Using what rom?
Stock!  |
|
|
|
How many sol/s are you getting with that and how many watts, psu?
Thanks dude, appreciate it...
I'm getting ~210 sols out of each of my two rigs, each with 6x480. Each rig has 2x850W PSU. Both PSUs are cool and quiet... My GPU's are actually mining part of the time without even turning the fan on! I love it! |
|
|
|
What gpu-z are reporting is irrelevant.
That number is what the gpu onboard your card are pulling, not all the rest.
It's not irrelevant, it's just not a real figure as those measured at the wall. I've mined with 270x, 7950, 7850, 7970, and I know what I'm talking about! Old cards are very inefficient. That's a fact! Besides being noisy and generating a lot of heat. GPU-Z readings are a good way to compare efficiency between different cards, or different setting for the same card. Therefore, they're not irrelevant. In fact, they are very useful |
|
|
|
wow nice man....
I have the 8gb version....do you have any settings for those cards?
This is my config.txt: -zpool zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666 -zwal [ZEC address] -zpsw x -allpools 1 -ftime 15 -dbg -1 -tt 75 -ttli 85 -tstop 90 -cclock 900 -cvddc 800 -mclock 1750 -mvddc 800 -powlim -10 It works flawlessly fot the Sapphire RX 480 Nitro+ OC 4GB Give it a try  |
|
|
|
HD7950=RX480 with 50 h/s
OMG!
Yap it's great .. the only problem is that 7950 consume a little bit more then RX480 ( from what I saw , one 7950 consume ~ 270 w) a bit more?   I'm getting ~35 sols out of my RX 480 4GB consuming less than 40 watt!!! No heat, no noise, no GPU stress! That's efficiency! |
|
|
|
In this logic, the only ones mining would be the big farms. And this applies to any coin, not only ZEC. You are wrong! Unless you have a big farm and want to keep ZEC mining restricted to a few big players.
Genoil and Claymore are giving a chance for the domestic miner to make some profit, and that's a good thing!
Not only big players. Everyone could install linux, build silentarmy miner using clear instructions and run it home. But not everyone tried to do so. That is the key. That encouraged to learn something new. Now it is as simple as download and run. As for the chance, 1-2 days ago my small farm at home gave me $125/day with silentarmy what was rock solid for me. Today it is $50 even with CZM. No speculations, plain fact. That's true  But my small farm 1-2 days ago was crashing with Genoil's and now is working at full steam with Claymore's! My profits increased! At least for the next couple days.... Soon, it will be time to consider the return to ETH |
|
|
|
I guess, most peepz is now dumping, the price still falling reaches 0.74BTC as of the moment. and difficulty is also increasing. effect of claymore's Best miner :-)
Yeah, I really do not know why people are so happy. Here is the effect of CZM (this miner): profitability dropped by 2. In fact this is the end of profits on ZEC. Maybe it is good for decentralization, but it is an absolute evil for those who wanted (and made) some money on this. Let me explain in some bogus numbers if you like. Assume there were 3 players that generated 200, 300, 500 shares for 100 coins/day (10 shares per coin), they received 20 (200/10), 30 (300/10), 50 (500/10) ZEC coins. Assume 1 ZEC = 1 BTC. And they received 20, 30, 50 BTC/day. Now they have doubled hash rate and generate 400, 600 and 1000 shares. Since number of coins per day is the same (difficulty jump up to ensure it), now we need 20 shares per coin. They still create 100 coins/day and should receive 20 (400/20), 30 (600/20), 50 (1000/20) coins. The same amount, but increased power consumption. But now some lazy newbies started mining ZEC as well, and lot of old cards are now mining too. Let assume they added +20% of total shares. That is we decrease the ZEC profit by 20% and now receive 16, 24, 40 + new 20 percent of share for same 100 coins/day. Also we all are rich now and start dumping. The price dropped by 25%, and now in BTC we have 20% less. If 1 ZEC was = 1 BTC, now it is 0.75 BTC, and instead of original 20, 30, 50 BTC/day we and newbies receive 12 (16*0.75), 18 (24*0.75), 30 (40*0.75) and 15 (20*0.75) BTC. Was: 20, 30, 50
