first of all
campaign fear: 'mandatory vaccinations before end 2020'

reality check. there is no mandatory vaccination plan.
  1. there is no vaccine yet
  2. there wouldnt even be enough vaccines to even offer it to everyone
  3. not everyone needs them

..
second of all
campaign win: when governments try to debunk claims of mandatory vaccinations by saying they wont happen
the cults will class that as their win where they fought hard for that result.

meanwhile reality is that it was never even a battle to fight. and cults just want to look like they done something and then ask for donations/buy there herbs and supplements

...
whats next
cults advocating to cull all unicorns.. and when theres an announcement that there are no unicorns alive.. cults class that as their advocacy winning that fight

and whats missing

those 'home/birth' 'home schooled' parents who dont believe in medicine .. dont go to doctors to even get their kid diagnosed as autistic. they instead shelter them at home and just call them their special lil munchin and try feeding them wheatgrass soup thinking it will cure them

thus numbers of unvaccinated kids wont show as having much/any medical history because they avoid doctors to not have their actual illnesses recorded
these parents are the ones that dont want to have their kids branded/defined/diagnosed


EG
(lets play badeckers warped mindset)
if you avoid all traffic camera's and bought a car with cash. you can be studied that traffic lights and credit card receipts cause car accidents because only people who bought cars/witnessed by cameras get into accidents. and theres no proof you even have a car nor ever been on the road.. so your immortal to car accidents

.... until you actually do get in a car accident off camera with your cash bought car.
then you will deny its a car accident but instead a 'freeman vehicle of conveyence' thus deny any accident occured.

but reality is your in pain with injuries due to an incident that happened with someone elses vehicle hitting yours

yes you will avoid going to a hospital to get treatment.. but your still in pain. .. and ofcourse stil denying you are injured because there is no medical diagnoses or addmission record or proof of an accident..

your warped mind will be trying to shout that you are 100% perfectly fine and there is no proof otherwise.. while reality is your bleeding and limping

no matter how you word play to try to avoid the scope of reality, doesnt make your reality the real one

and thats the funny part
your cultish freeman esq  amateur brain cant even comprehend that your freeman script are not even following 'common' practices of reality.. although they try to fool you into thinking their scripts are common amungst the majority of world population

£0.99-£1.11 as 12% variance
they dont do 'full service' or any 'tips' or try to charge extra for using a card vs cash

the 12% variance it is very much based on factors of what 'company' its associated with which dictates how much control they have over costs. sometimes about convenience. sometimes about custmer loyalty

EG petrol station would charge the higher end but then offer £0.05 a lire discount if they show they shopped in the affiliated store that day
others are cheaper because they are affiliated with a super market and just want people to use them more often(bulk buy&loyalty)

well heres one for you

even after the fuel drop due to the stock market goof a few months ago
fuel in the UK is
~£1 a litre
=£3.78(uk) a gallon
=$4.72(us) a gallon

enjoy that thought when next complaining that US is expensive.. its not

guess you are also ignorant of the documents.
heck i did even screen shot it because certain people couldnt even page count a pdf file..(or used it as an ignorant excuse to not even read the content of the links)
maybe read it first. and see the actual words

also your other little dun goofed

ill quote you the rest of the page
which. thanks to doomad .. debunks nutilduh
its not about the coins. or amount of coins or who should pay out the coins or when or how
its not about claiming CSW is a username 'satoshi'
its about.. wait for it.. take a breathe.. bitcoin IP

so dont make out that i am saying this case is about coins.
so dont make out im saying this case is about trying to claim that is was CSW physical person at the keyboard writing posts under the username satoshi

its actually about the IP rights to the invention named bitcoin.

have a nice day though..

one last thought
ill leave this last stick on your camp fire for you lot to huddle around and stay warm
if the MIT licence was so protective. why just a few years did gmax do these two things
1. promote a DPL
2. forum rage dev's who made clients that simply didnt write the MIT licence

if it doesnt matter after the fact 'because prior art'.. 'because MIT licence 2009'. then why did he do those two acts.
(hint: because he knows that patent trolls can still SLAPP people for years)

there are ways to allow offering identification 'permissions' and withdraw them again

we all know the government know where everyone is. they are the department that hand out birth certificates/ social security numbers.

