Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 11:04:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
121  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] rhminer - an optimized CPU+GPU miner for the RandomHash algorithm on: November 08, 2018, 09:21:39 AM
I hope I didn't kill the TESTNET.

I ran few old computers overnight.  The AVG HR stabilised.

I use Linux, but those instructions are the same.  I just put the miner parameters in a small bash script.

Is there a way or need the remove the appended .rhminer. in an instance?  I don't mind it, just not sure if the miner name length has anything to do with it.

Cheers.

122  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 08, 2018, 09:17:03 AM
10k.  Is this for real?  0.65 USD.

This is the highest PascalCoin has been in a very long time.

Go team @PASC  FTW.
123  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 08, 2018, 12:43:21 AM
Is there a setup guide for PascalCoinMiner_4.0 anywhere? I don't see anything on Github or the Pascal site.

There is if you read carefully.

Quote
PlasticBanQ.com is building the world’s first true 360-degree Reverse Logistics platform for Plastics Recycling, leveraging blockchain and our native cryptocurrency. Sign-up for Bounty Campaigns, Beta Test Program and Early Adopter status. https://bit.ly/2PfHzK3

I need a beer.  I had a long workday.  I usually don't start drinking until 7.
Please get back to me if you are having trouble following the instructions.
It did take me about 1 minute to decipher them.   Huh

It's 11 minutes to 7.  I will be back.  Okay?

Cheers. 

I hear you on that front, need to crack a cold one myself. Maybe I'm just half asleep today...I found info on Ployminer's rhminer implementation easily enough, but not for PascalCoinMiner_4.0. Regardless I found the issue that was causing the miner to exit on launch - i.e. just change miner server private key to always use the same key.

*raises glass* Thanks for the nudge.

I wish I could be of more help, but I have no idea what "PascalCoinMiner_4.0" is.
Sounds like some sort of an archive.  tar.gz of binary code?

I recommend that you read the official website (I have only spent several hundred hours reading about PascalCoin) since its launch.
Then possibly join the Discord group.
All the answers are there.

Let's just say that it works fine.  PascalCoin, that is.
124  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 07, 2018, 11:42:00 PM
Is there a setup guide for PascalCoinMiner_4.0 anywhere? I don't see anything on Github or the Pascal site.

There is if you read carefully.

Quote
PlasticBanQ.com is building the world’s first true 360-degree Reverse Logistics platform for Plastics Recycling, leveraging blockchain and our native cryptocurrency. Sign-up for Bounty Campaigns, Beta Test Program and Early Adopter status. https://bit.ly/2PfHzK3

I need a beer.  I had a long workday.  I usually don't start drinking until 7.
Please get back to me if you are having trouble following the instructions.
It did take me about 1 minute to decipher them.   Huh

It's 11 minutes to 7.  I will be back.  Okay?

Cheers. 
125  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] rhminer - an optimized CPU+GPU miner for the RandomHash algorithm on: November 07, 2018, 08:53:29 PM
Following the development.

This miner is already unbelievably fast already on certain systems.

Thank you for your hard work.
126  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 07, 2018, 08:48:01 PM
@Polyminer

I'm not sure if you check here.

I ran a test on TESTNET.  A combined GPU+CPU mining for several hours.

15 CPU threads + 400 on each 1080ti (I have two in my Linux system).

The average HR was higher than CPU only and GPU miner did find blocks.

Code:
Miner 08:22:01   Total: 2088 H/S (GPU0 160 H/S GPU1 200 H/S CPU 1728 H/S).  AVG 1978.49

Power usage fluctuates, but GPUs run very cool.

Code:
root@the-beast:~# nvidia-smi
Wed Nov  7 08:29:24 2018      
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.87                 Driver Version: 390.87                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:01:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 46%   67C    P2   113W / 250W |   4694MiB / 11175MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 28%   60C    P2   134W / 250W |   4415MiB / 11178MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

I'm not sure how you managed 200 H/S out of a 1060 6GB.  Maybe 1080tis are not suitable.  I have not guessed the correct amount of threads.

The miner did not crash.  OS:  Kali Linux.

Cheers.

~Thomas

Hi @tlaskows, Indeed CPU+GPU mining is a little bit slower on the cpu side because of the CUDA driver and some internal stuff that occurs in the miner (mainly gpu mining handling !)

