are just too many facts. You are welcome to check the facts here.The charlatan has no clothes. Marty, unfortunately MANY people who bought your reports are very unhappy. Please refer to the following recent sample case: Fraudulent Blog Post RevisionsIf you want to contact Marty directly, just send a private message here: Contact Martin Armstrong and daughter. Once again Martin Armstrong is denied the option to use this forum for fraudulent advertising. Yes, fraudulent advertising, false advertising. And we are here to take corrective action with information, just the facts.Meanwhile, our themes of the day are still "Which Government has asked Martin Armstrong for Advice?", "Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic" and "Economic Advice by Martin Armstrong". And YOU MARTY (posting as over45 here), you get your standard reminder as promised. You fight facts with spam, you get the warning. You have been warned! As previously said, Gumbi's and cohorts' posts get replied to in a way that will remind them of the context in which we showed them that Martin Armstrong is a charlatan. Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. Here we show how Martin Armstrong's fraud manifests itself. Beyond any doubt. A self-documenting case. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end. Whatever smokescreen over45, Gumbi, m96, Alex-11 and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know they just want this message to go away but I am not going to do Martin Armstrong the favor. The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this standard response that documents the following model case. To show everyone what these charlatans are doing. I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side. AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up. Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level." Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion.  Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
Martin Armstrong had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events: Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedian Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Bullshit excuse. What kind of forecast is that - eventually. Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date. Armstrong and his supporters claim the ECM can predict things to the date, otherwise what is the point of having specific dates? Then you say people are idiots for thinking so. This subject is his call on gold reaching $5000 or so when there is a currency crisis and people lose faith in govt. You would have to be a complete idiot to assume that this call is being made to a specific date in time. Clueless if you believe that. An explanation of the ECM was provided. The turn dates are exactly what is stated - change in trends. Sometimes something happens to the day on the stated change of trend that is noticeable, sometimes not. This is not rocket science to understand. Learn to read and comprehend what is written.
Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.
The point is: ?that $5000 call is what he has said gold will go to when there is a currency crisis. That's not a bullshit call. The bullshit is you thinking it has to be pegged to a specific date and not an event. - Do you bashers even comprehend written language ?
We read the evidence and derive our conclusions. Proof: Will Gold reach $5,000 +? (Click on link to get context) P13:
A 21 year bull market in stocks points to 2015 and a 17.2 year high in gold points to 2016.
P14:
However, if gold exceeds this level and it too forms the subsequent support, now we are looking at the
$3,500 to $5,000 target zone. This is where we see the potential for Gold is a true economic meltdown of Confidence.
GOLD $5,000 + (Click on link to get context) P13:
Technical support will be at the $800 level for 2010. Holding this will keep the bullish momentum in place. We should see a temporary high in 2010-11 with a retest of support perhaps into 2012-13 with a rally into 2016.
You call us idiots - we pull out the facts and you ...  over45 you need to get a break because you have fallen flat on your face as much as Gumbi needs a break because he has also fallen flat on his face here once again. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Wow. Ok.
Thanks Digi and Over for your replies, but I have a few problems with them.
...
At some point gold rose above that number in the first gold under 1000 post. Why didn't he then, after gold closed above that number, then turn around and publish on the public blog that gold was now going to go higher? He told a lot of readers it was gong under 1000 shouldn;t he have told those same readers it was now going on a bullish run?
Uuhhhh....At this point I'm beating a dead horse. Ha ha haaaaaa............
I'll sum up my thoughts another time.
Don't worry too much. His computer is stupid. It cannot predict anything. It cannot reverse direction until it is too late. It took me years to figure out the fraud in this case. Now it is fully documented here: Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015Just click on the link and read that page. And everything else on the site. The cat is out of the bag, armstrongeconomics.com is a scam. You say you think he deleted and possibly modified posts. There are other users who found out: I am so glad I happened on to this blog. I have been trying to figure out this guy's ramblings for far too long. I got sucked in by the Forecaster movie - that's a compelling story. I subscribed to his website and analyzed his posts (no easy feat) for the past year. I began to notice what appeared to be revisions in his historical posts to align with reality. I began to screen print his advice/predictions (no way to print otherwise) so I could compare. Yep - proved that. Have cancelled subscription.
Don't worry about the slack forum - ask the people there to come over here. The slack forum as you say doesn't show older posts unless you pay, and it cannot be searched using google so it is fairly useless. Most people in that slack forum have already gone anyway. Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedian Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
I found out about M.A. around half a year ago. Myself being an engineer, I don't want to learn, I want to understand.
And for me that was possible only following M.A.
An engineer needs Martin Armstrong to understand? Perhaps time to go back to school to catch up? Gestern wusste ich nicht wie man das Wort "Ingenieur" schreibt, heute bin ich einen. But remember the joke about tigers. Why do you blow the horn? To keep the tigers away. But there are no tigers here. There you see! |
|
|
|
Facts DO matter:
Record Falsification is Fraud
Private Blog: Gold Elects Monthly Bullish at $1207 On its Way to $1309Tuesday, March 1, 2016
...
Our Quarter level of the model generated a Bullish Reversal at the end of the year reversing its short positions and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next Bullish Reversal at the $1347 level.
...