now imagine you certify those records as a key-pair
imagine this first layer as you having your name/hometown logged a pubkey. where you own the only private key in secret

when someone wants you to prove your identity. you then make a message saying .
"i validate i am who i am to company X
from July 6th2020 to july 20th2020"
for purpose of:
postal mail
emails 
"
and you sign it and hand over the signed message
(remember all message signatures are unique)

they can now validate you are who you are. but only that one is dedicated to them for a spefic time that they can legally use it under your permission. as they have proof you gave them permission
..
now take things like junk mail.
imagine instead of a postage stamp. there is a corner of envelope that has to include the desired recipients signed message in QR code format.
and if the expiry has passed the postal company just doesnt bother to send on the junk mail.

signing a credit card purchase that authorises you to spend X on date X
that helps them know your not a card cloner as each signed message is unique while still verifiable as you.
it helps avoid multiple payments on different days trying to use the same date X message. you know that its their mistake as they cant prove you authorised the other payments on other days

things like then getting random postal mail from other companies. you can request the permission proof and see which signed message they are using. which then tells you who sold them your message
(EG if company X sold facebook your 6thjuly/20th july. and facebook used the company X permissioned message to send you junk.
you can then punish facebook and company X

the main problem about sharing identity between companies isnt that they do it. its that there is no way to link spamjunkmail company number 125 all the way back to the source company X that sold their records
this way. you can. and also limit how long it can be used for legally

IRA has not in the last fortnight asked for 410k coins payout
he asked for default judgement in his favour that CSW/DAVE were bitcoins creator

meaning: a win for ira and loss to CSW in this case.. is actually a win to CSW in his long con game
lets be more exact. losing the case and just paying court costs.. well thats the price of doing business
and its something i bet CSW planned out years ago as the cost to receive the title he wants. and thats what his 'money guys' are funding right now. they would have been promised future riches from his story exclusive and his future patent trolls.. if they invest and fund his case now.(same promise he made to calvin basically)

decisions about who buys out who from the partnership is for later speculative discussions way outside the scope of this case. so its not about the 410k coins. this case is about the partnership IP and establishing CSW as part of bitcoins creation. BOTH IRA AND CSW want that claim certified by a judge

again (avoid repeating in new posts)
this case right now. in this reality:
is about claiming rights to the partnership of bitcoins IP/creation.
after this judgement if judgement is in IRA favour. all that is included in the verdict is that there is a partnership and IRA gets to be part of FUTURE asset decisions

if your expecting this trial to be the trial that will see payout/no pay out. you wont.
thats for other speculative future scenarios of flip floppers

and any smart person knows. if ira is only after money. he would gain more working with CSW on patent trolling than he would trying to get compensation from CSW

in this whole topic you have not once talked about the topic of the case of IRA/CSW or referenced any documents or paragraphs of documents

i have
and its clear BOTH IRA and CSW BOTH want a judge to validate that the partners were part of bitcoins creation.
it is other buddies of your that pretend that the nail in the coffin is the imaginary future cases where ira asks for damages.
its of your other buddies that flip flop(your trick) that MIT licence is an immortal shield. but then have been advertising their own DPL which have highlighted the whole risk of SLAPP lawsuits

heck it doesnt seem they even bother reading what a SLAPP is. to know its not about getting to the end of a trial to get a verdict. but to cause issues for years before even getting to trial and making requests that work in their favour BEFORE trial

if you cant see the documents or dont want to actually get involved in the topic. then find another topic.
because so far you have added ZERO relevance to the topic
the rest of the community know CSW games. they seen him saying how he wants to SLAPP loads of devs
but it is funny how certain people think it is actually fine to let a judge rule that CSW is bitcoins creator.
funny amazes me how much you guys are happy if bitcoin fails or causes tensions in the community.

next time atleast try to bring some relevance to the topic and not just be a flip flop troll

few years ago Gmax and his (ex)boss were trying to sell/promote the community into adopting a blockstream licence under the guise it would protect them

kinda funny really
(ex) = unsure. because retirement seems to no longer be linked to when they stop being involved daily. but when their very last possible response months later saying 'i already moved on' is. (in the eyes of gmax, anyway)

in the past i have owned up to my mistakes.
but funny thing is when your club of people try a little too hard to avoid the actual topic/debate and instead want to make it about my grammar or my opinion, or try to use presumed and probably statements, or even flip floppy statements to make it sound like a debunk. your group are the ones muddying the water.