As it was stated many times, GPU mining of RandomHash is slower by design. But it has some room for improvement that will come in the later weeks (if all goes well).

If I read correct, you have 400 GPU threads per 1080. I'm, sure you can raise that substantially. Look at the "Ideal CUDA thread count" on the rhminer main page : https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer#ideal-cuda-threads-count

Still ~2000 H/s for a system like that is awesome in comparisons to typical systems (i5, i3...)

Cheers.
Polyminer1



Thank you for the clarification.
I tried various settings and GPUs just slow down that CPU.

It would only make sense of someone already had a "GPU mining farm".   Wink

BTW.  I compared performance on Linux vs Windows 10.  Major difference in regards to performance too.
Real numbers.  about 25% slower on Windows and HR all over the place.

Cheers,

~Thomas
127  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 07, 2018, 06:56:04 PM
I am rebooting into Windows 10 on this same system.

I suspect that there is a big performance difference.  OS overhead.
I shall verify my suspicions.

Windows chokes every computer I have.  Maybe it's just me.


This problem is almost everyone who used Microsoft products mate. So much garbage is stuffed from the first days that it is difficult to work with time. In this case, the Apple is all the better. But this is a privilege of a closed operating system rather.

I don't use M$ products.  Or Apple proprietary.

It's ridiculous.  Takes me several days to delete and disable all the useless stuff in Windows 10 and it still sucks.

I have Kali on my old POS MacBook Pro.

macOS killed it.  Planned obsolesce.  I had more than a dozen of Apple products that died 'accidentally' and none of them were covered under warranty, but they were still on warranty.  Apple considers those normal use wear and tear.
128  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 07, 2018, 02:31:41 PM
I am rebooting into Windows 10 on this same system.

I suspect that there is a big performance difference.  OS overhead.
I shall verify my suspicions.

Windows chokes every computer I have.  Maybe it's just me.
129  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 07, 2018, 01:30:20 PM
@Polyminer

I'm not sure if you check here.

I ran a test on TESTNET.  A combined GPU+CPU mining for several hours.

15 CPU threads + 400 on each 1080ti (I have two in my Linux system).

The average HR was higher than CPU only and GPU miner did find blocks.

Code:
Miner 08:22:01   Total: 2088 H/S (GPU0 160 H/S GPU1 200 H/S CPU 1728 H/S).  AVG 1978.49

Power usage fluctuates, but GPUs run very cool.

Code:
root@the-beast:~# nvidia-smi
Wed Nov  7 08:29:24 2018      
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.87                 Driver Version: 390.87                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:01:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 46%   67C    P2   113W / 250W |   4694MiB / 11175MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 28%   60C    P2   134W / 250W |   4415MiB / 11178MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

I'm not sure how you managed 200 H/S out of a 1060 6GB.  Maybe 1080tis are not suitable.  I have not guessed the correct amount of threads.

The miner did not crash.  OS:  Kali Linux.

Cheers.

~Thomas
130  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 07, 2018, 04:48:37 AM
Using rhminer on i7 6700, I got about 600 h/s. That's about +200 more compared to bundled pascalcoinminer.

I get around 600 h/s on an old i7-4770k.  Similar specs to your CPU, just older.  2011 production date stamped on the chip.

BTW.  Polyminer updated to fix some HR status issues.

I tried the Pascal GPU version.  ~200 max on a 1080ti.  Killer speed.   Wink

You can see my old Haswell Xeon on the TESTNET.  I would like to think the HR is off, probably not.
Can you extract some block with this hashrate?

On TESTNET, I can extract a block with 7 H/s.  But it would take some time.  The difficulty on TESTNET is quite high right now.
This is not a production environment.

To answer your question.  If you would like to support decentralization of PascalCoin, even 200 h/s will do.  600 h/s is very good.  That is a higher end CPU.

Also, you can mine using the GPU version and it does work.  I tested it.  Polyminer posted some benches he did on his GitHub page.
131  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 07, 2018, 02:24:54 AM
Using rhminer on i7 6700, I got about 600 h/s. That's about +200 more compared to bundled pascalcoinminer.

I get around 600 h/s on an old i7-4770k.  Similar specs to your CPU, just older.  2011 production date stamped on the chip.

