ancient people didnt have ideal society
tribes battled each other all the time
and i guarantee you back then more dogs were eaten

these days we are more diverse.. but still want others to pay attention to a small groups voice
take vegans. they are not happy just to eat veg. they ant other people to eat veg too and will get angry and aggressive if we ignore them

its the drone vs diverse problem

drones all want the same thing, it may make everyone content and settled that everything is equal and everyone gets things the same.. but when demand for one common thing is questioned then there is those that want that one thing more then the other.
whether its money, resources, land, or status

diverse all want different things, it may make everyone not want the same things thus allow for more variety and less 'demand' of a certain resource.. some people like coastal property, some like urban property some like courtyside/outback property.
however diversity means not everyone will agree and can cause arguments in area's where a set single choice/option is trying to be made

wallets by standard dont just program themselves to suddenly accept a NFC imput and recognise it and prompt for questions
the wallet would need to be programmed by someone to interpret/react to a certain imput and activate a function in the wallet software they program

so with this said you can encrypt a private key. and put it on a nfc
and then do all the complicated stuff on the wallet software.

there are many options
like have the wallet software require multiple NFC inputs and a passphrase

EG
1 nfc input can be for a 'hotwallet' that only contains daily spend amount. and requires 2 nfc inputs for your main hoard.
that way when you are at home you can move a small amount of hoard to a small value address. because at home you have a NFC you keep at home and an NFC on your keyring you carry with you.
then when out and about only having the keyring with you. you can only access the small address

EG
wallet requires 2 passphrases
mothers maiden name and first girlfriends name for instance. along with the NFC

heck you can even make it so the passphrase encrypts to a certain latitude/longitude range. meaning people would need to know a certain location you ping on a map to get the decryption to be successful

..
in short the data on the NFC chip is not that important.
but how the device interpreted it and encodes/decodes it

so care less about the NFC and think about the ways in which you can add as much random/multiple input 'salt' into the encryption. to reduce the risk of someone getting to your stash unless they are in your house and know your secret holiday spot you fantasise about visiting as well as your mothers birth surname and your ex girlfriend

i am laughing
but ill bullet point the comedy
* tash wants to post a article from a faux media
* the article thinks the covid test is just the PCR part.
* the article thinks there is no gold standard.

let my number the fails
1) tash cant cite real science document saying the same thing so resorts to faux media
2) the PCR part multiplies a virus that EXISTS. and if it didnt exist there would be nothing to multiply.. after that. its then tested to see what virus it is. tash wants to think the test is purely "multiplying it" and nothing more is done
3) they actually do have and have had samples from as early as december/january. and they compared them and identified whats special about the viruses.
then they created methods of testing these things more quickly and accurately
oh and i must add that many different countries researched different approaches and done it in different labs ..
and all came to the same 'gold standard' via trial in february/march and error in december/january
this is why at first it appeared there were no cases in france in december/january. but when they actualy got a good gold standard months later and retested previous samples that diagnositically had the symptoms but no available test. they realised those in december/january did actually have it

yep in recent months they found someone sick in december that was france's patient zero
same occured in retrospect in california and in new york

heck they even have the ability to contact trace and look at those peoples travel history and work out that the west cost of america got it via passengers from china direct.
and that the east coast patient zero got it from europe and europe got it from china before that

this is why in january/february some tests and some poor countries were not good at detecting the virus.. but by march onwards there became the gold standard.

seems tash has the same mental impairment badecker has. where they are stuck only reading faux media. not researching the facts and trying to pretend we are not in June, but instead stuck in a scenario of january

oh well it has been a good laugh reading these idiots thoughts

the white house is just a house..
the house does not give him power.
if he loses then he simply is then tresspassing. and get evicted by the secret service

the legal documents /inauguration ceremony gives an individual the power to be president. and the person that wins gets that.

