No. They can ship to a C&R FFL holder as well. C&R is easy (and cheap) to obtain. Definitely worth it if you're planning on buying 3+ C&R firearms.

Thumbs up to you guys.
Not a service I currently need, but with the way this country is going, I am overjoyed to see anything that protects what's left of people's privacy.
Hope it is successful.

Oh, I didn't realize this loan was just to support your whims. Why shoot so low? Ask for enough to buy a new Ducati.

You are so clearly the picture of fiscal responsibility, I can't imagine why no one has jumped on this amazing low-risk opportunity yet. 

You can get a reliable 250cc bike for MUCH cheaper than $4000. If saving money is truly your goal, your break-even will be much lower and your mpg will be much higher.

Still, without even providing ID, I can't imagine why anyone would lend you enough to buy anything. Of course, I'm always surprised when I see people lending to begin with. Good luck.

Which one do you need?
http://7.62x54r.net/MosinID/MosinFeatures07.htm

Win7 x64.

I believe I tried 11.12 and while the CPU usage appeared to go down, it was not 1-2% it should have been if this problem was truly fixed. Instead it was like 15% on 6 processors, which is basically the same as 100% on one. And coupled with that the hashrate went down.

Are there instructions somewhere for an old SDK installation with newer drivers? Did you replace your openCL package? What is your CPU usage?

I hope this happens.

I'm most interested in CPU usage. What OS are you running?

What I'm referring to is that part that the respondents evidence, including the longform birth certificate, were deemed not authentic.

Again, this won't matter in the long run. But anyone who is refusing to look at that fraudulent garbage they posted on the whitehouse website once it's been pointed out that it's fake is just being silly. If you don't care about the argument then don't comment on it.

Ignore this Hawker, since you are proud of being ignorant.

9 days ago, Obama's lawyers admitted in court that the birth certificate posted on the whitehouse website was a fake. The judge upheld the position presented by the "crazy birther teapartiers" who want the constitution to be followed.

Here's the judge's decision (don't look Hawker! You'll be scarred for life!)
http://www.scribd.com/puzo1/d/89431332-Final-Decision-of-SOS-in-Purpura-Moran-Ballot-Objection-4-12-12

And here are stories with more details, which I'm sure will never be reported by the MSM.
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-officially-ineligible?fb_comment_id=fbc_10150813560905801_22858408_10150815481950801#f2d58f4d41ea61
http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/04/13/obama-lawyer-admits-forgery-but-disregards-image-as-indication-of-obamas-ineligibility-damage-control/


Regardless of whether Obama is eligible to be president, and whether it's an important issue to anyone personally, it seems pretty crazy to refuse to look at both sides of an argument. Especially if you're going to argue one of those sides.  

I'll tell you tomorrow. 

No Angel by Jay Dobyns (ATF agent that went deep undercover in the Hell's Angels)
Good so far.

They've officially sucked since they made unauthorized withdrawals from Tradehill's account and then erased old transactions from already issued account statements to try to hide it. Don't give your business to thieves.

LOL, how hilarious can you get? The press conference was the "news of content." How many faceplants are you going to make in a single thread? You're making the birthers' arguments better than any of them possibly could. 

You're making an unsupported leap there. It's perfectly reasonable that someone having a kid outside the US might want to make sure he's considered a natural born citizen without any plans for him to be president. (P.S. - newspapers accept ads over the phone.)

Anyway - I'm not joining anyone. From the view of a non-vested party, people who dismiss this obvious fraud are being just as silly as any conspiracy theorists.

That's really all I have to contribute. As I've said from the beginning, I was hoping you DID have something which could explain this nonsense.

Whoever wrote it certainly didn't lend themselves any credibility by faking the return address.

It's hilarious that you keep saying "There is no eligibility question." Clearly with all these people questioning his eligibility, there is a question.

I've never been one of those people, so I don't know the facts. But from your statements alone, your stance seems unsupported: Hawaii "says" they have proof, and the proof provided is forged. An advertisement is only proof that someone thought it was important to make it look like he was born in Hawaii. It's not proof of eligibility.

I completely agree that there are much worse things going on in our government and have never given this issue much attention. But refusing to acknowledge this poor forgery is looking sillier than the birther people ever looked.

Apparently it IS disputed. And fraud perpetrated by a governing body should be a concern to everyone. I would have thought that was a given. 

I would have thought it was obvious that it's not an exchange's place to police trade. I am sure they were not responding to a court order.

SR sales are legal in many places and for some of the items on the site the sales are definitely legal in the US.

If they're locking accounts because someone might use the bitcoins for something illegal in the future, might as well lock every person's account.