BTW.  Polyminer updated to fix some HR status issues.

I tried the Pascal GPU version.  ~200 max on a 1080ti.  Killer speed.   Wink

You can see my old Haswell Xeon on the TESTNET.  I would like to think the HR is off, probably not.
132  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 06, 2018, 07:32:22 AM
Hmm shitty german laptop just found a block haha !

Then rhminer said: "end of devmode"... "you an awesome person" ! Wink

I wonder what this means exactly.

Perhaps the 1% fee is only for 1 block or something ? and then it's disabled or it's because testnet... not sure...

Hmm I wonder how this fee is applied.

Doesn't seem implemented... see no transactions in operations explorer ? Hmmm...

Maybe that devmode is ment for stratum/mining pools ?

* little update note to consider *:

This time the shitty german laptop is running the rhminer cpu version.... with two threads... and it's hash rate is higher than pascalcoinminer.

However CPU utilization not that much 56% or so... I am kinda amazed that laptop hasn't shutdown yet...

Another explanation might be that the block explorer (if visible) in pascalcoin deadlocks and might make the laptop crash.

But for now I will assume the laptop only crashes/shutsdown if it gets to hot... I could try running more threads... to see if I can force it to overheat again... without showing the block explorer... just to make sure it's not some windows nt kernel dll deadlock that makes this laptop intel cpu crash... but for now I am pooped Smiley and almost time for bed so this will have to wait till tomorrow.

See you ! =D

I would say try more threads.  I am stress testing the TESTNET with The Beast.

15 threads at once.  Will it crash or not in 7 hours?

Take a guess...  I called it The Beast for a reason, you know.   Smiley

Update:

6 hours on the TESTNET with CPU maxed out.  Temps did not go above 60 degrees.  Thanks for guessing @Skybuckflying.

BTW.  @Polyminer did an amazing job.  He spent a lot of his own time on this.  I am not removing the dev fee.  That message "Thanks..." is hardcoded.
@Skybuckflying.  He was nice enough to provide the source code and tell you how to remove the dev fee.  Read the GitHub page.
133  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 06, 2018, 04:50:53 AM
@Skybuck

Bring it on.  Or go home.

Quote
root@the-beast:~/rhminer_Pascal# uname -a
Linux the-beast 4.18.0-kali2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.18.10-2kali1 (2018-10-09) x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@the-beast:~/rhminer_Pascal# ./rhminer -list

  rhminer v0.9 beta for CPU and NVIDIA GPUs by polyminer1 (http://github.com/polyminer1)
  NVIDIA CUDA SDK 9.1

  Donations : Pascal account 529692-23
  Donations : Bitcoin address 19GfXGpRJfwcHPx2Nf8wHgMps8Eat1o4Jp

List of gpus and cpus:
GPU0 : GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU1 : GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
CPU  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU @ 2.40GHz
root@the-beast:~/rhminer_Pascal# nvidia-smi
Mon Nov  5 23:49:28 2018      
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.87                 Driver Version: 390.87                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:01:00.0  On |                  N/A |
|  0%   39C    P8    14W / 250W |    324MiB / 11175MiB |      1%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 108...  Off  | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
|  0%   31C    P8     8W / 250W |      2MiB / 11178MiB |      0%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
                                                                              

BTW.  I just tested it.  GPU version works, but it's slower.  You need 9MB of GPU memory per mining thread.
I launched 1024 threads.  Maxed out 11GB on a 1080ti.
Redo your numbers again.   Grin
134  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 06, 2018, 01:19:00 AM
@nightraven
@polyminer
@jason

How many blocks per month would an AMD Ryzen 7 2700x be able so solve?
I ran the TESTNET on various old CPUs and have no clue which one to use.

I have this one.  But it only has a fan controller with fans hooked up to it.   Huh



Run them all independently, so they all have seperate work. Maybe I'm wrong, if so please correct.

Polyminer released his open source RandomHash today. Get it and be ready for hard fork on Nov 15.

Sources : https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer
Binaries : https://github.com/polyminer1/rhminer/tree/master/Release

I did try that.  One server node and few local mining nodes.  I only have one IP address.

Would you happen to have the link to the miner source code?  I have been using the one from official repository.  It compiles and runs fine.
But Polyminer worked on RandomHash, so I would rather use his code.  He probably has GitHub.  I shall look for it later.

