Who are you to make unsubstantiated accusations about anyone?  Let's just look at the facts.  You're living in the Philippines with some twenty-six year old bimbo attempting to get a diagnosis on Bitcointalk for a medical aliment affecting your genitals, which you claim isn't a STD (Uh-uh, sure it isn't), while spending the mass-majority of your time posting absolute nonsense in some pathetic attempt to prove to everyone else your self-worth.  Not only that, you get on here and promote the "acceptance of drug use" and "promiscuous sex as natural".  Are you trying to get others to follow you down the path of messing up their lives so completely that there is no return?  What is wrong with you?  You've contracted a disease from your ex-wife, presumably, who was sleeping around with drug dealers to get her fix, and you still think this type of behavior is "natural"?  Not to mention your twenty some year old children, which I can only imagine that you left with your drug-addicted ex-wife when you ran off to the Philippines.  What type of a loser are you?  Who leaves their children with someone like that?  Those kids are going to need some serious therapy to get over you two screwballs.  You've already stated that you don't have a lot of BTC, so why don't you get off this forum, go get a job, and at least attempt to financially provide for your children who you've neglected all these years.

Really?  That's the "big flaw"?  That a user has to pay a tx fee in NXT?  NXT is supposed to be a transactional currency.

Yes


Lol.  Not everyone is as messed up as you are.  Ever thought that maybe some of us are just sick of your degenerate crap?


What?  Qtips are supposed to be soft and round.

I knew it was you.  Since you've been absent from the forum for a few days, I was hoping that Darwinism had finally taken its course and ensured that you could no longer spread your apologetic, immoral ways.  How'd you come up with such a creative username by the way?

Gambling requires no foresight or knowledge.  Speculation requires both.

Please refer to the definition of 'idiot'.

I don't believe that you have 100 BTC of your own money to gamble, and I believe you would dip into IOTA funds to pay out, since such a bet, if fairly and subjectively judged, would be a guaranteed win for me.  I'm not going to be an accomplice to malfeasance which is what this amounts to.  Good job making my point that you have no business running anything let alone a company.  Get help for your gambling problem.

I'm curious as to what the "big flaw" is?

Honestly, I don't think David has 100 BTC of his personal money to "gamble" like this.  Investor money maybe, but not his own.  Normally, I'm morally opposed to "gambling", but I'm having a personal crisis right now determining if this would really be considered "gambling".

I haven't trusted your business skills for a lot longer than two months... this bet can't be retroactive can it?

Wrong.  Like RTRT pointed out, I've been highly critical of David and didn't invest a cent into IOTA, because I think it is a poor business premise and that David doesn't have the business skills to pull it off.  I'm also upset with Jean-Luc, the NXT devs, the NXT Foundation, committees, and marketing team.


What type of unscrupulous individual collects money (donations or not) under one pretense, fails to deliver upon that pretense, and keeps the money.  Your right, if I gave money to charity under the assumption that it would be used for a certain project and they took the money and spent it on something else, I'd sue them.  It's too bad that you have to fall back on "show me the signed contract" and people can't take you for your word.  Again, I don't care about implementation on Burst or Qora.  Both of those are failed projects and PoC is a joke.  I honestly didn't expect for you to refund my money, because I've heard from numerous people what type of a person you are and you just proved their point.


You know David, you ought to be thanking RTRT for trying to help you.  He's giving you some good advice, and you'd be smart to take it.  While I don't agree with you on a lot of things, I think it would be unfortunate for you to drive this business, even though I don't think it has a high probability of success, and everyones' investment into the ground.  I don't know how one minute you can claim you are successful, because you've returned XX% ROI, and the next minute lambaste people for being speculators.  It seems you honestly believe that your investors are your enemy and that businesses don't need investors.  That conviction means that IOTA is already dead regardless of anything else.  You'd do yourself a world of good by not being so antagonistic to everyone, mainly your investors, and try to act like a real businessman who is looking out for everyone's best interests.

James commits malfeasance.  Get out while you can.

@CIYAM - I am getting sick and tired of your attitude (it seems strange for someone to treat someone else so poorly when that individual tried to do the right thing and support them when obviously very few others did).

If you have any actual desire not to look like a scammer, then please reimburse the 1.049 BTC and not the "Prove you gave it to me" rubbish.