so just tresspassing/squatting does not make you 'potus' or  commander-in-chief of a country

seems you really are that ignorant and just want to avoid whats actually said


...
well here goes .. again
this time showing citing.. and showing what im proclaiming.. debunking your page number theory all in one pic



the genius of modern technology.. one image explains it all

oh look there are 28 pages.. oops your mistake.. ill say it once more. 28 pages . debunking your 26 page limit theory
oh look its iras side wanting the court to legalise that CSW was part of bitcoins creation(1)
oh look its iras side wanting the court to legalise that CSW owns all the coins he pretends to own(2)
oh look its iras side wanting the court to legalise that CSW get the patent IP rights of bitcoin(3)

and this request by ira.. is the 'punishment' (sanction) ira wants CSW to receive
..
next time dont try looking for excuses to avoid reading..
ignorance and finding a way to pretend "i didnt know because i refused to read" doesnt make you right
just makes you look stupid

next time just read it. not argue why you shouldnt read it
it saves EVERYONE alot of time and that includes you
if you dont want to learn about a topic. then just dont get involved in its discussion

no he wants to be claimed as being satoshi. so he can ruin bitcoin for his own profits
he is not satoshi though.. never was
he didnt even know satoshi. wasnt even around when satoshi was.
and has no proof of being satoshi, never did.
so he is playing the deception card AS IF he is satoshi and just avoiding proving it.

and now his buddy is using this game to get a judge to validate that he was satoshi..
..

CSW never has been satoshi, never mined prior to 2014 and does not deserve the accolade both CSW and IRA are fighting for.
but if he gets it. he will patent troll bitcoin into failure

but what everyone keeps missing is the fact that ira is not actually doing much on the deception part.

IRA IS saying:
CSW is not proving he was part of 'satoshi' so we need to sanction him by validating that he was part of 'satoshi' as his punishment
IRA IS NOT saying:
'CSW is not proving he was part of 'satoshi' thus a pennyless scammer unable to afford compensation, so transfer case to criminal court with imprisonment punishment available'

see the difference??

we both know any 'compensation' is done AFTER judgement. we both know IRA can just say ''yea i got paid judge, no further action required' and they both move on destroying bitcoin now they been deemed the owner.. it no longer about the 820k coin its about the IP

its not a case of 'ok hand over half the coin' its ok judge make it legal that CS created bitcoin as his punishment

your posturing that people should concentrate on the social drama of iras team calling CSW a deceiver. yet it is just social drama of no negative consequence to CSW. .. the deceiver social drama is the obvious thing that everyone knows and doesnt care about as its just obvious

i know you and your flock think of bitcoin as just an experiment and dont care if it fails because 'thats what can happen in experiments'
but many people do actually care. again i dont think your one of those caring types. to you its just an income mechanism success or failure

but its the claim that IRA wants CSW to be the bitcoin creator.. as his punishment(facepalm), that people should concentrate and care about

its kind of weird that you and a few others known that follow you. seem to be ignoring the parts where IRA is requesting CSW to be made the bitcoin creator. its weird that you now just post that you think no one cares.
its weird that you want people to only discuss or think about the 'ira reveals CSW is a deceiver' part and not the IRA AND CSW are both trying to get the judge to legalise CSW as the creator

very weird indeed

but heck. seems you are again showing your lack of care for the future of bitcoin. yet again. and care more for the commercial benefit of hidden investors that want to abuse bitcoin later. yet again.
so because i dont care about merit. ill award you 50 merit for showing your usual style of not caring about bitcoins future

the commercial bank game for LN is to dis-incentivise people from making their own profit
the commercial bank game is for people to deposit/lock their funds into their custody
the commercial bank game is to make it appear faster and cheaper and more reliable to use the banks services

certain devs are attached to companies that have over $100m in investment from the big banking corps and those investors want their returns.(banks dont just give out charity. they always want returns)

if you think that you can be independent and make profit on LN you are in for a shock
there is already alot of chatter that the big guys will attach themselves to you via channels. and then attach themselves to others so that a 10 hop route via independants is more expensive than their 2 hop route through the big guys 'factory channels' because they are the shortcut bypass, while making the normally 5 hop route appear to be 10 hops by being inbetween each

in the end making the independants give in and just put their funds into the big guys custody in full and then be offered temporary non broadcast 'factory' channels that can be consolidated/reconciled and aggregated without having to open and close onchain.
basically keep handing out paper promissory notes(bank notes) so people dont want/need/have/care to hold gold anymore

so i say IRAs team is not trying to:
call out CSW as a pennyless scammer.that had nothing to do with bitcoin..
but instead IRA's team IS trying to:
claim the partnership is real, that its involves creating bitcoin. that it includes a collateral of 820k coins
and CSW is just being deceptive about it

yet you disagree, still.. (facepalm x5)

i show you documents of IRA's team actually asking the judge to make a default judgement that shows this

and your still in denial
(facepalm x6)

i find it funny how you think im making assumptions
im the one actually quoting the documents and reading them
seems others are just finding an opinion that agrees with their friends

so here you are you can check my post history.. ive mentioned them and referenced them in many posts before. but hey once more wont hurt..
THIS TIME READ THEM!!!! FOR ONCE