Thanks.
135  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 06, 2018, 12:48:43 AM
Heya Folks,

Even my DreamPC from 2006 was cable of mining a few blocks/coins. Will keep hash rate secret for now lol.

The fastest core did it, core 2 (2.0 ghz and much slower memory probably then todays machines Wink).

It is possible to include spaces in the miner name by using -n "Miner name".

So encapsulate it with " " in batch file/prompt commands to do it right.

For the time being all miners stopped maybe later I will do some more testing =D thanks for testing guys ! =D

Bye for now,
  Skybuck.


The RAM speed does not matter.  Any RAM will do.  I am running single channel DDR3 on my gaming computer.  Bandwidth of 9GB/s on a good day.  Latency horrid.
I read the PIP-0009.  It's for low end hardware.  That means any old junk will do.
The whole point is to keep the network running without wasting electricity.  Core 2 series used 65 nm process (I think), which generates as much heat as today's low end 14nm process. 
Ryzen 5 series for example.  They are terrible in terms of heat/performance, but affordable.

You started with "I found a free laptop", now you have 7 dream PCs.  Please keep the forum clean.
136  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 05, 2018, 09:48:46 PM
Hey tlaskow... thx for the pictures... funny to see rig involved.... kinda noticed this on the testnet4... i7... 8 cores or something...

Here is a hint... my dual core AMD x2 3800+ can only do 1/20 th of your machine ! Cheesy  if both cores running.

I will however try and optimize the randomhash code here and there to see how much I can squeeze out of it Smiley

I think you wrong about the gpu/asic part though.

The GPU hash algorithm is still present in the pascalcoinminer... but it will become completely useless soon... I tried mining with it... but it gives wrong results for pascalcoin v4.

Mining must be done with the -C option on the testnet v4 as far as I can tell.

And since this code randomhash and such is as far as I know pascal only at the time being there is no real way of running this on a GPU... it would have to be converted to C first... or some "magic" pascal to "intermediate" and then to ptx/opencl/cuda or whatever... don't think such a compiler exists yet though I could be wrong Wink

The sha256 part of randomhash might be executed on gpu... but randomhash uses many many many hashing algorithm... so this would give it a slight boost.... but the source code of the pascalcoinminer would first have to be adjusted a bit...

Here is a question for you:

Did you already try to optimize randomhash while running it on testnet v4 ? Did you change any code yet ? Wink Smiley

Oh in regards to your rigs.... Yes they do look fine... their aircooling look fine.... I would still be a bit worried about my own rigs though... they may even have better airflow... but what kind of stress can memory chips truely take ? Hmmm... Well you have been running it a lot... so for now I would guess it's probably alright for now...

The laptop overheat... probably related to CPU just getting to hot... so maybe I got a little scare there.... I have never really hard of a system overheating because of too much RAM activity... so I may be way off... or perhaps this is something new... I am just not sure... and I don't have a real way to tell... Sad

But perhaps in the future hardware will have temperature readings on RAM chips as well... that be nice Wink

Building special machine is probably the way to go for cryptocoin mining.

But this is also why it may fail... the idea of "average joe" mining on his "main rig" is probably an illusion... most people will probably consider their computers to important to do this... especially if it's work related...

So these cryptocoin miners... do provide some service and are running servers... so the idea of "distributing" cryptocoins fairly... is slightly flawed... ofcourse anybody could buy a second computer and just run it on that... (most people probably won't do this though thinking it's a waste of money... so in that sense this distribution idea is flawed...)

* update *

There are still a few days before main net switches over... so this should give some days of more testing on TESTNET v4.

Later today I will leave the laptop on running at 1 core or so... with 1 miner... just to see if "my" laptop can still get some coins VERSUS your BEAST ! LOL.

Pls leave beast running as normal... just to see if """my""" laptop can get some coins "fairly" too Smiley

Since I am using internet connection sharing... might as well launch this f*cker now so I can keep an eye on it...

Shitty german laptop here it comes ! =D


*** UPDATE 2 ***:

HAHA !!!!

Success !!! =D LOL.

Shitty German Laptop was able to mine a block on TESTNET v4 !