Assuming all the stuff posted about you is false (which you claim that it is), then you should be lucid enough to remember that I did in fact give you the one bitcoin and honest enough to do the right thing.

What do I care if AT was delivered, but not integrated into NXT?  What puts you under the assumption that a give two hoots about AT development?  Everyone, including myself, funded you under the assumption that AT would be integrated into NXT.  You did the work and collected money under that assumption.  I don't care whose fault it was that AT wasn't integrated into NXT.  The fact of the matter is that it wasn't, and whether you want to admit it or not, the blame at least partially lies with you.  Refund all those who gave you money, or be prepared to be labelled a scammer.  That's the way the game works.

You're right.  I think NXT was destroyed from the inside out, and I think you are somewhat to blame as you collected funds and failed to deliver.

I still have the wallet from which I anonymously sent 0.049 BTC to fund a NXT AT CIYAM task.  So, I can prove that, but I can't prove I sent you 1 BTC for you to work on NXT AT even though you and I both know it is true.  Regardless if I am "2Kool4Skewl" or not, which I am, 2Kool4Skewl sent you 1 BTC, and 2Kool4Skewl was never refunded for this 1 BTC.


You're looking more and more like a scammer and an untrustworthy individual, but I already knew this to be the case.


You're the one that was saying that all NXT AT supporters were refunded their money, and I simply stated that you never refunded me.  If you're so honest, why didn't you contact me personally and ask if I wanted a refund?  If you only received three Bitcoins, then I gave you a third of that money.  How could you forget me?  If I remember correctly, the price of one Bitcoin then and now is almost the same.


It was everyone's understanding that it was to fund development of AT on NXT.  Why would NXT stakeholders fund development on a competing chain?  Anyway, I gave YOU the money directly.  I didn't give it to them.

I was trying to be a nice guy and give YOU some money to help YOU out on NXT AT development even though YOU stood to make money off of it too, and what do I get in return besides some smart ass statements?  You don't have any room to call out anyone as a "scammer".

From what I remember, your split from the NXT community wasn't on friendly terms and there were several allegations about your poor behavior including from one of the guys working on AT with you.  As much as I dislike the way David acts, I think he is telling the truth when he alleges that you wanted to destroy NXT.  I'm not sure what your motivations for such an action would be except for jealousy / envy or you were acting under the influence.


I just went through all my old wallets, and unfortunately, I cannot find the tx / address I used to send you the one Bitcoin.  Although, you know and I know that I did in fact send it to you after we briefly talked via PM on the NXT forum.  Additionally, I found another donation that I made to a NXT AT CIYAM project fund for 0.049 BTC.  So, you really owe me 1.049 BTC.  I don't think you were as innocent as you are leading others to believe in your split with the NXT community.  I actually think you instigated it.  Too many people spoke out about your poor behavior for it not to be true.  2Kool4Skewl was banned from BitcoinTalk and NXT forum.  You can't sell banned accounts.


I wasn't expecting to have to prove to you at a later date that I actually sent you money.  I like to think that people are honest and try to do the right thing, but unfortunately, that is not always the case.  As far as I'm concerned, you scammed me out of 1.049 BTC due to your inability to act rationally with other individuals and intentionally sabotaged NXT's AT implementation.

Refer to this post.

I didn't have any use for an empty bitcoin wallet.

I never called you a "scammer".  I just said:


From my understanding of the situation, It doesn't seem honest or fair.

It is impossible for me to provide you with proof, because not only do I not have the bitcoin wallet I used anymore, but the centralizing NXT devs banned me from the "NXT forum", because they cannot stand freedom of speech, so I cannot even log in to my old 2Kool4Skewl account to send you a private message on there.  Anyone with common sense can tell that "DecentralizeEconomics" is "2Kool4Skewl" from my posting style, but feel free to do what you think is right.

This is 2Kool4Skewl.  I gave you one bitcoin when you started working on AT for NXT.  I deleted the wallet I used for the transfer a long time ago, and chalked up the loss to a lesson learned.  I'm not sure of the full details as to why AT was never implemented on NXT.  Whether that was your fault, the NXT devs, or some combined form of both, I don't know.  If you're still willing to refund me, I'll take it.  Let me know, and I'll send you a bitcoin address to receive it.

Years of proof?  or  Years of opinion?

It all comes down to which compromises you want to accept and your definition of "decentralization".