22 May 2020 - pages 25,26,27 is of huge interest to the REALITY of iras position
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.512.0.pdf

24 june 2020 - page 19 is of huge interest to the reality of iras position
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.595.0.pdf

just read what IRAs teams requests are in relation to the partnership, the creation and IP of bitcoin. the 820k assets.

have a nice year (it may take you that long to wake up and stop just buddy following)

yep IRAs teams game is to say that CSW awkwardness if proof itself that the trust must be real.
funny part is that it is also what CSW wants the judge to come to the conclusion aswell.

poor badecker..
ignores that the hospitals in his own home state are filling up more then before..
but instead kisses ass of a youtube influencer

such a shame that badecker beleives things on youtube more than whats actually happening around him in his actual home state

i bet if bigtree started saying that people are lizards and decendants of aliens and the history of humanity of the last 2000 years is just fake history wrote by aliens to hide their agenda. and that bigtree claims that christianity is actually a religion of a lizrd king..
badecker would be first to get on one knee and pray for the lizard kings return.. all because bigtree told him so

..
meanwhile badecker should actually avoid youtube and speak to actual doctors in actual hospitals in his actual state to get the real facts of whats actually happening in the area he lives. and what can actually affect his life

badecker also thinks the lockdwn is about jobs.. sorry its not. its about health and keeping hospitals from going over capacity leaving people needing care not get the care because they have no beds/facilities spare.

but nah.. badecker doesnt care about the health of people. he just wants people to hand money over to chemical companies and youtube influencers. and wants FIAT to survive..
seems badecker doesnt even realise that his actions more align with the 'corrupt agenda' of profiteering NGO's and GO's
kinda funny that.
but not as funy as badeckers stupidity of not even understanding his own actions and words. which is why months ago i called him out as a blind follower. just repeating the crap of other peoples desires and not having a independant thought of his own...

and yes i expect badecker to advertise his cultish philosophy rather than try to actually think for himself about the real issues happening locally around him

the thing is. yes when hospitals have capacity its fine to say this.
but when hospital beds are full of old people. and no spare beds for the younger ones that might get into car accidents from drinking too much or getting burned having a barbecue with friends it impacts everyone young and old.

take for instance this topics well know ignorant troll, badecker..
from January to may. daily cases in his home state of arizona did not peak above 600 cases a day.
yet may to june saw a climb in cases due to the relaxation and things like the protests pushing people to be in close proximity
june 19th had over 3400 cases of covid. yep 5x higher than anyday in the first 5 months

take the hospital bed capacity
in march/april.. azizona hospital capacity was at 70%.... this month its at 88%
yes people will cry that 70% is low. and allowing for 30% redundancy. but at the time of the spread a R0 of anything more than 1 would eat up that redundancy
the lockdown kept the bed capacity at a workable 70-75% meaning the exponential rate of r0 was at or only just above 1.. which was the whole point of the lockdown

but in june the numbers went up. and continuing as they are will see numbers go even higher.

hospitals know that patients do not take up a bed for just 1 day. but in most cases its 7-14 days. and occassionally longer so when doing the maths of the expontial rate being above 1 now in arizona its only time before they hit 100% and they mathematically know they have to lockdown or do something that will curb the 100% occupancy figure atleast 2 weeks before it happens. to prevent it.

because its not just about the old people with covid. it would also be the lack of care available to any person that needs hospital care for any reason. because there just wont be any beds left for any other care

think about that.
if your in a covid hotspot. but dont think your at risk of getting hurt by covid. atleast be aware of other things like getting intoxicated by drugs/alcohol.. car accidents, house/barbecue fires. fights and injuries. because you do not want to get injured and be told there is no hospital bed for you. so still be alert and stay safe.