See block number 146693 on TESTNET v4 safebox/blockchain ! =D

I am starting to like this new hashing method ! LOL =D

*** Update 3 ***:

I can mine on laptop with 1 miner, with two miners the laptop overheats and shuts down ! HAHA. At least that's what I think is happening. It's kinda weird though... it's not even getting that hot... perhaps there is some heat setting somewhere... This time I also "lifted up" the laptop a little bit... to let cold air flow under it... still overheated/shutdown hmm...

Will try my DreamPC next for the fun of it... hopefully it won't get damaged Wink Don't think it will... bit risky but fun. It must update the blockchain first though... hmm..

Bye,
  Skybuck =D

Those are not special machines.  Windows 10 gaming computers.  VR (add any catchphrase here) ready.
I build them to last.  I do pro music  (DAWs are very hard to build right), graphics, video too.  The CPU will be the bottleneck when it throttles.

Those i7-4770ks BTW.  I paid 300$ for.  For 2 of them used.  Newer tech doesn't mean faster.

The CPU socket needs to be able to dissipate 120 watts of electricity (in 4770k OC case).  A fan cooler won't do.

Again.  Don't mine on a laptop.  And even with a desktop grade CPU.  Don't load all the cores on an air cooler.
I had 3 cores loaded and was able to play Worms Revolution without any slowdowns.

Hint:  I rarely use Windows.  On Linux, install lm-sensors.  And run
Code:
watch -n .1 sensors
.  You can see the temperatures of most common parts in real time that way.

The Beast actually runs Linux.


137  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 05, 2018, 01:54:34 PM
PASC is going back to CPU only mining? Shocked

No.  GPUs and ASICs will still work.
It's a hard fork, but it doesn't mean the original PascalCoin hash algorithm is being "abandoned" for those who can afford tens of thousands in hardware.  Wink
138  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 05, 2018, 07:05:33 AM
Heya Folks,

Today is the first time I saw RandomHash in action, it was quite amuzing (why is secret for now). Unfortunately my main CPU is probably a bit too slow to compete with modern CPUs though with a bit of luck maybe some mining can be done, or maybe some parts of the randomhash can be executed on gpu Tongue though I am not yet sure if there will be CPU-mining pools I would guess so which might make mining with a single CPU useless anyway.

However that is not the main reason I am writing this.

The main reason is this:

I just tested the new miner on a very shitty german laptop which I got for free from somebody... I ran multiple miners on it... and after only a few minutes the laptop shut off... it probably got to warm.

This is a little bit alarming really ! Cause this laptop was able to game, but somehow it shuts off... I did kinda let the laptop fall while setting it down near a candy carnval shop not sure if that has anything to do with it and it also has driver/IRQ blue screen issues probably cause I stopped some services or maybe there is some other damage... not sure though...

Hover this shutdown seemed different... total black screen and simply power down.

What I am concerned about... even on my main system ! is this:

RandomHash alledgedly uses some "memory algorithm" which is supposedly hard to run on a GPU and it's memory chips, so now instead it will run on CPU/MAIN RAM right ?! (The gpu option of the pascalminer is not to be used... ?! instead cpu option !)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!! SO THE ISSUE/WARNING ALERT IS THIS: !!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RandomHash will make your memory chips RUN HOT !!!!

!!! Probably/maybe much hotter than normal !!!

And at least on my hardware there is no way to check the MEMORY TEMPERATURE OF MAIN RAM ?!?!?!?!?!?!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So as far as I am concerned this is a very bad and dangerous situation.

I can monitor CPU core temperatures fine with CPUID HWMonitor tool/software. I can monitor GPU cores with GPU-z and such.

But here is my point:

Monitoring the temperatures of memory chips is unheard of as far as I know ?!

My hardware is old though.

Can your hardware and software monitor your memory chip temperatures ?!?!??!?!?!??!???!?!!!!?!?!?!?

If so please backup any claims with screenshots as proof !!!!! Smiley)

Note:

I have been through the experience of having a RAM memory chip develop 1 single bit error probably due to heat, static discharge can also not completely be ruled out.

This was a very scary experience which lead to file to file copy corruption and zip corruption and cd/dvd burning corruption at the time... very scary.

I would definetly not like to go through something like that again.

So this is a big worry right now.

Nobody really knows what kind of HEAT and STRESS RandomHash will cause on main RAM memory chips.

