Hasn't Narendra Modi been the one banning all 500- and 1.000- Rupie banknotes in november last year? This cumbersome bureaucracy managed to do THAT over night. There had been death casualties in front of an india bank building in 2016.

Could not trust their lakshmi if that ever pops up anywhere. Doubtfull if it could even reach the usual trade places (Bittrex, lodging in las vegas) since regulations and such.

Remember we had been at $1800 on 7/16/2017. There is another view from the other angle at the price action last 8 weeks.

Imagine those dips had not been margin attacks, trying to short but instead been failures to artificially hoover the price above $4000 for making the chinese exit. Reeking in enough money (for electricity, new Asics) until the elections are done and kapitalists could talk to communists again on a sane level. The "bann" has merely been political because of Xi Jinping's reelections taking place at 10/18/2017 and should be reversible if some money changes pockets.

ETH's relative strength has been ICOs, and we know there are regulatory crackdowns happening almost everywhere.
Another segment where ETH will be loosing ground is mining related. When they turn POS, they will loose miner's adoption. However profitability in that segment has been declining anyway. Hodling miners are another kind.

From technology perspective I do agree. This is the hottest tech developing, and they have a Wiz in their team. Vitalik ranges right in the same class as Satoshi, in breaking new ground.

A smaller candidate could be LSK Lisk. To be mentioned as a possible Second Place since they started like $0.13 into 2017 and will manage to stay above $3.50. Because since two monthes beeing at $6.00, so unlikely to fold down below 50% of that level at christmas.

Could be about the 2x part of Segwit2x, or Bitcoin Cash hashrate moves. The first would be timeable since it has a specific date on it.
Another theory watches this ""dropping" is already over" as a bulltrap. Ask Loops about going short.

And why there are doubles? Anything special regarding GNO or KMD ? Or just polishing up their results by providing more clickable surface on screen?

coindesk.com has thrown out another article presenting rumors (mostly) from deputy finance minister of Russia just yesterday. That could be the 10.000x time of russian rumors, again. But markets do react on that. Rumors along banning any payments.
In the last minutes of china money having to flee their tradesites BTCs will be capable of traveling in ten minutes, so first choice. And supply onsite nearly beeing dried out, so that last china day will likely present a green candle on all charts.
Almost no-trade-territory, neither for margin nor for new longs.

Seems to throw in "bubble" as "robbery" at random. Which are different things. Robbery goes one way with clear criminal intention.
Market movements that are calling for a correction are foreseeable and most often caused by traders, news and rumors.
The new era seems still pending. Internet shops on PayPal and the like.

On a scale ranging from 1.0, bubble up to 10.0, new era we are falling below a 5 now.

"got dumped badly" because of the mining centralisation. If china would not carry any relevant hashrate, the markets would not have reacted at all.
Partially these chart moves have been artificially, even by dumping lend money. Hence the rebound at the end of the effect.

Same troubles on Bitcointalk, Newbie Spam and such. However phone numbers are so old fashioned surveillance state, aren't they? I am not interested in any channels that require a cellphone to enter. And my smartphone from china got bugged by its manufactoring company even before packaging.

People who invested livetime in their accounts are legit. Maybe there could be a currency for that. A forum coin?
In a way there had been crypto projects focusing on attention economy, currently up&running: Steem.
Seems Slack got an edge above Steem in the ways of beeing dirt cheap, so people flocked to that.

Can you enlighten us when the supply will not be too much, even reduced by some amount perhaps? Any exact date, maybe?
Some arguments are just hillarious. Supply grows.

According to https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/siacoin/#markets Yunbi left the building. In a hurry, to my observation. Even BTCe seems to be more resilient.

Mostly I am on an errand mistaking South Korea with Taiwan in between the Four Asian Dragons. In my mind not only the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan, but chinese miners too. But they seem to have choosen South Korea instead as an exchange location, because of the Wong. Or prefere mainland travel? Would require a bitcoin benevolent Kim Jong-un.
Damn geopolitics!!
It's all tangling up but whatever china decided in all it's glory and supremacy, there are still enough people to route around anything. Always has been that way.

GMO might sell ASICs?

Right! They did that, too. But Google still exists, doesn't it? How about Facebook

Usually they rebuilt something more localized like Baidu. Makes sense if westerners cannot really do mandarin. But Google has returned to china, hasn't it? Featuring a local subsidiary now and struggling on third place by market share.