and atleast respect any decisions made to curb the covid outbreak to prevent it over running hospitals. because thats what its all about

heres the funny part
juan is crying so hard. but has not himself read the actual parts of the latest documents

ill say it one more time.. but please this time let this sink in..
dont just instantly hit the reply button.. but instead
1. go read the document
2. se what it really says. not what a friend of yours told you it says
3. sit back and have a cup of coffee. calm down and let it sink in
4. ask yourself if your about to reply are you going to talk about contents of the documents. or just ignorantly attack franky1. if the latter. dont reply your wasting your time
5. if you havnt read below this point. read it and then have a break and really think of a good reply that is worthy of replying with.
6. and dont be as lame as some of your friends that are so ignorant and avoid researching they just reply 'wrong because franky1' thats no excuse

so anyway
juan pretends that i have not given evidence or pointed out parts..
yet post history shows i have
take the gavin interview. i referenced it i even said about how the first 80 pages are waffle and then how the next 25 pages when it got to the 'proof session' ira's team didnt go into detail. and instead on multiple times .. many more times than questioning the proof session. ira's team kept asking gavin about the partnership

heck i though juan was getting enlightened by asking 'why would iras team question gavin about the partnership' i actually thought juan had the courage to go against the grain of his friends opinion to have an independant mind and actually research what the documents actually say.. seems im wrong about that enlightened moment

anyways
i then referenced IRA's teams latest document requesting that a judge by default finds in favour that the partnership and creation of bitcoin was involving CSW&dave.. and that 820k coins are 'somewhere' and the partnership/trust has that value/ownership

again.. i referenced documents i talked about documents. i actually said what was said in the documents. but ill summerise it just one more time just for juan.. and then give you references again one more time

IRA is saying CSW is not supplying the real evidence of the partnership and so IRA wants the judge now or a jury later to by default judge that there is a partnership. judge that dave and CSW created bitcoin and judge that it has value.

atleast try reading it and stop being a cry baby
so do yourself a big favour. and realise in many posts now i have showed you
and all you wannt do is cry saying i have not showed you
so this time instead of asking me to show you.
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND READ THE FRIGGEN document

here.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.512.0.pdf

that document has in many different times within it multiples times saying that the plaintiff(IRA) wants the judge to rule that the trust has value and CSW&dave created bitcoin

..
now dont bother replying and just read the document

you have no excuses left. just read it
i could show you many other documents that have IRA's team not really caring about the real fact that CSW is a scammer that had nothing to do with bitcoin more than 5 years ago.. but instead is pursuing a story that CSW had alots of involvement throughout including creating it.

no where does it say that IRA is calling CSW a fraud in regards to pretending to be satoshi. no where does iras team suggest CSW had nothing to do with bitcoin

so go wake up and realise the game CSW and ira are play together.. but against the community.

if you want to reply. use the documents. not your friends opinion that your following. use the documents and actually read them for what they are

my point is not about my opinion.. but about what is actually wrote in the documents.
try to do the same..

next time you pretend that i havnt provided any references... atleast realise bitcointalk has this thing called post history.. ..
heck i even said it multiple times in this topic and another topic of similar content..
yet weirdly but obviously ignorantly. you skipped it and then pretended it didnt exist because it opposes your friends opinion

...
P.S
i still cant beleive after so many days certain people would rather argue on a forum than just do the friggen research and read the documents.. first i thought it was ignorance or lack of ability or lazyness.. now i just think they just want to avoid doing anything that goes against their friends opinion. and instead want to earn merits from their friends by just being argumentative..
they're idiots if that is the case

sleeping in a bed for a week on a vessel. is not seasteading
sleeping a few nights on someone elses vessel does not make you a seasteader
if that vessel was designed for a aerospace/oil rig industry. and you are a guest and your motives are to garner investment and promising people liberties and freedoms and citizenship. but not actually having anything they can actually call their own lifetime home on the sea. and not even in a truly international waters. or even in a new recognised 'civilisation' created by you.. is not the seasteading promise you promote to garner investment

elwars latest project is basically tourist leased "overwater bungalows" just done using resin walls instead of wood
trying to get $10k a week from people.
its that simple

nothing new, nothing not tried before by thousands of others

by the way you can get established ones already for just $1.5k a week. so elwars group has stupidly and greedily outpriced themselves for the market
and he did not even pick up on that hint months ago when i called it out

i feel sorry for the locals in the area he proposes to make they vacation huts in. they want tourism but elwar wants to outprice it for the area and make it imposible for even the locals to afford to buy one and lease out for vacationers. thus he is doing a dis-service to even them, yet promising them soo soo much

because some forms of autism are not detectable by any current diagnostic equipment
EG you cant tell by a blood sample or a DNA test.

instead its diagnosed by a doctor listening to symptoms and observing the patient.
this means its easier to trick and get a diagnoses without needing any physical evidence

some doctors for a price will just make a diagnoses based on payment
some do mis-diagnose but as long as the mis-diagnoses does not cause any health risk/death a doctor would not be liable. and instead just be swept under the rug as just a bad judgement

there are many ailment that are not really measurable by an scan/fluid sample.. and many people take advantage of these. but in many doctors cases. if it doesnt cause any harm. then nothing wrong with making that diagnoses if it appeases the patient

