People keep saying this, but I don't see any value.

A name in the shitter. Software that can't be trusted because whether or not they stole the coins, it's been proven that they installed a malware infested wallet at leat once. Wouldn't it just be easier to start over from scratch?

I wouldn't be sure of that.

It doesn't really make sense for them to offer a legitimate contract that won't ROI. If you give me 1 btc, why would I put the time, energy, effort, and costs into running a miner that will generate .9 btc over the length of the contract to send you .9 btc when I can just send you back .9 btc over time?

That's why it doesn't make sense to buy cloud mining, ever.

Don't worry about those coins. What is the total outstanding debt to depositors/traders?

that's a large amount, but how long have withdrawals been stalled? How much have they made by dumping other coins elsewherre? Park those coins somewhere, claim they were stolen, and keep the rest.

Leroy, nothing about Bruno's background changes the fact that you turned people's bitcoins into worthless shitcoins in your investment, so stop.

He didn't kidnap your investment.

He turned it into shitcoins, and the value of those shitcoins plummeted. Exactly like we told him (and you) that it would.

Since then he has changed the TOS to make it impossible for you to withdraw the coins that don't exist any more, and I won't read through all his nonsense to see which version of his rules he is trying to follow or breaking at this moment, but maybe it will make you feel better to realize that you can't withdraw coins that don't exist, and do more research before your next investment.

You are only just now starting to think you are being trolled?

What have you seen behind the scenes to lead you to believe you weren't being trolled?

From all the fees that they collected while allowing you to trade coins that were "stolen."

Oh, and also from the stolen coins.

OK. Interesting tidbit. Still not sure how that qualifies you to get the money back or what the hell all of this is about.

Cryptsy should get the coins back and then give them the coins that you are owed, negating the need for the lawsuit.

That of course is assuming we are on the same planet where this random guy is able to get and then would give them back for some other reason. Since none of that is taking place on this planet, I don't think you have anything to worry about.

Many people have made the claims, yet your company is out here looking even more incompetent by giving cryptcracker the time of day publicly.

You've almost got me believing you guys are stupid enough to have lost the coins and done nothing about it for over a year. If that was your plan, I must say, BRAVO.

You realize that the only reason that there were highs is because those were the only coins people could get off the site?

So smart people bought doge for more than they were worth so they could get the doge out and sell them somewhere else "at a loss" because selling one doge or less than they bought it for on cryptsy left them in a better position than holding any other coins that they couldn't get off of cryptsy.

I wouldn't count on you getting anything out. The fact that your actual coins weren't the ones that were "stolen" doesn't give you more of a claim to 100% of what cryptsy owes you than anyone else who had their coins "stolen," so if there is any resolution, expect a haircut.

You should care because this story being out there shows that you aren't getting your coins back.

Either Cryptsy is putting on a show to make it seem like they are getting the coins back for some reason that won't result in you getting your coins back.

or

They are stupid enough to believe this guy who has offered no proof that he can get the coins back, and are waiting on this jabroni to get the coins back when they could be doing other things that have a chance of working to get the coins back (assuming of course someone actually stole them).

Your coins are gone because you gave them to the wrong person.

You are in this situation because you didn't do anything about the "out there" stories and bullshit reasons they gave for their "technical problems" preventing withdrawals when you could have taken a loss by moving to coins that you could withdraw.

I'm not sure what (if anything) you should be doing instead of listening to this "out there" story, but sitting back and hoping it works out will work out just as well as it did when you did this to the withdrawal problems, and all the other scams that have come before.

Very good possibility he is just a troll. real question is why cryptsy is engaging with him at all.

Why would there be any issue with that? just get the 13,000 coins, then send cryptsy 11,250, you have your fee and cryptsy can't touch it.

That works like every other strategy in the world.

it seems better because you feel like around 25% win 50% tie and 25% lose is better than 50%win/50%lose when you bet on one color or 1/38 chance win 37/38 chance lose but they are all the same.

Even if we take everything said at face value, Cryptsy has made a deal with a random person to pay him a certain amount when he gets the coins back. There has been nothing shown publicly to suggest that there is an possibility of this happening, so I'm not sure why anyone thinks anything will happen or why cryptsy has made any of this public.

Lucky number don't exist, but picking your lucky numbers is a great strategy in roulette, because no strategy works.

Obviously surrender is a good option in that situation, but that isn't allowed in many placed. Do not bother keeping track of what numbers passed online, most of those sites reshuffle the entire shoe after every hand, and counting cards doesn't really help unless you are going to go full bore and learn an entire system and keep the count for the entire shoe. It's especially useless online when they reshuffle.

Those systems and tips you call strategy people with brains call shit. They all have the same EV so they all have the same value, nothing.

Yes, it's easier to win by picking bigger groups, but you win less. there is absolutely no difference between putting 200 on any number or putting 200 on a color. It's a lot easier to win if you put it on a color, but the fact that you will win so much more if you get the number right means that the bets are exactly the same.

What have the authorities said about this deal? Or about anything really? What have you done to get the coins back besides sign a contract written by a random person who sent you a tweet?