One could suspect there will be a state run crypto currency popping up that will play the same game again. And then there will be gateways between that state controlled artificial currency and Bitcoin, which will be hard to do but completely disrupt the govermental banning approach.

One developer (been Luke?) once suggested changing the algo. Just hinting at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Hashcash#Future_Hash
There are two sides who could bust any existing monopoly, but the whole process will result in a bloodbath lasting years. And that will damage the idea of digital gold forever.

For GPU miners it's arbitrary if SHA256(SHA256()) getting called or a single SHA3. But how long for the new ASICs generation to pop up?

Will you take a moment of your time to jot down a few notes about our service on (this thread)

Sure can do. Taking my coffee time reading through your concept.


The payment in project specific coins lowers the entry barrier for entrepeneurs owning empty pockets. That equals an unknown market segment, so far unexplored. The bussiness ideas originating from people of this kind never made it into the limelights of a wider audiences attention. Maybe those got in contact with a bussiness angel, maybe that did not worked out.
Could this approach become a gamechanger?

Just the risks are carried over onto the hopefull employes. Team members? Company owners one day!
Could work?

You can serve as an example yourself, doing a PreITO, that at some point in time hard currency (if Ethereum counts these days) has to flow for food and nibbles. For ink and paper. Often expenditures can get postphoned up to a point of no return.


My concern, too. When I picked up that "Jira analogue" approach, feels like reinventing the wheel. Not on all of them mentioned above there is collaboration possible, to access their services from your own platform. Continually playing cats and mouse to keep their walled garden intact.


I believe this is their goal, creating a group collaboration platform that creates job opportunities. Where the funding aspect kinda has been built in, using a crypto token as local currency.

Employes who do work for preDGZ token income will experience the full swing market forces, high volatility on their savings. That should get explained early on, both sides the risk involved and the chances (by your own words "the need to overpay devs a bit as there is risk associated") so we can guess it will not always be the cheaper way for employing workforce. It might become a fast way however because of the world wide reach.

Almost on toppic, but advised to spread here. Just typing into the location bar from memory, or quick google can make everybody run into attacks like this. Tradeside got hit, too. Same trick like similar sounding domain. They even invested into some ads money to get up there on the result pages.

Like @defunctec mentioned, this approach is overkill and most likely to fail by management hickups.
And I voice doubts that your redundancy is safe from the same hack, like all wallets maintained from single desktop.
Or two completely similar desktops, featuring the very same security leak.

Just a small advice from someone stupid who transitioned 8+6 IOTA wallets.

genNewAddr() should check balance and call stop() once a user defined amount has been reached?
Or perhaps stop if last 3 addresses did not carried anything?
   
According to https://iotasupport.com/how-addresses-are-used-in-IOTA.shtml these things will worsen further by every snapshot. Customer satisfaction seems to be guaranteed.

Ack, set to 14.

Where did that transition tool vanished? The menu entry isn't there anymore.
What about people who did not done (or missed) the transition? Can they still use version 2.4.0 to keep up again?

Curious about the differences between WebGL 2 curl vs. ccurl. Looks like some POW speedup. Which is irrelevant if applied by everybody.

No it isn't. Anything capable of running any Java application suits.
Recieving IOTA requires almost no CPU cycles.

However... in practise things are more complicated. Some day you might want to be able to spend those IOTA, and that requires POW work to be done on your sending site. There are no miners who mine blocks for a small fee or block reward. That laptop should have some GPU. Intel i3 dualcore with onchip graphics suited me so far, besides some issues on occasion. Tried on a single core lacking any graphic hardware, attaching an empty new adress onto the tangle, ninty minutes runtime: No success.


Brainstorming: However "mining" could become a future bussiness? Service gets PGP signed message containing recipient address, percentage amount of fees to be gained, tangle explorer source address and private key wrapped inside additional PGP envelope that only this very service can decode. After two days (or arbitrary timeout) everybody could see if they initiated the transaction and played honest on fees. Lacks complete trustlessness.

Naw engineering overkill again, trying to force some "IOTA mining bussiness" into the scenario. It's doable replacing client sided POW work with Fee Payments, but unneeded.

Jamie Dimon taken as a recent example. His bashing did not really caused a panic, but his origins are to be considered.
Goverments are overated in a globalized society. Corporations expanded into the scale of countries. There are banks of that size.

A goverment has ruling limits documented by their constitution. Any of the other players of compareable sizes are not limited by something even similar. I think they are the real thread. And those got a lever into politics by lobbying, bribery or other means.