since becoming a BTC hodler my sleep has not been good, maybe I'm still in the process of becoming a strong hand

4. Click "Create Wallet".

I suggest sharing the list of usernames you get from your email with the other whitelisters and immediately request theymos for a ban if someone's sending requests to all of you at once.

Don't forget about hilariousandco's alt account .... You will probably have to stare at the phone screen for a very long time publishing posts to overtake his second account.

1137579 120694 335088 379487 1099980 1285797 364070 382413 507936 521899 976210 1852120 465017 787736

I reviewed my previous post. It does have similarities with the post pointed out by icopress.

The DSA content I posted was not copied directly from the link he pointed out.

I do not quite understand the purpose of posting handwritten calculations, since looking at these fuzzy images, it is impossible to distinguish anything.

Plot twist2: @Theymos is @o_e_l_e_o

Can I see my own Merit graph?

Posts 2 (or more) profiles and I'll get you a graph. Please use this format with only userIDs:

⭐Name: WhaleMixer

I had no idea about the issues, I thought is it safe to use them since I found the website on this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827109.0

The fact is that I checked how they work with Monero, this is the only mixer that can do it.

#2 - Monero

Monero is not a magic black box which provides perfect anonymity! If you use eg. flyp.me to buy XMR and then quickly sell this XMR on flyp.me again, it is blatantly obvious to flyp.me what you've done (if they keep logs), both due to the amounts and the specific Monero inputs used. In order to get decent privacy, you have to do something like this:
 1. Convert BTC to XMR (using your own Monero wallet, not a hosted wallet).
 2. In two or more transactions of random amounts, move XMR from that wallet to a different wallet/account.
 3. Optionally, you can repeat the above step with additional wallets/accounts for greater anonymity.
 4. Preferably in two or more transactions of random amounts, convert the XMR in your last wallet in the chain to BTC.
 
Ideally, all of the above should be performed over as long a period of time as you can tolerate.

 - Pros: Possibly the best anonymity, especially if you're able to stay within the XMR ecosystem to some extent
 - Cons: You should use Tor with Monero, but you have to set this up manually; it's all more difficult; you're exposed to exchange rate risk; transaction fees may be significant

- User: kxwhakexk
- Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
- Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/
~
I will say in the words of pooya87 "It is not your English, there are fundamental flaws in what you explain. Maybe you should avoid trying to explain to others things you don't fully understand yourself", especially when the user is trying to explain something to someone without specifying a link to the source.

I am not shocked that a power that controls everyone's movement would want to ban something

you shouldn't have deleted your first post, also this thread needs to stay here.
just because your problem is solved positively this thread should stay, just like negative cases.

Limiting transactions below 10,000 euros

I'm required to pay taxes only on the fiat I withdraw from exchanges, so the agencies may not know certainly the amount of my holdings.
If in 5 years I want to cash in all my crypto, will they consider me a terrorist?

But what I would be interested to know especially from more knowledgeable people like you is if you think this will be implemented and if it will indeed greatly limit the privacy and ability to transact for users who have their funds in hardware or paper wallets and don't want to identify themselves.

I would gladly give away the privilege of pseudonymity if it can prevent terrorist funding and money laundering from using crypto

Instead of having multiple email addresses for each person who can do the whitelisting, why don't you guys create a shared account that you will all have access to?

Wait I think I'm missing something, how does that make abandoned accounts?

One hundred and twenty-second week paid.

I would like to suggest the default message that request a fee for whitelisting should also come with an info of this development.

For some reasons this might need a bit of clarity by LoyceV because, my idea of Vouching for someone brings me to the point of standing in for a shortee or like putting in your foot to say, I trust and what ever effect that might arise from this user can be pinned on me. I really hope this isn't the case because, humans do change and the user you vouched for might be good today but turns to something else tomorrow.

Another issue I'm finding with Vouching someone is the fact that, from the way the forum works, you automatically project yourself to be studied against that user for the build up of a relationship. Either as an alt or merit wise and any evil at all. It doesn't seem so idea to me should tred this part.

This is the same as saying it's a personal judgment thing

there should be some sort of requirements to be a voucher, so everybody would have a chance.

Tagging a defaulter? Like oh yeh this user abused the whitelist system? Is it? Or is there something I'm getting wrong about your answer?

Do you know why we get whitelisted for all accounts? I thought that the link would only appear to newbie members, in other words what is the point of whitelisting high rank members.