when satoshi emailed gavin. it was not when he was leaving. its when he informed gavin he ALREADY left
again it wasnt satoshi singing 'im leaving, on the next train' (present)
it was 'ive moved on'(past)

let me word it this way
satoshis 'trigger' date for pulling back and not involved in the day-to-day of bitcoin was december 2010
again the trigger was in december. gavin didnt even get any CIA request in december
what was getting satoshi triggered in december was things like wikileaks and how loads of people were becoming to dependant on satoshi

so when he informed people he already retired out of bitcoin was april

its like retiring from a job. and months later your co workers ask if your alright because they havnt seen you in the office for a while and then you inform them you already retired. then remembering you still have the namebadge and the key to the executive bathroom in your pocket so you hand them back.
your retirement date is not the last communication you make with your co-workers
otherwise we could debate your communication dates of blockstream and your supposed retirement date.. (get my point)
or should we use the date of when you months later were telling people you moved on and no longer part of blockstream as your new retirement date.
if i remember you mentioned it like 10 months later in some conversations
(see my point)

........
anyway the flip flop strategy of trying to muddy the water about patent trolls
gmax involvement with DPL infers that the MIT/prior art would only cover the early versions of bitcoin. but blockstreams patents/DPL would cover latter incarnations/variants
thus opens the gates for patent trolls to fight such.
(ding ding. is anyone seeing the attack vector here)

can you atleast admit your mistakes that either:
MIT/prior art is not immortal hense the possible need for DPL you previously advertised years ago..
or admit
that a DPL is never needed as bitcoin and all its updates are protected forever.. like you suggest now
pick one.. flip or flop?

you cant say bitcoin is locked tight from any legal battle.. and then in same breathe say certain things can lead to patent trolling so need something like a DPL
(again do you get my point)

i do love the flip floppy statements you made, seems to be a well known strategy to just try muddying the water and not staying ontopic for a certain few people that are in your social group


CSW himself years ago was posting how he wants to fight those making latter alterations

yes i know he doesnt have much to fight on such as his 'i own the databases' which in itself is a laugh.. but in a courtroom wont get him instantly dismissed should a judgement be made that the IP is CSW/IRA's

a patent troll is not about getting their claim to a trial judgement to win. its about having the mere relevance enough to not get auto dismissed a day after filing the claim and try to make requests that happen in their favour before any judgement.
again as CSW/IRA case wasnt auto dismissed and has been playing out for a couple years while the world knows CSW wasnt involved as satoshi. just proves that its no auto-dismiss thing.
otherwise this 2 year case drama would not have even begun

if CSW and ira can keep a case going for 2 years without even having the bitcoin IP legitimised as theirs. imagine the games to be played if they do

'you presume'

yet lets be more specific.. satoshi gave the alert key to gavin way earlier
infact it was not even a package deal where you got one too at the same time.. you joined github later.. in like june 2011.. if i recall
so i dont know why you felt the need to try to make yourself look like you were one of the chosen

by this i mean you didnt have any direct contact with satoshi in the first place. you got a 'hand-me-down' from someone else

also funny how satoshi stopped making posts and code updates in december 2010

satoshi also made gavin the main contact on bitcoin.org
satoshi gave gavin access to the sourceforge too

so when satoshi told hearne he moved on
it was past tense..
not 'i will be moving on'
or 'im about to move on'
he moved on long before april

......

as for the MIT licence.. real funny thing is
not so long ago Gmax and his boss were promoting their own patent/licence
even saying as much as
"What can still be patented are the incremental improvements, complementary technologies, or additional applications of the technologies that are currently being developed. We think the open strategy has been a good one, and we want to ensure that our work can be used to further open development, like Bitcoin itself, rather than risking it being locked up by short-term opportunists."

and thats where the lightbulb moment should be.
patent trolling anyone that tries to patent the 'incremental improvements  complementary technologies, or additional applications of the technologies that are currently being developed'

i did find it funny how Gmax says everyones protected by MIT but was happily promoting a DPL
wouldnt a DPL be dismissed due to MIT licence.. if we use Gmax's same logic

