I am trying to build Clam-qt on a (virtual) Linux 14.04 LTS 64 bit. Installed all dependencies but when I run ./automake I get this error: Makefile.am:5: warning: user variable 'GZIP_ENV' defined here ...
/usr/share/automake-1.14/am/distdir.am: ... overrides Automake variable 'GZIP_ENV' defined here
Makefile.am:46: warning: user target 'distcleancheck' defined here ...
/usr/share/automake-1.14/am/distdir.am: ... overrides Automake target 'distcleancheck' defined here
src/Makefile.am:221: warning: user target '.mm.o' defined here ...
/usr/share/automake-1.14/am/depend2.am: ... overrides Automake target '.mm.o' defined here
what am I doing wrong? |
|
|
|
D*mn very nice coins! ordered 1 set  |
|
|
|
Payment round #2 send
I am guessing you meant round 3? So I marked for that one.Yes you are right, round #3 that is ... lost count |
|
|
|
|
I am not into much higher price for the (silver) coin + much higher prizes. I would prefer a top 3 price award. Maybe raise the price of the coin a little and make top3:
prize #1: 0.8BTC
prize #2: 0.5BTC
prize #3: 0.3BTC
max coins per round 10 or maybe 12.
|
|
|
|
|
I run a full node now on 0.11.2, is it possible to upgrade to 0.12 RCx and still serve the network?
|
|
|
|
P.S. If you think you are a real bitcoiner and have done real work in this sphere, let me know and I'd be happy to send one free of charge for you.
I think I have done some work in this sphere (as far as I can say for myself), a true believer in Bitcoin, active and forum and spreading the word of Bitcoin in the real world and ...... I produced a Bitcoin-miner once: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=647102.0 I run a fullnode:  if I receive a keychain I could replace the current chinese plastic coin on my full-node and make it Super BTCFull node This SuperBTC keychain is SuperB! |
|
|
|
I was joking of course about the peeling. I love the excitement: does it cointain 1BTC or doesn't it?....  |
|
|
|
I received my #1.8 today, very nice coin! gonna peel it tonight  |
|
|
|
Bestshare --> 2.673.688.111 Die Jungs aus dem englischen Teil sind jetzt übrigens raus ...  {"hashrate1m": "0", "hashrate5m": "5", "hashrate1hr": "7.56T", "hashrate1d": "78.9T", "hashrate7d": "18.7T", "lastupdate": 1455016407, "shares": 2893621439, "bestshare": 7144260711.0091543, "bestever": 7.144.260.711}
Wie lange waren die drin? Hast du mal nen link zu denen?  Scheinbar haben die nur mit 80Th gehashed |
|
|
|
I am gonna buy me a VERGE P20  |
|
|
|
So the rental is over. Our bestshare: 7,144,260,711 Just multiply by 20 and we are good  too bad, but it was an insane lucky shot better luck next time. I have joined the German Lotto guys, let's see if we are lucky there, 1PH for several dyas.. |
|
|
|
|
wttbs: 0.25 dabei : 00bc8990aa554dde4cc91a8657c7a3ed0d8b41383060a7c6a3b733c15daca8f3
|
|
|
|
So right now only one person knows which coin is really the winner of each round and that would be gravitate right?
Yes Perhaps gravitate will tell anyone that asks whats on their coin. I wont redeem it either way will just be nice to know whats on there . I hope Gravitate doesn't do that ... takes away the excitement. If he does it should pulbic in the thread so everybody knows. |
|
|
|
Great ! Lets pray to the cryptogods we find a block ! Are these stats normal? Do I see 2 workers or displayed double? one with .BBUG1001 and one with _BBUG1001 {"hashrate1m": "177T", "hashrate5m": "158T", "hashrate1hr": "32.7T", "hashrate1d": "1.51T", "hashrate7d": "217G", "lastupdate": 1454875341, "workers": 4, "shares": 30521948, "bestshare": 14073951.90875967, "bestever": 14073951, "worker": [{"hashrate1m": "0", "hashrate5m": "21", "hashrate1hr": "970", "hashrate1d": "1.45K", "hashrate7d": "1.47K", "lastupdate": 1454875341, "shares": 1000, "bestshare": 1365.5312884080506, "bestever": 1365, "workername": "1FuL4PkG4MWGEh6JzUzu25CK67LVMyPbYX.BBUG1001"}, {"hashrate1m": "0", "hashrate5m": "0", "hashrate1hr": "0", "hashrate1d": "0", "hashrate7d": "0", "lastupdate": 1454875341, "shares": 0, "bestshare": 0.0, "bestever": 0, "workername": "1FuL4PkG4MWGEh6JzUzu25CK67LVMyPbYX"}, {"hashrate1m": "177T", "hashrate5m": "158T", "hashrate1hr": "32.7T", "hashrate1d": "1.51T", "hashrate7d": "217G", "lastupdate": 1454875341, "shares": 30520948, "bestshare": 14073951.90875967, "bestever": 14073951, "workername": "1FuL4PkG4MWGEh6JzUzu25CK67LVMyPbYX_BBUG1001"}]} |
|
|
|
So right now only one person knows which coin is really the winner of each round and that would be gravitate right?
Yes |
|
|
|
|
Well, that is the fun part of this Lucky Coin, to redeem or not redeem? I you don't redeem you don't the BTC value of the coin, if others do redeem then you know what chance you have owning the 1BTC coin. I think this very exciting every round. And what will the collectors value do of redeemed and unredeemed coins, it all depends how many coins are redeemed and if the 1BTC will be redeemed and the owner makes it public.
|
|
|
|
|
I never seen this before... guess something is not 100% OK or perhaps Orphan
# Height Block Reward When Status Diff Diff% CDF B
514 397182 25.23924789 2016-02-07 09:01:52+00 New ~0 ? ? 1
513 397163 25.09993944 2016-02-07 05:25:11+00 +20 Confirms 53,277,174,830 36.968% 0.309 2
512 397140 25.12460839 2016-02-07 02:15:10+00 +43 Confirms 77,066,132,001 64.204% 0.474 3
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
