^^^ When I stated 1 mile = 1 minute and that the Sun is 32 minutes in diameter, how exactly did you get 3,000 miles? bump+++ ...  So much for their claims, looks like the Sun does shrink when atmospheric conditions are right. ... bump+++ You assume the stars are flat due to claiming they're gazillions of miles away (with an apparent size of less than the plank length AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!) this implies the curvature that can be derived from the measurements you're making is due to the Earth curving (re: Aristotle). I'm fairly sure I can also derive curvature (the framework for applying it at least) from whatever equations you're using and show you're making an assumption purely on a mathematical basis. |
|
|
|
And if the sun was 10x further, and 10x bigger, it would appear the same size in the sky, and your saxtant would have the same measurement on it, including
the angles on the airplane.
Angular size requires the horizon and two sextant readings! ANGULAR SIZE:  [source: http://www.thechironcenter.com/grade-7-perspective-drawing.html]Apparent size does not require the horizon and only needs a single sextant reading! APPARENT SIZE: [source: re-purposed pseudoscience image]With angular size the angle never changes so long as it hasn't past the vanishing point, it's a constant that correlates with physical size; 1 mile = 1 minute.    If it turns out that airplanes do in fact catalyze air into fuel and they're scamming everybody on fuel cost, then what was the source of the kerosene accelerated fire that melted all those steel beams on 9/11?
If you use a sextant or a transit to triangulate with the sun and several different stars at a particular time of the year, and then triangulate with the same stars and the sun 90 days later, and then triangulate the triangulations, together, the distance of the sun from the earth can be ascertained to be about 90 million miles. You can use the calc to find the rough diameter of the sun to be +/- 800,000 miles.  Your margin of error is about ~89,999,666 miles if you factor refraction (WARNING: DO NOT USE REFRACTION TABLES FROM NASA!) into the equation. You're also assuming the Earth is a sphere, the fact you made an assumption limits the validity of your evidence; petitio principii, or at least a variant thereof. Try measuring the Sun's size directly with the sextant (32 minutes in diameter) and you'll get much more accurate results. |
|
|
|
^^^ Asking for a picture of a mirror in darkened room without a flash powerful enough to illuminate even a small section is a tall order. There's evidence for the dome but mostly in the form indirect observations and measurements.
Meteorites made from manufactured steel could be considered direct evidence of an engineered structure above us. Lasers can be bounced off the dome as a method of directly measuring the shape.
As far a pictures go a rainbow takes the shape of the dome.
There's lots of indirect evidence such as the holographic nature of the celestial objects and their measured (sextant) values, the electric field it produces, the requirement of pressure vessel needed to hold the atmosphere and, microwave & high energy cosmic rays. This is just to name a few.
Darkened room? What do you mean by that, just take the picture when the sun is shining, also what is the dome, transparent glass or a mirror?  1. During the day you'll observe the sky is generally blue or overcast and very much opaque, however as you can see from the above image there are some phenomenon that can still be photographed. 2. Based on my analysis of meteorite fragments the dome (firmament) is manufactured from a nickel-iron long-grain damascus type steel alloy with a gold colour optically reflective oxide layer. Measurements of the Sun and Moon's elevation with a sextant indicates they reflect off of the dome at a height of about ~3,000 miles.  [meteorite cross section] [meteorite nickel-iron oxide] |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Asking for a picture of a mirror in darkened room without a flash powerful enough to illuminate even a small section is a tall order. There's evidence for the dome but mostly in the form indirect observations and measurements.
Meteorites made from manufactured steel could be considered direct evidence of an engineered structure above us. Lasers can be bounced off the dome as a method of directly measuring the shape.
As far a pictures go a rainbow takes the shape of the dome.
There's lots of indirect evidence such as the holographic nature of the celestial objects and their measured (sextant) values, the electric field it produces, the requirement of pressure vessel needed to hold the atmosphere and, microwave & high energy cosmic rays. This is just to name a few.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ Not an argument, the terrain is flat and covered by an artifical structure in both cases. The hypothetical existence of other planes of existence have no bering on what can be observed, tested and measured here.
BTW the asymmetrical electric field a polarized angled triangular structure creates between it and the ground would cause falling objects to accelerate at inconsistent speeds and stationary objects to weigh differently depending on their locations, the dome minamizes this effect. The magnetic field would be inconsistent, pressure & temperature differences would also make the weather hellish. The triangular structure is also not as strong as a dome and would be subject to deformation and other catastrophic effects over time. The projection of celestial lights (sun, moon, stars...) is also an issue with the triangle roof.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ When one takes a reading with a caliper the reading is true, it is the truth. The reading is not faith based, it's not conjecture, it's not arbitrary, it's not opinion, it's not the result of consensus, it's not the product of ideology, it's not a belief and, it's not a concept.
The same applies when one takes a reading with a sextant; it measures angles on a plane. If you disagree with direct measurement then you've got a problem with the truth.
A rope around your neck can help you overcome this problem you have with the truth.
|
|
|
|
^^^ I've got proof beyond a reasonable doubt the Earth is motionless and all you can do is change the subject. The USAF replication of the M&M experiment and, Dufour & Prunier's replication of the Sagnac experiment both irrefutably falsify relativity. Without relativity there is no globe. I've got the scientific evidence bruh, all you've got is white knighting for organized criminals that need to be stuffed into a gas chamber. BTW I learned new slang today, "gaytheist" wear your new label with pride fag.  |
|
|
|
|
^^^ We're not discussing the dome, stop changing the subject fucking cocksucker.