..
as for gmax's assumptions that cases get instantly dismissed as frivolous
well this topics case has been going on for 2 years
yes we know its frivolous.. but it was not instantly dismissed 2 years ago
so assuming that a judge would just throw a case out. is a bad assumption
as this case is showing clearly.
2 years of drama and its not even got to the trial stage but wasted many peoples time in the process

sorry had to correct that. (LN doesnt use 8 decimal units, thus not bitcoin)
you do know that while a route is being set up the HTLC within LN which are temporary cater for the balance at that time and organise it so that if 2 routes are trying to pass at any one time they both cant double spend.. these temporary contracts are millisat measures.
the actual payment complete is a separate contract process. which is the 'possible broadcast' one



yep many routes might already have used their millisat contracts/balance on other routes and therefore not able to cater to new routes.
many might want to pay regularly but those on the routes time out. and thus not available next time
this is more reason to not put in huge hoards for months. because it may just end up being locked for months but no way to spend.
all leading to the only possible 'guarantee' of service is to stake funds into 'factories' AKA bank2.0

where as BTC which is the whole point of it. was to have CHEAP value transfer without middlemen. without resistance or politics making financial decisions of who can and cant pay another person.

plus the other flaws that can just steal funds from their channel partners.

LN does not deserve the same credit or recognition or some trust bases as BTC. not only due to the flaws but because it doesnt even offer the same security nor the same redundancy nor the same protections

im all for people developing other stuff. but trying to fool people into saying that it IS btc. even though there is no blockchain and its not even measured in 8 decimal units of account. just bewilders me how either naive some people are that havent even used it yet but advertise it soo much (windfury is obvious) and those that might know the secret corporate 'banking' agenda. who just troll and kiss ass to certain people thinking that they can continue duping people into promises of riches and unlimited unhindered utility.

it just amazes me how callous people can be

many factors at play

1. if the fuel is mined/refined in country vs imported
2. how many gas stations to dilute the HQ profits. EG 100 vs 1000 means the thousand can offer slight cheaper prices.
3. location of the gas station. even a quarter mile might have a different lease value
4. tax amounts. again state by state and also if imported or locally refined.
5. distance from nearest distribution point
EG if shell is just 50 miles from nearest local point. and mobil is 150miles. it costs mobil slightly more to refiill
6. how busy the station is
a gas station that only requires one tanker a week vs gas station that requires 3 tankers a week can get better deals for bulk buying

problem is that there are not just 2 opinions of just centre left and centre right

each 50 states have different ethics, morals, desires and needs
those in NY are more of the capitalist money guys. they want freedoms to take all oppertunities to increase wealth. able to create monopolies and franchise their idea's under licence with incomes received by all that use their idea..
but they also want all the legislation restrictions that oppose freedoms to protect their idea's
even they cant agree on freedoms or restrictions


yet other states in the farming regions care more about land and freedom to control their own crops and not have capitalists manage them. helping their neighbours but not wanting to manage their neighbours
but they also want all the insurances and assurances that if they have a bad crop someone is their to manage and protect them.
again. cant agree

then theres the freedom states that just want to have barbecues go skiiing and surfing without a care in the world. they just wanna do a good enough job that pays for a fun happy lifestyle
they want to be able to go to coffee shops without big queues, but dont want to work in the coffee shop to help with the queue.. again they cant agree

there are jsut some jobs that no one wants to do. the 12 hour back labouring jobs. and so they want the freedom to import staff from other places todo the work. but at same time they dont want those immigrants to stay or have freedoms themselves.

which then comes to the human rights of travel/shelter and slavery. deciding one group of people is better than another human and only some groups are classed as full humans that get rights

.....
trying to get such diverse mindsets too unite into just 2 factions is harder than the article writer pretends to make it

quantum mechanics vs quantum computing

mechanics is about understanding something at the more accurate nano/pico level of the smaller pieces inside the pieces known at the macro/micro level

for instance what we deem ice as a solid object at the macrolevel
is water particles not moving and compressed together at the micro level
is h2o molecules at the nano level
and is energy waves compressed together to form barriers of resistance/interference at the pico level

understanding things more accurately at smaller levels allows not only more accurate results. but also allows tuning devices to be more precise to even fit more devices into a smaller area without losing quality

