Eagerly anticipating parts 3 and 4.
Same thing and i've waited info on that gas from the start. It would almost seem that they are timing this publication of info towards the launch time to get people hyped even more. Every time i look at these medium posts they remind me of eth-level potential. But where's the fud? Only fud i've encountered is coming from inside my head where the fear infused theories are painting over the blanks. Exactly the thought I was nursing after reading part 2. Looking at the publication frequency and spacing, there can only be one endgame to this play; mainnet launch. However, I don't think the aim is hype though. If it was hype, they wouldn't have been so forthright with the network's shortcoming - would have opted to gloriously paint the solutions as novel features instead of fixes. Mental FUD, eh? You don't say. Crypto's generally not in a good headspace at the moment, so it's understandable. Just holding collective breath, however, it's projects like these that will define the next phase |
|
|
|
|
Eagerly anticipating parts 3 and 4. This really whets my appetite for more, especially the testnet's finding and insights. Would be nice to get more stats and insights from the testnet
|
|
|
|
UPDATE:
Meet LIUM advisers!
Meet them where? Here? Also, skimming through all the convos, what you're launching is a freelancer/gig economy-type service first, right? The tokenomics doesn't justify it. 10b tokens seem way too much for a "services" platform (cars and whatnots) and that's without factoring the decimal places in. |
|
|
|
While this is promising, the newsletter doesn't address the most pressing concerns: marketing, partnership, community, and ecosystem growth. You don't have to spell out whom you're in talks with or even where, but just broadstroke overviews (bullet points) will go a long way in showing momentum. Community is everything: https://twitter.com/lrettig/status/1183568054351028225Thank you for the suggestion, the report is supposed to be a round up of development over the last period, any partnerships etc, that are established will of course be announced! Development is of course the most important part of ecosystem growth that can be analysed before main launch! Ah yes, mainnet launch. Any ETA on when that's going to come out? Still on track for this quarter? Also, think I recall the team mentioning that Cardstack will always be on Ethereum blockchain. Am I correct? No plans for other blockchains, even those that support EVM? |
|
|
|
Are you announcing any details for Gen 2 devices?
Probablly not Gen 2 devices. I don't see much innovation idea here. Well, apparently we have a 'master of innovation' here... looks like a completely custom blockchain platform without any centralization at all, including a totally decentralized trade mechanism that is automated to work just like a centralized exchange, decentralized web hosting, data storage, and communications, along with a completely unique model for community influence and account leveling and block generation, isn't 'innovation' to this master innovator. Well, Mr. Innovation master, since we're a fully open source team working on open source ideas, you're more than welcome to provide some of your master innovation to us, so that we may then meet your criteria. (I challenge anyone to even modify the device to make Java and acceleration therein work, that at the very minimum before challenging our innovation. Prove you can do that, then I might take your nonsense comments seriously.) Also - scanning through a thread and only looking at pictures, obviously not reading any information or links... does NOT qualify you to judge innovation level. If you have nothing useful to say, please take your nonsense elsewhere. You're very accommodating but probably shouldn't have bothered responding. Really. Just take a look at their post history and it says all you need to know about them. Meanwhile, I'm trying to gobble this all up. Do you ship worldwide? |
|
|
|
While this is promising, the newsletter doesn't address the most pressing concerns: marketing, partnership, community, and ecosystem growth. You don't have to spell out whom you're in talks with or even where, but just broadstroke overviews (bullet points) will go a long way in showing momentum. Community is everything: https://twitter.com/lrettig/status/1183568054351028225 |
|
|
|
Saw this official disclaimer and would like the team's response on it. I went through prior conversations here and couldn't find it being addressed: "The Financial Market Authority Liechtenstein (FMA) points out that Smart Valor AG, Vaduz, registration number FL-0002.596.088-9, has not been licensed by the FMA. Smart Valor AG is not authorized to provide financial services subject to licensing in and from Liechtenstein.
Especially, Smart Valor AG is not a “Licensed Exchange”, as stated on the website https://smartvalor[dot]com/en/valor-platform.