EG declaring a male as female on a re-registered birth certificate. even when all evidence shows they have a bulge in their pants and no high estrogen in their blood. its done because it would cause undue stress if the person is kept being refered to as a male
so ye just saying that by not being diagnosed as female causes you stress and depression and you can be then legally defined as female. no operation or hormone treatment needed

same with autism cases. jsut sayint to certain doctors that not being diagnosed as autism will cause undue stress because other people wont understand why a irrating twit is being an irritating twit
..
in this case i think the judge should request an independant doctors diagnoses.
to properly diagnose him as psychotic
because any doctor either IRA or CSW prefered would both say whatever CSW wants. because of the obvious frenemy game at play

in a previous post where i summerised IRA's request for a default judgement it came from
ira's recent filing
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.595.0.pdf
you can see it on like page 19&20. but ill quote it here to save time
ira wants the judge to

basically 'first'
1. deem that CSW and dave did have a partnership
2.all bitcoins and altcoins listed by CSW ramain property of the partnership
3. all intellectual property of the partnership remain property of partnership
(basically validate a trust and assert they are satoshi without proof but infer it due to lack of proof(facepalm))
'second'
judge that CSW lack of evidence of
1a) CSW and dave were partners
1b)the activities of the partnership (claim they were satoshi)
1c)there are 820k bitcoins 'somewhere'
must result in
2a) jury to give default verdict that there was a partnership of creating bitcoin
2b) jury to give a verdict that bitcoin and other creations are part of the partnership
2c) jury to give default verdict all coins in CSW fake list then become the partners property

yep no evidence. but just wanting a judge/jury to give a verdict that then makes it 'their property' (facepalm)

no where has IRA's team tried to clam that CSW is a pennyless scammer. they are both playing the same side of trying to get a judges order that flows in favour to making the 'trust a valuable asset based on judges rule. not reality fact. trying to make it that by 'law' craig invented bitcoin. not by reality fact. but by judges rule
and IRA has not made claim that would result in any actual punishment for CSW

time to uncover the myths of quantum

quantum is not some weird SCI-FI extra dimension.
nor is it creating new things.
instead its just measuring the previously before unmeasurable. and being more accurate than previous technology

take for instance the visual spectrum of light. our eyes only see a mixture of a certain amount of the primary colours.. yet we then made tech that measured infrared and ultraviolet and used it for things like night vision goggles and heat detection

thats quantum. where we first thought the only colours were a mix of the primary colours because thats all we seen previously

..
now quantum computers. is not 0's and 1's and maybe 0's and maybe 1's.. but instead its the new ability to not measure things in only 2 dimensions of 0 and 1. but more dimensions/steps/variables.
take for instance binary being 0 volts of electric as 0 and 1 volt of electric as 1.
and in the past volt meters found it hard to measure 0.33v or 0.66v so people just stuck with 0 and 1 volt and only 2 measures they can use predictable/comfortably without much error

now imagine we can accurately without error measure the difference between 0v,0.33v,0.66vand 1v meaning now we can have 4 variables per pulse/transister instead of 2.

now instead of jsut yes or no/on off/true false. we can have more expressive choices in 4 options
so instead of single direction stop forward. we can have
stop, left, right forward(3d vectors instead of 2d)
so instead of single options yes or no. we can have
no, sometimes, most times, yes

all of this opens up more options. allowing a base 2 to become base 4
it allows hex to be stored in just 2 'bits' instead of 4 bits
it allows base64 to be stored in 3 'bits' instead of 6 bits
so 8bits can store a numeric of 65536 instead of just 256

its not some sci fi extra dimensional universe. its just standard 'dimensions' of going from 2d to 3d

..
now that simple lesson has sunk in
quantum computers wont do much for the efficiency of 256bit hashing.. at most expect 2x efficiency gain.
so dont worry much about anyone making a quantum super computer to out hash the network
the millions of binary based ASICS far far far outpace any quantum systems of any scale for the forseeable future

but the signature process of the eliptic curve is more vector based than binary/hex based and binary computers are not good at these vectors, but quantum is.
however this is not some massive change.
firstly the path of bits a quantum system follows to get to the destination is different then the path a binary system would. so trying to go from a binary problem to a qubit puzzle thenback to a binary solution will not always get the intended binary result

take for instance
needing to get to 256
in binary its answer is 11111111
in quantum(0,1,2,3) it could be
3333 using jsut 4 bits, where if 3 represents 1v in qubit would be 1v in binary thus 1111
thus not the answer a binary system would recognise as 256 but instead as 16
thus a translater that turns each qubit into 2binary bits.
q0=b00
q1=b10
q2=b01
q3=b11
thus reducing the efficiency of the process by having to decompress quantum to binary per try

and keep in mind if it takes a few eons(millions of millions of years) for binary to brute force  bitcoin signature. it will still take thousands of years for quantum.