things like voltage
at the macro level of a 0.1v accuracy rating. a voltage of 0.0924v would get rounded up to 0.1v
its not saying the voltage at any given split second is both 0.0924 and 0.1 at the same time. its just the observation method affects what the result is because the observation method is not accurate.
also a volt meter might actually use 0.0004 to measure and round. so although the voltage is 0.0924
when measuring it then a 4 decimal accuracy voltmeter would read it as 0.0920 yet as i said its actually 0.0924 if you can account for the dip due to the measuring method.
again its not that the actual voltage is both 0.0920 and 0.0924. its about understanding all the things involved to get a better more accurate result.
..
super positioning is not some new universe cross reality multiple position theory. its at the macro level vs micro level in terns of computing just accuracy where the measuring/observation device is interpretting and rounding it off to something it can recognise
say we play with 0 or 1 volt.. due to inteference nothing is absolute 0 or absolute 1. so when no power is on the cable might be picking up 0.2v of interference from neighbouring cables.
and when charging 1v through the cable it loses 0.2
1.0
0.8                     /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
0.6                    |
0.4                    |
0.2\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
0.0
so macro would round it as 0 or 1...
so micro would round it as
0.2 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 1 0.8 1
same voltage in both cases.. but accuracy of 2 different meters of
0-1v over 2 seconds.
vs
decimal accuracy at 20x10^ths of a second(2seconds)

and its this that QC computers are playing with the most
not only more acurate measuring but also cancelling out the interference so that instead of 2 gates 0-1  current generation QC is playing with 4 gates 0-1-2-3
0.30
0.25^{\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/}
0.20                    
0.15_{\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/}
0.10                    
0.05^{\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/}
0.00_{\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/}

where the gaps in between are precively chosen so that they are at their different levels of energy not going to interfer or be confused/rounded to the next options

imagine it like going from a volt meter that can only measure 0.0v as binary0 and 0.1v as binary one
and then in the same size transister. QC can now measure 2 decimal
so 0.00v=0        0.05v=1        0.13v=2    0.26c=3

now instead of base 2 math they can have base 4 with each transister being upto 4 instead of 2
so it allows Hex(base 16) to be stored in 2transisters instead of 4 transisters

do it with less energy too as they are now using microvolts instead if milivolts

this 4 positions allows for more options
instead of just north/south true/false yes/no and then getting confused if the voltage fluctuates to decide to round something in the middle as a north or south, yes or no they can be more precise and call it east and west, sometimes/mosttimes, left/right

so now they are working in 3d vectors much faster then 2d vectors.
this makes elliptic curve math much faster as it can interpret updown left right faster than trying to get binarys limited one transister: up down and a separate transister: left right to figure out vectors

..
anyway back to mechanics.
by knowing things at the pico level like everything is just a wave ultimately.. depending on how many waves and their frequency and strength factor into how much interference/resistance. they can find new ways of deciding what 'materials' to use that have least interference set on them so that they can make smaller transisters and not have it over heat due to density of multiple transisters
they can also work out what interference things are still occurring so they can math them out of the equation of measuring the value the transister holds or combat the interference with their own wave generation to cancel it out(noise cancelling headphone idea)

right now they want a QC computer at below freezing because at that temperature no heat is interfering with their results. so if they take a regular reading of something they know the result before passing it through the QC computers. and then try it again at higher temperatures. they can work out what waves are appearing to then design wave cancelling methods. or just mathematically substitute it out. by predicting how the interference may change a result and correcting that result in lieu of the interference
 
hoping slowly they can get to a point of still having accurate readings but at a more fashionable temperature that people can reproduce at home.
this side of things will take along time

meanwhile at the most accurate resul temperatures. doing other science
they can play around with this 3d dimension mapping instead of 2 dimensions. and create new algorythms and get results of complex 3d puzzles that 2d binary just cant really handle

its ability to solve 2d binary problems is just efficiency. because a binary problem with a binary solution has to have binary logic. and as such is just 2x efficiency
but vectors and eliptic curves are not binary problems. they are 3d vector problems. which QC can handle many many times faster.

but with that said.
bitcoins ECDSA is a still not going to be a 2 second brute force

imagine it this way if you were to try brute forcing all 256bit possibilities
115792089237316000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. 00
at a pace of 1billion tries a second. would take you this many years
/1bill/60/60/24/365=
3,671,743,063,080,800,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
in binary
and still many thousands of years in quantum

all the other talk about alternate dimensions and teleportation across the planet and other stuff is more done to fool people into thinking its al mysterious magic so the guys playing with it can get ahead and master it without much competition..

