Except for Samuel L. Jackson, I could give a fuck less if all of those celebrities went to hell.
An actor is a paid liar. Samuel is going nowhere. An actor is a paid liar? Wtf are you talking about again? ^^ Wanna share one of your strange theory again? Google it. And I get nothing. Strange, how is it that all your theories are known from you only? Simply because your life revolves around everything I say? Try again  |
|
|
|
Who should do the curating of the internet? People like you?
You ask these unrelated random questions but I feel inclined to answer them, police officers and free will be dammed! The 'internet' is a bunch of privately owned sites. Policy should be up to whoever owns the site in question. Reddit is good because there are so many communities, but I'd prefer a series of privately held forums. Reddit is good because it keeps you from having to read the worst postings. Reddit is bad because it is rule by the majority. While I believe in global warming, (lol duh) I don't believe in the majority subjugating the minority. You guys and the anti-vaccine crowd should be able to post your stuff somewhere just not wherever you desire. Bitcointalk is pretty cool in that regard and here we are. The internet 1.0 is a protocol owned by no one. If internet 2.0 is a hit people will migrate to it and leave private facebook and others behind. VPN services were a niche business in the past. Now even Google (yeah right) gives it as an option. Nothing is written in stone and paradigm shifts happen all the time. That makes bitcointalk better for both of us, better than reddit. We believe in something that's bigger than both of us |
|
|
|
People involved in crypto-currencies are an interesting lot but they all have a huge bias against accepted reality. It is conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory. I'm not saying they're anymore 'wrong' than the average Joe, but their biases in this regard are far beyond the average Joe.
Finding a hive of climate science deniers on here should be of no surprise to anyone.
Should people voicing a different opinion than yours be banned from the internet? Nope. I preferred the internet 20 years ago when it was very select, but there is no going back now. In general I am against censoring, but people have a right to not have to read nonsense, just like many other rights. 20 years ago only the bourgeois had access to the internet through a paid portal like compuserve, via a paid land line. Now with a dumb phone and $10 prepaid card you have access to information, stupid facebook, etc. Why would anyone want this kind of elitism back among us? No one is forcing you to participate in this thread. Yet you are so used to a life of servitude you cannot understand why a police officer can't help you not have the free will to not reply... Strange, but...I love it when they start projecting on others about their 'servitude etc'. My internet access was through fraudulent university access and I borrowed my first modem. I prefer an internet full of the geekiest of the geeks and not others. The internet didn't appeal to those who were not driven out of curiosity. There are reasons people like reddit etc with all their upvoting/censoring aka "curating". That reason is there is a ton of crap. Seriously though, no idea what you mean by the rambling stuff about police officers, free will, and replying or not replying in this thread. I replied to this thread quite a bit a couple years ago. I still remember some of the posters. Wilikinson, Spendulus ... still going at it. I'll move on shortly. I just like kicking and pissing on antbeds.Who should do the curating of the internet? People like you? |
|
|
|
Dropping like a rock... The end is near...  |
|
|
|
Bernie Sanders has been treated terribly by the Democrats--both with delegates & otherwise. He should show them, and run as an Independent! Sanders seems to be showing every sign of being the kind of guy who is happy to bend over and take it in the ass. The question is how many of his supporters will follow his lead. Most of them.  |
|
|
|
Except for Samuel L. Jackson, I could give a fuck less if all of those celebrities went to hell.
An actor is a paid liar. Samuel is going nowhere. An actor is a paid liar? Wtf are you talking about again? ^^ Wanna share one of your strange theory again? Google it. |
|
|
|
Well that settles everything. It was a one time chance for America, they didn't take it. Let them assume the consequences.
At least the good news is that Trump is too dumb and greedy to harm anything but his own country ^^
Do you still see a path of victory for bernie sanders? Nope but me I see a path of victory for European Union =D With or without the UK? With the UK or without it doesn't matter, what matters is that it'll be without the US! Then I am glad you'll finally do your part by paying your participation in NATO and stop being a blood sucker and have protection for free for more than 60 years... |
|
|
|
People involved in crypto-currencies are an interesting lot but they all have a huge bias against accepted reality. It is conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory. I'm not saying they're anymore 'wrong' than the average Joe, but their biases in this regard are far beyond the average Joe.
Finding a hive of climate science deniers on here should be of no surprise to anyone.
Yes, not terribly surprising. Many of us here on the bitcointalk.org forum questioned and researched the highly propagandized 'understandings' of the fiat monetary systems and that is why we are here. It is a proclivity which correlates to the questioning of other similarly propagandized 'understandings' implanted to achieve a designed effect among the plebs. Usually associated with lining the pockets of a select few at the top. You can look around and see many changes already in play from global warming and we're just getting started. Critical thought and fighting against group think is an admiral and desired trait. That doesn't mean you can blindly apply it. Once you do that, you're no better than the group-thinkers. I have yet to be aware of any sort of global conspiracy amongst actual scientists to refer to historically for comparison. (Actual scientists = those who do science for the sake of furthering humanity's understanding) Scientists are the one group of people we can trust in a general sense. They're aware of their own biases far more than any other group. A lot of the guys on here will never see a conspiracy they didn't like. If most scientists are doing this for money, they're really going about getting rich in a stupid/inefficient way. <scratches head> What else is settled in science, like Global Warming, forever? |
|
|
|
People involved in crypto-currencies are an interesting lot but they all have a huge bias against accepted reality. It is conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory. I'm not saying they're anymore 'wrong' than the average Joe, but their biases in this regard are far beyond the average Joe.
Finding a hive of climate science deniers on here should be of no surprise to anyone.
Should people voicing a different opinion than yours be banned from the internet? Nope. I preferred the internet 20 years ago when it was very select, but there is no going back now. In general I am against censoring, but people have a right to not have to read nonsense, just like many other rights. 20 years ago only the bourgeois had access to the internet through a paid portal like compuserve, via a paid land line. Now with a dumb phone and $10 prepaid card you have access to information, stupid facebook, etc. Why would anyone want this kind of elitism back among us? No one is forcing you to participate in this thread. Yet you are so used to a life of servitude you cannot understand why a police officer can't help you not have the free will to not reply... Strange, but... |
|
|
|
Except for Samuel L. Jackson, I could give a fuck less if all of those celebrities went to hell.
An actor is a paid liar. Samuel is going nowhere. |
|
|
|
People involved in crypto-currencies are an interesting lot but they all have a huge bias against accepted reality. It is conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory. I'm not saying they're anymore 'wrong' than the average Joe, but their biases in this regard are far beyond the average Joe.
Finding a hive of climate science deniers on here should be of no surprise to anyone.
Should people voicing a different opinion than yours be banned from the internet? |
|
|
|
Well that settles everything. It was a one time chance for America, they didn't take it. Let them assume the consequences.
At least the good news is that Trump is too dumb and greedy to harm anything but his own country ^^
Do you still see a path of victory for bernie sanders? Nope but me I see a path of victory for European Union =D With or without the UK? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