The FMA urgently advises to only do business subject to authorisation with financial firms that are authorised by the FMA or other national authorities. Please find all information regarding regulated entities in Liechtenstein in the public register of licensees on the FMA website."Taken from Financial Market Authority Liechtenstein (FMA)As you may have read, FMA (Finanzmarktaufsicht Liechtenstein) published a warning regarding Smart Valor AG (Liechtenstein). In this regard, we would like to provide clarification around Smart Valors’s current regulatory setup: Smart Valor AG (Switzerland) is permitted to act as financial intermediary based on its membership with VQF, Financial Services Standards Association, a Swiss Self-Regulatory Organization – SRO member search Smart Valor Smart Valor AG (Liechtenstein) is operating as a currency exchange for FIAT/Crypto and Crypto/Crypto limited to payment and utility tokens. FMA has been notified of the launch of operating a currency exchange according to the Liechtenstein Due Diligence Act in early August 2019 following preceding discussions about the targeted business model with FMA. In its current setup Smart Valor is not providing any services related to security tokens to which the warning was related. Services related to security tokens will only be offered after the necessary regulatory approvals/authorizations have been obtained. Smart Valor is in contact with FMA and immediately updated its website. Herewith I am sending you the official statement of the company ( https://news.smartvalor.com/regulatory-setup-of-smart-valor-in-liechtenstein/) Thanks for the response. I have two follow-ups though - one's an observation and the other question. 1. Observation: The official statement says "deleting the word “licensed” and the jurisdictions in which it is currently planning to receive authorization". However, these were not the only words deleted. The word "first" also vanished. Could you give an insight into why? 2. Any ETA on the actionable from this "SMART VALOR will publish a further update within the next days in order to provide further transparency" |
|
|
|
After one month on Binance:  Can't lay a finger on exactly what's the reason for the dump. There was no major run-up pump prior to the listing on Binance as far as I'm aware of. Wondering why the market's been dropping it like hot potatoes lately I think it's because of the bear market since the price of BTC drop a lot recently the price of beam also drop but right now it looks like BTC is recovering so thee price of the beam also recover. This is normal to see on any coin every time the price of BTC drop altcoins are drop too except to other coins which is used mostly for withdrawing like XMR. Once the BTC recovered I'm sure the price of beam will increase more just keep holding. Bear market and you've got assets like LINK, QNT, OLT, MATIC performing so well. Of course, different tech focus and Grin too seems to be taking a massive hit. However, the fact that Beam seems to be taking this hit shortly after listing on Binance does raises a few questionable eyebrows. |
|
|
|
Saw this official disclaimer and would like the team's response on it. I went through prior conversations here and couldn't find it being addressed: "The Financial Market Authority Liechtenstein (FMA) points out that Smart Valor AG, Vaduz, registration number FL-0002.596.088-9, has not been licensed by the FMA. Smart Valor AG is not authorized to provide financial services subject to licensing in and from Liechtenstein.
Especially, Smart Valor AG is not a “Licensed Exchange”, as stated on the website https://smartvalor[dot]com/en/valor-platform.
The FMA urgently advises to only do business subject to authorisation with financial firms that are authorised by the FMA or other national authorities. Please find all information regarding regulated entities in Liechtenstein in the public register of licensees on the FMA website."Taken from Financial Market Authority Liechtenstein (FMA) |
|
|
|
Think forkdelta is probably the only viable option right now. Exrates and Felixxo have ridiculous spreads and I haven't had a peek at the new exchange they listed on because users have been complaining and liquidity seems to be an issue there too. |
|
|
|
Recently I put there some tasks - and Latium is still working, I've got few employees
Unfortunately not many, but the platform is still alive
I think they just need to do more marketing
So what's your LATX worth right now? You have been hold these token since a year ago based on your post above, right? When i seeing on Coinmarketcap, it shown this https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/latiumx/There is no any volume and also didn't have any listed exchange. Did it got delisted from all exchange sites? Most of these projects faced a lot of difficult time during the bear market. They never prepared for it at all. I also remember buying some LatiumX tokens from ICO but am glad i sold them off when they still had value. Most of these projects only focus on advertising before the ICO, after the ICO, they just go quiet which is the reason people also forget about them except for the people who hold their tokens I think the whole freelance/Gig economy on the blockchain concept is one that's been difficult for startups to peg down. On paper, it sounds like a no-brainer, however, real-world successful execution has been sorely lacking. Begs the question why |
|
|
|
After one month on Binance: Can't lay a finger on exactly what's the reason for the dump. There was no major run-up pump prior to the listing on Binance as far as I'm aware of. Wondering why the market's been dropping it like hot potatoes lately |
|
|
|
Any links to website, discord and telegram?
We are studying how community works. Looks Telegram and Discord are popular. But these things are planned to hand over to community itself. A website is under work by us as kick start. Hope it goes online in next two weeks. And we hope community can also take over the website. Community take over the website? Community take over social networks too? Soon you'll be requesting the community to take over development too, right? I mean it's all decentralization and community-based project, after all, you've established the foundation |
|
|
|
From my monitoring on social media, the project actively participated in several events the latest is 15-17 October in Amsterdam this activity will have a positive impact on project growth meaning we still have plenty of time to buy this token.
This is good news for DUSK holders with information about this event might have a slight impact on DUSK prices and the event that was held are interesting Yeah, top industry leaders are there "We can speculate who are these secret partners of dusk". Pretty sure when DUSK starts announcing the slew of partners it has onboard into its ecosystem, jaws are going to drop. they are probably holding back due to regulatory concerns and compliance. |
|
|
|
did you pass verification? because I also filled out this form and did not receive a response as well as payments I understand that silence on the forum means everyone is happy, but I missed everything with my fucking business trip What business do you mean I don't understand, what I know is that the swachhcoin project is no longer running, there is no interesting information, there is no important news and there is no active swachcoin coin team here, so where do they go now? Goes to prove - yet again - that not everything should be blockchained or tokenized. The hype is gone now and only projects that not only have credible usecase but also managed and developed by knowledgable teams will survive the ongoing cataclysmic shift in the industry |
|
|
|
So what is this, basically a Eth competitor, that wants to make its name by handling 10k TPS?
