Hey,

I'm selling 4 R9 290 reference designs. Used 2 months. 300$ each.

Also have a Rosehill 1600w for 250$. Have used 10 of thems, no failure at all, very solid.

Shipping from Ontario Canada.

People have the delusion that being accepted by merchants creates value. It does not. Directly anyways. One of the only ways it does create value is by the marketing being accepted gives (there's a couple other minor factors where higher liquidity might create value in an otherwise relatively low liquidity commodity).


And you seem to say EMC2 doesn't have use like most other altcoins. Emc2 has more use than most altcoins. Most altcoins see a rise from hype driven by new clever ways to create artificial value (multipools creating artificial demand, large premises like country coins creating artificial market caps, etc). Emc2 actually has a use, which is beyond "spending". It's also targeting a little bit outside of crypto world. Those 2 things are really good value drivers.

Being condescending doesn't make a point. Also you wisely state how it's convenient to just keep the information that's relevant to your point. Check what you're doing. As opposed to me where I did mention that variable cost means something, but so little in this matter.

You can argue that going further in the scope is just a long road, but staying over simplistic is a great way to be wrong. No where in history of crypto has efficiency being a driver for value. I said your point is useless, and it is until there is evidence that it's right. Russells teapot.

If electricity cost was at all relevant, bitcoin price would have lowered considerably and constantly with ASIC. It did the exact opposite, it boomed. It's very arguable what really causes that, it may be the arms race that ASIC are where more and more money injected into hardware means it would elevate the price equilibrium, or it could be other fundamentals. But either way, it shows how LITTLE electricity cost is relevant to value.

No matter the terminology you use, facts are facts, words need to be used correctly and with everything in consideration.  The fact electricity is a variable cost means very little. One of the only use of determining variable cost is profit optimization. But there is so much more than that to the matter. The arms race effect trumps a lot of stuff here.

efficiency is not the biggest factor here. Startup cost (cost of ASIC, that have no long term resale value). The ROI needs to be hit early or else you get burned.

it was suggested, and denied, for way more valid reasons than the suggestions propose. That's it that's all.

I'm jumping ship of any coin that would even contemplate changing coin supply for very obvious reasons.

Any suggestion of changing the coin supply is extremely foolish.

It's like if the federal bank decided to tomorrow remove half of all money in circulation. It would perturbation buying power and value. 2 things you don't do to someone's money.

You guys talking about good "long term news" but "bad short term news".... There is no such thing in markets. Markets adjust as knowledge about it is made public.

Unfortunately, people don't see the true value of being an NPO at this stage.

Btw, seriously, the "announcement of a news" has no reason to be. It can only have negative effects. Announce something or dont, don't announce an announcement.

Mining on old chain possibly?

I actually like the color much more appealing. Coins are "shiny". Bland blue/green isn't that appealing.

So I would say, keep the color and drop the 3rd effect :p

a wild guess would be... update wallet? Lol

Check first post of this thread.

Constructive criticism btw.

I think the idea is to move towards something more professional in the sense that a little godzirra grabbing a plane isn't exactly professional. You want something that is "coin/symbol". Also, I think baby blue isn't touching that goal either. As well as white background being not very eye catching.

It's an error on your side. Works for me.

The fuck are talking about? All you have is a trash name and a post that took 2min30sec to write? :S

yeah if the timestamp is in line with the new wallet.dat it probably means it's lost.

However, I believe when you drag and drop something it gets saved to a hidden clipboard. Will google that. Maybe it's recoverable from that action.

If it was syncing what may have happened is that the old wallet.dat didn't copy over because of restricted access while in use. Nonetheless, copying while syncing is def what screwed it up. HOWEVER. Keep that wallet.dat (copy it). Delete the whole file and delete the wallet .exercise file and reinstall. Before even opening it copy paste the old wallet.dat back into the new appdata.

Also. Does the wallet.dat have a different timestamp than the rest of the files in the folder or a different one ( by the second)

I just edited my post, please re - read to confirm.

Also, do you still have the original wallet.dat you dragged? Or you simply just drag and dropped back in, therefore have no copy of it?

I can't say if something can be done.  But the proper procedure is to ALWAYS BACK UP WALLET. And then just install the update. No touching of anything necessary.

And in the event that something bad happened while updating wallet (not sure I ever witnessed a wallet overwriting wallet.dat while updating), well you have your backed up key anyways.

Now... in your wallet, do you still see your old receiving address, or its a new one?

And to resume, you

Copied wallet.dat to desktop
Installed update
Copied wallet.dat back into appdata (and confirmed you wanted to OVERWRITE A on prompt)
Synced?

(ANY discrepancy in what I resumed, please note, anything can make a huge difference)

Fair enough, but as you may have guessed I was really aiming that to the people that it concerns more than derbrause himself.

about F'ing time. ...

You know... let's just update AFTER the fork.

Wonder how many pool/crypto site maintainers don't check their emails every day...