Perhaps this very shitty german laptop is a very fortunate thing to happen... without it... this potential issue may have remained hidden for some time... until much later... when better ventilated systems might also start showing damage because of this. Now the issue was immediately detected by this shitty german hp laptop with intel hardware/cpu in it.

I have used my current main system for 12 years and I am pretty confident it can handle all kinds of memory stress/loads cause god knows I have stressed the shit out of it with all kinds of softwares lol and test programs.

However RandomHash might be something totally different/something totally new that may tax RAM chips like never before ?! So I am slightly worried about this.

It seems to only use 1 or 2 MB of RAM or so from these chips (according to pip/documents, not evaluated via monitoring tools yet), but this specific section will probably become pretty damn hot !

Now imagine running this for 24 hours non-stop ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!

You may be risking damage to your RAM chip ! So consider yourself warned.

I hope to god that I am wrong... cause it would be cool if I was wrong... but this laptop shutting down might be a sign of things to come...

For your information: This laptop was used to run a pretty hot game: "Master of Orion"...

Hopefully the shutdown is not related to heat... but I am pretty damn sure it was... because the FANS started spinning up like crazy.

First miner: it was like ok... little bit of fan spin.

Second miner: wow... much more fan spin...

Third miner: fans going super load/max for a laptop...  few seconds later... BAM laptop shuts down...

This was an i3 core laptop 2 real cores 2 logical cores.... so this thing has hyper threading...  maybe it was a hyper threading bug but I don't think so... maybe the laptop has special overheat protection software or maybe it's just the CPU inside forcing the shutdown... or perhaps some motherboard sensors near memory chips shutting this thing down. Pretty sure it's heat related though. (So I don't know exactly what happened cause I don't know this fucking laptop that well lol... but it was pretty damn scary ! it rarely or almost never did this during master of orion... not that I can clearly remember... maybe one time or so... maybe two times... but then I shutdown many services... currently it has some services which may not be necessary but nothing to bad... before running the software the system was pretty idle... so I don't think these services are contributing to much to heat... though I could try and shut some down... I don't think it will matter measure... and the overheat/shutdown result will probably be the same. Perhaps because this enclosure is so small... the heat from the memory chips reaches cpu sensors... ofcourse I could be completely off the mark... and perhaps it's the CPU itself that is totally overheating... that could be and would be very funny as well... then intel's/hp products truely crap then again one might consider this some abnormal heat/load detection by advanced software and shutting it down out of precaution... though it more seems like some shitty overheat situation which is simply bad product design... your mileage may vary... very interested in hearing about any other systems shutting down because of overheat ! Wink)

Here is my question for you:

"How the fuck are you going to measure your RAM chips temperatures ?!" Would love it if somebody could actually do this ? =D

Bye for now,
  Skybuck.

RandomHash is CPU biased.  Implementation for GPUs is possible, but it will never be efficient (by design).

It uses as much CPU as you let it.  I have been running it 24/7 on an overclocked 4770k @ 4.5 GH/z (7 year old CPU) w 1 stick of value ram (no heatsinks).

I have a water cooler on it.  It gets up to 70 degrees with 100% load on all cores @ 4.5GHz.

Don't mine on a laptop.  I tested it on an old MacBook Pro running Kali (core i7 quad).  It can run stable 24/7 (with 3 cores loaded) and that laptop is the worst design ever in terms of thermal.

Systems do shutdown if they are not stable or overheat.  It's to protect your hardware.  It's normal behavior.  There are 1000s of settings in the BIOS.  You can change that.

I put 2 volts into the vcore of my i7-4770k for few minutes because I missed a decimal point in the BIOS.  It didn't shut down, but the CPU boiled to 100 degrees.
139  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 05, 2018, 12:21:12 AM
Hey all, what is Poloniex doing for the fork?  That is where my coins are now. 

For Poloniex support, you need to contact them.
They take forever.
My coins were there for 7 months (missing from the blockchain/stuck).  Now on local wallet.
That's a huge risk if you ask me.
140  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - v4 Hardfork at block 260000 on: November 04, 2018, 12:08:36 PM
RE.  TESTNET.

I put two 4770ks on it last night (old gaming computers).
It's still going.  I was curious how Windows binaries compare to Linux.

 Wink

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!