You guys do realize that its taken Eth years and probably 10,000+ coding hours to even get where it is NOW hey?
Gonna take alot of work, do you guys have a single line of code to show?
looks scammy when u have a github symbol posted but the link just redirects to your ICO website, why even include that symbol there? to trick noobs i guess
This is basically just promises and an ICO... : / (same weak money grab we see everyday)
Hello CJMapope, We hope that you are well. We acknowledge your freedom to express your thoughts, which is also aligned to the foundation which Decracy is based on, though, reviewing your comment, there are things that you have stated which are incorrect and in ways, inclusive of malicious design and misinformation. Before going too far, if your message was only to be read, it, in fact, highlights assumptions, presumptions, and claims about our ecosystem and development that was never expressed by our entity or direct team. When considering this, we re-approach your thoughts to no longer be inclusive of value or base and rather re-grasp your intentions to be in opposition of genuineness, truth, and validity. Decracy has not attached a 'GitHub' image in this post which redirects users to our webpage, it instead re-directs users to the Decracy LinkTree - as designed for a seamless user experience, nor have we stated that Decracy is constructed to be a competitor of ETH, or that we have ever addressed or thought of any individual who will view this post to be " noobs". These are all baseless. Though when looked from the outside in, if a post like this would have not been drafted by our team, this mal act, your comment, may have been read and received with the belief that it holds weight and/or validity. As included in the original Decracy soft-announcement post above, any individual is openly invited to view our webpage, our detailed research, and structural design of the Decracy ecosystem via the official 37-Page whitepaper, as well as, invited to visit our publicly available Decracy team profiles, which emphasize the remarkable team that Decracy is made of and the value-creating history that each hold which has directly elevated the space of blockchain. To all reading, Decracy is very aware of the breakthroughs that we are advancing, and of the profound mission that fuels us, this is the very reason behind why we openly introduce you all to our innovation. It correlates to the revolution that we are empowering and the advancements that consequentially will positively influence each of your experiences and involvements within the field of Blockchain, Privacy, Freedom, and Equity. Visit our webpage to learn more, follow our Twitter and Telegram to be kept informed as we continue making progress. Decracy TeamBasically, all you're saying is read the whitepaper. Ok, not a problem to read that. However, if Decracy has been "constructed to be a competitor of ETH" the give us the tech paper rather than the business pitch via dummy guide you guys are referring to as a WP. Ethereum famously released a technical WP that demonstrated its difference from Bitcoin and exactly how they were being implementedProbably best to drop the ambiguity in your response too. Just KISS a reply And let's not forget that Ethereum now has hundreds of contributors. You've got only one dev profile up |
|
|
|
Couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the ANN header and all that tech integrated into one product especially tree graph and smart contract. It was looking at the mother of all DLT. Now with this warning and a quick look at the OP post history is leading me to believe this is nothing much a scam. No site, no team info, no WP, and they have a bank somewhere... oh my... We have years of crypto and blockchain tech dev experience. Some marketing work is under process to let more people know our project. The whole "team will be anonymous" line is so 2016. The banner of anonymity has been used by numerous bad actors to scam the community and get away with it. You have a project claiming to have married some very tricky tech together and don't even have any paper to back it off of. At the very least, would expect a tech paper to at least demonstrate how the marriage came to be. Then, you've got the virus warning and your response is "the vendor" rather than pointing out the possible culprit that could have triggered the false positive. None of this adds up and in my experience. If it doesn't add up, it never will Hope this time, it will. Hope? In crypto? Surely you jest, sir. Why bank on hope when you can just as well deliver a paper to address the concerns raised and point out the exact culprit triggering the "false positive"? It's a simple question of showing, not telling unless this is just another hopium project... I agree with your point. We will deliver things beyond your expectation, hope you can wait and see. And any ETA for deliverables? When are we likely to see a tech paper and/or a roadmap? Will you be having any AMA with the community too or be at any roadshow/hackathon event? |
|
|
|
Couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the ANN header and all that tech integrated into one product especially tree graph and smart contract. It was looking at the mother of all DLT. Now with this warning and a quick look at the OP post history is leading me to believe this is nothing much a scam. No site, no team info, no WP, and they have a bank somewhere... oh my... We have years of crypto and blockchain tech dev experience. Some marketing work is under process to let more people know our project. The whole "team will be anonymous" line is so 2016. The banner of anonymity has been used by numerous bad actors to scam the community and get away with it. You have a project claiming to have married some very tricky tech together and don't even have any paper to back it off of. At the very least, would expect a tech paper to at least demonstrate how the marriage came to be. Then, you've got the virus warning and your response is "the vendor" rather than pointing out the possible culprit that could have triggered the false positive. None of this adds up and in my experience. If it doesn't add up, it never will Hope this time, it will. Hope? In crypto? Surely you jest, sir. Why bank on hope when you can just as well deliver a paper to address the concerns raised and point out the exact culprit triggering the "false positive"? It's a simple question of showing, not telling unless this is just another hopium project... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