..
in short quantum is not some new magic that jsut uses magic glitter dust to come to an answer
it just is a transister based system using 4 options instead of 2. and requires the system to be kept at a very very low temperature to keep it able to measure the smaller variables inbetween


p.s
those who have read stories that its wormhole tech/alternative universe/different dimension sci-fi.. its not. its just the patent owners are deliberately trying to be deceptive about the meaning of different dimension. to avoid competitors from stealing the real concepts and making better alternatives faster and cheaper before the patent owners get their competitive head start

if you want to avoid the myths.
binary has 2 'gates' quantum has 4 'gates'
(well some researchers are now seeing how practical/possible it would be to measure 8 gates.. but thats for future generations to play with)

hopefully i dumbed things down enough for beginners

here is the thing
the purpose of LN might well seem to be presented as offering fee's of 1 sat per channel hop
but multiple parties involved to multihop. multiply that

so although one node may only make 1 sat per swap.. reality is the distance from the sender to the receiver is like 10 hops away. so the fee for the sender is 10sat

..
one group of nodes are already setting themselves up as multiple points along a route
A<>B<>C<>D<>E<>F<>G<>H<>I<>J<>K
imagine it like this A wants to pay K
b will only get 1 sat for his part. C only 1 sat, D only 1 sat and so on
but it cost A 10 sat

now imagine if B D F H J all belonged to one person..
suddenly for that one payment from A-K that one person has earned 5 sats

..
next generation of game theory is that the 10 hop route costs A 10sat.. but the guy owning BDFHJ
then offers a route of
A-B-J-k for only 9 sat

so A prefers paying 9 instead of 10. and now the guy owning many chanels gets 9 sat instead of just 5
and making the independant nodes CEGI never get used and end up giving up using LN
..
but that was game theory back when the promotional media dribble was promising low sat fee's
with sat fees at 0.1% and most route being multiple hops. that total fee end to end is more than 0.1%
and if channel factories are clever enough they can get multiple 0.1% as shown above

have a nice day
and as for the bugs and flaws. i dont like to teach scammers how to scam. if your not smart enough to work it out you dont deserve it.
the LN devs themselves know of many flaws and yep they themselves have 'lost' funds from it
i say 'lost' because coins do not disapear off the blockchain. but silly bugs and bad rules make silly people give away their LN millsat funds to others. so that when a real bitcoin transaction occurs onchain its not in their favour. due to their silliness. they signed off on a broadcast transaction thats not in their favour due to the silliness of the LN contracts offchain(facepalm)

LN is not a safe network and not a network that should even be considered on the same neighbourhood as bitcoin. it does not deserve the fame/trust that the bitcoin network has

while all you lot cry and squabble over the stupidity of CSW
your not seeing that its IRA that is also playing CSW game. they are frenemies

IRA wants a default judgement that the claims of CSW/dave being satoshi and creating bitcoin and having 820k coins are all true even without evidence.
or it to go to trial for a jury to judge that dave/CSW were behind bitcoin
win win for csw

oh and when two people are playing a friendly game with money involved but want to hide their private wager /pay off for service.. the one side wanting to get paid for playing will just make requests to the referee to demand foul sanctions in the form of payment from the other side

and suddenly the money to cover IRA's costs is legalised

..
reality is in a patent troll case that uses similar tactics.. yep its a real thing.
the troll would pay out his friend who's faking opposition.. but to hide it. they try to put it out in the open as a different reason for payment. EG 'court ordered sanctions'

now IRA can get paid from CSW without revealing the game/bribe

IRA's team has never been on the stance that CSW is a pennyless scammer that never had anything to do with bitcoin
IRA is teamCSW but playing frenemy

to save repeating the obvious from similar tpics
IRA's case is not to dismantle CSW and make to clear that CSW is a pennyless scammer and not satoshi
but instead