the 'spooky stuff' is interesting for other things. but in QC its not what they are needing /using
take the spooky about affect something one side and the equal opposit reaction happens at the other instantly
its not spooky
they just want you to think if you have a bath tub of water and splash at one side. usually it takes a few seconds for the ripple to reach the other side. and they found new ways to make the water move the other side instantly.
the trick hear is not to think about the water on one side as lots of individual parts that if you tap one part its partner on other side gets it.. but instead everything around is all connected. and if you tilt the bathtub you instantly notice the water is at a deeper water line one one side and shallower at the other.. no delay
..
like the ocean tide when the tide is in at one side of the planet it is out at the other side.
its not the single lapping wave being in 2 places where the wave at one end is in direct communication with a wave at the other end telling it to do the exact opposite. its the fact that the whole volume of water acts as one. 'object'
same with light.
wave particles in a beam of light at macro/micro level are treated as lots of little 'photons' but at the pico level you see they are all joined together by waves not normally seen at macro/micro. so when you think your splitting a beam in half and only affecting one side. thinking there is no way it is able to reflect back and then down the other directions.. what your not realising is the interference is affecting the non visible wave at pico level which then affects the visible wave at the other side
EG less white light interferes with the pico level gamma wave thus the gamma wave on the other side reacts causing it to affect the white light spectrum on its end
exciting stuff..
but this interference and stuff is what QC computers want to try limiting and separating so that they can have more precise readings to allow more options in a smaller confined space.

other exciting revelations
take splitting atom. is not the image if cutting an apple in half to see the core.
its about neutralising the energy waves that form the 'shell' of an atom so they can utilise the gamma wave inside that links the shell waves together and holds them together normally

its actually some fun stuff once you get your mind around it and debunk the sci fi magic/universe buzzwords used to keep only a select few ahead of the competitive edge

idiots above cant actually bother reading so find excuses not to read. like be grammar nazis and just call it white noise
totally avoiding reading it because it opposes their cult influencers opinion.

it makes me laugh

ok lets handle this lttle diddy

imagine there are 5 types of antibody. some proactive, some reactive

lets just concentrate on the 2 types
the way the proactive ones work is by the antibodys surface having a wiggly outter surface. imagine it like a puzzle piece
your body has billions of different antibodies variants but lets imagine in anyone time there might be 6000 main types. always present in significant numbers 150k of each main type and then just a couple dozen thousand of less needed types.

when a virus comes in. the antibody that matches the edges of the virus joins onto it. and thus stops the virus from joining the edge of a lung cell wall.

the tail of the antibody knows it has a successful lock and then breaks the tail off to tell the body to produce more..

your body then goes from just 150k per billion. to 500milion per billion
and then when the threat is gone. it then slowly goes down to 150k numbers. and if after a few years of no seasonal attack it can go down even further to dozens

going from 500m to 150k is normal. it doesnt mean your no longer immune. it just means theres no current threat... your body can handle the residual mini battles of invaders without hassle
your body remembers and keeps a few around as a blueprint to make more when needed.

..
the best advice is to not allow millions of viral particles to invade yur body when you only have a dozen antibodies to defend
just like any battle its about numbers
if the invaders can get passed the defensive gates of the nose and throat. they can then attack the lungs

if enough are attacking lung cells then your body temperature rises as a strategy, your body floods the lungs as a strategy while it tries to create the reactive antibodies

imagine a sick person is coughing up 1million particles.
at 6inches (kissing/hugging distance) you wil take in 500k.. at 3foot(1metre) you will take in 30k and at 6 foot(2metre) you will take in 3k

so to avoid 1mill invaders standing at 2metre will only incur 3k
which is why they say 15mins at 2metre is the same as a single breath at 6inches
one breath every 3 seconds (20 a min) so 300breaths=1mill

wearing a surgical mask is 95% effective so at 6 inches 1mill instantly becomes 50k. meaning at 1metre is 1500. and 2metres is 150. so super effective
however jsut normal cloth covering is ~20% helpful
so 6inch=800k 1metre= 24k and 2metre=2.4k

thus cloth facemask is not much different than no mask.
more important is the distance
EG
cloth mask 1metre =24k
no mask 2metre=3k
distance is 7-8x better than the 0.2x mask/no mask at same distance