Martin Armstrong claims that his model reversed its Gold trade at the end of the year from short to long, months before publishing this event! This is FRAUD. RTFM at Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015 and try to refute any of its details or get lost! It is a fallacy to construct an argument based on falsified hindsight signals or other noise out of context. The truth can only be obtained by constructing the timeline as is unfolds step by step with only verifiable information that is available at each time step.The bottom line is that Martin Armstrong's model elected a bearish quarterly reversal at the end of the year 2015, and he waited for the second "Benchmark" in 2016 to produce the final low that would confirm that bearish quarterly reversal. That did not occur as we know and therefore he was compelled to falsify the record by claiming in hindsight what can be seen in the private blog above. That bullish hindsight signal was not available to anybody at the end of the year, and we have reports from multiple people confirming this fact in this blog. Anything else is just a distraction. Other instances of this fraudulent falsification: Martin Armstrong The FalsifierMartin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Bullshit excuse. What kind of forecast is that - eventually. Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.
Only a fool thinks that forecasting is simply price. Time is far more important than price.
Martin Armstrong
Forecast arrays anyone?
Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.
The point is: ?that $5000 call is what he has said gold will go to when there is a currency crisis. That's not a bullshit call. The bullshit is you thinking it has to be pegged to a specific date and not an event. - Do you bashers even comprehend written language ?
We read the evidence and derive our conclusions. Proof: Will Gold reach $5,000 +?P13:
A 21 year bull market in stocks points to 2015 and a 17.2 year high in gold points to 2016.
P14:
However, if gold exceeds this level and it too forms the subsequent support, now we are looking at the
$3,500 to $5,000 target zone. This is where we see the potential for Gold is a true economic meltdown of Confidence.
GOLD $5,000 +P13:
Technical support will be at the $800 level for 2010. Holding this will keep the bullish momentum in place. We should see a temporary high in 2010-11 with a retest of support perhaps into 2012-13 with a rally into 2016.
You call us idiots - we pull out the facts and you ... over45 need to get a break because you have fallen flat on your once face as much as Gumbi needs a break because he has also fallen flat on his face here once again. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
CHARLATAN
TRAPPED
ONCE AGAIN
I'd like to ask the Pro Armstrongers a few serious questions.
You are not going to get what you ask for ... He has always said that he expects it to get to around $5000 at some point.
But we get this major forecast failure here documented once again which is that Martin Armstrong kept preaching this $5000 target at the $1900 high when he missed the turn as he always does. That is by no means good at all. If these reversals are elected, look out below. We may have to clean house before gold can resume the uptrend.
That is the problem that all charlatans have - THEY MUST CONTRADICT THEMSELVES all the time, and I am playing this game which they always lose ... because we have the facts for everyone to see. over45 you have fallen flat on your face as much as Gumbi needs a break because he has also fallen flat on his face here once again. You are discredited once again - you need a new life - change your handle. And all that they can do after this is to throw a tantrum ... don't listen to Anonymous Coder - she's an idiot.
Like a 5 year old .. because they are running out of arguments. Rinse, wash, repeat. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
over45 you are not getting what you want that is why you are throwing a tantrum ... wasting your energy on this futile exercise. We won, you lost. Resistance is futile. The charlatan has no clothes. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.
|
|
|
|
I forgot to say: It's a scam as it always has been. The game is over. We won. Resistance is futile. Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
Fraud Warning Martin Armstrong is publishing misleading content here under his handle over45. What is he saying this time? Gibberish. Pure brainless mud-slinging by quoting unnamed sources mixed with Armstrong advertising. This is spam. He spammed this thread with over 70 posts without providing a single coherent response. Game over. He is being ridiculed and he does not deserve any respect because he is just wasting other people's time.He is in high demand.
Hmmm. Perhaps by the ones who want to put him behind bars again?  He also recently posted here as m96 and under Gumbi. Gumbi needs a break because he has fallen flat on his face here once again. His scheme has been exposed many times. The damage is done. Irreversible damage. It's a scam. Game over. There are just too many facts. You are welcome to check the facts here.The charlatan has no clothes. Marty, unfortunately MANY people who bought your reports are very unhappy. Please refer to the following recent sample case: Fraudulent Blog Post RevisionsIf you want to contact Marty directly, just send a private message here: Contact Martin Armstrong and daughter. Once again Martin Armstrong is denied the option to use this forum for fraudulent advertising. Yes, fraudulent advertising, false advertising. And we are here to take corrective action with information, just the facts.Meanwhile, our themes of the day are still "Which Government has asked Martin Armstrong for Advice?", "Socrates Technical Analysis Prediction Magic" and "Economic Advice by Martin Armstrong". And YOU MARTY (posting as over45 here), you get your standard reminder as promised. You fight facts with spam, you get the warning. You have been warned! As previously said, Gumbi's and cohorts' posts get replied to in a way that will remind them of the context in which we showed them that Martin Armstrong is a charlatan. Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. Here we show how Martin Armstrong's fraud manifests itself. Beyond any doubt. A self-documenting case. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end. Whatever smokescreen over45, Gumbi, m96, Alex-11 and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know they just want this message to go away but I am not going to do Martin Armstrong the favor. The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this standard response that documents the following model case. To show everyone what these charlatans are doing. I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side. AnonymousCoder"Quarterly reversal time unit is one quarter. Gold rallied before the quarter was over and no other signal in the opposite direction was available to indicate change of direction.The time span is 1 to 3 units in time so the quarterly bearish reversal had 1 to 3 quarters before time was up. Armstrong wrote on his private blog on the first of March our quarterly level of the model generated a bullish reversal at the end of the year reversing its short position and going long. This also signaled that gold would rally from the $1060 area and should test the next bullish reversal at the $1347 level." Not sure if you are aware or not but you are losing this discussion. Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!
Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that
Martin Armstrong had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?
In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!
If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.
You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!
And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!
More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.
Here is a detailed time line of the events: Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015Martin A. Armstrong: convicted felon, shameless conman, schizophrenic crackpot & financial comedian Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed. Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud. See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