Now: 12, 18, 30 and 15 for new players who was waiting for this miner. And yes, you should also subtract 2.5% fee from this amount. Net result: 50% real profit loss. Numbers are not real, but the idea is the same. Do not know why people are so happy. I think only those who was not able to build a miner on Linux are now happy since they have come into the game. But good profitability is behind. In this logic, the only ones mining would be the big farms. And this applies to any coin, not only ZEC. You are wrong! Unless you have a big farm and want to keep ZEC mining restricted to a few big players. Genoil and Claymore are giving a chance for the domestic miner to make some profit, and that's a good thing! |
|
|
|
These are my peers: 88.198.53.194 79.98.220.209 73.38.41.211 85.10.200.36 85.25.44.119 144.76.237.39 74.118.192.18 83.99.248.18 104.159.241.2 72.185.23.235: 81.203.244.154 23.88.59.245 82.181.124.248 No problems whatsoever |
|
|
|
|
@Claymore:
Dev fee connect and disconnect work well in nanopool. However, upon disconnecting from your pool, it takes like 20~30 s to reconnect to nanopool
It's too long...
|
|
|
|
dont think u need exactly 15.12, just need 15.12 or higher
im using 16.9.2 with no issues
well i have 2 rigs one with 3x rx480 8gb, and the second with 2x r9 390x 1x r9 290x 8 gb, and there is only about 15-20 sols so i was thinking of changing the driver version since it appears to be recommended by the creator of the miner just a thought. The new RX 4xx requires newer drivers than the 15.12, at least 16.x I use 16.9.2 without issues |
|
|
|
So at the end of the day all of us will pay more for electricity, but will earn the same - only Claymore and my electricity company wins  (and some people for a day two, but that's nothing...) Wrong! With this miner my unvolted, underclocked card are mining faster than with Genoil's and wasting roughly the same amount of power. Claymore wins (deserved) and I win. The power company gets their share but I'm making a nice profit |
|
|
|
Someone pls help me with remote control:
What to put in IP section?
Where do I get that info?
Do I have to fill other spaces?
Do I have to change in "options" section?
Can someone pls share screen shot how to fill this.
You have to fill in your rig's IP address:  |
|
|
|
Unfortunatelly, by this time tomorrow ZEC price will be below 0.7 BTC |
|
|
|
OMG... No more work today! |
|
|
|
I use 15.71 drivers, since the 16.2.1 drivers tell me there is no opencl device found? Maybe thats my issue
Try using 16.9.2 drivers. |
|
|
|
It takes time and skill to write a good stable and efficient miner. I have absolutely no problem with paying someone for their time to do this and release it publicly. Would you prefer people with these skills to create private miners so only they capitalise? Or perhaps have some steep upfront fee? If a miner works well, is stable and gives me a consistent hash rate it will automatically be a few % faster than a buggy one that needs to be restarted constantly. If there are tweaks and enhancements to give me a greater hash rate - so much the better. If I share a percentage of these additional gains with the developer as a way of paying for his/her time - I'm more than happy with that. If the dev fee erodes the improvement and means that it becomes less efficient for me to use than other miners, then clearly I won't use it - that's my choice and something the miner developer should take in to account. All of you have the same choice so I don't understand what all this complaining is about I wasn't complaining. I'll gladly pay the fee as I have been doing for ETH. |
|
|
|
Who wants to guess the dev fee?
5%
The dev fee will stay the same. Claymore is not greedy, he knows 1% of a good miner is more than enough to make some money while keeping a faithful comunity More than 1% will probably take away a significant part of the current legion of miners using his stuff |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