..
because this virus is new . people just do not have the antibody in any large number that fit the viral puzzle piece.. so they have to rely on a healthy immune system that has enough just totally random antibodies with completely random wiggly edges in the hope that by pure natural luck they have enough randomness that some fit. and then their body can produce more. and remember that these new ones are now important blueprints rather than just previously random design. and keeps enough around to easily block and create more quicker than the virus invader numbers

ive tried to dumb it down as much as possible.

think about getting 3k invaders from jsut walking passed someone for 3 seconds at 2metres
your nose and throat 12k random luck defenders kill it off. before it gets to the lungs
now imagine being 1metre and get 30k. your random luck 12k antibodies block a third. but now 18k can get into your lungs

not so bad with 20k cells per mm . and lung being 50,000mm lung surface area
its only 0.002%damage. and not really going to make your temperature rise
but getting 30k every 3 seconds on a 10min bus journey
is 0.4%. and this would increase your temperature by maybe half a degree overall
and if the reactive antibodies cant kill off them 18k that get into the lungs faster then every breath. those viruses then multiply within your body.
thus a trojan attack of invaders coming in. and invaders already inside breaking out

so again. just to be safe. stay at a distance and dont mingle for too long

ETFbitcoin: earn more by charging more..(facepalm)

yea seems very elementary school economics.. but

if other routes are charging less. people just wont use your route. meaning you end up getting less/nothing
because your just too expensive

imagine A wants to pay J 10 hops away

all a person has to do is strategically place himself with just a couple channels
EG                 5
          /-------Z-------\  
      A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J
         1  1 1  1 1 1  1 1
now it doesnt matter if independant node D wants to try to earn more by upping his fee above 1
now it doesnt matter if D wants to just earn loyalty and reputation by downing to 0 fee

A will still prefer 5sat A-B-Z-I-J .. compared to 7-8-9 sat abcdefghij(depending on what D charges)

oh and one more trick
Z does not actually have to be another channel linked between B and I
by owning both B and I the user can just manage B and I and just move funds from I<>J's promisory contract as soon as A moves funds from A<>B
 
yep Z is not a real channel just a person charging 5sat to aggregate A<>B I<>J funds


imagine it like this

A    K               I
  \  /                 \  
   B        E    G    J
  /  \     /  \  / \  /
L    C--D   F    H

B doesnt need a direct channel B to I. he can aggregate separetly with no routing
he can also up the fee through B-C to make it less appealing to go BCDFGHJ
another trick is jsut to fake that B-C has no spare fund capacity. thus just rule out a BCDEFGHJ route

too many people dont do real research and instead just become publicists for a popular influencer..

and thats is the biggest 'first world problem'.. no thought. just blind admiration/faith 'coz he popular'
its these youtube influencers and popularity contests that create more cults.
peter realises he is playing the cult game, recruiting blind followers. but points fingers in other directions to avoid revealing he is the cult leader to the idiots following him

..
as for obvious lack of research take peters belief that btc has no 'intrinsic value'
firstly PoS coins has no upfront cost of creation. PoS coins have no upfront intrinsic value. which is the same thing of if gold could be mined with a tea-spoon and coffee filter paper in everyones back yard for $0.50 a ounce. gold would only be selling at ~$1 a ounce not $1k an ounce

cost of mining is just one element of intrinsic value. and btc actually has some. (albeit some altcoins dont)

there were posts and emails of satoshis actual words.. where satoshi was also realising too many people were relying on satoshi as a decision maker..
also things like wikileaks accepting BTC was one of the last few posts satoshi made an opinion as being negative for bitcoin before no longer writing on the forum

need we forget the actual time line of events. and not the speculation

EG
way way before april 20th satoshi already left.
april 20th Mike hearne asked if he was coming back
april 20th satoshi said he moved onto other projects but keys were safe in gavins hands

april 27th gavin said he was preparing to talk do a talk at a CIA conference

so satoshi left before any CIA drama

edit to note the trolling below
majority of my psts have been about the legal strategy CSW is playing
but a certain group of people have been trying to discuss me..
seems they cant actually think about the topic and instead want to just be trolls

oh well ill stick to the actual document words and the actual details.
ill leave them to be trolls. seems they have no other hobbies nor friends outside of this forum