I've got actual proof to back up my claims:
"Special Relativity," Nature vol. 322 (August 1986): p. 590. <--- NOT AN OLD FAILED EXPERIMENT | Replication and results of the M&M experiment sponsored by the U.S. Air Force.
Seriously, go hang yourself faggot!
|
|
|
|
^^^ Lets stay on the topic of Earth and its claimed motion instead; your checkmate is showing. Flat Earth Origins: The Michelson-Morley Experiments -- https://youtu.be/fxB5vY-RpGo |
|
|
|
If you're measuring something with calipers the reading taken is not a matter opinion nor is it decided by consensus. In this case [M&M] we're measuring the motion of the Earth with an interferometer; the Earth does not move. 
In other news...  Elvis Presley Sings About Flat Earth -- https://youtu.be/vsa0-a7YLvk |
|
|
|
|
You can't reason with organized crime any more than you can reason with a tapeworm. If muggles is caught red-handed, he's going to cry "I dun do nuffin" all the way to the gas chamber and that's a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ This is why I promote violence; the consensus is the result of organized crime and there's no alternative action.
|
|
|
|
^^^ D&P's replication of Sagnac's experiment took rotating frames of reference into account and the results falsified SR beyond any reasonable doubt. The only one in checkmate here is you.  The Earth is flat and motionless. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ You getting paid per post or something? My reply to the off topic post in regards to Moore's Law (the number of transistors in ICs doubles every year) has nothing to do with Einstein, his theory of relativity or the M&M experiment.
Your quoting wiki's semetic screeching about how relativity wasn't a direct response to M&M's experiment shows what a massive fag you are. Dufour & Prunier falsified relativity with their experiment and, Einstein is quoted as saying relativity was in fact a direct response to M&M. Einstein like Newton also implied that he didn't believe his own bullshit theory.
The Earth does not move, period. Get a mechanical gyroscope that reacts to a 15 deg/hr rotation and prove the Earth is stationary yourself! Also before you start screeching about ultra-sensative ring-laser and mems gyroscopes, they're picking up the "aether drift" documented in the M&M experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ Not an argument and honestly I don't ever recall referencing Moore's Law in any way, the current physical limit 6 nm IIRC and new technology will be required to maintain the trend.
Absolutely off topic.
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ The pipul is strong with this one!
He's claiming the Earth is motion and that one of the many accelerations we're claimed to be experiencing is too small to be of any consequence. How is my response (established scientific proof we're stationary) irrelevant you fucking cocksucker?
Claim a rim velocity of 66k MPH? Kill yourself now!
edit:
Also on a side note, the bulge that gives fake ba'al Earth its wonderful pear shape would be undulating with an up & down motion to the tune of ~14 miles every 12 hours haha haha! Talk about high tide!
|
|
|
|
... you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.
At a certain time at the equator, you are traveling in a direction at about 65.6k mph, and then about 67.6k mph in that direction 12 hours later. The change in speed is about 2000 mph over 43200 seconds, which is an overall acceleration of about 0.0463 mph/s. That's nothing compared to falling, at 21.8 mph/s, which is why we don't fly off the earth. If we accelerated at that rate when we started walking, it would take over a minute just to get to a normal pace of 3 mph. ^^^ Quit your bullshit! The claim Earth is in motion has been experimentally falsified by Michaelson & Morley, the rebuttal by globalists of "muh relativity" has also been experimentally falsified by Dufour & Prunier. That the Earth is stationary is established science that can be proven by anybody with a gyroscope (reactive to a 15 deg/hr rotation). The claimed rotation of the Earth would cause everybody to get seasick if it were true, we can most certainly feel the ~14 grams of force that would be present if we were spinning, not to mention all the other claimed motions and accelerations we're supposedly experiencing. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Relativity has been falsified by experiment (Dufour & Prunier), gravity is an unproven theory and you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.
Globalism is a conspiracy and an act of war on all of humanity, all life and the creator of this plane of existence. You're committing an act of war against me, go rope yourself you sack of shit.
|
|
|
|
^^^ Not only is the Earth not rotating (rotation at a constant velocity is an acceleration) but the variation in rotation speed every 12 hours caused by the 66,600 MPH orbit around the Sun would be catastrophic.
The example of a car or aircraft traveling in a straight line at a constant velocity is a fucking joke, go kill yourself!
You also must have Alzheimer because we also talked about this already. In fact, I don't understand why your google doesn't work, you could have searched this yourself, aren't you the one telling us to do our research? That acceleration you are talking about is minuscule compared to gravity. There's no proof gravity is real, it's an unproven theory that exists solely to support the pseudoscience of heliocentrism. You claim your average person can't feel a force of ~14g, I'm going to call bullshit on that. I like how you mention Google, as if it gives any credibility to your fucking conspiracy of bullshit run by the rich and powerful of this world, as if they don't tell Google its business and make all the top links point to pseudocientific garbage. Finally you don't even address the fact you claim we're going around the Sun at 66,600 MPH in addition to the 1,000 MPH rotation, 14g * 66,600 66.6 = you're fucked! My recommendation that you KYS stands. ^^^ Wow! Your religion is something like the Koran violence part of their religion. Is this something you share with all FE people? Or is it basically only you? When criminals are so rich and powerful they have nobody who can enforce basic common law what can be done? Murder, torture, rape, pedophilia, cannibalism these are all normal for them; how is violence not just? |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Not only is the Earth not rotating (rotation at a constant velocity is an acceleration) but the variation in rotation speed every 12 hours caused by the 66,600 MPH orbit around the Sun would be catastrophic.
The example of a car or aircraft traveling in a straight line at a constant velocity is a fucking joke, go kill yourself!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
